Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
or...the typo is they forgot the word "new" and its actually 300,000...
Gorilla glue and old bubble gum...
I also suspect new sec regs and how brokers are banning tickers early pissed off many traders who just quit OTC completely. I am still filing complaints with finra daily because i can't buy pink/current and even otcqx tickers.
SCHWAB is blocking buys! Its been OTCQX for 5 months!
succeed or fail, lawyers always make money either way...
Schwab is the one having trouble with.
Suggest a letter to FINRA about that, I filed one yesterday on $OODH and $VIZC. both have been current for 3 weeks or more yet I cant buy.
How about a high profit margin game shop that has food?
OMG!!! get ready for "its a phone store freak out guy"! Its an old sprint store...
TDA but not schwab...same damn company in theory.
when did this get current? I still can't buy. gonna have to file some complaints I think.
Being custodian does not require that you hold a position, I don't think. If the court has not terminated the custodianship, I would assume the court is still over seeing this transition. I would really like to see a formal motion at the court.
Did The ONE Group make any statements about how they intend to handle the ticker symbol. One group trades under $STKS on Naz.
makes me wonder how all those non-public businesses manage...
I tried to invest in Kona Ice yesterday after seeing one of their trucks...not public.
Only 6mil moved. Looks like most are gonna ride this out into the new company.
well then, Ill see you and raise to $3.50....
That reply was about future cases of CE usage by the OTC on Pink/Current tickers, not about BLLB specifically. Yes, Millers case is about done.
OTC has a tag for "promotions" so I assume CE means they suspect illegal activity.
That was the odd part of the whole mess...the BBQ company still exist. https://bellbucklecompanystore.com/collections/captain-rodney-s-private-reserve
$BLLB is the first instance I have seen where a Pink/Current ticker has a CE tag. I suspect we will begin seeing more though. Companies are being forced to be current to be quoted, this includes the scams. Well funded scams will still exist as they pay the fees and file to remain quoted.
The CE label may start popping up more often as these Pink/Current scams fail OTC's smell test. As long as they are current they can be quoted so, the CE tag is OTC's only way of warning traders until the SEC builds a case.
The new regs just clean out all the dead tickers that could be hyjacked by scammers with no real expense other than pre-loading shares and some fake PR's.
Every states courts act a little different. If this was NV we would know by now, if it were DE we would never know....
Your broker can make up their own rules and have. SEC regs targeted delinquent filers. CE is the OTCM's own way of warning about other issues.
After the 28th delinquent tickers get demoted and MMs can't quote them electronically. If BLLB gets demoted while PINK/Current than I would think they should file a lawsuit.
The CE has nothing to do with SEC regs to my knowledge. The deadline is for being CURRENT and last I looked $BLLB is Current.
First, get past the idea CE labels have any thing to do with being delinquent. If they did, every pink/stop ticker would be CE tagged. Pink/ Current, Pink/ Yield & Pink/ Stop all refer to filings issues and paying your dues.
When you Lose PINK, you are either CE, EXP-MKT or Grey MKT. EXP and Grey MKT demotions are what happen when you don't pay your dues and file your docs.
CE means the OTC thinks your acting illegally. It is a WARNING to traders that something isn't right.
$BLLB still has it despite being PINK/ CURRENT. They paid their dues, they filed all the crap but OTCM has issues/suspicions about the company itself. They have obviously had issues with Miller for awhile.
You will have to research history of CEOs, It is my understanding old (being prosecuted)CEO appointed Kim, current CEO.
Millers stink is stuck to her until OTC decides otherwise. That will probably happen when SEC wraps up prosecuting Miller and closes the book on the whole affair without naming anyone else as a target.
The same purpose all new owners have...to have complete control of the shares so the can use them for their own purpose. They have funds to raise and people to pay with those shares.
In my whiskey...
They have 6 stores soon to be 7. If they cannot generate enough income to pay the bills for at least 5 of those stores without selling stock, then they are in trouble.
Selling stock is for future investments and expansion. It won't keep a failure afloat.
If they are failing I would expect it have happened already or by end of year.
I sold at .10...looking to re-enter at .01. If not I move on.
$1.58...I picked this when I saw another ticker with more shares hit $1.20 last year.( I got out at .75, had to hide my left foot from my gun for 3 days)
odds are the shell is already clean, they just have to go through the legal motions.
He just handed over HRAA odds are he has a customer for this too.
If they hit my ask price and keep it there, they could manage an up list in maybe 12 months.
I think you mean dough...sorry no coffee yet...
No I am not kidding, Bauman did not write that, its the original companies description and their scam website and email address. Custodians do not update that stuff. they change board member names and disclosure documents. to make a change to the description would be fraud(its an empty shell). The custodians SELL these tickers they do not manage them.
Some asshat trying to pump it told everyone it was new info.
who said anything about lithium, that was rumor mill crap based on the OLD dead companies description. Bauman never said anything of the sort.
90% of all buyers RS to maintain control of shares so they can pay people.
Verified profile simply means information given was deemed to be true and accurate. Yes, she is acting CEO. it is not for OTCM to decide otherwise.
It is in the OTCM's purview to warn investors of potential issues
CE is a warning to all investors that something is wrong.
What is wrong with BLLB is that it is linked to a criminal investigation that MAY implicate the CEO. Until SEC has resolved the case it is a big unknown and the CE may stick until the case is resolved.
So here is the problem and probably why the CE is still there. What makes Kim legitimate CEO? Who put her in charge? Was Miller involved? The OTC is waiting for the SEC case to resolve all issues.
I do wish they would lose the Amfil Tech name. WTF is an Amfil? is it like a landfill?
There simply isn't enough interest here. Most are in and waiting or out and waiting. Like I said many won't touch food business stocks until after the fact.
Restaurants are a tricky business. Food trends swing wildly and profit margins are often low. Many investors flat out avoid them until they become a market of their own and are able to over price their wares(like coffee).
I got into Snakes & Lattes because of their unique venue but, it could take years to pay off. $GRLT is less unique and playing in a crowded field. Only time will tell how well they succeed.