Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
well I see 186M bid luring those to buy 4's ...exactly what the manipulation is intended to do ... the large bids have been common place all the way down; then suddenly they go puff, after enough have been dumped ...but who knows, maybe, jus maybe, afterwards, it might move up enough,a tick or two, to get a pump of hope going again to dump more
whats th matter? everything looks good to me
even th CEO is gambling on a win in litigation ..that's all there is
for all those who have free-shares ...things look great
CIRC you're making MoneyMade look pretty good
why? ...I believe it's th performance of th co
good idea
certainly not evident here with CIRC
LOL ... a rigged answer to a rigged question? whatever happened to corp executives being able to connect sentences & ideas, convey lucid honest answers without a teleprompter ...
I see the fleamarketeers want to dump those sixes, either at th bid or ask, before it's brought back to .0002-.0003
More & More, Magazines & Newspapers across the board are stating losses ..this is the digital age..competition is fierce ...Playboy balance sheet says it all, as a result there was a downgrade ...185M in debt refinancing something to strip about ...sex magazines are becoming "a thing of the past"
Fair & Bal ...but I wouldn't go that far ..fact is shareholders hang by a thread ...those shareholders who don't have free shares by now that is
some fodder to digest - some licensing deals have apparently taken longer to negotiate, crimping playboy cash flow; prompting S&P to down grade playboy corporate debt rating
EXACTLY ...TY
I'm never sorry ...but you keep waiting
..."NOT RIGHT"
it's going to continue
I sold a bunch upper 1.30's bought at .60's ... is that what you meant?
bigger haircut coming ...
Goldman -Sachs been in news quite a bit for price manipulation ...on wrong side of law
wrong...as always -how many yrs now?
first th hedgies shorted her down on no apparent public available news; obvious a double was coming on no apparent public available news ...now th haircut back
thanks for the profits wmih
since this is in the discovery phase, protective order most likely regards disclosure and discovery activity; protection for CIRC confidential, proprietary, or private information ... special protection against "public" disclosure or use for any purpose other than the prosecution of this litigation ...pretty standard in these type of cases when one party wants certain info kept from public eyes
But you did insert yourself into a post, my reply to another individual, in an attempt to put out there that the possibility of a 50-100M settlement exists; well I guess it does, in “Never – Never” Land …when this exists discovery phase, and goes to actual trial, most of those seven additional defendants with deep pockets? …will most likely be relieved of legal complicity - lets see
btw, since this is in the discovery phase, protective order most likely regards disclosure and discovery activity; protection for CIRC confidential, proprietary, or private information ... special protection against "public" disclosure or use for any purpose other than the prosecution of this litigation ...pretty standard in these type of cases when one party wants certain info kept from public eyes
IMO
Keep Dreaming , just like settlement is tomorrow... It's just so unbelievable ...this financial acuity on the pinky boards amazes me; case histories do not support such iffy settlements for companies with such miniscule non existent profits or sales projections
Think more about whether you'll recv any gifts at all, even if both parties do come to some sort of agreement or settlement; and leave the 50-100M predictions in never never land
...back to flipping stocks that make me money
Hmmm Playboy has 16M CASH on its balance sheet and just refinanced 185M in debt per Scott Flanders [CEO of Playboy] CEO of Penthouse just declared personal bankruptcy ...you better collect that laughable amount quick
Does anyone remember when I let on that mostly everyone in Hollywood had this idea on their boards or in R & D both long before and at the same time... it's not the greatest nor even unique; now the wheel - that was an idea!
Not their problem ...they're creating real revenue for themselves that adds up
how does that affect the truth ...btw my holdings are virtually free shares now ...date never marry; hold some but flip more ....never wait for a rainbow, create your own
so will shareholders when they lose their investment as a result
yes, and we're all on a Star Trek through the universe riding the good ship CIRC Har Har har
CIRC First the chasing of rainbows, then the talk of rainbow should, could and if's when the rainbow gets away ...I personally chase gold in the beautiful Sierras ...sniping & sluicing for gold got me a nice nugget and a whole lot of gold dust this weekend ....never wait for rainbows to land in your backyard...date never marry; hold some but flip every chance you get ...better yet, buy a gold claim
have the right board?
and th co will GLADLY oblige you
looks like the co ...it is; it is
looks like someone is glad to sell it....and much happier for it - time will tell
for a co that supposedly is making tons of money, someone sure does dump a lot of shares
Don't let anyone talk you out of taking your MINE profits so that they can take their MINE profits first
looks like profit taking to me; do it more than once and making money is easy in the pinks ...Date never marry, take profits; hold some but flip more shares than you hold ...and you'll make more money than MINE trying to sell a beverage
go MINE
Date never marry, take profits; hold some but flip more shares than you hold ...and you'll make more money than MINE trying to sell a beverage
go MINE
did I mention that of the 10-30% of the products that stay on shelves due to well funding, only 1% actually succeed because of popularity or necessity
looks impressive, but to tell you honestly, that doesn't make a difference ...maybe the 70-90% failure should be represented by power brands and the world would have 100% success