The test that the ADCS moderators use is whether the post discusses another poster in a negative fashion, or whether it's about people who post rather than the company.
You stated that ADCS was under attack. This wasn't a general statement, but was referring to some messages on the board.
You pondered "how many people did the shorts hire here," implying that the posters were paid by people who "short" the stock.
You questioned the motives of the poster by stating that people who posted were attempting "push" the stock price "down."
Finally, you inferred it was an act of "desperation" by the people who post.
If you're looking for ADCS to be successful, or at least it's share price, positive facts about the company would help more than banter trying to intimidate people to stop posting. More importantly, you actually bring attention to the negative messages by attacking those posters.
For instance, if the poster says, "Gee, this is a terrible stock, it has nothing going for it," in an hour or so, it's buried. If you attack the poster, call him a short, he's going to reply. He'll say, "I'm not short, I simply think the company is a scam..." Then you'll say, "Go away," and he'll say, "I'm not going away, this stock is clearly positioned to go down, and I think people should know."
Now the same negative message that you tried to make go away was amplified three times.
Think about it.
--------------------------
wow, ADCS is under attack..how many people did the shorts hire here...somethin is up ....even people who dont have any "desire" to own are trying to push this down further...desperation at its finest....
