Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
go to zpauls post about the pacer update.
Zpaul could you confirm whether or not the 3 companies supposed to update pacer 72 hours before the meeting?, and if so do they need to update 72 hours via trading days, or do weekends count too? And what is supposed to be confirmed?
I lost the booklet temporarily, hope i can find it.
and plus the burden of proof is on him to provide evidence of why sfor is not working with intel. Speaking an opinion ain't going to prove anything, and we have George saying that we are working with intel, so we're one up the Nigerian prince.
a few days ago I got it, what broker do you have?
I got a booklet too generally meeting materials, but i might have missed something.
Zpaul, is there like a need for the 3 companies to update pacer about their position in this lawsuit? Someone mentioned 2 weeks before the lawsuit, but then said they made an error and aaid it's 72 hours before the lawsuit takes place. If that were true, is it 72 hours only on trading days or 72 hours before the actual event? Which places the update on a sunday.
only if it covers having to use a pass and your phone to verify. Out of band authentication is the main tech we're working with.
If mark gave either negative or positive news without it being a pr, then it might be considered insider trading due to the method that the information is being revealed. (youtube) if he released info as a 8k that may be a different story because the news was released through the sec.
I think the only difference that might have given authentify an edge was that they had a similar patent. Phone factor dint have that, and neither do the 3 infringers that we are currently tackling right now. Heck if they did have a patent they would have put out the counter claim stating that, but instead the counter claim against sfor is that we don't own the patent.
AFTER the fight with authentify, I think we got smarter on who we should stick with a lawsuit so that victory is more likely.
price speculation aside, how much liquid cash do they have? If an offer is made, we know that sfor isn't going for the small stuff.
the price plunge was just everyone being scared that expectations wont be met cause the video crushed expectations quite well. Now that expectations are lowered, the future is uncertain so what ever happens is whatever happens. That being said, if we beat expectations and with such a low rsi, we might see a significant boost to high levels, but that's merely speculation.
Perhaps the video was made to stop over speculation of things so that people won't get over hyped about what is to occur, when it could be nothing. it would hurt the company more i would think if we were all pumped for something, and it doesn't occur. A very fast drop would have followed. But since we got that drop out of the way, it should be relatively okay.
With the recent or video he put out, I feel like everyone's expectations took a major hit, which is why it fell so sharply. IF it so happens that the meeting is just a meeting with the 3 Companies then it would be a meh event, and we would just be waiting for the next pr. However if something does happen at the meeting that is good, then we could see a rise in sentiment due to our expectations and rsi being as low as it is already. ONLY a week and a half folks, let's keep her going steady.
that would be a bad idea unless it was huge money, and plus it's still patented by one of the members of the team with no changes to the patent itself, so i don't think it changed hands. On top of that it would mean that they would lose the licencing money with the big companies they claimed to be working with. Overall it would be stupid to sell the patent unless like i said for very very large amounts.
A more reasonable explanation is that protect id is only available for corporate right now, and not the general public; which Guardedid and Mobile trust is. it wouldn't benefit them to put protect id on the website because they can't really sell it to the avg joe.
Which store?
I'll ask again, is this still happening?
"They have until a max of 14 days before the meeting to give the judge a status of the case of possible settlements. In the Microsoft case they put in for mediation exactly 14 days prior on the day the same exact update was due. This is what we are waiting for at this precise moment. The update that is required by the courts. I think it'll be Wednesday personally."
So is this like still happening, or not.
Every fast fall has resulted in a lower high. We will have to work our way up back to those numbers.
OD is where I got my copy, so it is definitely there.
if it makes it to 1 cent there will be a nice hammer on the 1 day chart.
it's still money. Saying that it's nothing is clearly, and blatantly wrong.
literally outdated, they even have screen capture protection now.
the way you phrased it is not good, because you claim no revenue when he said the revenue would be roughly around the same, despite not having someone do the numbers yet.
isn't today the day that presumably pacer is to be updated?.
any future predictions my man?
man that heavy dumping
he mentioned ihub haha.
nah use this chart, it's clearer i would think. http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui
Haha that's quite a lot of money. They would need 28 billion probably to make the price go up that high.
Presumably after this week, we will have the opportunity to go to otcqb, and once again the stock may be deemed most likely not a scam. Will mark take this chance to redeem the stock?
false information, no news of settlement by any yet. Move along...
Post proof.Edit: yep calling bs, pacer says nothing.
Isn't it usually updated at the end of the day on most (if not all) days? Its not unusal that the docket is updated at the end of the day, but has it changed 3 times today?
My question how do you know someone had been accessing the lawsuits recently?
Whoa whoa whoa this info by duo is very similar to the Microsoft 2fa vid. https://duo.com/why-duo/why-two-factor-authentication-2fa
Definitely infringing upon sfor cause its oob sfa.
Tell your boss, that they're under litigation lol.
So wait zpaul, why do they have to update by Wednesday?
Back to a 64% buy, and the rsi is pretty low. Stock is also winding up. News is what we need to break the cycle.
If we at least positive tomorrow, the pattern may be set for Consolidation until something upsets that.
it would be interesting to see a a pacer update.