Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Why certainly! Nyah, Nyah, Nyah
Doesn’t look like a financial arrangement as it was pointed out that a joint business agreement would have been material to shareholders, and Kabunuchi (sp?) translated that it was something like signing up to join the medical technology center as tenants, if I understood correctly.
Do I take it that we are the seniors that you picture trodding along and drooling on ourselves? Not quite yet he said as he got into his Benz wearing Ferragamo drivers
Thanks for the info which I feel better about than if there was a partnership of some sort, and you make a good point regarding the material nature if it were in fact some joint undertaking.
If the efficacy is there, patients will seek treatment as a life or death option for the best shot for extending life with minimal side effects.
Respectfully, not this time imho. LP did not qualify her statement about unblinding this ninth month in the year of our Lord, as in September. There wasn’t even a hint of wiggle room, which may be a first for NWBO communications!
I know it’s hard to accept that we are finally about to get the trial results after years of we are almost there, but I think barring an unexpected calamity NWBO will make good on unblinding the world.
Then it’s a matter of how good the data is and how the approval process plays out as we all know.
What a beautiful day in the neighborhood... can you say bio markers? I knew you could
You wouldn’t need an abstract but I don’t see northwest bio nor LP anywhere on the programme for ESMO.
Plus the machine reduces the clean room and technician requirements = more bang for the buck
Thanks Marza!
Yep when the pharmacy bro got bagged I thought his buddy was going to join him in the joint.
Gary, thanks and a PR after the market close tomorrow would make for a long weekend of anticipation. Anyway I am convinced that the deadline of TLD in September will be met. GLTA
Yeah, I can picture LP in a black suit with black wayfarer shades playing a mean blues harp to the “shorties squeeze blues” Akroyd and Jim Belushi might be up for such an event - I’m too silly now, time to call it a night.
Is LP presenting this weekend?
The SNO presentation strongly implies that TLD will be available meaning NWBO will be unblinded with time to prepare in advance.
Imho no way they’re going to miss the SNO event.
If high level summary of TLD is made public by end of this month, that provides the whole month of October for increasing anticipation leading to the opening of warrants exercise freedom and climax event at SNO. One would hope the sp would appreciate through October in that scenario and the locked up warrants could conceivably make it harder for short covering or limit the float. Again, the November timing of the warrants/options unlock must have specific logic behind it.
Perlmutter briefing - it would be very interesting if some tie in to dcvax is mentioned there. One can only speculate however the Duffy connection and dcvax direct combo trial at least present overlaps in mutual interests imho.
And regarding the timing of the locked up period for the options such that they can’t be exercised until November, that was done for a reason and it must be to the advantage of NWBO.
But will NWBO dcvax be at risk for China exploitation of IP and/or copying the secret sauce and manufacturing dcvax-like cloned vaccines?
Was Trump successful in getting China to no longer require access to companies IP?
Does AF have credibility still and might he need to lay low re SEC visibility?
What time is Perlmutter holding this shareholder briefing Tuesday and can we access it?
I didn’t see NWBO or LP anywhere in the programme. Is NWBO supposed to be participating?
My recall is fuzzy on the stock but I do remember what you described. It did start with a C, and I think it had a D and possibly an X, like CDEX. That’s what came to my mind anyway and I wouldn’t bet the farm on being correct.
Yes, All of the above!
Sounds promising, in the words of a certain ceo
Picked up some more shares up to 0.90-ish, then stepped away from the keyboard to have some self control.
I tried to get an allotment of snowflake shares from my broker but I guess I don’t have enough juice, was somewhat disappointed until NWBO began this launch off, then forgot about snowflakes
Enjoying the ride now after 10 long years, as the song says.
I know I leaked, champagne that is!
Funny and quite enjoyable!
The thought of a cozy prison cell near buddy Martin S should be motivation for AF.
Scotty it’s a relief to hear from you!
Was afraid you were taking this sp rise badly.
If it will make you feel better go ahead and let loose another derogatory statement like 1.4B shares, etc.
(You can always quietly accumulate a boatload of shares)
Could this be related to flaskwork buyout.
There’s hope for humanity yet !
That 30 minute Los Angeles video piece on Linda L should do wonders to spread the word LL is helping people live longer with her caring, skills, and a certain vaccine!
First trading day in weeks that I resisted the temptation to buy more. I should be at break even now from averaging down. Now I’d start averaging up like I did when Neil from the UK bought all those millions of $$$ in shares.
That devilish little voice is urging me to keep buying again
Was I looking at the wrong ticker?
Didn’t the sp go to 0.66 from around 0.61, for 5 quick cents?
It seemed like for the first hour or so the sp was kept to just under 0.60, like to 0.599 each attempt other than the gap open. Got tired of watching this and went away for a while. Finally found it above 0.6, like highs of 0.619 or so when I returned. I don’t have detailed visibility but it felt like a concerted effort to cap the rise in sp. Any level 2’s, etc., see evidence of this?
Just one data point, however the oncologist prescribed a cancer drug off label because the genetics of the cancer indicated the drug, but the insurance company declined to cover on the basis it was not a cancer for which it was labeled.
IMHO bringing up a trading glitch at a brain tumor conference would have been totally out of place and even disrespectful of the conference and attendees. An investment conference would be a different case.