Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm going to end the debate because I am sure Admin is tired of the worn out dialogue, so I won't post any more rebuttals.
As I said, we were given a directive by Admin Shelly that outlined what stays and what should be deleted. If she wants to modify that directive, that's under her purview.
For those that said Second Life is ADCS, that'd be nice as even I'd buy the stock at the current levels. Unfortunately, ADCS is just another merchant on Second Life. It's no different than if I started a stock club board on ihub, it wouldn't make my stock club a part of ihub. It's just a conduit.
Sure, if there's a bona fide link, it'll stay. But if it's bootstrapped (such as, "ADCS is on Second Life. Coca Cola, Walmart, Nike, are all on Second Life. Coca Cola has revenues in the billions of dollars"), Sylvre will delete it in accordance with Admin's guidelines.
Admin Shelly gave the mods specific and unambiguous instructions as to what's on topic and what needs deleted. I have asked her permission to post those guidelines so that the users know her position and so the posters can negotiate the guidelines directly with Admin.
Does anyone have the EXACT updated transfer agent numbers?
If you do, please let me know the date they were obtained.
First, that press release was recalled. Second, I agree that a message about the Idol Center on Second Life would be on topic. Just like a discussion of the VStarr You Tube ad that "adcsps" uploaded is on topic. But to say that a general discussion that Dr. Pepper, Toyota, and others advertised via a YouTube ad also has nothing to do with ADCS.
Second Life is a huge platform, ADCS has a tiny module therein. I could start a group on Second Life, wouldn't be on topic for ADCS.
Agreed, I'm just questioning the poster's desire to personally attack the people who post negative comments. It doesn't help their agenda. On ADCS, the mods do not look at the positive or negative tone of the message, only the TOU.
Sometimes comparisons are in order with respect to stocks, and if ADCS wasn't under so much scrutiny alot of them would probably stay.
Understand, on the other hand, that we have people posting messages that have nothing to do with ADCS. They're saying "On Second Life, Coca Cola and Walmart advertise." It like saying, "On my television, I can get Fox News and CNN."
It has nothing to do with the company. Because it's being done repeatedly, over and over, to a point of being orchestrated promotion, it's deleted.
Nobody can even read about the company because the board is being flooded with messages that have nothing to do with ADCS and aren't comparisons.
The test that the ADCS moderators use is whether the post discusses another poster in a negative fashion, or whether it's about people who post rather than the company.
You stated that ADCS was under attack. This wasn't a general statement, but was referring to some messages on the board.
You pondered "how many people did the shorts hire here," implying that the posters were paid by people who "short" the stock.
You questioned the motives of the poster by stating that people who posted were attempting "push" the stock price "down."
Finally, you inferred it was an act of "desperation" by the people who post.
If you're looking for ADCS to be successful, or at least it's share price, positive facts about the company would help more than banter trying to intimidate people to stop posting. More importantly, you actually bring attention to the negative messages by attacking those posters.
For instance, if the poster says, "Gee, this is a terrible stock, it has nothing going for it," in an hour or so, it's buried. If you attack the poster, call him a short, he's going to reply. He'll say, "I'm not short, I simply think the company is a scam..." Then you'll say, "Go away," and he'll say, "I'm not going away, this stock is clearly positioned to go down, and I think people should know."
Now the same negative message that you tried to make go away was amplified three times.
Think about it.
--------------------------
wow, ADCS is under attack..how many people did the shorts hire here...somethin is up ....even people who dont have any "desire" to own are trying to push this down further...desperation at its finest....
ADCS moderators have been given specific instructions by Admin about what is and what is not on topic on the board. We were instructed to delete, as off topic, conversations which discuss Second Life generally since it really has nothing to do with the company or it's plans. Your particular message isn't even about SL, it's more of a personal message that should be by Private Message.
Unfortunately, the majority of the discussions on ADCS are nonsensical one-liners that don't help anyone learn about the company. I don't think the barrage of messages such as telling someone to meet them on SL helps people who are pro the stock or con the stock, and most of the messages fall into the same category of fluff.
It's almost as if the whole goal is simply to keep messages coming so that the board remains highly ranked on ihub. But that won't help the share price go up as the charts show, it only confuses potential investors who have nothing intelligent to read.
ADCS Posters: Per Admin's instructions, all posts containing discussions of deleted posts, personal attacks on users, or off topic discussions will be deleted.
The method to appeal a deletion is to click on Tools and then My Removed Posts.
I will review the deletions made by my assistant moderators, and if I do not reinstate it, then it will be reviewed by Admin. If they do not reinstate it, then it was a violation of TOU.
ADCS Posters: Please discuss only the company. Here is a message from Admin Matt regarding the terms of use. I don't want to delete your messages, but artful talk about the company does not include questioning people who post.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=28809325
Are they related? Is this some deal Brian Kistler set up?
Proceeds from sales of common stock - $610,000
(now most of the cash is gone).
Wonder if they will keep the authorized at 20 million?
To answer your questions:
1. The suit is against the company, not any individuals. A change of name does not eliminate a lawsuit. Mr. Spahr entered an appearance on behalf of the company in the suit, and he was directed to attend Court in Nevada in June 2008.
2. See answer 1 above.
3. There is only one company, it's a Nevada corporation formed in 2003. As stated in the disclosure statement ADCS filed with Pink Sheets, it previously had 6 different names. But it's one company.
4. My suit was originally against Real Hip Hop Matrix. During the pendency of the action, the company changed its name. After the company did so, it failed to continue to pay its legal counsel and he filed a motion to withdraw.
5. There is only one company, it's now known as Advanced Content Services, Inc.
6. Again, there is only one company. If they form a legitimate enterprise, that's great. If they just placed a business model into the shell while VStarr really owns it and shareholders get nothing (similar to what they did five times in two years), then it's bad.
The press release said in their PR that they didn't need any additional capital which begs the question as to why they want or need to be public.
I am not interested in what the stock price is; I am interested in discussing the company generally, good and bad.
I don't wish for the company to fail if they have legitimate operations that investors will benefit from.
The modus operandi, however, has been that six businesses were placed into this shell and investors never received benefit. The businesses didn't go out of business, they were only removed from the shell.
Again, my lawsuit is for defamation for false attacks the company made against me for discussing activities it was involved in. That lawsuit is for what it is for, and my disclosures of information occurred prior to the lawsuit, but not much has changed.
If you are referencing my lawsuit against the company, which is a subject that is on topic, it is not for investment fraud, but only defamation that occurred as a result of my comments about activities of the company. I have not engaged in settlement discussions with the company; and, I certainly never offered to settle the suit.
I can't imagine that the share price would suffer from discussions about the company's structure, management, etc. The company's own admission in its disclosure on Pink Sheets makes it clear that it has no money and no assets. Zero divided by anything is zero. Thus, anything about zero is a bonus and factors in forward looking assumptions.
There were less than 250,000 shares after the r/s.
I don't doubt that the t/a's numbers are correct. It's clear what they did here. They had a couple hundred thousand shares after the reverse split, and they immediately printed about 220,000,000. They simply didn't dump them all.
First, the idea is to "pump." Only thereafter do you dump.
Obviously they dumped some shares onto the market, which is why the price fell to the subpennies.
They being the company's nominees which most likely were done through alleged debt or other tricks.
This is the same scenario used by this company over the last three years.
Nothing but a talent contest hosted on Second Life. Inferences that Second Life is somehow involved with the company appear meant to gain momentum for this high risk stock. It's kind of like saying because your business has a Myspace page that Myspace is somehow tied to it.
Do you know what percentage we actually own?
The price of entry is $25-- and I think that's virtual world money. So 20 entries is $500?
The website was created by the company as you might know from reading my lawsuit for defamation.
My theory is that they issued the shares to their nominees either for alleged debt or some other squirrely method. I'd love to hear an official answer from the company since they went so far as to say they didn't use Reg D.
... and in late 2007 there were only 250,000 shares. So the question is where did they come from?
People, please discuss the company not each other, personal issues, deleted messages, accusations against members, etc. Posts about the company will be the only things that remain here.
One what?
ADCS POSTERS: Please discuss ADCS and try to avoid attacks or talking about other stocks. Messages are deleted if there is any form of attack contained therein.
The reason you have a "joint venture" company is so you can pull the assets from the shell the same way this company did when it was CCDX (weight loss centers gone), RHMX (hip hop channel gone), MSGM (alleged music contracts gone), IMMN (alleged mineral contracts gone).
Since VStarr and ADCS essentially are one in the same, let's say VStarr is successful with it's business, what percentage do we receive from the operation?
Joint venture doesn't necessary mean 50/50.
0.0012 180000 OTO 15:40:32
0.0012 201700 OTO 15:09:30
0.0015 30000 OTO 13:41:26
0.002 30000 OTO 13:41:26
0.0015 62500 OTO 13:35:05
0.0018 38000 OTO 12:50:14
0.002 100000 OTO 12:50:12
0.002 50000 OTO 12:50:01
0.002 5800 OTO 12:46:24
0.002 100000 OTO 12:35:27
0.0015 124706 OTO 12:26:17
0.0015 215000 OTO 12:25:40
0.0015 200000 OTO 11:07:28
0.0015 100000 OTO 11:01:52
0.0015 130000 OTO 10:50:05
0.0015 10000 OTO 10:49:53
0.0015 15000 OTO 10:29:43
0.0015 100000 OTO 10:09:49
0.0015 40000 OTO 10:02:48
0.0015 340000 OTO 09:44:06
0.0015 50000 OTO 09:40:12
0.0015 10000 OTO 03/26
0.0015 276854 OTO 03/26
0.0015 50000 OTO 03/26
0.0011 395000 OTO 03/26
0.0015 200000 OTO 03/26
0.0015 63000 OTO 03/26
0.0015 120146 OTO 03/26
0.0011 520000 OTO 03/26
0.0011 250000 OTO 03/26
That is true, providing we actually have a true interest with our joint venture partner. It's still not disclosed what portion of any revenues go to us and what portion go to the partner. None of the press releases mentioned any partner, they all inferred this was our business.
is the a/s still 20 million?
One thing is for certain, every moderator on ihub has a conflict of interest. They either own the stock and want it to go up, some have disclosed that they are receiving payment from the companies, etc.
My lawsuit was for defamation because the company created a website to attack me personally. The incidents occurred after I spoke out about dangers of the company's stock, not before. The long term chart speaks for itself.
I do list the lawsuit in the ibox on ADCS because the company has been ordered by a federal magistrate judge to appear by legal counsel, and the federal magistrate judge recommended judgment by default because legal counsel wasn't hired as she ordered. To date (and I checked tonight), the court order has been ignored. I think that tells you the seriousness of the company's financial situation.
I don't know how you would feel if you were a long term investor and you read an ibox and didn't get that kind of information. It's nothing to do with bias. The ibox also contains a link to every press release from the company, etc. I can't imagine a more balanced ibox.
On the contrary, only personal attacks are deleted on ADCS, and we can't even keep up -- most of the deletions are by Admin on ADCS because we're too liberal.
"Strategic alliance" was authorized? I have no evidence of that.
I don't think for a minute it's not true that the idea may be subject of a case study; however, calling it a strategic alliance seems quite deceptive.
But just go to the website and the Board of Trustees information is there.
My friend has been in touch with the Board of Trustees and the Chancellor's office.
The problem is Purdue didn't authorize the press release inferring an affiliation.
It's not a small float, and the company has an authorized of 500 million, up from 250 million under the prior regime.