Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
IMO if you file an answer, pro se or not, you admit to their jurisdiction.
perfectly childish imo. This is the level you maintain?
Im pretty sure all info is available to all defendants. The best part is if we get to discovery, then all you megasites will really find out how deep into your panty drawer megas can get.
Thats why I just did a response with no info, when everyone was on here calling me a basher. I knew I would have my day when the koolaid drinkers finally woke up to what is happening.
The irritated on here don't fear the stock trading. THe stock would be trading if Megas would have done what needed be. We are outraged by being sued by megas. Penny ceos don't engender trust among the wise Hurley. Especially those that sue you personally for making an investment in their company.
Should not matter what the price is to the evil MM. You guys are too much.
What guarantees do we have that if the shares are judged invalid, that we will be able to cash in against our brokers? 0 imo 0
I would give 10:1 payback on money bet that a cash in against brokers will happen.
countersue is one thing, sanctions are another. They both get to the same spot. Anyone who supports megas in his suit against themselves and thier fellow shareholders is a traitor and a wuss imo.
There are some, no doubt, but this is not what the suit is about. Megas is talking fake certs in his claims.
Tell if you know. Enlighten me.
Benefits of him confiscating shares are to increase his own percentage ownership. So he can go back jack do it again.
In keeping with the cat food analogy, how about, instead of a witch hunt, a fishing expedition?
Tell me whats not odd about this thing? Including all these posters who, as defendants in a fraud suit, spin fascinating, elaborate arguments in support of megas, the plaintiff who sued them.
I stand by my statement. You have morphed NSS into megas suing us, the shareholders of BCIT. There is zero correlation.
Well imo brokers and stockholders, like you and me are not the reason Molson.
makes no difference. There are none.
Giving up personal info to the plaintiff without a direct requirement from the court is not advised. You should at least talk to a securities attorney in OK before doing anything. The people on this board who are pushing the template are of questionable motive imo.
At this point, Fido doesnt know what Megas is trying to do. No clue dude. None. Nada. So you and your pals on here know more or act like you do anyway.
They apparently have hired an attorney to represent shareholders, not themselves. They were'nt sued. Where is the negative in that? You and pals keep attributing bad to everything except the person who sued you. WEIRD!!!
My broker has nothing to do with BCIT not trading.
In chess, you look at the next two or three moves. Thats how I play the game. Usually I win. I will win this from Megas too.
...and the costs involved in that? Does anyone think it possible to accomplish without an attorney? With an attorney, thousands? Tens of thousands?
I'm not having any problem with my broker. They are doing nothing. They gave me a copy of my transaction, thats it. Instead of answering my questions, they say thank you for the business, here are copies of your transaction.
So are you saying here that the suit has been dismissed entirely? Post with some clarity dude.
I am waiting to see the trick of getting from the totally unpredictable result of this suit to the stock trading. How is that mapped out I wonder? Thats the hope of the faithful though.
I think a lot of this stuff is being brought up for the good of discussion for all. Its an online community.
Classaction suit is a bad idea imo.
Art a ceo is responsible, thus the title, the duties, the rewards. The buck stops there. You can't have a victim ceo, they are mutually exclusive terms. A ceo of a penny, with nothing much else but stock to sell, seems to me needs to be right on top of the stock situation at all times.
This is one of Megas's dereliction of duties as ceo imo. It happened on his watch.
Its my understanding that the faithful believe that according to Megas there was a crooked TA, manning a special phone number and okaying the bad certs.
I would bet that one never happening and easily give 10 to 1. LOL.
But the question remains, why not just do it the right way to start with? So we need a federal court to trade. Why not sue in federal court the people who had the fake certs. But he already sued for the fake certs and won. LOL. Right? Reminds me of a dog chasing its tail
Yes I read it a few times before. Still does not justify suing shareholders or accomplish anything to fix that problem.imo.
So the DTCC needs an Oklahoma county court to rule in order to let a stock trade? Says who? Santa Claus?
Who got the money you paid for the BCIT stock?
Sue clearing houses then, if thats who they are after. Big difference between clearing houses and company stockholders.
What you said may be a problem. But, its not the problem of shareholders. Why are we footing the bill for it, with time and legal fees? Why is our good name being dragged through the mud for this farce? A lot of people here have good names in thier communities that they want to preserve. They are leaders and good citizens. Obviously some of you could care less. That tells all of us something about you.
Fact: By virtue of the list he sued from, he had to know persons on it never had fake certs imo.
Since the judgement deals with certs, they'll know who has what, good and bad, and clearly all of us that provided proof of purchases thru our brokers have nothing to worry about.
Proof to plaintiff that you purchased through broker? The plaintiff got s/h names from NOBO list. DUH. Screw giving proof. I want proof why I was sued. Thats what you need to ask.
Well the city actually has money that can be tapped for a damage claim. LOL.
all i'm saying is that most of the rebelliousness by the defendants is understandable, but getting a bit carried awya, and may in fact end up costing you more money, and NOT helping anything...
Why do you call defendants rebellious? Odd choice of words. A defendant that expresses a desire to clear his good name is a rebel to you?
i don't know how this case will end up, i want to see this trade, but mostly i am interested in fixing a broken system
You chastise average investor for wanting a jury trial to protect himself and good name. You said how that is a waste of money, but you make a statement saying you primarily want to fix a broken system? You think sacrificing stock, money, and good name for this ideology of an alleged broken system involving NSS is what one should do here? Knowing that you have been sued for fraud by a pinky CEO, that has nothing at all to do with NSS? Thats like instead of fighting a parking ticket you receive in the mail, because you don't own a car, you pay it anyway to help fight corruption at city hall. Makes no sense.
Usually they start raising the price immediately. Remember: they don't care what the price is; they make money on the spread. The spread narrows when volume is high, but then they make more trades.
So few understand this.