zombywolf, sure, here's what I think...

I think today's selling is an overreaction. A delay has happened as you had stated with NHMD moving forward, but I still believe in NHMD. Even though it is always fair to expect delays within the penny stock market, I will admit that I was not expecting to see a delay. I still believe they are going to deliver. I believe that there has been way too much that they have done to not close it. I think things are real and I think there is a logical answer for the delay as I believe that the company will remain above board with how they have been communicating with us shareholders. I believe NHMD is not a scam and is very real based on me doing my own DD. I have no problem waiting for the dust to clear.

v/r
Sterling

rockie101, with NHMD, in my opinion...

In my opinion, nothing has changed here with NHMD and my sentiments. I was guessing that the 8-K would be out this morning pre-market, but technically speaking, the company's tweet said Monday. Just because the 8-K is not out yet doesn't mean that something is wrong. Again, nothing has changed with my sentiments. I still have zero concerns. The price action today is a non-issue in my opinion.

v/r
Sterling

zombywolf, "again" to answer you DIRECTLY...

That's absolutely not true. Are you trying to spook people about NHMD before they release their huge 8-K tomorrow morning? I did answer you DIRECTLY. You just didn't like my answers as I don't like neither your questions nor your answers for how you are viewing things in response to what I have already answered. I'll refresh your memory a bit with these NHMD posts below when I was telling you and others that John Park's personal debt has nothing to do with the price of tea in China since they have gotten a "verbal approval" on the financing already, plus I gave other answers to questions to consider as other food for thought too. Here are these posts again for you:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173147440
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173147473

As for them indicating only 2/3rds of the contract, well, guess what? They are not required to show the full contract. Do you know how many penny stocks show even one page of any of their contracts? Almost all of them never show anything in regards to a contract. Let's see what the details in this 8-K is going to show tomorrow morning (I'm guessing) since the company specifically stated that they will be releasing "ALL" of the details. Personally, the most important part of the contract was the part confirming the $268 Million for their sugar deal and the registration number for their Exporter that will be getting the sugar to China from Brazil that was officially registered to go through the General Administration of China Customs (GACC). That's huge too! I'm sure the SEC and China Customs are not all in on a scam with little old NHMD. I think it's real... very real.

So again, just because you might not like my answers, they could not have been more DIRECT, especially the answers above. If you see such differently, then we will just have to agree to disagree. Tomorrow morning will be here soon enough with the 8-K providing all of the details!

v/r
Sterling

RKMKE, with that BLTH/SGII:NASDAQ thought...

I disagree. Now that BLTH is merging into SGII fairly soon here to trade on the NASDAQ, I think that is a very bullish sign for us BLTH shareholders for what we can expect after we merge into SGII:NASDAQ. Remember, with where both stocks have been consistently trading at over the past few months, based on the reverse split ratio, the value in our current positions will automatically be tripled in value once we merge into SGII:NASDAQ.

SGII:NASDAQ had over $2.4 million in dollar volume this past Friday!

v/r
Sterling

Thepoorguyonline, with me and twitter or any social media...

I don't have a twitter account. I personally don't have any social media accounts that I use. I'm a little old school. A few times I had thought about getting a twitter account, but I always seem to back out from doing it. Maybe I will one day. I don't know, maybe I'm being dense (LOL). I barely have time to post on the forums and I feel good about my life without any of that. I'm not sure if I want to make time for another vice like that, but maybe one day I'll catch up with the times.

v/r
Sterling

zombywolf, important, to honestly break this down...

Respectfully, I'm glad that you don't have a problem with me, but I think we just see things different. I feel as though I am not going overboard. Going overboard or underboard is in the eye of the beholder. I am very excited about NHMD and its potential for being a very good and legit investment for the penny stock market. You don't see many $568 Million deals with a penny stock that pans out. It looks so good and real that it excites me just thinking about how high this should go with a current Market Cap of $5,693,444 with its closing at .0022 per share as of this past Friday:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/NHMD/security

That's part of the reason why I'm simply just excited. Look at the room that exists to grow if they prove that they are real and that they have funding to support their contracts...

$568,000,000 in Contracts ÷ $5,693,444 Current NHMD Market Cap = 99.76 times difference

This means that NHMD, from a Market Cap perspective, could be worth 99.76 times higher than the current price of .0022 per share based on its current Market Cap. This means that if more is released to confirm the validity of their deals, NHMD could be trading at .219 per share from a Market Cap perspective derived as such:

99.76 times difference x .0022 per share = .219 per share for NHMD

Some stocks trade 3 to 10 times higher than its current Market Cap once the market learns of such stock's existence within their respective Industry. I'll let you do the math for that potential.

In my opinion, this is a lot to be excited about. Because I'm excited doesn't mean that I'm pumping. I'm not going around telling people... "Buy now, it's going to the moon!" I'm clearly articulating and sharing why I like NHMD and its potential for growth as an investment. The decision for one to buy or sell does not reside with me. That's up to each individual as I know that every stock is not for everyone. Which is why I respect those who don't like NHMD, but the respect should go both ways for those that do like NHMD or any stock for that matter. I'm not sure why that seems to be so hard for those not liking NHMD or a certain stock to understand. If I'm wrong about how I feel, then I can live with such as I will have no choice except to do so. But I should not be mocked for making the decision to take such risk.

I did not create those numbers for their contracts. I do not work for the company. I am basically an outsider just like you and all here within this forum regarding NHMD. So when they file something of this huge size with the SEC, who am I to tell them that they don't know what they are doing? Technically speaking, none of us are qualified to tell them that they don't know what they are doing. None of us know what all they are doing behind the scenes. What if they truly are doing all of the right things behind the scenes? The 8-K is coming this Monday and I am very confident that they will have the key details to prove that they are real. I think that is the hope that myself and others that have done our due diligence have chosen to latch on to. What's wrong with having hope in the market? If it wasn't for hope within the market, the market wouldn't exist. Why can't we just be respected and left alone for the hope that we choose to have in any stock? Why is there always some small group following people around trying to destroy all hope and knocking people for where they choose to put their hope instead of helping them by showing them where they should put their hope? Why not just sit back and let things happen? Then we all will know who was right or wrong for having hope by those actions earned by the company and not by words of fighting amongst each other. That seems to be part of the problem with the world today. Nobody wants to see each other's side enough to have respect and care and understanding for being able to peacefully and respectfully coexist with each other.

v/r
Sterling

surfkast, respectfully, I'm sorry, but very important...

Respectfully, I'm sorry, but very important here with NHMD right now. None of its past failures don't matter. JC Penny filed bankruptcy three times and still became a multi-billion dollar corporation in the past. I can find all kinds of examples of failures... that turned into successes... that turned into failures... that turned into successes... and etc. to where ending in either as an outcome.

My point is that it's not all about having adversity. It's all about how you handle adversity. We all as people and as companies fall. But do we stay down? Or do we get back up to move forward to prove that we have learned from our mistakes?

I think every company within all markets have had some failures of sort. I think the old NHMD has learned from their mistakes and failures. This is why we are being presented with a new NHMD. We are experiencing a new beginning!

v/r
Sterling

PENNIEStoSTACKS, with those JP Energy Group partners...

I'm not sure if any of those partners of JP Energy Group will be merging into NHMD too, buy I am very confident that some things of a huge magnitude will be transpiring with them from doing some of my own DD.

v/r
Sterling

Strukture, with this JP Energy Partners confirmation...

Wow! Regarding this NHMD merger, this post of yours should answer the mail to have a better understanding for why JP Energy Group was newly created to have transferred all of the Food Processing contracts and businesses from JP Energy Partners over to them. John Park owns them both and even though JP Energy Group was newly created, JP Energy Partners has been in business for 4.5 years:

v/r
Sterling

trader59, again, why none of that matters here with NHMD...

Again, my bottom line as to why none of that matters here with NHMD:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173147440

v/r
Sterling

zombywolf, with these NHMD (JP Energy) thoughts...

No I was not born yesterday to answer your question. I could ask the same question about you considering you apparently didn't even read the first paragraph which debunks a huge part of your argument that you are trying to have.

First, if we are going to debate, discuss, or whatever you want to call our disagreements, I'm fine with that. However, I'm asking you to chill with the little subtle jabs or I will just hush and you can just wait and see what NHMD releases in its upcoming 8-K. Look, I know we don't really like or care too much for each other, but I am simply asking you to just be respectful for the sake of the forum. Remember... attack the content not the character.

You said... "Take a look at the merge docs. There is no company named JP Energy or JP Energy Partners or group."

When you say merge documents, I am looking at the 8-K within the link below with key info within it and within the sugar contract that is attached:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=16941153&guid=1jg-kpw7lRDWJth#nhmd_ex1_htm

Those are merger documents to me and both JP Energy Partners and JP Energy Group are indicated within them. If you scroll down further, you will see where it says JP Energy Group, LLC of which I'm sure it is the same as JP Energy Group. Also, just so you know, within the very first paragraph of the Acquisition Agreement, it indicates that JP Energy will be used as the abbreviated form for JP Energy Group, LLC.

Also, the New Jersey Secretary of state (SOS) has JP Energy Group, LLC within their database:

My bottom line point regarding the financing was that they have verbal approval from a banking institution for financing. I'm saying that in order for that to happen, then whatever view was used by that banking institution to give a verbal approval was not regarding anything dealing with John Park. Or maybe it was. Who cares? The point is that they have major funding so who cares as it seems like it is through a major banking institution so it will be legit funding. My other thoughts on that matter was simply me suggesting how the banking institution could have taken some things in order to give them a verbal approval. Technically speaking, I have no idea who the banking institution is and I have no idea how they were able to get a verbal approval. But bottom line... they got it or they would not have ever filed such to be true within their 8-K below:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=16966415&guid=FG5-kF8sfHc8Kih

So in my opinion... more proof is coming to confirm that they officially have funding or they would not have ever filed a DEF-14C to move forward with the deal. So either you believe or you don't believe. I believe. If you don't believe, then it's very simple. Wait and see what more is released from the company providing more details. I think lovethatgreen summarized it very well within his post below:

v/r
Sterling

Xman1959, with these thoughts...

Valid points regarding the situation here with NHMD.

I think some are missing my bottom line point which was that proof of such not being an issue with NHMD is the fact that they stated in one of their 8-Ks that they already have verbal approval for their funding from a banking institution. If NHMD (JP Energy Group) was not going to be approved, they would have never had gotten a verbal approval from anyone. So, in my opinion, the deal is done. Apparently, any negative that is being brought out about John Park didn't matter for whatever the reason.

They stated that have a verbal approval for the financing for the $268 Million Sugar contract in the earlier 8-K filed with the SEC below for all to see:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=16966415&guid=FG5-kF8sfHc8Kih

v/r
Sterling

zombywolf, to answer those NHMD questions...

First, I didn't see where you asked me those questions. Second, it's my own discretion for me to answer any question I want to answer. If I think it is redundant, I don't have to answer anything and the same for you or anyone within these forums if one chooses not to answer something. However, I see no issue with your questions so I will answer them based on how I see things.

None of what you posted has nothing to do with the price of tea in China. Meaning that none of that will have any kind of significant impact on the huge deals going through. Let's talks about each one at a time to address separately.

John Park being millions in debt is a personal issue and nothing to do with the company. Example: Back when Bill Gates was CEO of Microsoft (MSFT), if he took out a loan to buy a $5 Million house, that would be his own personal debt that he would be responsible for paying off. It would of had nothing to do with Microsoft. That debt would not be associated with Microsoft as a company. When a deal would be in the process of closing, it would be based on the merit of Microsoft as a company and not based on if Bill Gates was paying his mortgage on that $5 Million loan or not.

But wait, let's say that there was a banking institution that maybe would not want to deal with Microsoft because of Bill Gates having bad credit, then that is why John Park has a team. Someone on his team would be the one that would go through the banking institution to be able to get the funding that is necessary to move forward. Apparently, the proof of such not being an issue with NHMD is the fact that they stated in one of the 8-Ks that they already have verbal approval for their funding. I had personally done a Stand by Letter of Credit years ago. I first got a verbal approval as they sifted through my info to be able to tell me if I ever needed to go forward to get the Letter of Credit. I was later approved just as I was told I would be. If NHMD (JP Energy Group) was not going to be approved, they would have never had gotten a verbal approval from anyone. So, in my opinion, the deal is done.

Another option is that they could be using something as collateral that is in huge value that has been approved to be used by a certain banking institution. Maybe they have some huge asset or something of huge value that was approved to be used.

With the sugar contract being 5 months old, that means nothing. I'm guessing that they probably have 12 months to honor the contract before it becomes voided. The time frame could be indefinite as long as they come up with getting the sugar to its destination. I'm guessing them on the other side know the challenges that exists and are patient enough to allow NHMD (JP Energy Group) to work through honoring the contract.

With you question regarding the creation of JP Energy Group... It's very obvious, as it was stated within one of the NHMD 8-Ks, that JP Energy Group was created to have transferred all of the Food Processing contracts and businesses from JP Energy Partners which is who originally owned the $268 Million Sugar Contract. Now, as NHMD had stated, all of the food processing operations have been transferred over into JP Energy Group. It's better when they do it like such because if JP Energy Partners had any debt or anything that could be negatively connected to it, it doesn't transfer over. Its debt gets left behind. Bottom line, JP Energy Energy Group was newly created to be a newly clean vehicle for the purpose of accepting and owning the $268 Million Sugar Contract to come into NHMD as JP Energy Group mergers to be one with NHMD.

Oh, and I'm guessing that nobody cares when JP Energy Partners was created since you and nobody is asking. But just in case you ask, In my opinion, who cares as that is not important either? As long as they were created early enough to obtain the $268 Million Sugar Contract as it was filed in the 8-K which is good enough for the deal to be done. I'm sure though that they are not newly created. As an FYI, John Park owns both JP Energy Partners and JP Energy Group. I'm sure that he is going to approve a deal that he is doing with himself.

I think they did a great job with structuring this deal and I think the proof will further be confirmed in the upcoming 8-K that is to be released in the next day or two or so.

v/r
Sterling

Xman1959, to add with NHMD...

With them being an SEC filing company adds an extra level of transparency and credibility. What some people don't know, I'll just say that because of them having a deal of such huge size and with this deal being registered to go through the General Administration of China Customs (GACC), the SEC has reviewed all that they are claiming to have. If the deal wasn't real, it would have been shut down a long time ago, like not long after they filed their first 8-K on the deal weeks ago. We are good here with NHMD in my opinion.

v/r
Sterling

Nice about NHMD...

NHMD is going to be the blueprint for how SEC filing reporting penny stocks complete huge mergers/acquisitions in my opinion. The time is almost near. They have been doing a great job with being transparent so I expect for such to continue with great and important details that will be transforming NHMD from a trade to an investment.

v/r
Sterling

BLFR**Kayne Anderson is a $33 Billion Company & more with BLFR...

I think the team here with BLFR is a lot more serious than the attention coming from the market right now. From this BLFR PR below, Resource Rock Exploration, LLC is funding BLFR and their Screaming Eagle Partners, LLC operations to increase oil production as part of the six month plan to strategically achieve its vision of no less than 10,000 bbls/day of sustained production of oil by giving them $3 Million for starters to fund BLFR:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLFR/news/BlueFire-Equipment-Corp-BLFR-Enters-into-a-Binding-Letter-Agreement-with-Resource-Rock-Exploration-LLC-to-Increase-Oil-P?id=419011

The price of oil per barrel is currently $80.00+ per barrel:
https://oilprice.com/

I suggest all to figure how much in revenues that 10,000 bbls/day will equate to then figure that they are currently tracking initial production of the first 6 wells to be up to 1,200 bbls/day and with an additional 1,800 bbls/day in Q4 2023 from another major acquisition:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLFR/news/BlueFire-Equipment-Corp-BLFR-Acquires-Screaming-Eagle-Partners-LLC-a-Cashflow-Positive-Family-Owned-Oil--Gas-Company-in-?id=417926

Screaming Eagle Partners, LLC was just their first acquisition with a much bigger acquisition coming soon as the company has indicated. As of Oct 30, 2023, the company filed a Share Structure Letter from their Transfer Agent (Issuers Direct) indicating that BLFR has not issued any shares of common stock since March 2017 which shows that BLFR has 33,947,368 shares indicated for its Outstanding Shares (OS):
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/385171/content

BLFR stated in PRs that they are going to cancel 18 Million shares from the OS taking it down to 15,947,368 shares and that they are going to reduce the Authorized Shares (AS) down to 250 Million:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLFR/news/BlueFire-Equipment-Corp-BLFR-Shares-a-Letter-from-the-Interim-CEO-with-Updates-on-the-Share-Structure?id=419478

Then BLFR recently PR-ed that they have entered into strategic partnership with Eventus Advisory Group, LLC, to get them to the NASDAQ while not a reverse split to meet the $5.00 minimum bid requirement:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLFR/news/BlueFire-Equipment-Corp-BLFR-Partners-with-Eventus-Advisory-Group-LLC-to-Work-Towards-NASDAQ-Uplisting?id=419690

Resource Rock Exploration, LLC is a Kayne Anderson portfolio company with a financial commitment from Kayne Anderson Energy Fund VII and Fund VIII for $100 million, respectively:

Kayne Anderson is a $33 Billion Company:

v/r
Sterling

BLFR**Kayne Anderson is a $33 Billion Company & more with BLFR...

I think the team here with BLFR is a lot more serious than the attention coming from the market right now. From this BLFR PR below, Resource Rock Exploration, LLC is funding BLFR and their Screaming Eagle Partners, LLC operations to increase oil production as part of the six month plan to strategically achieve its vision of no less than 10,000 bbls/day of sustained production of oil by giving them $3 Million for starters to fund BLFR:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLFR/news/BlueFire-Equipment-Corp-BLFR-Enters-into-a-Binding-Letter-Agreement-with-Resource-Rock-Exploration-LLC-to-Increase-Oil-P?id=419011

The price of oil per barrel is currently $80.00+ per barrel:
https://oilprice.com/

I suggest all to figure how much in revenues that 10,000 bbls/day will equate to then figure that they are currently tracking initial production of the first 6 wells to be up to 1,200 bbls/day and with an additional 1,800 bbls/day in Q4 2023 from another major acquisition:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLFR/news/BlueFire-Equipment-Corp-BLFR-Acquires-Screaming-Eagle-Partners-LLC-a-Cashflow-Positive-Family-Owned-Oil--Gas-Company-in-?id=417926

Screaming Eagle Partners, LLC was just their first acquisition with a much bigger acquisition coming soon as the company has indicated. As of Oct 30, 2023, the company filed a Share Structure Letter from their Transfer Agent (Issuers Direct) indicating that BLFR has not issued any shares of common stock since March 2017 which shows that BLFR has 33,947,368 shares indicated for its Outstanding Shares (OS):
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/385171/content

BLFR stated in PRs that they are going to cancel 18 Million shares from the OS taking it down to 15,947,368 shares and that they are going to reduce the Authorized Shares (AS) down to 250 Million:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLFR/news/BlueFire-Equipment-Corp-BLFR-Shares-a-Letter-from-the-Interim-CEO-with-Updates-on-the-Share-Structure?id=419478

Then BLFR recently PR-ed that they have entered into strategic partnership with Eventus Advisory Group, LLC, to get them to the NASDAQ while not a reverse split to meet the $5.00 minimum bid requirement:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLFR/news/BlueFire-Equipment-Corp-BLFR-Partners-with-Eventus-Advisory-Group-LLC-to-Work-Towards-NASDAQ-Uplisting?id=419690

Resource Rock Exploration, LLC is a Kayne Anderson portfolio company with a financial commitment from Kayne Anderson Energy Fund VII and Fund VIII for $100 million, respectively:

Kayne Anderson is a $33 Billion Company:

v/r
Sterling

BLFR**Kayne Anderson is a $33 Billion Company & more with BLFR...

I think the team here with BLFR is a lot more serious than the attention coming from the market right now. From this BLFR PR below, Resource Rock Exploration, LLC is funding BLFR and their Screaming Eagle Partners, LLC operations to increase oil production as part of the six month plan to strategically achieve its vision of no less than 10,000 bbls/day of sustained production of oil by giving them $3 Million for starters to fund BLFR:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLFR/news/BlueFire-Equipment-Corp-BLFR-Enters-into-a-Binding-Letter-Agreement-with-Resource-Rock-Exploration-LLC-to-Increase-Oil-P?id=419011

The price of oil per barrel is currently $80.00+ per barrel:
https://oilprice.com/

I suggest all to figure how much in revenues that 10,000 bbls/day will equate to then figure that they are currently tracking initial production of the first 6 wells to be up to 1,200 bbls/day and with an additional 1,800 bbls/day in Q4 2023 from another major acquisition:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLFR/news/BlueFire-Equipment-Corp-BLFR-Acquires-Screaming-Eagle-Partners-LLC-a-Cashflow-Positive-Family-Owned-Oil--Gas-Company-in-?id=417926

Screaming Eagle Partners, LLC was just their first acquisition with a much bigger acquisition coming soon as the company has indicated. As of Oct 30, 2023, the company filed a Share Structure Letter from their Transfer Agent (Issuers Direct) indicating that BLFR has not issued any shares of common stock since March 2017 which shows that BLFR has 33,947,368 shares indicated for its Outstanding Shares (OS):
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/385171/content

BLFR stated in PRs that they are going to cancel 18 Million shares from the OS taking it down to 15,947,368 shares and that they are going to reduce the Authorized Shares (AS) down to 250 Million:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLFR/news/BlueFire-Equipment-Corp-BLFR-Shares-a-Letter-from-the-Interim-CEO-with-Updates-on-the-Share-Structure?id=419478

Then BLFR recently PR-ed that they have entered into strategic partnership with Eventus Advisory Group, LLC, to get them to the NASDAQ while not a reverse split to meet the $5.00 minimum bid requirement:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BLFR/news/BlueFire-Equipment-Corp-BLFR-Partners-with-Eventus-Advisory-Group-LLC-to-Work-Towards-NASDAQ-Uplisting?id=419690

Resource Rock Exploration, LLC is a Kayne Anderson portfolio company with a financial commitment from Kayne Anderson Energy Fund VII and Fund VIII for $100 million, respectively:

Kayne Anderson is a $33 Billion Company:

v/r
Sterling

Or maybe it's related to EGYF & its eBox...

Or maybe it's related to EGYF & its eBox:

v/r
Sterling

Maybe it's something related to this with EGYF...

Maybe it's something related to this with EGYF:

v/r
Sterling

Citrati...

I'm still here being a strong believer in EGYF. I like how it is quietly creeping up on no news. I'm guessing that somebody must know something to be coming fairly soon.

v/r
Sterling

lovethatgreen, with that thought...

Not here. No way! I think BLFR will prove to be very serious with what they are saying they will do.

v/r
Sterling

rockie101, with the DEF-14C...

It's nothing more than what I expected. It's basically what was laid out in the PRE-14C. Everything was already cussed and fussed about with its contents within. The DEF-14C was basically a necessary formality to position NHMD to move forward with their operational plans for growth. Now I suspect that they will start to lay things out in 8-Ks, PRs, other filings, etc. very soon. They seem to be moving along expeditiously. I'm fine with waiting for things to continue maturing. I still believe this is going to be very big.

v/r
Sterling

Huge BLFR NASDAQ & Share Cancelation Update...

Huge BLFR NASDAQ & Share Cancelation Update:

v/r
Sterling

Huge BLFR NASDAQ & Share Cancelation Update...

Huge BLFR NASDAQ & Share Cancelation Update:

v/r
Sterling

Huge BLFR NASDAQ & Share Cancelation Update...

Huge BLFR NASDAQ & Share Cancelation Update:

v/r
Sterling

webprods, with this post of yours...

Relax... read what I said about that being my last post on the matter.

v/r
Sterling

Johnny, technically speaking...

I'm not covering for anyone. I have not even read what you are talking about with the attacks on you about you. I was just coming at you from a perspective of how you should not had posted that you were selling NHMD and not expected that someone would attack you. I did exactly what you did years ago in another stock and I was attacked. They thought I had turned into a basher, especially after I told them why I sold that other stock years ago. That was a lesson that I learned from. You seem to not be learning from this lesson that you are experiencing.

Technically speaking, this is something that you should have asked me privately. I could go into quite a few reasons why, but I'm not sure if you would even still listen. If you are not in NHMD, I would just stop posting over here and move on to the next stock that you find or found that you like. It's starts to look childish and it makes both of us look bad. Or you now because I'm not responding to you publicly on the matter anymore. I almost didn't until you doubled down and asked me a second time to do so.

When you sell out of a stock, and plus when you tell the forum about it, you are hoping that the stock go down to justify why you have sold. Think about it. You don't won't to look wrong with the stock doing the opposite of why you sold and go up. The sad part about it is when you publicly post that you are selling for the reasons you did, other people listen to you and get spooked and sell because of the trust you had earned from the forum. Then the stock goes back up after you sold like it did and it starts to look like things just might be real. Then now you have more people even mad at you, to include you being mad at yourself, for selling in the first place.

Look, I like NHMD and now you don't. We won't know who's right or wrong for believing in NHMD until after we see what the company manifests into a reality still going forward. I will continue to exercise patience to give them a chance based on me doing my own DD because I still strongly believe it NHMD and not based what some group of people decide or not decide to do, but that's just me.

v/r
Sterling

HoldEm777, with that BS...

No, what you are saying is BS. I don't know what "crew" you are referring. I don't have a crew. I don't even know who that Bunny guy is that you are referring to. Like I said, nobody should not be attacking anyone... period. But unfortunately, that's not how it goes. I was coming at you from a point of logic to where you in your mind was being truthful, but in the minds of others, they don't know you. They don't really know what your intentions were or are. Even by clogging up the board the board with something like this. Why? People have always had a tendency to defend their stock and themselves. That includes me and you too. You are doing it now.

My thing was if you don't like a stock, sell and move on and leave the people alone that are over there still believing in a stock whether they are right or wrong. I did what you did before and I was attacked just like you for doing it. I was telling you what you should probably do to bring less attention of attacks on you based on my own personal experience. Yes, I was being honest, but that's not how the forum took it in this pother stock. The market will determine who's right or wrong for believing or not over time. I think it's best to leave people alone and move on. It's called respect. Or at least that's what I would have done.

v/r
Sterling

HoldEm777, respectfully, to answer your questions...

I would hope that we see some very good price action here with NHMD this week and going forward into the coming weeks justified by the company filing first the DEF-14C with the SEC and then many more updates shortly after.

You posted your reasons for selling which was more personal than stock related. Yes, you were right. It did drop, but then it made you look like you were wrong because it came back up to close at .002 per share. You should have kept all of that to yourself and just sold and moved on in my opinion. NHMD has been one of the top forums on IHub for most read and most posted. You brought much on yourself of which nobody would not have really ever known that you were gone if you just would have left. It looked like you wanted some attention, so you got it. When you go to any forum in the market and post that you are selling and it's a fair amount of shares, you are likely going to get attacked. In my opinion... Why do that? It doesn't make people think that you are honorable; to some people. Some will think that you have some kind of an agenda. With many of the people here that are pro NHMD, it makes them feel a certain negative way of almost feeling of betrayal by you, especially when you were here posting strongly positive thoughts. Sure you have the right to change your mind about a stock.

And no, it's not ok that you were attacked, but it usually will happen and come with the territory when one does as such. When you are in a room with a lot of people, you will likely encounter a lot of different personalities... good and/or bad.

v/r
Sterling

NHMD OS Remain Unchanged after Past Three Updates...

I think this is a huge indication that any claims of "new" dilution is not factual as the Outstanding Shares (OS) for NHMD has remained at 3,163,024,616 shares as of 10/27/2023. This confirms that the selling volume has been nothing more than retail investors trading and some "legacy debt of old" which can be confirmed by looking at the increase in the "Held at DTC" number that has increased to being nearly maxed out with the "Unrestricted" shares while the OS still remains unchanged for being the same:

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/NHMD/security

v/r
Sterling

NHMD OS Remain Unchanged after Past Three Updates...

I think this is a huge indication that any claims of "new" dilution is not factual as the Outstanding Shares (OS) for NHMD has remained at 3,163,024,616 shares as of 10/27/2023. This confirms that the selling volume has been nothing more than retail investors trading and some "legacy debt of old" which can be confirmed by looking at the increase in the "Held at DTC" number that has increased to being nearly maxed out with the "Unrestricted" shares while the OS still remains unchanged for being the same:

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/NHMD/security

v/r
Sterling

NHMD OS Remain Unchanged after Past Three Updates...

I think this is a huge indication that any claims of "new" dilution is not factual as the Outstanding Shares (OS) for NHMD has remained at 3,163,024,616 shares as of 10/27/2023. This confirms that the selling volume has been nothing more than retail investors trading and some "legacy debt of old" which can be confirmed by looking at the increase in the "Held at DTC" number that has increased to being nearly maxed out with the "Unrestricted" shares while the OS still remains unchanged for being the same:

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/NHMD/security

v/r
Sterling

RickRat, with those VYST thoughts...

That was exactly my point here with VYST. My main point was that all they had to do was do what they have already been doing for years (file their required reports with the SEC) and they would be current.

Now that they are back current as of today, it was at a low of .0003 per share, then it closed yesterday at .003 per share, let's see how it does on their first day of being current, then let's see what kind of substance they are going to bring into it with an OS of 12,942,592 shares:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/VYST/security

v/r
Sterling

RIGATONI, with CDIX...

I averaged down with CDIX. Thanks for the heads-up! I'm a little rusty on what was going on with it. I'll have to shake some cobwebs loose to start learning about it again and their situation. I'm guessing that they just went current for a reason for having some updates with substance coming:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CDIX/profile
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CDIX/security

There are talks about them canceling the reverse split. That would be great because they have a good share structure.

v/r
Sterling

HoldEm777 (& All), respectfully, only a suggestion...

Only a suggestion, but for me, here with NHMD or any stock that I am in... I do my due diligence (DD) on a stock and if I like the potential it has for growth and gains in comparison to where the price is at, I buy it. I don't care or even get into the shorts or the manipulation or the the groups or the few who decide when a stock is going to move or not. I can't control or worry about those things. Something important to understand.

When you start worrying about those things that you can't control, then those things will control you.

When I buy a stock, I wait for the story or the reason why I bought that stock to mature. If the story or reason changes, then I make a decision to either hold or move on. Like here with NHMD. The story changed for the better in my opinion so I made the decision to continue waiting for the story to mature.

When you get a chance, read this post. I have this post in my signature block and it might help you:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=128822531

v/r
Sterling

HoldEm777, here with NHMD...

My sentiments are the same here with NHMD. Busy day for me with some other things. I really have not read many posts for today. I'll try to get caught up later. So far, the company has been doing everything that they said that they would do so I expect to see the DEF-14C on Monday, Oct 30,2023 like they have stated.

v/r
Sterling

trader59, with the NHMD Preferred Shares & the Merger...

First, my apology to you if some of my personal thoughts had come across a little personal and off topic. The topic here within this forum is NHMD so let's keep it like that regardless of how good or bad I am at picking the right or wrong stocks.

Hmmm... let's see what we can agree on. I agree that the Series A Preferred is a little confusing since they did not indicate them being converted into common shares and stated that they only represent voting rights. But right in line with what's filed with the company's Articles of Incorporation within the Colorado Secretary of State (SOS), the company stated... "Each Series A Preferred Share cannot be converted into Common Shares, unless it is approved by the Board of Directors and agreed upon by the Series A Preferred Shareholders"...
https://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/BusinessEntityCriteriaExt.do
(You have to enter only "Nate's Food" within the Search field to pull up the NHMD information.)

I got what you were saying about the board approval thing, but I wanted you understand what I was saying as to how I saw that it wasn't an issue about the Series A Preferred being converted into common shares. I just felt like if they had any intentions on converting any of those Series A Preferred Shares into common shares by a certain ratio, they most definitely would have indicated such right there under the section titled "Conversion Rights" with their "Articles of Incorporation" filed with the Colorado SOS. I also had interpreted such like that because I had seen companies in the past that made changes intentionally to show no conversion into common shares of their preferred shares structured to look just like such afterwards.

Something else we both hadn't thought of was that maybe they are not sure how they were going to fix that for something needing to be changed when the time comes and left it out because of that. The only reason why I'm thinking like so as an option is because if it is as you had suggested as an option to consider, then maybe they are going to come up with a more logical ratio for the 18M of Series A Preferred Shares that are being used for the change of control. If it as I had suggested as an option to consider, then that would mean that the incoming merging company would have no skin in the game because they would not own any common shares. With putting myself in their shoes, if I owned some common shares, that would motivate me to really really grow the company to really really grow my investment in myself as a company. Without that, why would I be motivated to put my $568M worth of contracts into NHMD? Maybe then I wouldn't be so motivated. They are not doing this for free. They are not doing this to just make shareholders lucrative while they gain nothing. I think it's fair to expect a change that would also take care of the incoming company to benefit from the fruitages of their labor.

From the way how I see it, there are two sides that have to be taken care of to their satisfaction in order for the deal to consummate. There is the side of Nate Steck and the old team that were involved who are giving up their public entity and John Park and the new team that is coming on board. Nate is not going to let those guys have the public vehicle NHMD for free. So this is where I think the Series B, C, D, and E Preferred Shares come into play. This is where I think that they will disseminate amongst themselves the 411M shares that I explained in this post below:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173081168

I think the new team coming on board or the new company will be part of the 18M Series A Preferred Shares for getting paid. I'm thinking that the logic I stated earlier applies. The incoming merger wants to have some skin in the game to be motivated to grow their investment of NHMD. It would make sense as it would also position the new company merging in to have an Exit Strategy later down the road after they grow the company to be trading on the NASDAQ as they have suggested.

So far, they have been above board with communicating with shareholders. I am going to trust NHMD to make sure that however they decide to structure the deal, that it would be in a way that will be in the best interest of themselves and us shareholders. The $568M in contracts gives them a great cushion for room to be creative enough to bring about significant growth.

Now let's talk about the operations coming into NHMD. Sometimes when I get excited about a stock, I might show it a little. That's all it is. My definition of pumping is if I was just coming in here saying... "Buy now! We're going to a dollar!"... or "Hop on board! We're going to the moon!"... then that is pumping as there is no substance or justification. I think the true definition of pumping is derived and should be aligned in nature by the heart condition too with what you are saying. I'm not trying to get people to sell while I am posting. Heck, I 've been in NHMD since 2021 and I bought initially in the .002s as high as .0028 per share as I had indicated within the post below from my Ameritrade account:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173067372

I'm simply sharing why I like the risk that exists in the stock that I am posting about. Then I try to explain through logical deduction the potential that exists in a stock. I think learning the valuation that exists in a stock is important to help one to know or have some kind of an Exit Strategy if for some reason things start to manifest into a reality. That's why I do my valuation posts from time to time. Take for an example which was sub-penny about a week ago. I stated valuation thoughts about BLFR that it should be worth right now $1.00 to $3.00 per share. Yesterday, it closed at .26 per share. Those bashing me would never even know or bring it up. My point in why I'm bringing this up, if it gets to over $1.00 per share, it won't be because of me and any valuation thoughts that I stated. It wouldn't mean that I was right. It's not up to me for determining if my valuations posts or thoughts are right or wrong. It's up to the company and if they deliver on what they are claiming they will achieve. It would be because of the market learning and understanding what exists for themselves and because of the company doing the things to make investors believe in them as an investment.

Now let's talk NHMD and the valuations that could exist. Wait, I just thought. I think we should first talk about why I believe that the operations coming into NHMD are real. Anybody remember XLA from the old days? It started out sub-penny and went to trading well over $100.00 per share and got uplisted to trade on the NASDAQ and was later ceased to trade as it later was known to be a scam. Does this mean that NHMD is a scam? No it does not. My point is that no matter how big things are, I do understand that any stock I'm in could actually end up being a scam. I do know too that the SEC is well aware of the large numbers for their contracts that were filed in 8-Ks with the SEC and I can assure you that they have likely spoke to whoever they needed to speak to or had sent to them whatever was needed to be sent to them to review the validity of their deals. If this had not happened, NHMD would have been halted either a long time ago or they would have been instructed by the SEC to take them 8-Ks down. I know of a few companies and CEOs that were scrutinized like such for something far less.

NHMD is a fully reporting company that files audited financials with the SEC. On Sep 21, 2023, NHMD filed an 8-K with the SEC confirming the Change of Control of NHMD going over to JP Energy Group:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=16941153&guid=1jg-kpw7lRDWJth

The beauty about this deal is that JP Energy Group needed to have transferred over to them all rights to the sale of the Sugar Contract from JP Energy Partners that has a maximum value of $268,140,000 including all fees and discounts per the 8-K filed by NHMD below which is one of the prerequisites to move forward. As indicated from the post below, they have done this:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173070478

The other requirement was the financing for the contract. They stated that have a verbal approval for the financing for the $268 Million Sugar contract in the earlier 8-K filed with the SEC below:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=16966415&guid=FG5-kF8sfHc8Kih

Then they did as they have stated and filed the PRE-14C and then tweeted that the DEF-14C will be filed on Oct 30, 2023:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=16994480&guid=Dr5-kqe4gPf_Tih

That strongly suggests that it is done in my opinion or at least that the hard part is out of the way. Thus far, they are waiting to officially secure the financing via receipt of its Letter of Credit that they have been officially waiting for that they are expecting any day now.

Here are some important corrections to verify that their connection with the General Administration of Customs China (GACC) is confirmed and legit:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173063762

Before we can go any further, I think we all should agree and know that these are the formulas that are used to asses the Fundamental Valuation of a stock:

Revenues x Net Profit Margin = Net Income
Net Income ÷ Outstanding Shares (OS) = Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Earnings Per Share (EPS) x Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio = Share Price Valuation

Below are some thoughts that were shared within a valuation post for indicating a "potential" valuation:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173067140

I ask that you and all that believe that such valuation thoughts were too aggressive to share your thoughts on a more conservative valuation.

v/r
Sterling

NorthPeak22, with your very biased thoughts...

You definitely have a problem with me so let's see if I can help you resolve such. Your thoughts are very biased. You just delivered a post to me making the same big time ad hominem comments to me that you think I have been making to others. If it ain't the pot calling the kettle black. Go back and read your post to me since you have such great people skills. Then go back and read those posts that I have been responding to. Usually I'm humble, but I am human. After a while, if you take a redundant jab at me, then I might take a jab back at you or the person that's giving the jab. Go look at the jabs that came at me before I even threw one jab back.

But wait... Let's both me and you put up or shut up. Let us both and all within the forum keep things on topic here with NHMD. This ain't about me and this ain't about you. This is about NHMD. I will start with myself to work on practicing what I preach in doing so. I will even go back and tailor a post or so and posts going forward to stay on topic. However, I'm going to need you and the rest of those people here that seem to have a problem with me and some others who share similar thoughts to work with me in keeping things on topic. I will try to be a better leader and lead by example for the sake of getting this to a sane level of being able to converse about NHMD without feeling like you are being attacked even if we have to agree to disagree on some things with each other. I think we all have some good in us somewhere down there that can be reached. Let's help each other to tap into that.

v/r
Sterling

doogdilinger, with your NHMD thoughts...

I share your same sentiments regarding NHMD. The impact date is Oct 30, 2023 which is this coming Monday.

So far, they have been above board with keeping shareholders updated. I'm expecting more updates soon!

v/r
Sterling