Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The filings are bare minimum, but they must either PR their deals or include in filings. They chose to PR which meets the requirements. So they are in compliance with the requirement. If you disagree, provide proof they must include in the filings.
That is opinion, no facts to support that opinion. However, Dryworld brands has put out press releases stating they have deals with SLT and Osprey as well as Darya as an ambassador.
Dryworld brands Inc. That’s what this board represents.
Anything that can’t be substantiated with facts is speculation. Providing facts is what makes it legit. Like saying they don’t have anything for sale or are not For sale on Amazon. Dryworld launched an e-commerce and has products on Amazon. Saying something will Never happen is misleading and false unless you have facts to back it up. Saying that it will happen when the company want it done is a fact. I know how audits work, and there is nothing stopping anyone from getting financials audited. The worst that would happen is the financials get restated with a not so fond opinion letter. Imo stands for “in my opinion”.
Dryworld has completed a lot of the things said would never happen. They will get the audit and ticker changed when they want to get it done. Imo
100% speculation. Provide Proof.
It has been stated here that Dryworld brands doesn’t have an e-commerce site or selling on Amazon, and guess what they did both. The audit and ticker change will happen when the company wants it to happen. Ask any CPA and there is nothing
That will Stop an audit. The financials may get restated, but it won’t prevent The audit from being done. Imo
100% speculation right there. When it happens, then what?
Plus it’s been stated here by some that the old
Shell would not be Able to be audited, and yet now it’s stated it shouldn’t take two years? Well two years of financials are required and we now have two years under Dryworld. Sooooo, It’s one or the other, can’t be both. Imo
You forgot…for the win! Lol
Retail can trade 4 decimal places with fidelity, not 5 or 6 though.
So explain how and where retail can trade decimal 5-6 places then?
Exactly. That’s why my question was ignored. It’s because I’m right, it’s not retail.
Market makers manipulating. Imo
So which broker allows retail to sell deceimal 5-6 positions? Still waiting?
Please explain how retail can do decimal 5-6 digit trades? If you can prove retail is able to do those trades, i'll actually listen. I know for a fact that fidelity's platform won't allow it. So tell me which one will allow it.
Never a doubt that Dryworld brands has the partnership with SLT, no matter how many times it is said it’s not. Dryworld brands for the win. Imo
Otc even says their obligation is to EITHER PR or nclude in filings. They fulfilled the requirement by PRing the events. End of discussion. Imo
Wrong, but it’s been proven multiple times. Dryworld brands and SLT have the deal together.
No doubt, it will happen. Imo
The Same legal documents I obtained states that TCA didn't provide the necessary funds they contractually promised. Well, it's known that TCA was investigated by SEC and shutdown.
I did some DD, I paid $7.00 to obtain legal transcripts where it was stated that the deals Dryworld had in 2016/2017 were worth 250 million canadian dollars over 5 years.
They did it before and I believe they will do it again. imo.
I agree. Everyone should make their own decisions and do what is right for them.
The corp update and progress thus far helps provide me clarity on what is coming. It's a question of who is willing and can wait? IMO
That’s you opinion. Mine is that Dryworld is not. Time will tell. Imo
And there are companies in the otc that are legit too. Dryworld is one of them. Imo
That is absolutely not true and again very misleading. Any real accountant will tell you all financials are auditable. Worst case scenario the financials get restated due to valuation, misclassification or disallowed expenses.
Yeah, the sec has never ever shut down a big board stock for scamming shareholders. MCI/Worldcom or Enron we’re not on the big board huh? SMH
They will. Just need to get audited financials done
Wrong. Provide proof where they MUST be included in the filings. Someone else already provided proof on this site that it doesn’t as long as they have publicly PRd the info. Imo
Implying that it MUST be including in the filing when someone already proved on this board that it doesn’t as long as they have done a public PR is misleading, imo
I have no idea. I go by all public information available to me. So the last corp update says they are working on things that are important to me as an investor, such as:
1) they will be selling Dryworld products in modells online site.
2) they will be doing Licensing deal play sports in the MENA which will put them back into football/soccer, volleyball and basketball.
3) they will be launching their AA collection of their DSkyn in support with their Osprey deal which will be starting soon.
4) they are continuing to work on audited financials to become SEC reporting and then will file with the SEC. So that explains why they haven’t filed yet.
5) lauxana line launches in the 4th quarter who can gets their technical lines out for sale.
6) haute D Essentials launches.
7) China- the deal is an agreement in principle.
So these are only a part of the reason why I’ve invested. Just like in the first 6 months there will be other things as well that aren’t in the corp update that will get done,
And some things may get pushed. Either way,
The future looks good. Imo
Who knows if they have or haven’t. It will happen when it does, and I believe it will happen. Imo
I can’t speak for others, but I don’t base my investment decisions solely on quarterly filings. I look at all public information available. I’m just saying it’s misleading to imply that it has to be in the filing and if it’s not it’s in violation. Imo
I’m certain that someone already posted the requirements to disclose material events in otc on this board. It’s either a public PR OR company filings. They definitely put out PRs.
Any real buying volume And this will move upward. Imo
Definitely an improvement over the previous filings for sure. But they still have some work to do.Imo
I agree, When the buying shows up and the ask walls are taken out, this has the potential to run. We have seen it before, let’s hope we see again. Imo
I’m saying the transfer agent is the one providing the updates to otcmarkets via a daily feed. You can call/contact the transfer agent yourself and validate. I also believe that the transfer agent is the one who remove the restriction and issue the securities. I also know that transferring those shares to a broker who will accept otcpink stock shares is not as easy as one may think. Therefore, even though you say the restrictions can be removed, I would say it hasn’t and therefore insiders aren’t selling. Plus, you have stated the filings have been wrong and inaccurate, so what makes this information accurate but other information not accurate in the same filng. Are we now picking and choosing info based on walhatever opinion is being made? Imo.
So you are saying that otcmarkets website on what is part of the float is incorrect? As of 8/19/22 last update, It doesn’t show those shares being unrestricted. My understanding is that information comes straight from the TA. The TA would have to show them Unrestricted before insiders could sell them. So it’s not insiders selling. SMH. Imo