Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Proof beyond reasonable doubt doesn't exist in the pinks, but the best possible form of proof that we could get is an 8k. A PR would be great, but an 8k would be fantastic.
Simply refreshing will not add to the post count. I'd rather not explain publicly how it can be done, or I assume it can be done as I don't know the specifics of the coding, but it's not as simple as refreshing. There are safe guards in place, but like any safe guard, someone knows how to get past it. It is confidence-inspiring that the admins do remove disingenuous figures.
Thanks for the update and quick action Shelly.
She said it was removed accidentally, meaning it is usually done automatically. It shouldn't happen again unless there is reason for it.
Shelly - Admin
He also has a history of not being caught committing felonies and if he owned any shares in BRZL, that's exactly what he would be doing considering he told me specifically, in an e-mail I have forwarded to over 10 ihub members now, that he owns 0 shares in brzl and has no affiliation with the company other than helping with the website. I can forward it to you as well if you'd like.
Also, the PR said the audit would be completed sometime in April. . . the audit. They gave no date or deadline when they would be PRing a completion of the acquisition. Mr. Renfro has confirmed that news will be coming this week.
Jim Renfro says BRZL RM news coming this week! $$$
CEO of BRZL says NEWS on merger is this coming week! Seat belts, get 'em on people!
"Within the next week. . . "
Nice.
Hmm, what's that R/M play I wonder ;)
BRZL
It's a sore subject because it has come up over and over and over again, but none of these people that keep bringing it up bring any new information to the table or spend ten minutes researching to find all of their questions have already been answered more than once. We've already discussed his connection to the company at length, but the same questions keep coming up, often from the same people that seemingly don't care that they have already been answered.
IMO speculation about what it would mean is unimportant as there is absolutely NO support for the idea. Nazir simply said they had a common business associate. A common business associate could be anyone, it could even be an associate from different businesses in which board members of BRZL are or were involved. The connection being made holds no water whatsoever. Hell, they could have the same tailor for all we know.
That's quite the logical leap there, you have any proof? Assumptions are worth nothing. There are hundreds of potential positions in which they could have a common business associate. You never responded again after I showed you a copy of the lease on the CMSB property with "Renfro Energy LLC" clearly listed as the lessee, proving your theory about Renfro Energy LLC not having any assets and the properties being owned by another company, "Renfro Energy Inc" absolutely false, but now you're back again. Care to address that this time around? When you have something valuable to contribute with actual support to back it up instead of suppositions, I'm sure people, including myself, will listen.
It was discussed over a month ago and constantly for a few days before I e-mailed him to confirm his only relation was with the website. 10,000 is a lowball figure.
This has been addressed 10,000 times already. Please do your DD.
"---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: nazir <nazir@blazemail.com>
Date: Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: Brazos International
To: Clayton XXXXXXX <cassiusclayX@gmail.com>
Hi
I hold no position in the company and am not a shareholder..I was just
helping them set up a site, because of a common business associate
Thanks"
No, +0400 is Moscow Daylight Time in correlation to UTC, however that could be OTC's timezone, or it could be the offset based on OTC's timezone.
ihub is so predictable. We're in the middle of that old cycle that happens every time. Monday will most definitely be heavily green. Be careful though people. . . a lot of those same old people showing up this weekend.
A few quick corrections. . .
1. The agreed closing date WAS mentioned again, in fact it was mentioned in one of the filings.
3/14/11 10-Q
"Subsequent to the above occurrence a Letter of Intent was executed, subject to certain conditions, whereby the Company would acquire the membership interests of Renfro Energy LLC and all of its assets, with certain exceptions. The closing date of June 1, 2010 has been extended by mutual consent indefinitely. Preparations are underway to prepare the documentation necessary to comply with regulatory regulations. "
2. Not that anyone's word is worth more than gum on the sidewalk, but I received an e-mail reply from Nazir @ the registrant e-mail stating he had no involvement with the company other than creating the website and holds no position.
You really have not taken more than five minutes to read about this stock, have you? Either that or you're incapable of understanding. If there's anything that is 100% absolutely proven, it's that Renfro has got oil. We have filings with the state of texas, well records, lease copies from the party that is the lessor, etc. If you had done even a reasonable job in your due diligence, you wouldn't make claims like that. Google is your friend, use it.
Because you were calling into question the credibility of another poster, as well as claiming he somehow is connected to the company and a scammer. Every bit of your posts were TOS violations. Those are ihub rules and it's what happens. Welcome to ihub.
The website info was already on the board and discussed months ago. You invested that much money with hardly any dd and now you're making huge leaps in logic out of very little. Prove that admiral has a connection or that Nazi being the registrant means anything more than him simply being hired for it, or stop making such claims. If you can support the claims, I'm all for hearing them, but right now you're making big speculative comments and presenting them as fact.
Ask who?
This website thing is getting so blown out of proportion. If you don't have any new information, specific questions or concerns about it, then why are we still talking about it? Nobody has to justify to anyone else why they are staying in or selling. Nothing has developed in pages and it has become senseless, circular arguing.
Posts are getting deleted because it's becoming spam. Just repeating the same hung over and over again is going nowhere.
What is your question. You keep talking about it and how nobody answered your questions. What are they?
I already answered your question two hours ago.
That's true, I could make a fake one too. However, if it looks anything like a real nondisclosure agreement, Austin would be committing multiple felonies by doing so. I'll wait to see it to make judgment, it could be the real deal. We'll see.
I just find it hysterical that there was a full page of freaking out about Nazir when I got back on, but when I posted the e-mail along with an invitation to have it forwarded to anyone concerned, I didn't get a single response, they all just went quiet. Cryin' wolf has never been so stylish.
It's funny how none of the people that are spreading, "concern" about Nazir have replied to my offer to forward them my e-mail conversation. That's quite telling imo. If you want answers, get answers. E-mail Nazir yourself or PM me yours so I can forward it to you. Don't sit here and spread rumors when you're not actually pursuing an answer.
Whether that's true or not, fight fire with fire. If he is actually concerned, I have proof to show him, if he's not, I have proof to show the people that may be concerned that he is right. IMO any concern is best eased by truth and facts rather than arguing.
Nazir doesn't hold a single share in BRZL. His only involvement was creating the website. See the e-mail response I received in my previous post. I don't know what you're worried about. If anyone wants to authenticate it, I can forward it to your e-mails if you'd like.
Like I said before, real support is always better than what some guy on ihub says.
Just to clear up whatever reservations there are about the website:
"Hi
I hold no position in the company and am not a shareholder..I was just helping them set up a site, because of a common business associate
Thanks
--- xxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com wrote:
From: Clayton xxxxxx <xxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com>
To: nazir@blazemail.com
Subject: Brazos International
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 01:26:58 -0600
- Hide quoted text -
Hello Mr. Maherali,
I am an investor with Brazos International Exploration Inc.(BRZL) and
I recently noticed that you are the registrant of Brazos' website,
www.brazosinternational.info. I was wondering if you could tell me
what position, if any, you hold in the company and if you don't, what
is your relation with the company? I am just doing some due diligence
and your name does not show in any of the filings, so I'm interested in
your affiliation.
Thanks."
Hope that's cleared up now so we can move on.
LOL what was that? They walked it down from 0.013 to 0.0115 in 19 seconds????
DANG! Look at this l2. . .
Taking a position here today. Looking for a bounce off that 50MA. I like the support underneath as well. Looks like a good time to get in here.
Wow, there's more attention here every day. So many reads already! I love it. Can't wait to see what today holds for us! GLTA.
No problem. I'm in the pursuit of information and truth here as well. However, I can also understand the Admiral's position as this has already been discussed once, a few months ago. However, I think it's important to address the questions of new investors clearly and as accurately as possible.
Anyway, the BRZL website was created before BRZL stopped referring to the RM as a, "proposed acquisition." I wouldn't be concerned about why Renfro is not the registrant, I would actually probably be more concerned if he had been since January. I'm inclined to believe this is simply a third party registrant that was payed to develop the page, mostly based on the number of domains registered under the name and the nature of many of the domains. Do a reverse whois and you will see what I'm talking about; He is the registrant for a privately owned tent company, a small journal/review site, the harry potter fan site I referenced in an earlier post and many, many more. Of course I am open to new information and ideas regarding the matter, but it seems to be a dead end and IMO insubstantial at this time.
Of course, but there's no harm in discussing or investigating the registrant of the domain of a company, especially when he's a figure that has been known to be involved in some shady business in the past. I hope you of all people would understand that just taking the word of someone on ihub, no matter who, that something is a, "non-issue" is not exactly the best way to make decisions. Not only that, but it makes a lot of new investors much more comfortable when their questions can be answered, or at least addressed, with support.
I don't find the matter disconcerting, even less so after looking into it, but time spent on research is never time wasted.
So far, all I can find is an absolute boatload of websites registered to this guy. Among them are a lot of sites unrelated to any company, public or private. The sheer number of domains, along with the nature of many of these domains, tells me he was or is likely a third party registrant responsible for the domain. For example:
http://www.deathlyhollowsupdate.com/
A harry potter fan site it seems; Also registered to the same Nazir Maherali.
I'm still digging, but that seems to be the extent of it. I did a reverse DNS search, but didn't find anything particularly interesting. Mostly, I keep getting brought back to this board a few months ago when this was all covered once.