Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You are the one who posts the fabrications on this board.
You have harped about how his this stock was going for a minimum of 10 months now. Meanwhile, it has not come true and you have sucked many more investors into throwing money at this.
I have doubts you have bought a single stock here.
Not even close.
When I worked there are a year ago, they had a total of 3 other programmers, and they were gone before I quit due to not being paid.
This company is a shell, has no revenue and no business.
You've been saying this stock was going somewhere for nearly a year, and you are getting upset with other people for speculation?
You are here daily trying to pump up $SMAA with nothing but straight lies.
You aren't even a real investor.
Please explain to me how if a stock is having trouble selling off so little at the 2's why it's suddenly going to jump up to 8's right after?
If this stock was worth 8's, wouldn't these 2's be selling like hotcakes?
I goes down because it's a crap company run by terrible excuses for humans.
I have no idea how high/far it will go. I just know what the company is and that eventually it's going to end up right back here.
I am quite curious to see how far the hype will carry it. I've written forex software, but I am new to watching penny stocks rip people off.
If you would buy 7's, then why did you sell 7's? And why was the volume so low on the 2's today?
I guess all the free time gives me time to actually look and point out the truth. Bummer.
So the management is not the company is what you are saying?
And the large volume being talked about that day were .0001's.
Odd because before you claimed you were buying at 7's and now it turns out you were the one trying to sell your 7's?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=115491797
I'll take some more 7s because this stock has nowhere but upside to it. Its only starting to get the ball rolling now..
$SMAA
LongNstrong
You said it, here's the link.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=116408569
Tony says he nor Sarah hasn't sold a share based on a text from him yesterday. Says he's not happy about additional shares added by new management but thinks they may have something good coming. Thinks they're working on updating last financial. We'll see.
Are you still holding the 7's you bought?
Investors aren't selling shares at .0001, the company is. Did you not see the note where Tony admitted it was the company diluting the stock at that price?
No, that's disturbing.
I never talked to the guy or anything ever. He may have been listed as the CEO, but Tony called all the shots.
That's why I kind of laughed when bman said Tony was upset about what the new management did in diluting the stock. I don't for the first second believe Tony wasn't involved in the decision, much less being unsure of why it happened.
Yesterdays sellers were the company diluting stock. It's already been admitted.
Everything I have said has turned out to be 100% true. Deny it all you want, but it's obvious you are just defending your friends at this point.
But just to understand, your claim is that they once owed me money, but maybe they've paid me and I'm still angry for some reason?
Here is my reply to them. I've never heard from them again. And hey, what do you know - it's the same story I still tell today.
Here you go. My story is out in the public, there is no secret behind it.
Here's the email from Sarah where they say they have no money to pay.
And of course, everything I said about the company before has already been 100% proven. I told you all it was just a shell, that none of the automotive stuff worked and that they didn't have business. That was proven to be true when they made new press claiming a new direction of the business. It was further proven to be 100% true when they updated their financials and showed no actual revenue.
Everything I have said about $SMAA, Tony and Sarah has been 100% true and accurate. Not a single thing I've said has proven to be false. Time has proven me right over and over.
1 year later and these crappy people have still not paid me.
The only one who has no proof around here are people like you and all the pumpers who have been saying the same thing for months. You've hyped this up, gotten people to buy in and it's done nothing but the opposite.
So I have 100% proven myself, when will the rest of you do the same?
really? I've posted the proof before, sec I'll do it again.
You really think Tony is going to tell you the truth?
Tony just admits to straight up dilution and you guys still think this company is going some where.
And "new management" is just plain rich.
Tony and Sarah make their living scamming people and screwing people over. It's what they do.
They are the biggest pieces of crap I've ever meet in my life - and I 100% mean that. I've seen poor people in my life do dishonest things, but they are just greedy and do not care who they hurt to get it.
70% of the volume is "whacking the bid".
And that in itself was a huge increase in volume.
If they release the games it'll be apparent just by looking at them if they have any chance.
They will just say soon or not answer.
I still think it's developers and stuff getting paid in stock selling off.
That's pure speculation of course and assumes they really are developing games(they do have a history of making things up).
Even more volume than before on these sales, and you are still making excuses?
I figured you'd be buying up all these 3's.
Are you changing your mind on the future of this stock?
It's a large increase over normal volume.
And even more concerning would be it's in the opposite direction than what people claimed it would be once the company updated it's financials. It was supposed to be trips, and instead it drops 50%.
The story never changes with $SMAA.
Well I actually looked at the volume when it was happening.
And the majority of the volume was all in 1 large sell off. It went down to 4, and then 3 within a minute.
There was a tiny amount of volume that pushed it up to 4 for a second, but then it sold off again down to 3's
Stop making stuff up.
That sell off was the highest volume in nearly 30 days.
Today is a repeat of that.
The last time it had higher volume is when it went up to 8 on news of news.
Well, good luck.
Maybe the hype works out better for you than it has so far. I'm somewhat interested just to see how far hype can carry things.
If you're buying though - at what price? Are the 4's available now not a good deal for you?
You and all the other hypers who make up things for every little thing that happens and take anything that is released about the company as somehow being a positive.
You post 10 times in a row with crappy 1 liners that have no actual substance for the mere hopes in gaining attention towards other investors. Promising the world, telling everyone how great it is, and then acting like anyone who goes against that are the dumbest people in the world.
I understand completely. And that you think I need to go away actually completely highlights what your actual position is - you aren't buying, you're selling. If you thought this was a good deal it would be the biggest secret in the world.
If you thought $SMAA was a good deal - I'd be your best friend right now.
Not really.
I will only make money if they actually make revenue. So while the hype annoys me a good bit, especially when it's just flat out lies, I don't generally wish bad things for anyone who is just an honest investor looking for a good deal.
If it was somehow possible for you to all get rich while Tony and Sarah ended up on welfare, I'd trade what is owed to me in a heartbeat.
Based on the 10 million.
I'm wondering if maybe a developer didn't get paid and sold off.
Because there are literally 100's of news games that hit the market every day.
Yet, only 12% of the games on the market ever get more than even 1000 downloads total. The ones that do get downloads more than 1000 usually just have to pay for the traffic/installs.
I did that just a month ago and can't tell you the prices directly.
If you want to advertise in say Iran/Iraq and have things translated to arabic, you can get the cheapest installs at around 30 cents per install.
The cheapest english speaking traffic will be the Pakistan and the Philippines. You can get some users here for around 60-70 cents.
Australia, UK, Canada - $2. You can get some european countries where english isn't the first language for about $1.40
US traffic you are going to pay about $3 per user.
And these are numbers for low volume traffic. Less than 50 users per day. In order to get good volume on a game, you are going to be paying $5 per US user. And things get adjusted otherwise.
You don't just put a game up on the store and it becomes "Field of Dreams" where people start downloading it. It's a big industry, but it's a very hard industry.
Most games fail. That's the reality. Especially the type of game they have been hyping in the news. Terrible model.
It was not a 10k buy that dropped it, it was 10 million.
You never say things that are true. It's like you are Tony posting for the past 7 months trying to get people to buy the shares he sells off for any price.
Terrible financials, no revenue for a year and currently don't have a working product.
Big volume today, and big losses.
Not a surprise to me from a common sense stand point, but thought with as much as you guys were hyping it, I'm surprised it dropped.
Have to wonder what's going on with that above normal volume. It's not really high enough to signal dilution I guess, but it's a decent sell off compared to recent history is it not?
Need some education here.
I keep seeing people say 500m is a "Tiny Float". I understand what the float is, but I don't understand how 500m is a tiny float on a stock that only trades a few million in volume per day.
Next week?
They said yesterday it would start today.
Actually they have said since January it would be any day now, but most recently it was yesterday.
You really think there are enough suckers out there who will fall for game hype?
I get a feeling once they show their games, it's going to be the end. I'm not sure some people grasp the difficulty of the industry.
But I wish they would hurry up and release them, I'm pretty curious about them. Would be nice if they generated real revenue and not just hype.
I thought the news was last month and yesterday?
This was supposed to be over 8 according to everyone yesterday.