Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Oh goody! Another distraction for GVSI!!
https://twitter.com/GeorgeASharp/status/1628072733853593606?cxt=HHwWjMC9ndHhiZgtAAAA
Here we go again with these two!!
https://twitter.com/BrettRosen325/status/1628047923144704000?cxt=HHwWgIDShbu9_pctAAAA
Are those the shares he needed to buy in order to apply for custodianship? You need to own shares before going to court to ask for custodianship.
Edit - looks like those were the shares:
https://twitter.com/GeorgeASharp/status/1628061908250107904?cxt=HHwWgIC9mcDrhJgtAAAA
Lol - god forbid you made your statement based on the actual filings. Wonder how many went screaming to George you said they were missing.
20 million common listed:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=15250025&guid=GH7-kH20MGmldth
Page 13
20 million common not listed:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/356873/content
Page 7
20 million common now listed:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/359659/content
Page 7
———
No you were not lying. You based information on actual filings. Filings that George has corrected now.
At least he knows some are paying attention and actually read the filings.
Huh? If any OTC stocks wants a corporate action processed they need to go through FINRA. So George will eventually have to process any name or symbol change or reverse split through FINRA.
Not sure why that makes them any different than any other OTC stock looking for corporate actions. That’s FINRA’s job.
https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/corporate-actions-public-companies-what-you-should-know
…
FINRA’s Role in OTC Corporate Actions
Federal securities regulations task FINRA with processing corporate action announcement requests by companies that trade in the over-the-counter (OTC) marketplace rather than on a national securities exchange. Corporate actions reportable to FINRA generally include mergers, a dividend or other distribution of cash or securities, stock splits and name and domicile changes.
FINRA’s processing function helps to keep investors and the market informed of company corporate actions. However, FINRA is not responsible for approving or disapproving the action the company is taking. And FINRA does not review such requests for a company’s compliance with any federal, state or other regulatory requirements. The public company is responsible for making sure their business decisions comply with all applicable laws and regulations.
Corporate actions for exchange-listed companies are handled by the exchange upon which a company is listed; and information on these corporate actions is available on the websites of the relevant exchanges.
How Can You Find Out About OTC Corporate Actions?
If you own stock in an OTC company that is the subject of a corporate action, you will want to check the Daily List. The Daily List provides valuable information regarding corporate actions announcements for OTC securities, including ex-dates (the date that determines whether shareholders will receive a dividend), new issues, deleted issues, deletions, trading symbol and name changes. The Daily List also indicates if previously announced changes have been updated or cancelled.
Be Wary of Announcements Regarding FINRA "Approval" of a Corporate Action
Companies undergoing a corporate action often issue a press release or other communication, such as a tweet or other social media post, to provide details of the change. For instance, a company might announce a new corporate name that reflects a change in product lines or business focus. However, in the past, some companies have used these publications to suggest that FINRA has somehow "approved" a corporate action or that a corporate action will be effective once FINRA approves it. To clarify, this is not the case: FINRA does not approve corporate actions.
Excuse me? Not what you said though:
Over-the-counter (OTC) securities are securities that are not listed on a major exchange in the United States and are instead traded via a broker-dealer network, usually because many are smaller companies and do not meet the requirements to be listed on a formal exchange.
——-
Is the OTC market an exchange?
Over-the-counter (OTC) is trading securities via a broker-dealer network as opposed to on a centralized exchange like the New York Stock Exchange. Although OTC networks are not formal exchanges, they still have eligibility requirements determined by the SEC.
https://www.investopedia.com › terms
Of course the past had something to do with the present as you just pointed out George had to deal with it. He also said in Form 10 that they would deal with that FINRA appeal. But it still exists. Which could cause a delay if FINRA wants a decision before moving forward with any corporate actions George requests.
Guess the court is waiting on something still - to correct that “non-conforming document”
Case Information
A-23-864342-B | Good Vibrations Shoes Inc., Plaintiff(s) vs. Robert Sullivan, Defendant(s)
Case Number
A-23-864342-B
Court
Department 22
Judicial Officer
Johnson, Susan
File Date
01/20/2023
Case Type
NRS Chapters 78-89
Case Status
Open
Party
Plaintiff
Good Vibrations Shoes Inc.
Active Attorneys
Attorney
Coppedge, Linvel J
Retained
Lead Attorney
Mushkin, Michael R.
Retained
Defendant
Sullivan, Robert
Defendant
Voss, Peter
Defendant
Eastern Asia Group Limited
Defendant
Waltz, Craig
Defendant
Carlin, Paul
Defendant
Butkis, David
Defendant
Bradford, Phil
Defendant
Cohen, Jeffrey
Defendant
Garton, M Pamela
Defendant
Koenig Grandchildren Revocable Living Trust
Defendant
Lane, Stuart
Events and Hearings
01/20/2023 Complaint (Business Court)
Comment
[1] Complaint
01/20/2023 Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure
Comment
[2] Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure
01/20/2023 Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending
Comment
[3] Summons - Robert Sullivan
01/20/2023 Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending
Comment
[4] Summons - Peter Voss
01/20/2023 Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending
Comment
[5] Summons - Craig Waltz
01/20/2023 Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending
Comment
[6] Summons - Eastern Asia Group Limited
01/20/2023 Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending
Comment
[7] Summons - Paul Carlin
01/20/2023 Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending
Comment
[8] Summons - David Butkis
01/20/2023 Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending
Comment
[9] Summons - Phil Bradford
01/20/2023 Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending
Comment
[10] Summons - Jeffrey Cohen
01/20/2023 Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending
Comment
[11] Summons - M Pamela Garton
01/20/2023 Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending
Comment
[12] Summons - Koenig Grandchildren Revocable Living Trust
01/20/2023 Summons Electronically Issued - Service Pending
Comment
[13] Summons - Stuart Lane
02/10/2023 Clerk's Notice of Nonconforming Document
Comment
[14] Clerk's Notice of Nonconforming Document
So did the daytona 300 happen yet?
Did thousands swarm to download the HUMBL WALLET/Social Wallet?
This is pretty curious - it was about the first Legato Merger SPAC
Also received a delisting notice, then traded a few days and days after that they deregistered with the SEC.
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?CIK=0001820272&owner=exclude
Will be interesting to see if Legato Merger II follows the same pattern.
Looking at the email from Shelly - she explained why - it didn’t appear to be a listed company. And the last filing showed it was delisted by Nasdaq.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1354457/000135445723000093/xslF25X02/primary_doc.xml
And obviously the company put out a press release mentioning it was halted.
So I would assume she went with what was known at that time. I wouldn’t take it so personally given what was filed with the SEC about delisting.
Well most likely Shelly went with the actual Nasdaq filing of delisting. And at that time it was delisted.
So if it is trading today and you can believe the company PR they settled the questions with Nasdaq you would be good to go? Personally I would wait for confirmation from Nasdaq in a filing like they did for the delisting.
Pretty much all SPACS suck though. Just sayin’!
And? Apparently Nasdaq has a problem with it and delisted it. The company said it would ask for hearing if delisted. So a hearing would be next.
Unless they want to go the OTC route instead?
I assume NASDAQ will file something if problem solved.
Southland Announces Efforts to Address Halt of Trading
Southland Holdings
Wed, February 15, 2023 at 12:59 PM PST·3 min read
In this article:
LGTO
0.00%
LGTOU
0.00%
GRAPEVINE, Texas, Feb. 15, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- As previously disclosed, on February 14th, 2023, Southland Holdings, Inc. (“Southland”) consummated the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 25, 2022 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Southland, Southland Holdings LLC and Legato Merger Sub, Inc. (the “Business Combination”). In connection with the Business Combination, Southland is required to meet certain listing requirements pursuant to the rules (the “Nasdaq Rules”) of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”).
Following the Business Combination, trading in Southland’s securities on Nasdaq was halted pending receipt of additional information that has been requested by Nasdaq prior to the consummation of the Business Combination. Such additional information relates to Southland meeting certain listing requirements pursuant to the Nasdaq Rules. Southland believes that it meets all listing requirements pursuant to the Nasdaq Rules and is actively communicating with Nasdaq representatives to provide all additional information requested and to take all actions necessary to enable the resumption of trading in the company’s securities on Nasdaq. Nasdaq representatives have informed Southland that the trading symbols for the company’s common stock and warrants are expected to be updated to “SLND” and “SLNDW,” respectively, by February 16th, 2023.
In the event that Nasdaq determines that Southland does not meet all listing requirements pursuant to the Nasdaq Rules, Southland may receive a notice of delisting from Nasdaq. If such a notice is received, Southland intends to request a hearing before the Nasdaq Hearings Panel to appeal any delisting determination.
…
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/southland-announces-efforts-address-halt-205900413.html
So They did get the delisting notice and I assume they will ask for a hearing as they said in press release.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1354457/000135445723000093/xslF25X02/primary_doc.xml
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1354457/000135445723000093/xslF25X02/primary_doc.xml
Filings Format Description Filed/Effective File/Film Number
25-NSE Documents Notification filed by national security exchange to report the removal from listing and registration of matured, redeemed or retired securities
Acc-no: 0001354457-23-000093 (34 Act) Size: 3 KB 2023-02-15
UNITED STATES
OMB APPROVAL
OMB Number: 3235-0080
Expires: March 31, 2018
Estimated average burden
hours per response: 1.7
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 25
NOTIFICATION OF REMOVAL FROM LISTING AND/OR REGISTRATION
UNDER SECTION 12(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
Commission File Number 333-260816
Issuer: Southland Holdings, Inc.
Exchange: Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
(Exact name of Issuer as specified in its charter, and name of Exchange where security is listed and/or registered)
Address: 777 Third Avenue, 37th Floor
New York NEW YORK 10017
Telephone number: (212) 319-7676
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Issuer's principal executive offices)
Unit
(Description of class of securities)
Please place an X in the box to designate the rule provision relied upon to strike the class of securities from listing and registration:
17 CFR 240.12d2-2(a)(1)
17 CFR 240.12d2-2(a)(2)
17 CFR 240.12d2-2(a)(3)
17 CFR 240.12d2-2(a)(4)
Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.12d2-2(b), the Exchange has complied with its rules to strike the class of securities from listing and/or withdraw registration on the Exchange. 1
Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.12d2-2(c), the Issuer has complied with its rules of the Exchange and the requirements of 17 CFR 240.12d-2(c) governing the voluntary withdrawal of the class of securities from listing and registration on the Exchange.
Pursuant to the requirements fo the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Nasdaq Stock Market LLC certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing the Form 25 and has caused this notification to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized person.
2023-02-15 By Tara Petta Director
Date Name Title
1 Form 25 and attached Notice will be considered compliance with the provisions of 17 CFR 240.19d-1 as applicable. See General Instructions.
Persons who respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB Number.
SEC Charges Final Participant in Multi-Million Dollar Scheme to Spread and Trade on False Rumors about Public Companies
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2023-33
Washington D.C., Feb. 16, 2023 —
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Milan Vinod Patel, of Cumming, Georgia, for spreading more than 100 false rumors about public companies to generate more than $1 million in illicit trading profits. The SEC previously charged Barton Ross, Mark Melnick, Anthony Salandra, and Charles Parrino for their roles in this scheme.
According to the SEC’s complaint, Patel received rumors that he knew to be false from Ross, Salandra, or Parrino about purported market-moving events, such as corporate mergers or acquisitions, involving publicly-traded companies, and disseminated the rumors to his contacts at financial news services, chat rooms, and message boards. Patel also disseminated the rumors to Melnick, a host of a stock trading webcast, who shared them with his webcast subscribers. The circulation of more than 100 rumors between December 2017 and January 2020 caused the prices of the subject companies’ securities to rise temporarily, which allowed Patel to sell his holdings in such securities and generate more than $1 million in illicit trading profits.
"Out of the five individuals involved in this scheme, we allege that Patel played the central role of using his contacts to repeatedly spread the false rumors via the internet, generating more than $1 million in illicit profits for himself," said Joseph G. Sansone, Chief of the Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit. "Today’s action seeks to hold Patel accountable for his alleged misconduct and serves as a warning to others who might engage in similar schemes."
The SEC’s complaint, filed in the United Stated District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, charges Patel with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Martin Zerwitz of the Enforcement Division’s Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit and Jonathan Austin. It was supervised by Deborah Tarasevich, David Hirsch, and Mr. Sansone. The SEC’s litigation will be led by Damon Taaffe and supervised by James Carlson. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia and the FBI.
###
Related Materials
SEC Complaint
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2023/comp-pr2023-33.pdf
——
Old cases they are finishing up on I guess.
Isn’t it odd George is making such a big deal about Brett changing his last name when he has done the same.
SEC Charges Terraform and CEO Do Kwon with Defrauding Investors in Crypto Schemes
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2023-32
Washington D.C., Feb. 16, 2023 —
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Singapore-based Terraform Labs PTE Ltd and Do Hyeong Kwon with orchestrating a multi-billion dollar crypto asset securities fraud involving an algorithmic stablecoin and other crypto asset securities.
According to the SEC’s complaint, from April 2018 until the scheme’s collapse in May 2022, Terraform and Kwon raised billions of dollars from investors by offering and selling an inter-connected suite of crypto asset securities, many in unregistered transactions. These included “mAssets,” security-based swaps designed to pay returns by mirroring the price of stocks of US companies, and Terra USD (UST), a crypto asset security referred to as an “algorithmic stablecoin” that supposedly maintained its peg to the U.S. dollar by being interchangeable for another of the defendants’ crypto asset securities, LUNA. The complaint further alleges that Terraform and Kwon offered and sold investors other means to invest in their crypto empire, including the crypto asset security tokens MIR—or “mirror” tokens—and LUNA itself.
The SEC’s complaint alleges that Terraform and Kwon marketed crypto asset securities to investors seeking to earn a profit, repeatedly claiming that the tokens would increase in value. For example, they touted and marketed UST as a “yield-bearing” stablecoin, which they advertised as paying as much as 20 percent interest through the Anchor Protocol. The SEC’s complaint also alleges that, while marketing the LUNA token, Terraform and Kwon repeatedly misled and deceived investors that a popular Korean mobile payment application used the Terra blockchain to settle transactions that would accrue value to LUNA. Meanwhile, Terraform and Kwon also allegedly misled investors about the stability of UST. In May 2022, UST depegged from the U.S. dollar, and the price of it and its sister tokens plummeted to close to zero.
"We allege that Terraform and Do Kwon failed to provide the public with full, fair, and truthful disclosure as required for a host of crypto asset securities, most notably for LUNA and Terra USD," said SEC Chair Gary Gensler. "We also allege that they committed fraud by repeating false and misleading statements to build trust before causing devastating losses for investors."
"I commend the SEC’s hard-working staff who remained vigilant in such an important investigation, even when the defendants attempted to prevent us from obtaining important information about their business," Chair Gensler added. "This case demonstrates the lengths to which some crypto firms will go to avoid complying with the securities laws, but it also demonstrates the strength and commitment of the SEC’s dedicated public servants."
"Today’s action not only holds the defendants accountable for their roles in Terra’s collapse, which devastated both retail and institutional investors and sent shock waves through the crypto markets, but once again highlights that we look to the economic realities of an offering, not the labels put on it," said Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. "As alleged in our complaint, the Terraform ecosystem was neither decentralized, nor finance. It was simply a fraud propped up by a so-called algorithmic “stablecoin” – the price of which was controlled by the defendants, not any code."
The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, charges the defendants with violating the registration and anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.
The investigation was conducted by Roger Landsman, Elisabeth Goot, Kathleen Hitchins, James Murtha, Daniel Koster, Donald Battle, and David Crosbie and was supervised by Reid Muoio, Osman Nawaz, Jorge Tenreiro, and David Hirsch from the Complex Financial Instruments and Crypto Assets and Cyber Units. The litigation is being handled by James Connor, Ladan Stewart, Devon Staren, and Laura Meehan from the Trial Unit.
###
Related Materials
SEC Complaint
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2023/comp-pr2023-32.pdf
I always thought George wrote that press release himself. It’s typical of the other ones that describe him.
At one point the OTC made him change a press release bragging about that position because they didn’t want investors to think OTC was recommending the stock.
I could punch holes in George’s claims but would rather not come across that I justify what that other stock is doing, least of all look like I support anything coming out of the mouth of hotheaded Brett.
Let them battle it out on twitter while George distracts from his own set of problems with his custodianship stocks.
Didn’t George help some other scammy company for a hefty fee to get off the CE market? I think it was one of the guys he put on his SHITLIST after he was paid to do it. Dang I will think of it in a moment.
I think it was one of Frank’s schemes.
The same thoughts apply whether it is posted here or on twitter:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171226255
These are simply reverse merger plays driven by short term momo. And how many long term successes are there with these mergers? They pretty much do reverse splits and dilute out the stock.
I know George said he wanted to show the world he could do something to change the OTC market with these custodianships. (Or some grandiose claim like that) But so far I ain’t seen a thing other than the typical Stinky Pinky playbook.
This is when George is in his happy place.
I did see that yesterday and was looking for a followup on that case. I think I saw something filed by Cyberlux in Virginia Sept 1, 2022? I didn’t want to bother paying for copy of lawsuit since it wasn’t my battle. Lol
Why on earth would anyone expect there would be dilution on an empty shell?
George is trying to knock down the outstanding in order to put something into the shell. AFTER the merger is the time to see if they are selling shares to raise capital - which would be the whole point of going public.
Geesh
But hey I guess it makes a good soundbites to pump up the momo.
Guess Brian will do what he can to avoid bankruptcy so he can pay his daddy back. Might even make it until he can cash out his own Pref B shares. But then again he will inherit his parents $$$$ that were cashed out. I am sure he is quite pleased with his expense acct with HUMBL living the good life on that $1/yr salary.
He has pretty low overhead - no wife or kids and living in the house he grew up in.
So no pressure there.
Probably not if they do a reverse split. What’s the hold up? Did they get a letter from FINRA asking more questions?
Total nonsense.
Huh???
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/good-vibrations-shoes-pk-GVSI/trades
Buys - 2.7 million
Sells - 4.9million
Where do you see strength???
SELECT DATABASE CORPORATION (1804466)
Initial Filing Date 12/02/1991
Status Suspended - FTB
Standing - SOS Good
Standing - FTB Not Good
Standing - Agent Good
Standing - VCFCF Good
Inactive Date 02/01/1995
Formed In CALIFORNIA
Entity Type Stock Corporation - CA - General
Principal Address 2043 WESTCLIFF DR #201
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
Mailing Address 2043 WESTCLIFF DR #201
NEWPORT BEACH,CA92660
Statement of Info Due Date 12/31/1994
Agent Individual
60350
GEORGE A HELISCHAUER
21 GRETEL CT
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663
———
PROGRESSIVE MICROSYSTEM DESIGNS INCORPORATED BRANCH
Company Number
1464510
Previous Company Numbers
C1464510
Status
Terminated Sos Admin
Incorporation Date
3 July 1989 (over 33 years ago)
Dissolution Date
5 September 1989
Company Type
Stock Corporation - Out of State - Stock
Jurisdiction
California (US)
Branch
Branch of Ontario (Canada) company
Registered Address
2 BILLINGHAM RD., STE 200
ISLINGTON ON CANADA M9B 6E1
United States
Inactive Directors / Officers
GEORGE ANDREW HELISCHAUER, agent
Registry Page
https://bizfileonline.sos.ca.gov/sear...
RSS feed icon
Recent filings for PROGRESSIVE MICROSYSTEM DESIGNS INCORPORATED
5 Sep 1989
CANCELLATION
Source California Secretary of State, https://bizfileonline.sos.ca.gov/sear..., 31 Oct 2022
Company Addresses
MAILING ADDRESS
207A CEDAR ST., NEWPORT BEACH, CA, 92663
Latest Events
1989-07-03
Incorporated
1989-07-03 - 2018-12-12
Addition of officer GEORGE ANDREW HELISCHAUER, agent
2022-07-10 - 2022-10-31
Change of status from 'Canceled' to 'Terminated Sos Admin'
The danger with trying to paint the pps up at the end of the day like that is the next day when it settles back to where it was trading earlier - the percent drop will cause some to panic sell. Whoever did it best hope that doesn’t happen.
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/good-vibrations-shoes-pk-GVSI/trades
This case?
https://casetext.com/case/sharp-v-seven-arts-entmt
DISPOSITION
The order on the anti-SLAPP motion is affirmed in part and reversed in part. The matter is remanded to the trial court with directions to vacate the order and to enter a new order denying the motion in its entirety and denying Sharp's request for attorney fees and costs. The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.
WE CONCUR: DATO, J., BUCHANAN, J.
https://unicourt.com/case/ca-sd-sharp-vs-seven-arts-entertainment-inc-1107271
https://unicourt.com/case/ca-sca1-sharp-v-seven-arts-entertainment-inc-et-al-160390
Works both ways doesn’t it.
Oversold based on what?
The r/m MOMO action?
An empty shell?
How does one really claim something is “oversold” when it is an empty shell?
What price is he putting on a pink current otc empty shell to declare such a thing?
Well given their SEC FORM 10 was withdrawn because of SEC questions - perhaps there was?
Subscribe to Ad free and enjoy an ad-free experience
Try Now
Keep the Ads