Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That's right. There's a quiet period that must be observed during the filing of an S1.
Ill-focused and immaterial. Nothing to do with anything going on today with ESCU.
This is totally irrelevant. It's not in the pervue of what's going on with ESCU today.
Correction: $300K
More bosh! ESCU has $300 in debt, owed to AJW Partners, an offshore entity. That's it. Where does this stuff come from???
Say what? Sorry, but none of this makes sense.
ESCU has simply been getting its bookkeeping and filings in order. That's it. No announcements. No promotions.
I don't know what the heck you're talking about.
No,it's definitely irrelevant. And frankly, tired and old.
A total waste of time. Nothing has been presented for the market to consider.
This is moot. It has nothing to do with anything.
ESCU has made NO ANNOUNCEMENTS about its actions.
Until this this is simply a waste of time.
This is all very simple. The past is the past. This is the NOW.
This is no longer relevant. A total waste of time to discuss.
Tempest in a tiny teapot. Not worth brewing.
It doesn't matter what anyone else is doing in Pakistan. It's a big country with lots of opportunity for everyone.
This is all tortured logic, and at the end of the day it means nothing.
ESCU is not dumping shares, and none of the rest of this makes a bit of sense.
ESCU has not said that it has a "saleable" product today.
Let's not revise history, please. The reverse split initially took the stock to $3, not $4 per share. And that's what the "ask" is now.
Why should they? They're obviously not concerned with promoting the stock right now. They are building their business. They are keeping investors informed via their filings.
Meanwhile the stock is still sitting at $3 on the "ask".
Actually the financials show that Ms Kimmons never was paid a nickel in stock or cash. Check the facts.
Kimmons left 3 years ago and his wife left 6 years ago. They are not focused on ESCU.
Wondering what they may or may not be doing or thinking is a total waste of time.
I forgot to mention that Kimmons is NO LONGER AN AFFILIATE or CONTROL PERSON in view of his relinquishment of the 1000 Preferred voting shares and he held and the fact that he owns less than 10% of ESCU's issued and outstanding shares.
He currently holds 1% of the ESCU shares.
Here are the FACTS regarding Kimmons' involvement with ESCU today.
Those questioning Gary Kimmons' current relationship with ESCU should check out the following disclosures filed with OTCM several years ago:
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=ESCU&id=116007
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=ESCU&id=121731
Where's the BEEF, bro? Give me some FACTS. Let's talk about the elephant in the room, rather than a bunch of trivial BS.
I see lots of questions, but I guess mine is being ignored.
Where is the evidence of Kimmons' active involvement.
Can you establish credibility on this issue?
Hello? Can you share your evidence with us regarding Kimmons actively running ESCU?
I'm sorry I missed your response to my question. Please share your evidence that Kimmons is actively involved in and running ESCU.
Funny. The SEC doesn't seem to be having any problem with what they've seen so far.
This is about ESCU today, not Kimmons and yesterday.
I'm sorry, I'm not clear from your response. Do you have evidence that you can share with us that indicates Gary Kimmons is currently running ESCU?
What evidence do you have that Kimmons is working with ESCU today? Please point us to the evidence.
Hold on, please clarify. Are you saying that Gary Kimmons and his family are running ESCU today?
Let me get this straight. You are saying that you believe that Gary Kimmons is in charge of and running ESCU today? You see him as actively involved in what is going on with ESCU.
Is that correct?
That tired old dog won't hunt any more, bro.
Questions and statements about Kimmons are irrelevant in today's world. ESCU has moved on.
I'm sure ESCU can do a better job of explaining what an S1 is. I suggest you give them a call for clarification.
I'm not sure what there is to misunderstand here. The S1 is an option vs the 10K. It's considered to be one step beyond what's required in a 10K.
Producing and filing an S1 is much more time consuming and expensive in terms of the legal and accounting involved.
The S1 carries more weight with the SEC than a 10K. It is more comprehensive and has more detail regarding the company's securities transactions.
ESCU is filing an S1 because of it's aim to register shares for a private offering.
The added benefit of the S1 filing to ESCU's investors is it gives us a complete picture of all of ESCU's previous stock transactions. And guess what? Everything's in good order.
The audited financials filed by ESCU with the SEC. They are the bible.
The facts are the facts, my friend. They are shown in the company's audited financials and S1 filing. And they simply do not support your accusations. At all.
Like I said the audited financials speak volumes. And they do not support any of your contentions.
Really? Why is it that every single share of ESCU stock has been accounted for in the audit, and there's no indication of any significant cash flow from the sale of shares? And no indication that Kimmons sold shares of his own?
What you are speaking of simply did not happen.
Brilliant. But lacking any substance or fact.