Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Who's Timmy and why/how is the stock going to .5 next week.
The key is "reasonable parties" ..... If they were "reasonable" to begin with, and strategic (they claim to be), we think the agreements would have been negotiated differently.
This article kind of jibes with Edelson's updated position:
http://www.mcoscillator.com/learning_center/weekly_chart/golds_13-1_2_month_cycle/?utm_source=McClellan+Chart+In+Focus+-&utm_campaign=2ff44df99c-CIF_ETF_Investors_Still_Hating_Gold10_31_2013&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9e79f8200f-2ff44df99c-151432473
If it's taken this long to "try" to turn the ship around, ask yourself if it can be turned around anytime soon or if LQMT has the $ to fight a legal battle unless some other entity is willing to go to bat for them.
Ask yourself why an exclusive arrangement was agreed to with VPC when it's common knowledge that second sourcing is standard practice in major industries (pre-requisite to securing significant business).
Maybe LQMT is taking the right steps in order, but to agree to an exclusive manufacturing agreement seems short sighted.
The excuse "we were in a precarious financial situation .... Not in a good negotiating position" could be used; but why form an agreement(s) that stands/stood to worsen ( not better) things.
On an hourly chart, at closing dust had negative volume above avg; gdx had positive volume above avarage; and nugt had positive volume above average.
One the hourly charts, the last bar of the day resembles a reversal bar ( this is more like self talk...not sure what happens on Monday).
Gold didn't breach 1300, a level Larry E. earlier thought would turn gold into a bear market.
Almost all minors traded down except HL ( and SLW, silver).
Dust and GDX are near or at some key resistance levels.
It seems to me that LQMT is yet to find an audience that could really help their stock to take off based on real business.
If they are holding out for govt. related business, it could take longer than business in a competitive market, e.g. CE (good fit for their technology that was given away to AAPL).
Maybe automotive has some promise.
It seems to me, that beyond second sourcing, the issues with LQMT not being ale to grow revenues might have to do with internal issues based on comments on this board (re:history).
Who knows what's really going on there right.
.... Suppose it kind of like watching a suspense thriller ..... One day....any day....out of no where....they could suddenly start producing and surprise everyone.
We actually thought it would be possible to take a free ride on LQMT and believe that some do.
The issue, it's a long time waiting between bumps and when it finally does, there are all these taunts, etc.
If the gains were from options or other leverage on something more credible, e.g. ETF, better stock, etc., that meets standard, the performance or lack of would be based on skill ( vs. being an insider).
I suppose that part of the issue with penny stocks is lack of regulation, etc.
Bingo,,lol.
Does anyone know off hand at what force LM crumbles?
Ad RGLD to the list.
AU and HL both showing strength.
This decline could be a nice sell off before more miners report next week (some positive reports potentially )
The iPad Air is "beautiful" ..... So light that it would/could benefit from lqmt casing and transparent lqmt like screen.
It is so light that it could easily be crushed because it meshes well with a pile of paper, etc.
maybe the next big thing will be a "flexible" screen, etc. .... Where does LM fit into that scenario?
Correction, the high ( which was gdx low) x .7 is actually 58.28
(Re: dust).
(Re: nugt) low, no telling; if gdx were to drop to 2008 lows, nugt. really low; maybe low 30s first stop.
AU is showing strength on a down day.
Who thinks dust can get above 35?
35 is resistance (6/3 low) and about 6/26 high x .7 ( for beta decay)
Pre-market
Gdx-down
Nugt-down
Dust-up
Thx, we'll work on it, lol.
Strengthening dollar
lowering inflation outlook in Europe (deflation)
Gold - down
Dollar - up
Equities - up
Oil - down
What are you talking about? A mouse? .... That was me when I was a dreamer....before wireless data, lol....I for sure did it....and now really happy can trade anywhere, anytime ( reason on an ipad).... No joke....finally get to trade anywhere...the key ( it takes more than a connection ( and a mouse, lol))
The reason I like those types of stocks (and con include miners), is because they have an upward bias, so corrections are definite buying opportunities ( removes some broader ambiguity). The main thing about the dollar is that when it's low it benefits large multi-nationals, etc.
Meant "link" ( darn autofill on oPad,,lol)
SS, that's me (about us).... I did research that confirms it; not promoting, just sayin' some categories do welll if you know what to look for ( laid back approach ... Long hold times).
Stocks there do well as buy and hold; but system uses a risk management trade approach ( longer hold times, wider risk reward).
As for miners, looking for this big kill (more for trading, agree,,and commodity ETFs).
I hear you; found an asset class that generally does well n good times and bad. If you are interested in more, check out the length on my profile ( laid back approach that works that I'll get back to after the broad market corrects a little next 1-2,3 weeks - market needs a breather for YE run; maybe gold is being included in this (can't tell)).
The reality: with limited resources, they can only do so much.
Steady might win the race, but not a fast one.
When things are slow in other places, we come over here to b*tch. The LQMT whippin' post, lol. They deserve it.
I guess that's why Steipp sees it as a "young man's stock", they need a steady supply of suckers to ......
Doesn't speak well for the co. in my opinion.
Look at it this way, as long as those guys are getting paid ( through whatever means), they probably don't care what anyone else is thinking about it (e.g. Low performance otherwise).
If they were privately held, it would be ok. But they aren't.
Maybe they'll do another pop for their non-general shareholders. If you aren't one or don't know one, you won't get the memo.
One guy bragged to me that he got the memo last July; but the other memos he thought were coming never made it, so ..... He could have been in the man stream of general investors, doing something, but he doesn't know how.
Why does this matter? I guess it doesn't really, except that maybe it's another lesson why not to trust anything based on what someone else is saying.
If the company doesn't feel a responsibility to openly communicate and disclose through traditional means, then for general shareholders ( with hope), it's guess work.
If some companies are planning to buy the Engel machines with LM capability, that would definitely be a positive, but if it's primarily AAPL ( with no further revenue benefit to LQMT according to Steipp ), it won't necessarily contribute directly to LQMT's bottom line.
It seems to me that LQMT is riding APPL's coat tail without near term financial benefit.
If enthusiasts can wait, maybe it will work out long term to "young man's" investor benefits ( Steipp's view of investors according to ASHM attendee, etc.).
It sounds like that people with the most information expect things to take more time . Zzzzzzzz
I guess it's no new news that Steipp has said "no further revenue" from AAPL.
Sure they are a great partner, and sure they have contributed to CIP.
The issue/opportunity is LQMT being able to capitalize on the relationship further by securing business in non-CE markets ( which doesn't involve AAPL by definition unless AAPL or MTRN buys them out).
AAPL may not let them die on the vine, but AAPL isn't responsible for LQMT securing their own non-CE business; LQMT is and the concern there is that they aren't cash rich, they keep running out of money, and diluting, etc.
Maybe they can turn the shop around from that trend but nothing so far points to it other than some comments here and there that they are seeking non-dilutive ways to secure more financing ( without details, etc.)
My simple charts pointed down, but we're no expert.
Maybe gold/miners needed a pause.
It seems to me that both BAC and Edelson are looking beyond a few days ( unless gold breaks 1300).
You can tell who reads the same newspaper ( NYT).
Apparently some think fed will taper sooner due to moderately improving economy.
Not sure if the tail is wagging things but it could be.
Gold - down
Equities -down
Oil -down
Dollar-up
it seems to me that eventually LQMT could meet more milestones. The question is "when".
I suppose that if you can time the pumps, dilution, and dumps, it can work to a trader/investors advantage.
But isn't it kind of irksome that they don't seem to be into straightforward business or seem to have a hard time executing on it.
If the can guarantee another 200%+ pump, let us know when it's coming.
-------------
There was this poster that still monitors the board but that felt so bad about being in this "investment" for years that they said they got satisfaction out of knowing about the pump and not telling. Months later, the other pumps they anticipated didn't happen. That was their "last hope" ( according to them). This is what is sad about LQMT, some people are actually banking on it for long term wealth but they don't necessarily fall into the category of "for young men"...what Steipp is recently told some investors implying that it cold be a loooonnnnggggg time (e.g. Years and ridden with risks).
Do you know when they get their distribution?
Who thinks the market will correct/pause/retrace beginning in Nov (maybe a week or two) to create a run way into YE gains?
Ok....then point us to their analyst report.
Can you do that?
There should be pro formas, etc.
Let's see the professional estimate of future cash flows, earnings, revenues, NPV, and stock price projections.
We're ready to hear/read the substance.
If you believe that BOA gives this stock and company credibility, them you must have done your DD and read their professional analysis.
We ready whenever you are, to share the "facts".
Thx.
Scam city.
Further comments to be aware of (of general investors):
(implied) "..... I'm big stuff....I live comfortably and well .... that's the reason I am invested in this stock ..... and why you should be also .... Trust me.....I'm big".
Lol