Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Joshy, that's not full disclosure. How many shares, when and at what price?
So Josh, if it is your opinion that the chance of collecting is almost zero, than you are my hero because your genius has never been recognized and you know more than Parabellum. Quite an interesting claim on your part. Since the partners at Parabellum are all worth hundreds of millions, let's just conclude that you are a genius but underachiever is a word I have in mind.
I don't agree the results will create a pump. However, you do realize the test is to prove the ammonia sensors that were developed by Niterra are working. The test as far as I understand it has nothing to do with the viability of shrimp's growout system. They only chose shrimp because they needed a company that had a system that grows shrimp. Period. The economic viability of shrimp's system has virtually nothing to do with the test. The test is to prove Niterra's tech, not Shrimp's.
The volume continues to be below levels needed to fund the company.
Not sure how you conclude that when the judgment can easily be researched. Law firm can easily be researched. And the litigation finance firm can easily be researched.
Joshy:
Allow me to answer. I assume whatever I say will have a baseless comeback but here goes.
Fact: GDSI owns a judgment that can't be appealed for well over $150,000,000 that with interest is over $225,000,000.
Fact: GDSI was represented by some of the best lawyers in the country.
Fact: Here is the key. The entire litigation and collection is being funded by one of the smartest and calculating litigation finance companies in the world. Admitted, they are much smarter than I am. So if you think these guys just took a flyer funding a penny stock company's lawsuit that has cost the litigation finance firm millions, that is your right. As I know how these firms work, they only calculate 2 things. Chance of winning. Chance of collecting. They checked the box on both and one is permanently checked. So, let's say that litigation firm is correct and they collect.
What do you think will happen when that news runs on Redditt, Twitter, Instagram and other social media sites. See, stock valuations are not based on $2 calculators. I can give you 1,000 examples of companies I have been involved with that have made 100-500 fold moves with much less than $225,000,000 collected. If you don't believe my analysis, don't care. The stock can go to 10 cents, 30 cents or $2. It simply depends on how crazy this story gets on Social media.
So if you have a 1/2 cent stock that can potentially make a 20 fold or much more move, it's a buy. And there is a basis for that move. A very large judgment that can be collected. Is the collection speculation. Yes, but so is every equity investment I ever made in my life.
Sir, I respectfully respond to everyone. When you attempt to insinuate that you're buying all the stock because it's such a great investment even though any financial analyst would conclude barring a miracle that they are heading to bankruptcy, you lose credibility like a basher. I define a basher as one who initiates a personal attack on management. One is not bashing when they tell the truth about Florida and the preferred stock fiasco.
Don't disagree on the promotional aspect but no public company would pass on it.
The more important issue is the dire financial situation they are in. Everyone is screwed including John Fife.
Once Fife attempts to collect, the legal aspects will get very messy.
Steve, can you state the actual criminal statute and state the facts that would support charges. Words are cheap. Nothing criminal here. As far as the Nevada civil statute they violated related to the Preferred mess, I can state that with clarity.
Uber:
I would suggest the following. he said, "It's still there." I believe those words were chosen. Jefferson County and Natural Shrimp are not moving forward right now because they couldn't get the money. There was no comment on the technology. So "It's still there." 100% truthful. No. Should he have disclosed? Yes. Should they have filed an 8K. Yes.
Uber, I listen to words very carefully and I try to be the fairest guy on the board.
Pursuant to the question asked, I don't believe there is one FALSE STATEMENT you can point to in that interview ABOUT JEFFERSON COUNTY. If he knew about the results of the meeting which I assume he did. than he omitted a material fact, Since a lie is defined as a false statement, I don't think you can point to a FALSE STATEMENT pursuant to his actual words. Correct me.
Board of commissioners meeting in which you stated the plan was scrapped. I am not aware of that meeting but if what you're saying is true, I would agree.
Uber:
Do you have a copy of the transcript from that meeting before I answer your question.
Allow me to respond.
Not one of my posts has ever been a personal attack on any member of the management team.
However, and if you look at the financial statements of SHMP including the one expected to be released in a few weeks, I believe common sense will allow you to conclude they are closer to bankruptcy than success.
Bolzan should have done this in Florida. agree with only this statement.
The issue is that if the court system in Brazil recognizes the principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel, then the points you are bringing up are irrelevant.
The issues regarding GDSI's health have been waived because it was not brought up as a defense at the trial level.
An article can say anything.
There are 2 issues.
1. They are part of the Hague Convention.
2. The Brazilian parties AGRRED via contract to the Florida jurisdiction.
What is puzzling to me is that Parabellum went into this without a collection plan. I can't believe the plan
was to go into the Brazilian courts. That makes no sense. Brazil is a very corrupt country so I have always believed collection there
would be very difficult if the Bolzans are as rich as GDSI and their funders believe they are.
Joshua there are no buyers. GHS KNOWS IT. As a result, you have fake volume to make it look like there are buyers. This is the lowest volume day so far we have seen in years
Take a look at the trading. The bid is for about $2,000 in stock. If someone was to hit the bid right now legitimately with $25,000 in stock, the bid would be .0175-.018. But magically and every afternoon, you have blocks trade where there was no sign of a buyer for 4 hours. And by the way, there is no supply on the offer either. So the blocks go off but the stock stays at the same price. That is why I am close to 100% sure someone is flipping the stock back and forth to make it look like there are buyers.
I'm sure you know but you can save as a word file and translate. Besides the fact that it's a well written and well researched document, it doesn't seem to be good news
That doesn't seem to be good news
Franny do you think it's time you demand answers.
You guys are funny today
Uber, follow.
ABC Taxic financier does a converson.
They keep 800,000 shares.
The have 5 accounts in BD 1, BD 2, BD 3, BD 4, BD 5.
800,000 shares is in BD 1 from a conversion. They now flip the same 800,000 shares 4 times. When it gets to BD 5, they still have 800,000
Volume is 3,200,000 shares. People think investors are buying.
Someone who doesn't get the process will probably ask why would they lose 1/2 cent for example on the 800,000 shares. First and at 2 cents, will not drop 1/2 cent that quickly. Second, even if they do, they are happy to do that if it creates 25,000,000 shares in buying and they make 20% on the tranche.
Did you read my post? One of our resident geniuses attacked me when I posted it because anything that he believes with his 60 IQ that is positive for NS he attacks. Called fake trades meant to look like buying to lure people in. A 2nd grader can pull it off. 600,000 shares and 5 accounts does the trick.
For a crash landing. Sad that promotion strategy is not working. As you go down the elevator, I'll meet you at 1 cent.
I could see your bids big spender. Good luck on the 700 shares you accumulated
The CEO should be thrown out.
Uber you have provided what I believe is some real analysis. Don't lower yourself by teaming with people who are babbling idiots.
Joshy real good try. Not one time have I ever been positive on the company. There was no prospectus so don't you did due diligence through a prospectus. East to fib and much easier to detect. GOOD TRY
Joshy there was never a prospectus. You know that and I know that. I am an expert BS detector.
Wow that is some sophisticated analysis. Exactly what I thought Joshy. And the date of the prospectus.
Watch this folks!!
And the date of the prospectus?
BTW, can you tell me the date of the prospectus you are referring to?
Joshy it doesn't bother me at all. It bothers me when your analysis is the equivalent of a 12th grader. So here is my challenger to you Joshy. What exactly in the prospectus of the Trane doc gave you your light bulb moment. Don't deflect with a BS LIST. The one light bulb moment
Oh Joshie, come on. You be my hero better than Warren. You so good that you label a stock a scam and still trade it successfully using cryptic long distance analysis having never visited the facility and never met with management. Hats off to you. LMFAO
Oh I see I didn't see you in 2015 to tell everyone to load the boat. Sorry I missed that post. Lmfao
Sorry chief, predicting it will crash 20% over the short term is very noteworthy. And the definition of swinging a dock around is having never met the management team or visited the facility once but professing to be an expert which you seem to like to do. You have done neither.
BTW, it was .206 bid when I made that call.
You don't understand how it works with all due respect. There are few buyers left. Let me get this straight. So every day, there is no liquidity in the morning and no bids and than magically in an instant while there are no bids, they find a buyer for 600,000 shares. Wow. Don't argue with me unless you think me calling the stock is going to drop 20% over a few days is pure luck.
It is my belief that much of the volume that you're seeing in the stock is fake. Essentially, and when someone wants to get out of stock, they flip stock through accounts to make it look like there is real buying. If there was volume in the morning and the blocks were printing in the afternoon, I would say the blocks are the prints. In other words, an institution wants to sell 200,000 shares and the company trades 20,000 shares 10 times, you would see a block then trade for 200,000 shares. That isn't what is happening here. Every single day, there is virtually no volume in the morning and then all of a sudden in the afternoon you see a 600,000 share block trade, and a 500,000 share block trade. Makes no sense. Therefore I think it's fake volume and I believe very shortly, you're going to see this stock drop 20% over three days.
I 100% agree and we are on the same side of the fence on GDSI. The challenge is collection and we all hope they collect.