Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Otterman: Were those otters fresh or saltwater guys?
The info I gave you -- did it help?
Ah well, it's Christmas. Guess the "consultants" need some spending money too. Seems like each and every piece of heartening news is followed by a pregnant pause followed by the imminent sell-off, lower PPS and, of course, the feeling that we've been had once again.
The last PR said there'd be more PR's in the future. Damn, I hope not, any more good news and the thing is likely to disappear altogether.
Otterman: You really oughta change your tag-line. Ain't nobody here more watching and hopeful as yourself. lol
Unfortunately. eom
Could be, mlf, but I got a gut feeling that one of these mou's is gonna produce sumpin. (Of course, 7 years worth of gut feelings is all we've all been going on). lol -- NOT
LOL -- g1
Wow, this summunabeech is creepin' up! Must be sumpin BIG gonna happen. Uh huh.
Anybody know why the "volume" stated the first thing in the morning is 1.21m when actual volume was about 20% of that figure? I've seen ihub do that on several occasions. Wishful thinking, perhaps?
"Nothin's gonna happen till it happens so never mind complaining until it does. If you dont have patience, the stock market is not the place for you."
Bid now at .066 with no real support in sight. Looks like your prediction of a 6 cent stock by the third week of Dec. might just be accurate.
Hmmmm. Perhaps he does and always has gotten around better than, oh, say, some members of the legal profession?
The last time I did this, a PR came out shortly thereafter -- must try it again:
.--. --- ...
I've never considered you a "pumper", Don. With all the axes being ground here, however, the resulting smoke sometimes obfuscates the real intent of the board.
Amen to that! eom
The point being?
There are two sides to each and every story. I've spoken with Wolf often enough to say I feel he is one of the most honest individuals I've ever conversed with. If he has a problem with present management, I have no idea what it might be, but where there's smoke, there's usually fire.
I'm told that if a call was placed, it would result in a conversation. I suspect that is a two-way street, but given the treatment that WM received at the hands of Elbee, I sure can't fault the man for being more than a little jaundiced
Otterman: Take it from someone who has been trying to orchestrate that meeting for a long time, the reason for there never having been a conversation between WM and Walter is NOT WM's. WM has made it clear he will speak with Walter at any time. That phone call hasn't, to the best of my knowledge, ever been placed to Mr. Meyerfeld.
Unless they're keeping their powder dry for something with a little more bite?
And disappointed that the news hasn't created much of a ripple in the investment pond -- thus far, at any rate.
I wonder what the time-line is for the delivery of our end of the bargain and actual production.
I'm impressed, pleased and hopeful. Here's to hope!
"Nothin's gonna happen till it happens so never mind complaining until it does. If you dont have patience, the stock market is not the place for you."
So, it's safe to complain about nothin' ha'ennin?
Seven years' patience, it seems to me, is plenty for just about anybody.
Up 1/100 of a cent at 10 am. Support building. Ooo-Rah!
Go to WallstreetMattel's.
Interesting new slant on spam, I must say.
lol -- on target, as usual, Breeze.
.--. --- ...
Happy Thanksgiving to all. eom
Gulfbreeze, thanks for the vote of confidence. I was kinda hoping you'd respond to that post -- your opinion means a lot to me.
Have yourself a real nice Thanksgiving. Eat all you want, that's what the day is for. That, and family and other important things.
It's been brought to my attention that perhaps I've been, shall we say, "choosy" as to who's posts I eliminate. The fact that Hasher is clearly displeased with the company and vents that displeasure does not necessarily mean that he has performed any TOS violations (vulgarity, personal attacks, etc). On the other hand, attacks against him have gotten pretty personal at times and have been removed. Hasher recently posted wherein he referred to Walter as a "liar". I removed that post. When someone made clear reference to hasher being of the "monkey-see, monkey-do" mentality, I removed that post as well.
The point I wish to bring to the remaining few who read this pathetic board is that I'm trying to walk a line here. Like mlf, I see both sides of the fence and refuse to plant my feet on either side until such time as it's crystal clear what's taking place. To the best of my knowledge, I've not partaken in any personal attacks on anyone other than our dearly departed past president.
Anyway, if our moderator wishes to remove me, that's up to him. It was he who asked me to stay on after Hasher left because I'm a "straight shooter". Maybe straight shooting is viewed as politically incorrect these days.
The inevitable "no news ain't good news" downward spiral. Look out beloooooow.
The silence (from all quadrants) certainly is deafening.
Congress Funds $1.5 Million for Electro Energy's Battery Development Program
6:44 PM EST November 10, 2005
Electro Energy Inc. (Nasdaq: EEEI), a leading provider of advanced battery technologies and associated systems, will receive $1.5 million from the 2006 budget of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for continued development and demonstration of its bipolar wafer-cell Nickel Metal Hydride (NiMH) battery energy storage program.
The funding was included in the Fiscal Year 2006 Energy & Water Development bill, which was passed by the U.S. Congress today and is expected to be signed by President Bush within the next week. The 2006 funding, will bring DOE's total investment in the development of the bipolar wafer-cell NiMH battery, in the energy storage program, to approximately $6.5 million.
Martin G. Klein, Electro Energy's Chairman and CEO, said, "I am extraordinarily grateful to Rep. Nancy Johnson and the entire Connecticut congressional delegation for their continued support of the Danbury business community and of Electro Energy. The continued DOE funding will allow Electro Energy to continued development of its patented bipolar wafer-cell technology for stationary energy storage applications and, additionally, will contribute to laying the groundwork for demonstrating that the technology will also be the technical and economic choice for plug-in hybrid vehicles. This is great news for Electro Energy and the Danbury community."
About Electro Energy Inc.
Electro Energy Inc., headquartered in Danbury, Connecticut, was founded in 1992 to develop, manufacture and commercialize high-powered, rechargeable bipolar nickel-metal hydride batteries for use in a wide range of applications. Its Colorado Springs operation supplies aerospace-grade high quality nickel cadmium batteries and components for satellites, aircraft and other specialty applications. EEEI is also developing high power lithium rechargeable batteries utilizing the Company's proprietary design. In May, EEEI announced plans to acquire significant manufacturing assets near Gainesville, Fla., by the end of 2005 to accelerate commercialization of its battery technology.
Certain statements in this news release may contain forward-looking information within the meaning of Rule 175 under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 3b-6 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and are subject to the safe harbor created by those rules. All statements, other than statements of fact, included in this release, including, without limitation, statements regarding potential future plans and objectives of the companies, are forward- looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, among other things, the following: general economic and business conditions; competition; unexpected changes in technologies and technological advances; ability to commercialize and manufacture products; results of experimental studies; research and development activities; changes in, or failure to comply with, governmental regulations; and the ability to obtain adequate financing in the future. This information is qualified in its entirety by cautionary statements and risk factors disclosure contained in certain of Electro Energy Inc.'s Securities and Exchange Commission filings available at http://www.sec.gov.
Pursuant to a December 1, 2004 agreement, Consulting For Strategic Growth I, Ltd. ("CFSG") provides Electro Energy with consulting, business advisory, investor relations, public relations and corporate development services, for which CFSG receives a fixed monthly fee for the duration of the agreement. Independent of CFSG's receipt of cash compensation from Electro Energy, CFSG may choose to purchase the common stock of Electro Energy and thereafter sell those shares at any time it deems appropriate to do so.
These things needn't go into vehicles in order for the company to fly. Hundreds, maybe thousands, of applications await. Someone's going to fill the bill(s). With a little luck......
dfh: I don't think credo side-stepped anything. I viewed it as rejecting the bait.
And there, without benefit of a sermon, is hitting the nail on the head. Nobody knows all there is to know as to what's happening. Therefore;
Might the bashers be right? Might they be wrong? Yes.
Might the pumpers be right? Might they be wrong? Yes.
Does hasher get carried away with his posts at times? Yes.
Is he entitled to do so? Yes.
Do therooster and dfh get carried away with their posts at times? Yes.
Are they entitled to do so? Yes.
There are two very divided camps here, but I don't think either camp is wishing the demise of the company. Some just don't think it's going to happen and voice that opinion. Some think it's going to happen "next week" (the two most used words on the BB).
The funny thing is that if one camp doesn't like an opinion of one of the other camp's minions, the "War of the Roses" begins all over again. Well, at least we're back to being one of the top posted boards again.
Given the effort and money that Credo has expended on our behalf, if HE doesn't cringe at the term "dispatched", I can sure as hell tell you that I did. Dispatched, indeed. And by whom? The king of smoke and mirrors, the master of prestidigitation, the one with the "L" permanently etched in his forehead -- LB. "Thanks for the effort, Wolf. Here's your hat. What's your hurry?" What is it that the letters LB stand for? Lying something?
Sorry, Credo. I know you need no one to speak for you. I just felt the need.
So endeth the sermon for the day. eom
Power Technology to Meet With Taiwan Companies to Discuss Joint Renewable Energy Project
Thursday November 3, 11:12 am ET
(just in case someone missed it)
HOUSTON, Nov. 3, 2005 (PRIMEZONE) -- Power Technology Inc. (OTC BB:PWTC.OB - News) CEO Bernard J. Walter announced today that following a recent positive evaluation of the Company's proprietary battery technology, Power Technology has been invited to Taiwan to explore a joint venture to manufacture and sell Power Technology batteries. Mr. Walter stated, ``These meetings have been arranged for next week in Taiwan only after the Company's technology was positively evaluated. We are looking forward to exploring a joint project to bring this important technology to the market.''
About Power Technology: Power Technology, Inc. is a Research and Development Company engaged in activities regarding alternative battery technology using patented, ultra light materials with up to 50% less weight and significantly less lead content than conventional batteries. The Company is in the early stages of commercializing its battery technology, and has designed equipment and systems to manufacture its patent pending batteries.
Please visit our website at http://www.PWTCBATTERY.com for more information or call the company directly at 713-621-4310.
All forward-looking statements are, by necessity, only estimates of future results and actual results achieved by Power Technology, Inc. (PWTC) may differ materially from these statements due to a number of factors. PWTC assumes no obligations to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting such statements. You should independently investigate and fully understand all risks before making investment decisions.
Contact:
Power Technology, Inc.
Bernard J. Walter, CEO
713-621-4310
"following a recent positive evaluation of the Company's proprietary battery technology"
I, for one, would be far more interested in hearing more about the positive evaluation that has recently taken place than a meeting in Taiwan that has yet to take place.
Seems to me that even if BeeJay delivers both the battery and the PR as "intended", it would do little for the stock until such time as the thing is tested, tested and re-tested. IMO, no company is going to permit their name to be associated with this product until that all takes place. IMO again, that is probably months away. Too bad there is only one apparent basket for our precious egg. I wonder if WM knows of any additional baskets. Hmmm.