Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I think the volume is up relative to the lower price, is all. Sellers are probably selling at the bid, driving the price down, increasing the vol but not by much!
According to Dr. Moro in the interview, by the end of the year, they should know whether or not the technology will be useful in imaging. They have already laid the ground work to be able to begin testing in mice. Then, I suppose they would test in human subjects. Whether or not they will publicly announce their findings remain to be seen!
This is true! I realized that after I sent the post.
Good advice, Kag!
Foam - your opinion of me is ridiculous and really doesn't warrant a response. However, I will say this: your opinion of me carries about the same weight as that of a three year old child, it's meaningless. I don't know you, but it's easy to picture you as being a wierd, cooky, friendless kind of guy. You accuse me of calling you a groupie and I've never even addressed you. I talk to bocxman and you respond! Shut up, get a life and leave me alone!
You're very welcome, the more people that can be a part of this, the merrier I become. I can't wait for the product to launch. I know I will take the serum test annually!
Yes, I am a Junior, in my thirties. I can learn a lot from my elders. My point remains, however. Who cares, regarding your griping over dilution, yada, yada, yada ... Most people here are pretty estatic with this company having only 38 mil shares outstanding. You can always find something to complain about, even in the most ideal situation. You chose dilution. What's done is done. It's not like we can look forward to mass dilution, according to Dr. Moro in the interview. Look at the over all picture, take a pill, and be happy!
See, you can learn a thing or two from the younger generation. Make no mistake though, I do respect you!
"issuing shares to directors/officers is just as dilutive as issuing shares to outside investors...they equally lessen the potential returns of current shareholders."
My contention is that it will not happen that way here, because directors/officers will not try to cash in at these levels, when higher values are imminent! And if these shares are being issued as compensation for services rendered, then share price is a moot point because these share would have been issued regardless!
"Amateur night is over?" You might be well advised to refrain from using sarcasm, because yours sucks. Not a personal attack, just an observation!
Oh, and Foam, in response to your opinion that my conversation about the diluted shares is "stupid"! Stupid is, as stupid does, hence your last post! So I really don't think anyone here is very interested in your opinion. Better yet, speak when your spoken to! lol
Opps, I was suppose to be working on the sarcasm. Sorry!
No, I never did get a reply!
Foam, I will be restrained in my response to your post. I made no reference to you. I gave no response to any of your posts regarding the groupie comment. Why then do you believe I was directing my comments toward you? If you are offended at the way I conducted myself in my conversations with bocxman, well that's not your business! And besides, you are the one with egg on your face. Interesting how you come to your hero's aid when you feel he is being attacked. And you say you're not a groupie? I did not accuse anyone in particular of being one, and honestly, I didn't have you in mind.
Frankly, you are displaying your immature nature to think I gloat over an interview with Dr. Moro? What kind of mind would even theorize such a notion? Apparently that's how your mind works! I'm not looking for recognition, or trying to receive credit from annonymous posters on a message board. I am interested in becoming weathly. First and foremost I am interested in attaining as much info about my investment as possible, hence the interview. I am also interested in sharing my findings, as my fellow posters have been doing. My purpose is to contribute and to encourage dialogue, as well as learn from the due diligence of others.
And bocxman, I don't want to spar with you. I do recognize the contributions you've made to this board. I admit I have challenged you on some points and you may have interpreted it as me attacking you. Understandable. I have a tendency to respond to sarcasm in like manner. As you can see in my response to Foam, I am working on that! I don't claim to know very much and I learn a lot from posing questions, questioning and reading the thoughts of fellow posters. If I ruffled any feathers, I apologize! I am just bewildered why Foam has so much to say about the groupie comment. I guess everyone has their own demons to contend with!
"7,801,837 shares issued in 2005. 160,000 of those were at $1 and the rest were sub-$1. The vast majority of the shares were issued at a tenth of a penny to directors/officers since the company had nothing else to compensate with."
If that is true, what's the problem! They were issued to employees, director's/officers, not the public or institutional investors!
In my book, they (company execs and employees) don't count. I think you are reaching again to try and make your point! There's no indication that they sold them on the open market at these prices, is there? I'm sure they understand the stock's potential! They work for the company and have a better "first hand" knowledge of the exciting happenings within the company than we. Do you have evidence that all of those 7,801,837 shares have been excercised and sold on the open market? I didn't think so! And still, we only have about 38,000,000 shares outstanding! Which is a huge positive!!! So stop "bit'chin"!
bocxman - I am not worried about getting you going. I have no problem admitting I'm wrong. Fact is, I'm not. My contention has always been that BOCX is not selling a significant amount of shares into a depressed market for their stock. Only 38,000,000 shares outstanding is hella low. Plus they pulled back a multi-million share offering because of the low share price! Now, maybe your definition of "significant" differs from mine, but please, explain to me how I'm wrong! Your ego, fed by a few "groupie" posters is what really has you going! lol
If you choose to respond, please come with some more facts to discount my contention! I look forward to it!
Happy Ressurection Day!
Bocxman - I am not kidding! I don't fault you for making inaccurate assumptions, rather I will simply correct you. Recall the interview. Dr. Moro said he does not want to sell company stock at these depressed levels to raise money because it would dilute shareholder value. He said the company has a few hundred thousand in the bank so they were doing all right financially.
n the future, it may be wise to have facts when you post on the board. The facts you did post re: the company's stock sells into the market, dated back years and the sells were very modest. State your opinions and assumptions as such, otherwise people may mistake them as facts and you will see your credibility erode.
How have we been diluting shares? The company has not been selling shares into the lower prices. Last I checked, late Feb, we only had 38,000,000 outstanding shares. What are you talking about?
It is my belief that being on the pinks is a blessing in disguise. If we were on the OTC, we'd be trading between 2-4 dollars. I never would have been able to load up like I have!
That means listing on a major exchange has to be very close, along with a double digit share price!!!
Kag - I was not referring to the approval process with the FDA, I was talking about the development of the technology within Abbott's Architect Platform. Allow me to present my ? like this: When Abbott further develops the technology and incorporates it into their Architect Platform, will the diagnosis for prostate be the same assay that would identify any and all types of cancer? My original post assumed that Abbott would have to develop an assay for each cancer type, but perhaps that is not the case!
bocxman - once Abbott has the working serum based assay for prostate cancer completed, do you think it would require much effort (time) to create an assay for breast, cervical, etc ... ? Of course I know they would have to test the assay on subjects, then go through the FDA approval process. I am just supposing that after the prostate assay is complete, other assays would follow in much less the time it took to develop the prostate.
Steel - That seems highly unlikely and would ruffle some feathers, not to mention be "tacky". Any info regarding the first milestone payment would be announced when it happens.That pr this week probable has nothing to do with Abbott's feasibility review. There is no hint that Abbott had anything to do with the report.
Kag - Is your comment accurate? "I am aware that semi-exclusive licensing deals are common for Abbott."
Fluffy - keep in mind, kjg is not interested in facts. His purpose here is one fold, to bash, lie and mislead investors. He has a hidden agenda, like DC STEVE had on the ragingbull board. Chances are he's one and the same!
"I've already posted that the insiders have excuted a pump and dump in the past:"
Like I said, you are a known liar, what idiot would believe anything you post?
Like i said kjg is ignorant and makes statements that are either assumptions stated as fact, or speaks flat out lies. Where he gathered I am holding shares @ 1.30 from, I've no idea! Don't worry about what I'm holding retard!
kjg - You are ignorant, you don't know what price I'm holding at.
Kjg - my 1st instinct is to say. if you don't have confidence in the technology, you should sell and not look for anyone to convince you otherwise! However, I will share the obvious. The technology sounds too good to be true, and we are trading on the pinks. I'm sure it is a standard practice for institutional investors to steer clear of the pinks (inherently risky) and otc stocks, no matter the technology.
You know, bocxman, I appreciate your gratitude. Without you, this board wouldn't even exist. This board feels like family, unlike that other board!!!
The way I've corresponded with you was all in jest. We are essentially and literally on the same team. We just were using our wit to get our points across. It keeps things interesting around here, with the lack of news and all. However, now, we have the real thing to sustain us for another month or two. I sure hope we never see under a $1.00 again.
Keep in mind Dr. Moro isn't a stock guy, he may not think the way a financially savvy investor would think.
bocx was wrong yesterday and he will be wrong again! He may be the superstitious type. If he expects the negative, the positive will happen and vice - versa! Too bad we have a so called proponent of Biocurex throwing salt on the party favors!
I have my 140k off the table @ least until we hit the double digits!!!
Well bocxman, looks like you were wrong, AGAIN!!! Last I checked we were way past a dollar!
With my last post being said, "I believe" that unlike Abbott's blind test study, this new pharma ran their own testing, in their own controlled labortory study, disclosing the blind test results to Biocurex, not the other way around!
This announcement is great for competitive reasons. Another pharma is responsible for the blind test results, which is why during the testing, Biocurex wasn't even privy to knowing who had early stage cancer. The pharma involved, wanted to test the limits of this technology before getting into bed with Biocurex! The next pr release should hit within the next month, announcing another licensing agreement with a large pharma. Because this technology will change the way healthcare deals with cancer, Dr. Moro will hold out for the best possible licensing agreement for Biocurex and it's shareholders. And is part of the reason for the "news" dry spell with re: to no new licensing agreements. Other pharmas have been trying to get Biocurex to give up some @ss, trying to take advantage of a small start-up biotech company who wants to license it's technology. Dr. Moro has been sticking to his guns, and won't settle for a deal that is not at least as sweet as the Abbott deal, (which alludes to the confidential part of the interview I had with Dr. Moro!) This is why Dr. Moro is the CEO, and not bocxman who thinks he can run more than just his mouth and stock portfolio!
My guess is another pharma. Dr. Moro has been in ongoing discussions with other Pharmas. It was the blind testing that got Abbott hooked! We already know Dr. Moro is tight lipped with the non disclosure agreements. That is why he didn't release the info regarding who did the testing! He wanted to release something, a little carrot, if you will, for all of the "bocxman" investors of the world, that we are still full steam ahead, despite the long news drought!
"A run to $1 would be nice but as always with this stock, we will float back down until we hit the next pivotal event."
Who's being negative now???
Since you are so smart, bocxman, why don't you name the company that you are the CEO of? Oh ..., that's what I thought! Man, Shut Up!!!
Yo, bocxman - Let me explain something to you, Miss High and Mighty (got asked to the dance, huh? lol)! If I am an ignoramous, I'm soon to be a rich one, ha, ha! Secondly, I wanted the price to go down cause I knew it would be brief, then rise again! Sort of like what it did. I was hoping for .60 though! Your assumption seems to be that I wanted the share price to go much lower than that, and maybe stay there for a while. Wrong!!! I guess your assumption gave you reason to want to explain something, you know, to impress your board goupies with your empirical knowledge. Well, you obviously don't impress me, though you try! The problem with you bocxman, is that your ASSUMPTIONS make an @ss out of you and ME! I don't want an idiot like you making an @ss of me! And bocxman, why do you have to dig back so far in time, reading my old posts, to try and find something to ridicule me on? YOU ARE REACHING DUDE!
I am counting my blessings that I was able to get an extra 10,000 shares @ .75!
Or ... maybe you could stop trying to leach off my efforts, be your own man and pick up the phone yourself! You have the number! What ... are YOU broke!!!
I get your point bocxman. Moro knows the technology works. He is not interested in "HIRING" a third party research company at this stage to verify these findings. He is focused on licensing the technology right now and allowing interested pharmas to do their own verification. And, in the meantime, using the company's resources to further develop the technology into other applications. He knows the third party verification will come and he won't have to pay for it once more big wigs get on board! Dr. Moro's agenda differs from yours. Dr. Moro understands that the value of this technology is unlimited. He knows the price of this stock will blow up soon enough. He is looking out for the long term interest of the company, and can give a rat's @ss about you making a quick buck on a sudden great spike! I think Dr. Moro's focus is in the right place. Your impatience makes you frustrated! Perhaps you should have used disposable income to invest, that you could afford to let sit, instead of mortgaging your house! lol
I suppose you chose to "shut up"! LOL