me2 please email me: dhippe@msn.com. I've has some phone interaction with Leo too. Like to discuss that with you.

Yes, as you have presented your application of it pertaining to ACLH.



Perhaps, but that remains to be seen. However, there are other ways to organize one's thoughts that are more dependent upon facts and evidence and that do not rely on conjecture. Your implication that those ways are less 'solid' is unsupportable.

I continue to contend that any form of 'presentation of probabilities' that falls short of what is required for being admitted into evidence in a court of law is deficient in dealing with facts and evidence. Why do you suppose that "objection, that calls for conjecture" is allowable in a court proceeding to dismiss statements consisting of conjecture, no matter how probable in the mind of the cross examiner?

No, what I'm saying is that what you call 'conjectural probability' is nothing more than guess work and that whatever you infer, from either conversations with Mr. Anderson or from reading his background, has nothing to do with what is or is not happening with ACLH management in the present circumstances.

I don't blame Mr. Anderson for either the suspension in trading of ACLH stock nor for the absence of contracts, which you insist on alluding to, nor for the indecisiveness on a strategy to move off the grays.

That's the equivalent of screening a resume without a face to face interview and thorough checking of references and most recent performance. Your misuse of words like 'analysis' and 'probability' in the context of the ACLH' 'situation' do not bring clarity to circumstances that cry out for it.

Your reference to contracts is also very misleading. In any case there is an opportunity today for you to lift the stock price as a show of your own confidence in your 'conjectural probability'.

Shouldn't take much to bring it back to .003.

My response challenging you about "increasing contracts" was removed. So let me try again.

Why should we accept a hearsay statement on contracts from a company that made claims about BP and the coast guard that could not, have not, been corroborated?

Why wouldn't "increasing contracts" be worthy of a PR rather than just an Ihub post by you claiming such? Stop with the paranoid comments about attacks on you. The so called attacks are being leveled against unsubstantiated comments and claims made by you.

LOL indeed! The ONLY valuable info as it relates to ACLH will be publicly disclosed info RE contracts, an actual decision to move from grays, or a buyout. Ares will not tell you or any of us about any of that outside of a PR.

Now that everyone understands that your conjectural probabilities are opinions decked out for the prom, feel free to share or not share those opinions. But don't kid yourself or us that those opinions are any more insightful than any others posted on this board.

You're really not in a strong enough position to be pointing out anyone else's supposed bias. You bias is to give the benefit of the doubt to ACLH executive competence and honesty. The 'doubt' has been well documented on this board and in the SEC reasons for suspension of ACLH stock trading.

Placing the word 'probability' after the word 'conjectural' does not impart greater evidentiary or predictive powers to conjecture than assigned to the word by definition:

Conjecture–noun

1. the formation or expression of an opinion or theory without sufficient evidence for proof.
2. an opinion or theory so formed or expressed; guess; speculation.

You really should get a thicker skin. Disagreement with you is not tantamount to mocking. Conjectural probability IS opinion dressed up in a tuxedo, an ill fitting one at that!

Tune in to Fox Cable News and watch it done by political opinion talking heads every day. Ideologues bend reality to conform to their ideological beliefs and theories. Facts and data be damned. I think it's more about comfort zones and avoiding the 'psychic pain' that comes from cognitive disonance which results when reality contradicts beliefs.

While this board is not a courtroom, and there is no 'trial' underway for the business conduct and decisions of ACLH executives, legal standards of evidence would result in the repeated raising of objections to your favorable speculations as to the good character and honesty of the 'defendants'.

"Objection, your Honor, the question calls for speculation."

A question is speculative if:
It invites or causes the witness to speculate or answer on the basis of conjecture."

Since 'conjectural probability' has not achieved a level of acceptance to allow it legal standing as an unobjectionable standard of evidence, I'm going to continue to hold it in 'contempt' as a useful guide to assesing the truth of the hearsay 'testimony' of ACLH personnel as summarized on this board.

In the end conjectural probability is as much conjecture as it is probability, and as such is simply opinion dressed up in a tuxedo.

Google up 'conjectural probabilities' and read what he actually means. I didn't use the word guessing, but rather suggested he was "projecting his wishes".

There is no 'science' not based upon testable, reproducible facts and evidence. You can call something 'science' based upon truth, but you won't find any corroboration for that view within the halls of science.

Other than that, you're dead on!

I've read the definiton as your posted it in July. Regardless of the validity of the theory or lack of same, It appears to me we could substitute "wish projections" for your application of the theory to ACLH. I'm not being facetious. How exactly DO you screen out your hopes for this stock to preclude them from coloring/tainting your surmises, which may be at total variance from what is really going on?

For example does the theory account for 'bad actors', malfeasance, poor decisions and incompetence? I'm not claiming any of thoe variables apply in this case, but I am asking if your theory allows for those 'variables'.

unless an objection or comment to Montana's Schedule 14C in this regard by the SEC will delay the Closing.

THAT'S the 'wild caed' in this proceeding. Absent the 'comment' or 'objection' from the SEC, the merger should go through.

2020,

Your product, OUR product, specifically this brand.....MARINES is now being presented to JWT, the advertising agency that has the MARINES as a client, by their sister ad agency and by my contact person.

I promise you no 'magic', but rather the perseverance and tenacity that carried my ass through Parris Is. many years ago.

Do NOT look for any updates on this anytime soon. We all know what comes of those on this board!

2020, allow me turn your question around. Is it worthwhile, helpful or instructive for you or anyone else invested in Go800 to be led to believe that something is true or is an accurate reflection of what is actually happening when it is flat out not true or accurate?

I'm not talking about a difference of opinion between two people with the same degree of knowledge about a particular matter....efforts, past and current, with the MDA or the length of time since new Go800 business was signed. You and everyone else have been misled regarding both of those issues. You now have the truth chiefly because I'm in a position to have direct knowledge and experience with both issues.

Anyone with any experience in B2B sales knows about sales cycles, multiple decision makers, 'timing', and buyers' skepticism of new companies. To assume that a sale has not been closed for reasons related to competence or thoroughness or lack of company support or lack of persistence is to assume things that can not be known by the one doing the assuming. Anyone is free to make those assumptions, just don't presume that those assumptions represent reality for anyone who values and respects evidence, accuracy and the truth.

Please, everyone, understand that statements that paint Go800 in a poor light, and that I know from personal experience ...MDA, new business...are inaccurate are NOT debatable. I will provide the truth about what is going on when I know that truth and the other person does not.

You've read some pretty incredible assumptions and unwarranted aspersions cast on Go800 management and Ambassadors. I consider those to be separate and distinct from legitimate criticism based upon knowledge of what is really going on. To assume that Brendan and the Ambassadors are not critical of Go800 shortcomings and are not constructively communicating those to Ike is to assume something that simply is not accurate.

This may flabbergast you.......or not. But the alleged 4.5 months
since a major company has been signed is an INACCURATE statement. I state that based upon my personal experience.

I have repeatedly requested that the 'offending party' on this board email me. It has been met with the same flaccid response as have the requests that he phone Brendan.

Now, let us all enjoy a 'quiet period' until the posting limit is up at 2400 hours EDT when you can expect a fusilade of responses that will be as indignant as they are unpersuasive. You'll see nothing more from me this holiday weekend.

"Conjectural Probability"

What is your conjecture about the alleged meeting that was to take place this week to strategise getting off the grays?

"...but you still choose to argue with that child."

For the record, the misstatements, if allowed to stand, were in my judgment potentially damaging to continued communication with the company in question. Recently one 'investor' felt themselves provoked enough by the appearance of inaction to take it upon themself to make a potentially damaging 'intervention' into a business situtation they knew nothing about. I refuse to stand by and allow that to happen again without reponse and regardless of claimed 'good intentions.'

" really don't like to put stuff like that as a sticky, only because it can be considered hearsay."

Did the fact that he didn't mention anything about any kind of communication to shareholders by this Friday lead you to believe that there won't be?

"Just called Leo, he was kinda busy and asked me to call him back in about 15 minutes.

Anyone have any questions I can ask for you?"

I spoke with him this morning. He was unaware of the pps plunge. I implored him to release some info before the holiday weekend.

He indicated he would release something by this Friday. Remember he's 85 years old and it may be too late tonight for a useful phone call.

When you do reach him please corroborate that he will release info by Fri as well as find out about what the assessed property values are.

"Ambassadors, is there a way to add go800 to the contact page on Lift Up America's website? :)"


As per the recording the service hasn't been implemented yet.

"Only down to one post for months. Does anyone know how to get reinstated??"

text 'humility' to 46800

"He may be screwing us ultimately like so many other pinky ceo's or maybe just maybe this 85+ year old guy is gonna do something wonderful."

I had a phone conversation with the CEO this afternoon and I confirm the same impressions of him expressed by the poster who outlined his call with him in an earlier post.

For what it's worth, quite a bit in my opinion, his email address is a combination of the P37 he flew in WWII and the year he graduated from law school. Hopefully the pps for DMGM will go up like a strafed Nazi munitions train!

"Blackhawks, just sent you my info, good luck. Let me know if i can be of more help."

Your company's name is reserved and ready for you to text tonight and demo to your colleagues tomorrow. Let me know how it goes and what you think our next step should be.

"$12; at what day do you predict this action...."

Don't let him 'play' you. There is NO such chart, NO such info to justify that number, Period.

"lol that's not "insider information", since anyone can call that number and find out for themselves whether a "PR is coming or not" too funny"

If you are given a specific date for a PR and no one else is, it's insider info. Which is why you won't be given that info. LOL!

"Knowing when they will come really will help all of the investors."

Be careful. Releasing PR dates can be construed as insider info. They should know that. Think about it. You could keep the info to yourself and load up, or sell if they're not coming soon.

"currently trying to figure out a way to spread the word about g0800 to my management team without it causing a conflict of interest."

I don't think you'll have any conflict, with either your conscience or your company's best interests, if you simply indicate that you "bought some shares in this interesting company. I think there may be a business application for us"...if in fact there IS a possible business application!

I'm an Ambassador for Go800. If you like you can send me the name of your company and I'll see if it's a brand that has been reserved. dhippe@msn.com

If it's not reserved I can reserve it for you and you can decide if you want to demo it to your team, or you can have me give you or someone you designate a phone call.

Meanwhile share this press release with your team. It's as thorough a briefing on Go800 as there is.


The Quickest, Easiest and Most Effective Way for Marketers and Advertisers to Instantly Connect With Consumers.
New York, NY (July 22, 2010) - Go800™, the first new direct response service utilizing cell phone text messaging and Voice Keywords™ for consumers to make immediate connections with advertisers and marketers, is now available to the 250 million mobile phone users who are able to send text messages, as well as all iPhone, Android and BlackBerry mobile Web users.


The service uses simple keywords rather than hard-to-remember toll free numbers or lengthy URLs to connect consumers with advertisers. Consumers text an easy-to-remember keyword they find on a print, outdoor, broadcast or online advertisement to 46800 (GO800). Seconds later, their cell phone rings as Go800 connects them with either a live voice from the advertiser’s response team or an automated response, which can quickly direct callers to a live voice. The service is free for consumers, although standard text messaging rates do apply. Go800 has trademarked the term ‘Voice Keywords™,’ which denotes keywords that return a live voice response.

Go800 allows advertisers and marketers to offer clients a creative, new value-added service. Advertisers register keywords through a do-it-yourself (self-provisioning) interface at Go800’s website.

The keywords can be company names, such as “Apple” or “Virgin Atlantic,” brand names, such as “iPhone” or a word, such as “diamonds,” which is easily associated with a product or service. They may be inexpensively leased regionally or nationally on a monthly basis. Companies may also advertise a single keyword and customize it by having their calls routed to a different telephone number for each area code, which facilitates local inquiries. They can even purchase multiple keywords or phrases to separate inquiries by category – from sales to customer support.

Over 7000 keywords have been registered to date, including “Walmart,” “Avis,” “Hertz,” “Jetblue,” Staples,” “Sears,” “BestBuy,” “BMW,” and “VirginAir.” This includes Voice Keywords selected by leading advertising and marketing agencies for select campaigns that will debut throughout 2011.

“Go800’s Voice Keywords enable quick accessibility to advertisers’ products and services when they are most top of mind and ready to buy” says Ike Sutton, President of Go800. “We expect to see explosive growth in this new direction for mobile marketing and relationship building between consumers and brands. In 2011, we plan to alert those advertisers and consumers about Go800 through a national, $6,000,000 print, online and radio advertising campaign.”

In addition, Go800 is partnering with Xtify to release free mobile Web apps for the iPhone, Android and BlackBerry smartphone platforms, allowing consumers to transmit Voice Keywords over mobile and WiFi data connections, bypassing the need for text messages. These versions will include enhancements to deliver geo-triggered notifications and messages.

Another benefit for advertisers is the ability to accurately measure short-and long-term value provided by Go800’s service through ROI accountability, since results are easily tracked and measured. The service is also far more cost-effective for advertisers than toll-free numbers.

The company has also launched a “Ticker” service, which will offer public companies the ability to lease their stock exchange ticker symbol as a Voice Keyword™. Shareholders and Investors for participating companies will be able to text the ticker symbol to Go800 and be kept updated on company activities. In less than one month, 25 public companies have already signed up for the service, and Go800 is forecasting approximately 1000 participating by year’s end. According to the Mobile Marketing Association (MMA), Cell phones are used by over 3.1 billion people globally, including 200 million Americans – over half the population. By early 2006, thirty countries had exceeded 100% per-capita cell phone usage.

Approximately two-thirds of these mobile phone users (1.8 billion people) are active users of SMS text messaging. Globally, there are twice as many active users of SMS as there are active users of email. In the US alone, more than 363 billion text messages were sent in 2007, and that number increased to over 600 billion messages sent in 2008. An estimated 4.9 trillion text messages will be sent and delivered globally in 2011. Nearly all cell phones are text-message enabled and supported by carriers, who promote texting.

About GoIP Global, Inc. and Go800, LLC
GoIP Global, a publicly held company, (GOIP) offers a range of mobile media services, solutions and tools for brands, agencies, content providers, online portals, entertainment and media companies. GoIP Global provides brand and content customers greater flexibility to create mobile marketing campaigns and applications.

Go800, a GoIP subsidiary, has launched a new patent-pending text messaging service that enables advertisers to incorporate a text prompt in their advertisements, prompting consumers to contact them through a text message rather than calling a toll free number. For additional information, visit www.go800corp.com. GO800 also can be found on Facebook at www.facebook.com/go800 and twitter at www.twitter.com/go800.


Safe Harbor Statement Information in this news release may contain statements about future expectations, plans, prospects or performance of GoIP Global, Inc. that constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor Provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words or phrases "can be," "expects," "may affect," "believed," "estimate," "project," and similar words and phrases are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. GoIP Global, Inc. cautions you that any forward-looking information provided by or on behalf of GoIP Global, Inc. is not a guarantee of future performance. None of the information in this press release constitutes or is intended as an offer to sell securities or investment advice of any kind. GoIP Global, Inc.'s actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, some of which are beyond GoIP Global, Inc.'s control. In addition to those discussed in GoIP Global, Inc.'s press releases, public filings, and statements by GoIP Global, Inc.'s management, including, but not limited to, GoIP Global, Inc.'s estimate of the sufficiency of its existing capital resources, GoIP Global, Inc.'s ability to raise additional capital to fund future operations, GoIP Global, Inc.'s ability to repay its existing indebtedness, the uncertainties involved in estimating market opportunities and, in identifying contracts which match GoIP Global, Inc.'s capability to be awarded contracts. All such forward-looking statements are current only as of the date on which such statements were made. GoIP Global, Inc. does not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which any such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

The PHONE number is 954-554-2725

"2029 Taft Street Suite 5
Hollywood, Florida 33020

Telephone: (954) 922-0847

Facsimile: (954) 554-2725'

You have got the #'s reversed.

The PHONE number is 954-554-2725

"I mean when did this conversation start... June... July? It is insane now... just crazy!"

Hey, I dropped it. How about you? I also tried many times to take it off the board. That said, if I see anymore misinformation or bogus arguments I'll be here.

"or you're trying to convince yourself that I am indeed right and just need more proof than was given to you....or....."

That makes no more sense than anything you've posted. We've had numerous requests to stop these exchanges. I'm going to abide by them. The offer remains open for you to email me. I personally don't think that requires any special courage on your part, but I'm prepared to be proven wrong!

"And again, when ACT was suspended, I called Ares not too long after trade resumed on the grey market. I told him in no uncertain terms that the grey market will kill the stock and that the PPS would never move on that market, and that they needed to make it a priority to GET OFF THE GREY MARKET. That was 2 months ago. Where have we gone since then? No where."

Mirrors my experience exactly. As I said a dual track with the SEC and geting off the grays would have positioned them to take advantage of any 'surprise' good news/contracts.

This stuff about 'nice guys' is irrelevant to shareholder concerns and far too subjective to base any investment or business decisions upon.

"He refused to submit the questions I asked him to, so stop trying to convince yourself otherwise."

Didn't state that he did, merely that he has the right to submit what he wants to submit. If he didn't have that discretion he'd having little time for anything else.

"It does indeed prove it. If he was "our" voice, which means all of us, then he would submit them."

Anyone else take 'our voice' to mean the voice of every single poster no matter the nature and content of their posts?

"and I'm supposed to have a cogent conversation with you?"

Why me anymore than anyone else? You haven't been cogent, logical or persuasive on any matter to date.

So this is good right? not down with how all this court stuff is played out.

Don't let anyone kid you. NO one is 'down' with all this court stuff. There are a lot of hopeful inferences being made about lawyers' backgrounds and what that measn to the filings. Unless and until you read "common stock to be preeserved", or words to that effect, it's pretty much guesss work and a little bit of tea leaf reading. Some 'readers' may be better than others, but nothing conclusive is in evidence as of the moment.

"Eventually if all you have to say about ACLH and other people is bad then people may begin to put you on IGNOR.

This post so clearly misses addresing the real concerns of ACLH shareholders that it's nearly worthy of being pulled as "off topic"

I don't dispute for a moment that unkind remarks have been directed at ACLH personnel, including by me. Mine however went more to the issue of competence than to character defects.

To imply that glowing assesments of the personalities of ACLH executives somehow earns them the benefit of the significant doubts that they have in fact EARNED from shareholders, is to totally miss the point of most of us who've raised questions about ACLH decisons and non-decsions.

I'll await your posts on feedback on any meetings that may take place, if in fact there is any substantive info worth sharing.

"i just wanted to say i dont apreciate your remark:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=53863853

if you see my post today on this board, you will see i am honest about having other plays in the works to earn "GOIG ask dollars"

i am long on go800 and i dont need you of all people mocking that. it has been a painful journey, and i expect that remark out of a basher, not an ambassador."

Text 'long' to Go800 should in no way be construed as a 'bash'. It was a heads up from me to someone else in both stocks, nothing more. It's really hard for me to fathom how you could take offense to that. Chalk it up to the misunderstandings that derive from attempts at humor in posts and emails. Look to my other posts to you on this board as a more accurate barometer of my respect for your posts.

" Please don't debate a statement the relates to a flat out truth. Brendan did in fact refuse to submit that list of questions to Ike, end of story. Stop glossing over it."

I'm neither debating nor glossing over. My statement is an accurate assessment and yours is not.

The "flat out truth" is that your questions not being forwarded does NOT mean that questions from others on the same subjects weren't forwarded. Further, no single post not being forwarded invalidates Brendan's role as a voice to Ike. Brendan made it very clear why your particular post was not forwarded. Anyone else feel that Brendan is not a 'voice'?

My statement below is acurate and irrefutable. See if you can wrap, shrinkwrap at that, your mind around that concept.

"That he doesn't forward everything on this board, or from anywhere else for that matter, does not prove that it "is not really true about being our voice to Ike."

You might want to drop 'don't do that' and 'stop' from your posts. They're not effective arguments!

"8,525 shares @ an average of $0.1656 and im not ready to sell."

Text 'long' to 46800.

"This is not really true about being our voice to Ike, as he already refused to forward some very important questions to Ike that most all of us would like answered."

Inaccurate AND illogical. That he doesn't forward everything on this board, or from anywhere else for that matter, does not prove that it "is not really true about being our voice to Ike."