Keep it real
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
How nice it is to have a direct link to the BOD and have the power to get the CEO removed!
But you will have Wilson fired end of the month through your BOD connections. Be happy!
If they could identify pre-natal that a baby has Rett then surely it would not lead to a birth. I would have it removed.
Shell game with cooperation from Department of Defense, Mayo Clinc, Sloan Kettering Memorial, AstraZeneca...
Give me a break.
Care to explain why .9 and not .7?
I do not really get excited when the same law gets reauthorised for a fifth time.
Waiting for the translation of 21st Century act into concrete FDA trial guidelines.
We'll see when the rule changes are approved and what they state exactly.
So If she can sing Kumbaya then we can expect approval.
All posters, please remind yourselves of the iHub Terms of Service for posting.
In a nutshell: TPIV is the only allowed subject of conversation, not other posters.
Any post not complying will be removed. In case you disagree, a review of the deletion can always be requested to Admin
Whats the fuss? Its a reauthorization of previous bills.
No you have not. Profile created in February 2017.
Furthermore, there is no investigation ongoing.
Classical scare tactics.
So basically whenever it suits Missling, not when they get it from Ariana?
Did Missling not say multiple times that it PK/PD would be released as soon as they have recieved it?
If all other rett trials take months, with the help from Rett Org, why would you expect that this enrollment would be any different?
Hope this is true at some stage, but no hard facts today. We need further trial data.
Let alone 2 p2's and a p3.
Has that p2 trial in an undisclosed indication that was to start soon already started? By the way thats from a Q1-16 statement.
So yeah there is some stretch in his statements, as with any CEO.
Ah good to know.
So far we have a p2a that says our drug is safe.
Get the bigger trial started!
How about scenario 3: BIIB tested it, didn't like it and threw us out months ago. Missling has to stay quiet until he can present us with another plan.
General theory is that volume precedes price. So far volume is within the normal range.
Lets conclude it this way: buying a significant amount of shares with his own money perhaps speaks louder.
Good on you John for trading along the side.
From personal experience: when you do trade shares, stick to the plan and sell them when they reach your targets. Don't hold on 'cause they are gonna go a little higher, thats how you get burned (been there, done that)
To this day, except for the peanut shares he bought himself in July15 and August17, all his shares are awarded to Missling.
Have a little faith in your company and make a substantial purchase. Same goes for VP's.
Show us the love and spend some money of your own.
You can hardly call a CEO spending 750$ and 350$ an insider purchase!
At INO, the CEO bought 2mil worth of shares some time ago. Now that is putting the money where your mouth is.
Great idea Sugar! I am sure a huge crowd will turn out for the biggest CEO-ouster campaign ever mounted.
Hi Marv, but you are the one with Board of Director connections, and apparantly the BOD is displeased with Glynn, which means they have been reading Ihub.
So we will see later this month what happens.
Well we will see wether the BOD connection is there or not, whether you can force our CEO out or not.
Good luck
Hey i am not the one with connections to the Board of Directors. So either they will follow your plea or the connection just isn't there.
You have the BOD connection, so you will make it happen. Failure to do so tells us a lot.
And here we are again counting eggs before they hatch.
It must be the human greed thing.
Excellent share price increase on no significant volume. Question that pops in my head is why did the MM's choose today to let it rise and not keep it down?
You need to do your own homework. I do not keep cross references to every statement made, on what day and what venue. Go back to 2015 and early 2016.
I see the last change on August 3d.
Am I missing something?
Correct, we don't know the real reason why there was no AAIC presentation.
All we have are speculations on this board.
You know it with the continuous increasing institutional sharebase. It is the price paid for big boys to enter at their terms. Long term this is good, short term it can hurt.
Sure, sudden liquidty created out of nowhere in Nov15
Or you believe a stock going from 8 down to 3,5 is normal behavior, minutes after good data was released?