Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
has anybody noticed that the total trade value in BEDA rarely exceeds $1000.00?
i enjoy exposing con jobs and those that hype them.
If the SEC found no wrongdoing BEDA would report it. That is the way it works. right now BEDA has said nothing and a year later they have still not resolved their SEC issue.
I try not to...too disgusting how his logic goes.
you need another "potential valuation" and those followers to bring life support to this con job.
did you lose money here? if so you didn't know as much as I did you?
can you imagine trying to pump a POS stock with 800 Billion shares and trying to insinuate it is legit? Amazing.
I believe I was at the forefront of warning you all and was mocked for doing so. If I can summarize the commentary it went something like this: "We don't need any saviors, we are all investing in pink sheet stocks and we know our risks so bug off"
Received the nasty comments and personal attacks while outlining why this was a fraud and a huge risk. now you want me to feel bad that instead of simply understanding you preferred to attack.
I suggest you are more careful on who you trust for DD.
so how does weather impact the business side of the operations?
Could CMKX still be alive? LOL
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=59438413
and of course you know this how?
weather has no impact on the reporting of financials, reporting on the sale of assets, reporting on how the lawsuit helps/hurts balance sheet, of reporting the percentage of ownership in this well. ZLUS stated we would learn much of this the week of January 3, 2011 and it is now February.
The company said they would be current in 60 days from late December which is late February and we have not seen the first of SEVERAL 10's to be filed. A little transparency on how ZLUS financed this would likewise be something they could disclose regardless of weather.
speaking negatively about Graham is not against the TOU so feel free. LOL
Interesting that this was not what was being stated when the news came out. now that the time line has passed it is being excused but it was never disputed when the company made the statement.
I wonder, what ever happened to the transparency Rainbolt claimed he would make the week of January 3. Still nothing!
You mean Graham doesn't have a master plan to make you all rich? that is what i have kept being told.
are you sure? The FTD data comes directly out of the DTCC and their net settlement system. It is a COMPUTER generated report without the intrusion of human touch. Do you think that somebody went into that program and wrote a special program around EXPH? This massive risk of a company that has yet to sell product - or for that matter - tell you who is in charge.
except when it means nothing. There is absolutely no reason to short a stock at these levels - absolutely none. you can only make a profit if/when the company shuts it's doors and these guys are having too much fun diluting to do that.
BTW...what was the dollar value of that 94% short volume?
When you buy or sell this stock, do you know how your trade is executed? Is your broker a Market Maker here?
Yea, like that will ever happen. it has been how long and yet no answers?
if BEDA had a leg to stand on don't you think the SEC would have lifted this restriction?
Care to show some evidence that a share retiring is in the plan and how exactly they retire 70%? understand that to retire shares they have to buy them in the open market. you can't buy restricted shares and retiring say 500,000,000 shares at $0.10 would require $50 Million in buying capital.
Yea yea yea....we heard we heard we heard. too bad nothing ever materialized from all these massive and all important hearings.
ownership shares - do you have proof of their ownership stake or is that simply rumor?
Offers - Have you ever actually seen the offer sheet or is this one of those nasty rumors that circulates?
product launch failure - really. all this time has passed and the product is still not available to the public. if the company was that dependent on a single individual, what is all this garbage talk of so many highly qualified people on board here.
at some point rumors created on i-hub have to be dismissed and facts have to be closely realized. EXPH is massively diluting shares as they generate minimal revenues and as they fail to properly disclose anything (SEC filings)
considering ZLUS has zero value i really wonder how this is to the advantage of present shareholders. They held no cash for this investment to begin with so they are already leveraged high.
Where does ZLUS show asset without debt/loan responsibilities. show a filing that demonstrates ability to pay for anything out of ZLUS sales/revenues.
I heard this really was a solid company with a bright future and stellar executive team and...I slept at a Holiday Inn last night.
maybe we can ask the new ceo. oops, he/she hasn't been identified yet. so who do we ask?
help, help
WOW....
If the market does not know this isn't that a 90% loss immediately?
I am actually thinking of investing here just for the enjoyment of watching how my trade was being spun into some major conspiracy.
then again.....
Cede and Company is the central depository for all sharers. When shares are issued in street name they are issued to Cede and Co. in the name of Bank XYZ. In doing so it allows the shares to be electronically traded without the expense of going back and forth to the transfer agent every time.
Bank A puts in 1 Million shares and has them issued to Cede and Co. in their name.
Bank B, Bank C, Bank D....all do the same.
But the next day Bank A sold 100,000 shares to a customer of Bank B. With all the shares issued to Cede and Co. they can electronically transfer 100,000 shares into the acciount of Bank B without pulling out a Cert and having teh TA re-issue.
Once shares are in Cede and Co. they only leave when a request for physical shares is made. for most securities you would expect to see near 100% in the name of Cede and Co.
Thank you for confirming what the school told me. this memo not only validates what I said but verifies that the school will give out such information upon request.
now people here have claimed that Rainbolt's family has denied what the school is reporting. He has done so in private and done so without verifiable specifics. I would simply ask that to kill this issue once and for all, all it takes is for Rainbolt to identify the date of graduation and the name in which he graduated under and the school can be contacted and asked specifically.
We heard 75% ownership of the well in a press release and later told it was less and presently unknown.
We heard we would know more about the asset sale and the court settlement on the week of January 3, 2011. Didn't happen.
We also know that Rainbolt's employer in California had some significant legal issues with the state of Washington and that his next employer (Ault) had similar significant legal issues.
to make sure that past experiences do not evolve into this new adventure it would help to have some answers on some matters pending.
I suggest you read the terms of the settlement - ZLUS gets nothing.
Sale of Assets - The reason that ZLUS gets nothing is in part because the subsidiaries of ZLUS were in bankruptcy (i.e. worth nothing) and the financials for those prove it. What would be offered for subsidiaries whose total annual revenues is less than $100K?
Now If you don't like what i say, don't read my posts but fortunately freedom of speech and I-Hub rules allow me my right to opinion similar to your rights to opinion.
1. You said SOS was default. SOS is active. 1yr old? Erm.. you only need to file it ONCE a year. Can I get a "duh" it's 1 year old since they did it. You are wrong (was in default when i made the claim. They only recently made it active. Duh!!! Me 1 you 0)
2. ZLUS is not OTCBB anymore aka don't need to file with SEC (DUH!) You are wrong (Filings have to do with how a company is registered. ZLUS is still required to file and if they don't they run the risk of getting deregistered under the SEC delinquent filier program. Look it up. They ONLY deregister pink sheet companies because to be on the OTCBB you have to be current. You are mistaken again. Me 2 You 0)
3.You said Chris Rainbolt never went to Oklahoma University. You claim someone at the school told you that. Yes, I took your advice and called. No such info would be given out. you are wrong. [color=red]I said he never GRADUATED from Oklahoma University like he claimed on his resume. As I stated, and you can read the post, I called to see if a Chris Rainbolt Graduated and they lady said no. his resume does not say attended OU it says graduated which is what I looked up.
My questions are simple: start from the beginning:
a. ZLUS has nearly 1 billion shares and no revenues and mounting legal issues. It also has no cash
b. Rainbolt comes in and takes over ZLUS and ZLUS is suddenly into Oil and Gas. How did they get the funds to start this new enterprise?
b.1 Lets say it was Rainbolt and his friends. why fund this project thru a shell with near 1 billion shares and not privately?
b.2 Lets say it was outside investors putting up all the capital. What do they get in return?
c. Why ZLUS? outside of Rainbolt working for Ault, why take over ZLUS when there are far better pink sheet companies to take over. ZLUS was not current on filings and had massive legal issues to deal with. so why ZLUS instead of a clean pinkie and one with far less than 1 billion O/S?
Investors don't invest for the fun of it and investors don't invest to raise the stock price of a company they have no stake in (via shares) so what is the details behind this enterprise and why, after 7 - 8 months do shareholders still not know what is going on? If all was free and clean, why not let investors in on the gig?
look at it this way, if you have $1 million that you put up to cover all costs for the drilling of a well, would you invest that money in the name of a company that you have no shares in or invest it in your name and take 100% of the profits? My bet is that everybody here as a shareholder would not invest it in a company they do not hold shares in for a percentage of the take afterward. so why would Rainbolt come here and put his investment in this company if he was not a majority owner. Majority owner significantly dilutes the O/S. In fact, they have to be majority owners to get away with all they do without a proxy vote.
And yet here everybody is 7 - 8 months later and none of this has been disclosed and when such questions are asked, it is the one who asks the questions that gets slammed.
Actually, I haven't seen anything proven wrong yet. Care to elaborate? If you are speaking with regards to the education issue, feel free to present evidence that Chris Rainbolt graduated from Oklahoma University with a degree in finance. A single tabloid that lists his name as a 4th string football player for one year isn't exactly proof of anything.
As for everything else I posted, show me where I am wrong. I can certainly show you where you are wrong.
Do you know what percentage of the well Corestream owns? Nope
Do you know what Rainbolt received to take over the shell once known as zealous? Nope
Do you know what shareholders gave up to finance these wells? Nope.
Do you know what Corestream received in the settlement of the lawsuits as you were promised? Nope.
Any idea why the last time this company filed anything with the SEC was August 2010 and that they are now 1 year delinquent in filings.
Can you please provide some evidence that HE Rainbolt and/or Pickins has anything to do with Corestream. Freedom of speech is one thing but to present an agenda knowingly false to raise the price of a stock is illegal.
yelling fire in an open theater can go both ways. interesting that Investors are so worried about the thoughts and opinions of one while never calling out the unsubstantiated rants of others. T. Boone - any links to his association to this company? How about H.E. Rainbolt? Other that a distant blood link are there any direct correlations to this particular issue?
Then lets talk about dilution, buybacks, no debt, etc... seems people here think no dilution took place with the takeover and that all this financing and effort is being done just for little old shareholders. There are no filing indications that Rainbolt owns shares and certainly filing indications that there was no direct capital available to invest elsewhere so how does a company get taken over and invest in a new project without dilution.
And then there were those rumors of buyback. Really? From a company with massive legal issues and no capital. a buyback?
No debt? If a company is spending money but has no revenues that is what you call DEBT. Are all these new executives working for free as well?
Since I have a name and a phone number, anybody that wants to sue me is free to do so. i have ZERO worries about the outcomes.
Fraud....The company is a con and the SEC shut down trading.