Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
felix...i've got 1.4 million shares betting that Bob will take us up the pps. my fingers are crossed. tks. em
i'm still holding 50k shares in the ROTH. since i think the pps is going to $0.0001 and i'm tired and i missed getting more of my $ out, i just took this opportunity to get a little of my $ back as a point of closure, realization and to find another company to invest in.
true or not, you have to admit it was a great plan. good enough to capture my $19K. that's my only point in touting Andrew and PV's possible involvement in it all. nothing happened it seems until Andrew got involved with Dennis. Dennis may have had some ideas moldering around in Loftwerks but it took Andrew to break them loose.
i agree w/you. i'm reporting the PR's. sending 50 million shares from nevada to "the Arabs" is a fact reported by the company, as i read it. that puts the company on the spot.
it sounded at one point like SLJB stockholders would have been at the end of the line of equity ownership in AR. that would have been a downer.
if Andrew and PV were to get back in then something positive could happen. i say that because Andrew or both of them no doubt are capable of visionary thinking...their ethics and ability to actualize their vision may be a little shakey however but i don't think Steve and family, alone, could have put togegther the plan we saw PR'd last year. it was a great plan. the street bought it. they could do that again but this time with verifiable substance.
tks otterman. that was sort of my point. Bob has been at this for 20 years. Something in his company has gotten in the way of development/market success. Maybe a Jerry Jones syndrome where it has been past time for the owner to bring a capable CEO/COO on board to take the company forward.
seeker1: much appreciated DD. tks.
uw86: but, but, but a company that has the management to take it somewhere (up) doesn't have to be prodded by a regulatory body. that kind of company is already ahead of the curve, building, creating, delivering. i ate another $7,752 of SLJB @ 09:39 this a.m. Sold 85,000 @ .006.
felix...ouch! i was to lazy to research it and really wonder how long Bob has been developing RSHN. it does seem most of what has been developed past the Rush drinks has been in the past year, year-and-a-half.
that nevada share count showed 50 mil being sent out and it was PR'd that the shares went to "the Arabs". that was at the time Wessal was going to buy 25% of the O/S in the open market and was going to put $25 mil into the pot to get the UAE projects underway.
PV said they wanted too much control of the company and the $25 mil was refused and Wessal didn't complete the purchases. ...something like that. After that, PV decided to not put Consultech into the SLJB shell and so on.
how long has Bob been developing RSHN as a company?
EarnestDD. Good info indeed. It is still a mystery about those 50,000,000 shares sent from Nevada to "the Arabs".
Interesting. Tks whistles. I hadn't heard that before. em
Earlier, some were wondering if Sam's was owned by Sam Sulja or was named after him. Just an interesting question at the time.
IMO, when Andrew had an interest in Sulja and PV seemed to be in it, the pps had a chance of increasing but now it appears that Sulja served Andrew's purpose (maybe prematurely) and all things Sulja will now probably go back to small town Canada in operation and pps potential. It had its day.
I think it's all going to go bye bye. Those of them who still want to work or entrepreneur will do something like starting up the Aberta operation but I doubt there will ever be a connection to SLJB.
If I was Steve, PV and Andrew, I'd have an answer for everything. One of Andrew's close friends and fellow NANNACO executive is an attorney. They wouldn't be stupid enough to put something out there that would place them in a lie.
not the kind of business plan that would result in a meaningful increase in the pps. there are a million building supplies store fronts out there.
that is likely. i don't think there is a chance of audited financials. if they are produced and published all the better. i'll hoist a Sheiner Bock in clebration.
MUST READING: This is a May 2006 press release. Note that Gottbetter provided financial advice and later in 2006 Adam Gottbetter opened up a HEDGE FUND in his name. Hello, HEDGE FUND people.
-------------------------------------------------------------
LoftWerks/Sulja Completes Audited Company Financials
Distribution Source : Market Wire
Date : Friday, May 05, 2006
WINDSOR, ON -- (Market Wire - May 05, 2006) -- LoftWerks Inc. (OTC: LFWK) announces its first exchange move milestone has been achieved. On May 4th, 2006, the merged company of LoftWerks Inc. and Sulja Brothers Building Supplies completed audited financials. The audits were conducted by a premier international accounting firm. The financials were submitted to the Company Directors and Gottbetter & Partners, LLP on the same day.
CEO Steve Sulja commented: "The completion of the audited financials solidifies the recent merger. We are now integrated and moving forward with our merger plans. With any merger, obstacles and delays occur as we familiarize ourselves with each other's operations. I am pleased that we are past that merger phase and working towards our new aligned corporate goals. There are many exciting developments for out shareholders in the near future."
This contains forward-looking information within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may be identified through the use of words such as "expects," "will," "anticipates," "estimates," "believes," or statements indicating certain actions: "may," "could," "should" or "might occur." Such forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. The actual result may differ materially from such forward-looking statements. The company does not undertake to publicly update or revise its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make it clear that any projected results (expressed or implied) will not be realized.
I'm cornfuzzled. I'll post a couple of photos of my garage which should have about the same meaning to SLJB shareholders as photos of anything supposedly Sulja or PV or ADeVIII. I have a 4X8' sheet of plywood leaning up against a wall and a partially opened bale of celulose insulation sitting there and once in a while a neighbor or two are seen walking down the road. I don't think we are looking at a future Bechtel or Home Depot to be created by Steve or his lott. In the nearterm and considering the current action in the stockmarket, we'd probably do better by putting a few $$$'s into a money market account.
LoftWerks and KORE first affiliation, FYI:
LoftWerks Announces Domestic JV With Kore International Mgt., Inc.:
Market Wire, December, 2005
LoftWerks, Inc. (OTC: LFWK) today announced a joint venture agreement with Kore International Management, Inc. and has identified two project venues. The proposed sites are Savannah, Georgia, and New Orleans, Louisiana. Initial venues will be managed by Kore International Inc. corporate officials along with Dennis Ammerman, CEO of LoftWerks, Inc. The projects will encompass residential facilities and commercial building refurbishings. Kore officials say that $8M (USD) will be allocated as the initial budget for property acquisition. "These projects serve many purposes for LoftWerks," said Ammerman. "Primarily, we will exhibit our design techniques and accessories that accentuate the elements we think have strong ties to the urbane 'Southern lifestyle' and the culture of a bygone era," said Ammerman, LoftWerks, Inc. CEO. "We are fortunate to have a partner like Kore that shares our vision and ideals."
Andrew DeVries III, NANNACO and their change in core corporate strategy, FYI:
NANNACO, INC. Announces Change in Core Business Strategy
SAN ANTONIO, Dec. 5 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Today, C.E.O. of NANNACO,
INC., (OTC Bulletin Board: NNCO) Andrew DeVries, III announced a new business
strategy to be effective January 1st, 2004. NANNACO will direct all its
efforts to building a holding company which combines accretive acquisitions of
development stage firms in its areas of expertise, mainly environmentally
friendly manufacturing and production companies, fuel production and
manufacturing companies, and cleaning services companies. This change is
expected to dramatically increase operational performance, and bring NANNACO
to a break even monthly run rate by June 2004. NANNACO recently announced a
joint venture with Innovation Energy and Technology, LLC (IE&T).
The company currently has five project development agreements, and three
consulting appointments including joint venture, co-marketing and project
development agreements for growing and developing companies. Revenues from
these existing contracts are expected to exceed $5,000,000 for our Company
over the next 12 months.
"We are fortunate to see many terrific opportunities to build both our
company and shareholder value including, candidates for JVs and mergers. And
while we do not believe that we have the ability to select that one perfect
developing company or joint venture partner in the industries that we will
target, we do believe that our selection of the choice few will result in near
term operational improvement. We are currently in discussions with a number
of quality firms in our target industries who share our business goals, namely
to build and operate new companies in growing industries within our realm of
expertise. (NANNACO has a fiscal year ending of September 30)," said DeVries.
"The long-awaited shift in our core business dealings is beginning to show
great promise to everyone involved."
Statements in this news release that are not historical facts, including
statements about plans and expectations regarding products and opportunities,
demand and acceptance of new or existing products, capital resources and
future financial results are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties, which may cause the Company's actual results
in future periods to differ materially from those expressed. These
uncertainties and risks include changing consumer preferences, lack of success
of new products, loss of the Company's customers, competition and other
factors discussed from time to time in the Company's filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
For further information, please contact Andrew DeVries, III at
(210) 545-3570, or send correspondence to 2935 Thousand Oaks, #6-261, San
Antonio, TX 78247.
i've go to admit i haven't looked at Woody's pics. i don't have any interest. so far as i know the Alberta thing has nothing to do with SLJB stockholders. i am guessing SLJB has been liquidated and we are just the twitching before rigamortis sets in.
so i'm NOT a long? i was too greedy to let go. i was holding for the $4/share that would have "easily" facilitated NASDAQ listing. hell, i was thinking why not $10, $20/share.
the story was great as PR'd. so i'm not a long? let's see, i was in before the LOFT/SMMW merger and i'm not a long. i guess i don't have any idea what a long is?
...former Navy IS here, photo interpreter and NAVSECGRU before that...CTR. it's a small world.
...and we know the only part of Loftwerks SLJB merged with was the empty public shell. Ammerman and Andrew took the Loftwerks part with the assets private. That's the way it looks anyway.
I bought LOFT back in March of '06. Is that long enough to be a long? I made 12 or more buys right through .12/share for an average pps of .09 all based upon company PR's, 99% of which (maybe 100%) did not come to fruition. The much PR'd and delayed AF's were simply the last straw put out there by PV. Did you spend any time reading his BLOG on the SLJB website? SLJB squandered ALL good will on the part of common stock investors. IMO, the pps is going to $0.0001 w/o a bid for after all, SLJB has no verified assets or prospects. SLJB stockholders have no idea what assets, if any, are in the SLJB shell. The OSC has identified potential assets but those need to be proven to be in the SLJB shell. There comes a time when it is stupid for investors to put one more dollar into a company like SLJB unless supported by verified, 3rd party confirmation. Granted if SLJB does make some positive progress, skeptical investors will miss the absolute bottom but that is a risk worth taking. Nothing should happen now on the part of investors and potential investors without 3rd party verification. Anything else would just be stupid investing. IMO.
my "former" wife's husband of 25 years just kicked. so she dumped me 4 him and he's dead. life is funny that way.
Tks, Jannie. The best 2 U. em
smart but not smart for those who jump in at this point with $$$ they will worry about. the time to move in on this one will be when management finally shows some positive movement that can be verified to be true.
Ok GRande25, knock it off. You and I were born here in the same month. I don't give a rat's ass what anyone thinks about this stock. The point of my stating that I finally sold shares will mean something to those long-timers with whom I have shared thoughts about SLJB over the past year +.
I don't have an agenda. I don't care if anyone buys or sells. For those posters who know me, I'm finally on record as saying I think it an't going to happen and I'm finally realizing the losses I have been sitting on for almost a year now. If anything good comes out of Alberta or Roberta or the Middle East or middle school or PV or VP or anyone with a III at the end of their name then that'll be good because I'll still be holding a bag with 50,000 shares @ $0.09/share in it. So now go focus on some other poster. You're wearing on me.
transaction number ending with 130, capacity code:3, representative:FF, CUSIP 865106108, principal amount of sale: $351.00, sales fee: 0.01, trade date: 8/30/07, settlement date: 9/5/07, commission $9.95, net amount: $341.04, unsolicited trade. i don't know what else i can tell ya. em
i dumped my subscription so i have to go the public avenue.
Stutt is still excellent. Day trips to the Bodensee, Rothenburg O.D. Tauber and Heidelberg. Central location. You'll like going back.
Oh GRande25: I dumped the 65,000 in a taxable acct and will be able to write off $7k over a couple of years. The 135,000 i'm still holding is in a ROTH and as you know i can't take a loss in a ROTH unless i sell out the whole acct. That's not something i'd want to do so after fretting over it all for 16 months or so as an original LOFT'y and holding out for audited financials, mega-deals, uplisting to the NASDAQ (yes, Steve PR'd NASDAQ...as best as I can recall), PV putting Consultech into the shell and a turn-around based upon verifiable facts, I've pretty much given up. I'll still hold 50,000 shares and see what happens to them but I don't expect anything other than it going to $0.0001 and no bid. I thought I'd at least walk away with something more than zero for my trouble and drinking the coolaid so I sold some shares. At this point...and much earlier on...I don't believe a word of anything Steve or PV have said or are reported to have said, nada. The and the company has no credibility in the financial markets. They squandered what little they had last Nov. 15th. That is when the last of the smart stockholders got out. This company isn't worth any effort anymore. What do they have on deck that could possibly raise the pps to even $0.01 at this point and why should we settle for that? there are smarter places to risk our investment capital imo.
MuchCom...: Patch Barracks and stayed at the Hilltop most of the time on TDY or at the Relaxa in Busnau...off and on from 1995-2000. Got in on the EUCOM workup to Kosovo. (NAVY)
I was there most of 1999. ...and you?
tld55...just maybe you don't know everything. all i know is that i have an execution in my TDAmeritrade acct. yesterday on the sell side 65,000 @ $0.0054. they were bidding .004 and offering at .006 today when i was trying to get rid of 85,000 @ $0.0054. in the last 30 min i changed that to $0.0053 but no luck. i have an active trading acct. w/them & $9.95 commission so i dunno. maybe that figured into it.
maybe if you live to be 140.
jerryrth: I was stationed in southern De in Stuttgart. Haven't been back for a few years now. Maybe next year. It's about time for the Ramstein Christmas Bazaar. Good stuff.
it closed at $0.006 today and i had an offer in to sell 85,000 at $0.0054 and no takers. maybe tuesday i'll get a fill.