is a 'Troll-Dad'
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You know the more I think about it, those nicknames out of context might sound a bit frightening at first when they come out of no where and start asking the "tough questions".
This MOP cannon can make or break you, son. Get to talking!
Thanks for the laughs this lazy Sunday morning...
I can see what happened here... "so bilal, give me all the details of your oil-tycoon connections and strategies NOW. We know who you are, we are MOP, we will find youuuuuuu"
lol...
I thought you were joking but you are right!
"WHERE IS THE MONEY LEBOWSKI, WHERE IS THE MONEY?"
Once again, jesss no one expects amazing results here for Q3. Let us just break even or make a tiny profit instead of the negative profit we booked last quarter.
And again, Charlie holds half of the OS...sooooo why reverse split his own stake? This isn't like most pinks that actually have a float close to or about their 500-1000 million OS or AS.
Just some things to think about...
Maybe? I haven't been able to find anything either. Its just doing way more volume than it should be doing right now, imo.
Please review the message from the admin stickied to the top of this board...here is a quote from that sticky:
Posts that violate the rules can be deleted by admin, the mod squad, the moderator or the assistant moderators.
If you feel that you have had a message removed in error, please go to Settings/My Removed Posts to request a review.
I don't know if you have noticed but someone/a team of people are trying to get as many shares under or at .004 they can. MM is start to raise to .006 now after 100-200k shares of buying pressure. Starting to get coiled here!
It as also an Ihub board. Just read a few months back to the beginning of this year and you'll see a lot of the same bantering by different people that you see here now. HDVY has two NDA agreements for its two most important tests and no news has been heard and no information can be told by the company itself until the companies themselves talk about it...which has not happened.
There are many, many parallels between that stock and MOPN now that we have a different kind of, but similar to an NDA kind of situation with the "big oil company" and other smaller agreements that they can't elaborate on.
No I haven't. If it makes any difference I will share the symbol: it is 'HDVY'. You will be eerily surprised with how similar the message board is in regards to "someday we will get revenue, and this will take surely take off!" kinda posts.
Right before close the MM dropped to .07 ASK and put 42,500 shares through at ask. Classic!
That and we finally get a CPA to audit them and DFS does some DD on the accountant and finds out that his most recent experience was at Arthur Anderson handling "large accounts" or something, LOL!
Once again, this reminds me of another stock I'm in that I compared MOPN to once before.
That company has agreements with everyone and additional agreements and contracts with other companies being announced all the time. Where does the share price go? It goes flat or down mildly. It is the market humbly saying: 'wheres the beef at?'
Once we get any tangible revenue booked or projected over time, this will take off. Then and only then, IMO.
Oh, its the conclusion I have reached as well. Trust me.
We will probably remain in this range of .06-.08~ until hard numbers or projections are released or a few mysteries are solved, hopefully a few are in the Oakley report.
Another day, another PR, another bummer.
vulgarity is why...you can't use a cuss word with an asterisk for the vowel. Talk to the admin about it yourself or read the TOS. Have a good night.
Yeah I'm kinda surprised as well. Definitely bodes well for now.
No sellers at the bid, eh?
Alright, come on, why the 100 share trade? REALLY. WHY?
And better than the new low it hit briefly yesterday!
Even if someone paints it to .07-.08 I'll still be only to sell (most easily) at bid which is usually quite lower. So yeah, enough already with the need to paint this. It'll move when it moves and when it wants to move.
I'm with the shot of scotch at this point, propping up the ask is a silly thing to keep stating and is getting quite old to hear, IMO.
I'd rather see the ending price reflect big buys rather than some bs 100 share trade.
Fair enough, lol.
Well, not the closing I was expecting. Hope we get some news this week!
Wish we had a tighter spread here...volume has fallen off a cliff since this morning. The ask has been unchanged since the minor volume surge though, which is odd.
levitate, maybe. Fly, still too soon to call.
and right when you posted that they raised the bid
MMs trying to hold it back, .065x.069 now. All buys...
Jeez ur telling me? Man, I still shiver when I remember that day we got 1000 shares of volume.
Except for 1000 shares sold, we are all buys, something is up here.
Dunno, but we are on track to beat the volume of many weeks combined!
two more buys cracked off...ask to .07 hmmmmm
Now that I check, we are at 100% buys in L2 on ~160k volume...me like!
Thanks for that...interesting.
Another 50k buy?
50k isn't bad for a buy at this time of day!
The quote system for stocks is down all across Ihub...not just us!
Agree with the communication and sometimes cryptic responses. Definitely. But riddle me this, what if we do get some tangible and recurring revenues or some major development? A lot of my investments flatline for months or years to just wake up and run like a scalded dog.
I'm not overly invested here, but I'm certainly willing to give it a chance considering how far they've come. Would you?
Read the Ihub TOS, please. WE CAN'T REMOVE HIS POST.
It is his opinion and he is entitled to it and there is no proof either way. I am not taking sides here, but please stop asking to remove his posts.
He has the right to post here as much as anyone. Please read the stickynote from admin at the top of the page and refrain from letting his posts "get to you".
Everything you say is correct. Just wondering why such a huge discrepancy was painted in regards to the Oakley commentary coming out. I have no doubt it will come out, and that things are in the works, but it does us a disservice to state two time frames to two different people. That is all...
There is not much to tell, but I find it quite perplexing that he would tell two different people two different time frames. Unless it has something to do with the "additional information" MOP was allowing to be included in the report that shauno mentioned earlier.
Oh boy...the waiting game continues.
Thanks for chatting with him and sharing what you found though!
Thanks ginuwine, but I am confused now...
from goforitmop's post:
I just called Larry Oakley and had a 10 minute conversation. I asked him when the report would be out. He said in a couple of days he is writing it as we speak.
I am writing a Research Report on MOP now, and hope to have it completed in a couple of weeks.