Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
HK - Toth said that!!! Our own witness destroyed the two population issue?
Odds of appeal win just dropped substantially for me
Lem - where do you get all your confidence? I want some!
But will the judges comprehend? My God, what a travesty!
Me as well moonotaur
Perhaps one of our attorneys could opine on this:
https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1239&context=appellatepracticeprocess
Meowza - one of the biggest problems. I gotta believe most judges are not scientifically qualified to preside over a case like this. Truly maddening
Totally agree Zip. Bhatt paper is great but, good grief, how did we get here?
RAF - the situation you describe is what we already have. With all the factual errors, the NV trial was a hoax
I rest my case
Aside from being an irritant, what do you contribute here Miller?
If Du is an “activist” she may not have enough self awareness to realize she looks a fool
Better not be remand. Du has shown her colors
I think Bhatt was referring to Dudu
Let’s not forget the fact that Mori did not even study TG>500. Surprised Bhatt did not give that a “by the way”.
The glaring errors in DU’s decision are becoming too numerous to count. The only remaining question is whether the CAFC judges believe in justice
Yep, Du is bucking for a higher position among people of a certain ilk
Hamoa - Thank you for returning and please accept my apology as being one who turned you away. Emotion often gets the best of me and I vent in unproductive ways.
I also thought the timing of Bhatt’s paper interesting. (I.e. just as the generics are scrambling to finish their opening brief)
How could they sweep the multiple Du errors under the rug? Have they no interest in justice? I thought that was their job,
RAF - the person who posed the question on Twitter said the appeals court. I don’t think Bhatt caught that.
Zman - Done (except the Jeffries item)
Rose - guess I’m assuming cropped when entered if it was in defendants finding of fact but, what do I know? Perhaps one of our lawyers could weigh in. If true, Covington blew it big time
It also reveals the scum we are fighting. Gotta believe their cropping of the table was no accident
Reading Singer’s opening salvo again. Regarding the cropped Kurabayashi table on Apo B results, Singer notes that the defendant’s findings of fact had the same “defect” (page 17 footnote) Coincidence? I think not.
Meant granite head
What the granite keeps saying is partner and/or GIA the EU. The man is an idiot
One would think. But, per people who know far more than me, it’s a coin flip at best.
Yes! That is a flat out lie. Unreal...
Zip - does Du's final written order state that the USPTO had not considered Mori?
Marjac - count me in
CBB - Totally agree on the GIA strategy. Question is, how does someone penetrate the granite that surrounds JT's pee brain?
20,000? Seems awfully high. What are you using for revenue per script?
Good advice Kiwi!
Just finished reading Doc 331 from NV debacle again (Covington facts).
That any of Mori, Hyashi, or Kurabayashi be considered proof of anything in this case is stunning, simply stunning
TTE - well said
You didn't answer my question. Based on what? In addition to a restaurant owner, are you also an attorney?
The opportunity cost of continuing to hold this pig is growing every day
Man, if we were to get a Covid pop the door wouldn't hit me in the ass on the way out!
Based on what Miller? (i.e., remanded not reversed).
TTE - I’m still checking the box that says “Hell No” on this year’s proxy.
LBL - no offense intended, but you were similarly confident before the NV debacle:
“I do, however, have a strong network of folks that are keyed in and they have zero doubts upon the final conclusion =Amrn win, dominant”
What’s different this time?
You forgot the part about voting out the useless board members