Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Inference being?
A "zillion" times? Yeah, I guess. Hasn't seemed to stop anyone, pro or con, from revisiting, though. Has it?
Just spit-balling here, but it certainly does seem as if the SEC is poking their fingers into the company's eye. It couldn't be that, instead of acquiescing to the rules, Linda, et al, chose to fight back and even got themselves a vaunted attorney to irritate them (the SEC) even further? A true 'David & Goliath' tale that hasn't ended well thus far.
All IMO, of course.
My sincere thanks for all the kind words. It's a 'slice of life' I wouldn't recommend to anybody but will, in one form or another, happen to us all.
Peace!
Sooner or later, everyone gets the wake-up call as to what is and what isn't important. Mine came a short while ago when my wife of 51 years passed from a brain tumor. Best of luck to all.
Geez! I guess so. Triple-aught was my re-entry point as well. But, that was years ago. Long time to hold a grudge.
I don't recall reading anything to the effect that "buying is dumb".
OR, perhaps 'Tombstone'?
That was from 2014 which brilliantly illustrates the accuracy of their information.
"ASK YOURSELF WHY"?? Why is the board "NOT active, with NO interest," in a company supposedly engaged in a market with a "HALF A TRILLION DOLLAR market cap? The simple answer is that DBMM is nothing more than a momo play. IF the CE is removed (and the probability of that happening seems pretty good), players had better be ready to execute a comfortable exit point because this "NOW TOP 10 in U.K."
will, IMO, tank as fast as it rises. If they're in the TOP 10, given their penchant for never making a penny in profit and being in debt so far they have to be fed with a slingshot, I'd love to see how the next ten on that list are surviving!
Just sayin'.
I found it rather entertaining. Clearly, it's an amateur production, probably by someone here, but pretty good. But, like everything else, it ain't gonna do nuthin' to improve the situation.
IMO, of course.
I was overjoyed to read your 'roller coaster' missive. Very heartening. Particularly this part;
"..THEY WE'RE NOT WATCHING TV...........THEY HAVE SOMETHING FOR LONG SHARE HOLDERS AND NEW SHARE HOLDERS COMING ON BOARD, ONCE CE IS REMOVED TRADING RESUMES THEY WILL START BUSINESSES NOT AS BEFORE BUT THE NEW IMPROVED DBMM WITH MORE TEETH FOR SHARE HOLDERS TO SINK INTO."
Knowing what has been said or done by the company that brought you to these conclusions would do wonders for those without the same degree of optimism.
Respectfully
A somewhat healthier 10Q than the previous several could go a long way towards the removal of that CE.
Paper signer.
Investor Relations
Inference being?
Shhhhhh! They're in 'quiet' mode.
Opinion? Fact?
Oh, I don't know that it's all that difficult. 'Is too' -- 'Is not' ought about do it. All without benefit (?) of the once ever-present cockalorum too.
Just sayin'.
Apparently the Animal House reference was either missed or not known about. Carry on.
Yessir! Another dismal Q. Several pages of 'This is what we actually did' followed by some 25 pages of fluff and 'This is what we coulda done if we were a real company'.
But wait ...... None of it really matters because all we're interested in is Pink and Squeeze. Or does it? Depends on who's posting, I s'pose. Just sayin'.
All IMO, of course
Why is it so difficult to ask a civil question on this board and receive an equally civil response in kind?
Would you be willing to invest in a company heavily in debt and with a history of NEVER making a single dime in profit in over a decade? In other words, were it not for the possibility of a big payday due, not to performance, but possible uplisting and the ever-popular belief that there could be a short squeeze, would you be at the betting window, plunking your money down on DBMM for the Win?
Oh wow! Really? I don't think that was the 'first', tho.
Hussah! Agreed. Adding fuel to a fire that does not exist.
She signs things.
More to the point is nobody really gives a rat's butt. This thing either lives or dies in the hands of the SEC. The principals have done precious little to preserve dbmm's future except to hire a lawyer who, thus far, hasn't been able to 'git 'r done' yet. Further, if perchance it actually DOES live, it certainly won't be for long.
Two words: Naked Short. Take 'em out of this board's vocabulary and it ceases to exist. The denizens in the land of dbmm in the Hub of I have seen some pretty dark days over the years but none darker than these.
Everything in that post makes perfect sense -- even without the unnecessary parting shot. Predicated upon the latest Q, however, their "continuing to do business" is up for interpretation.
Volume, interest? Yup, rare as chickens' teeth.
If the words "Naked Shorts" were removed from the dictionary, this board would cease to exist.
Insults and one-ups only. Lots of ‘em.
Alas! Even the most stalwart of supporters seem to be disappearing.
Yes. Got that notification from Schwab today. Sticky wicket, say what!?
A genuine whale-o-rama!