Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SO ORDERED re270 Stipulation and Order to Amend Scheduling Order (*Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Fact Discovery completed by 7/6/2018, Dispositive Motions due by 12/1/2018, An Oral Argument is set for 3/8/2019, at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 6A before Judge Richard G. Andrews, a Trial Scheduling Conference is set for 12/14/2018, at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 6A before Judge Richard G. Andrews) (see Stipulation for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/23/2018
I think close of Discovery is like July 5th ?
Amen to that. I think we will see it DENIED but maybe not until July. Def some catalysts coming soon.
UOIP
See the thing is you look at level two and it seems like that every time...just clear the wall at x and then thin up to x but someone comes in and hits the ask and it doesn't play out that way. I don't understand fully but thats what I've seen time and time again
10k sold for .02 when bid was at .022?
Minutes from yesterday on Pacer
Nothing on PTAB
Excellent Post
No, Just Checked
Thanks! Did not realize but should have if we are talking about valuations $$
Looking forward to Zombie update > second meeting should be wrapping up soon I imagine
So odd...why would someone dump 500k at .165
Billy Carter > That is All. Oh wait ...the person who wrote that article owns shares here ...hope you know
whoaaaaaa big volume
So can we talk about the 2 Million ask wall that has showed up since we started getting upward momentum?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
What do we think the sealed letter is regarding? More delay? Is the meeting still on for today?
If im the judge im thinking..."Mrs Ying, why do you always wait until the night before to bring me these ?
Zombie, are you attending tomorrow or not?
Ill tell you what we are not looking for..a dramatic increase in pps. Many here might be operating under that assumption. Id assume along with this we may see some subsequent selling because people take the info or lack thereof wrong.
Bingo its all about the Arris IPR. Stay or none. The stay is based on the resolution of Arris IPR. So even if it is granted we just wait til they deny Arris IPR
SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Richard G. Andrews from Jennifer Ying regarding continued deficiencies in ChanBond's Second Supplemental Privilege Log.(Ying, Jennifer)
Att: 1 Exhibit A-C HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
You would think so but at the same time honestly how many people would ever find out about UOIP? I suppose those who follow these types of plays, and occasionally some folk who look deeper into IHub breakout boards, most read, buzz cloud etc. Other than that word of mouth and maybe occasional technical people who have scans picking it up. Now when Arris gets denied IPR and we get some more articles on the matter then its time to start dancing
How could you ever say everything is a mess?
tons of Bids at .0165 is this covering? or retail?
Product of the market makers
No Retail Investors Can Naked Short OTC
Thanks for your explanation. Explain why out of nowhere you see 2 or 3 million shares on ask when momentum is bullish and the typical size in the 100k to 300k range
Well i would agree on all fronts here. Fist, the otc report was from 5-15. It is June 6 my dude. Second, i would agree on click bait etc but there is def some naked shorting going on
You think a market maker knows the judge and is talking to him in his driveway asking" hey you think you'll deny this IPR from Arris?" You think "you'll grant that stay?"
how would they know?
They are going to stack the ask more than ever soon
Wait until 2 min before open
You can say everybody gets their chance at PTAB...except when they are time barred lol (ARRIS) and the other two batters swung and missed
That would be very valuable.
Need to see if it will be open to the public.
Basically get to see the two sides present for 15 min. See how Jennifer Ying operates for them. See how good Robert Whitman and Steven Brauerman are for us. (Idk if thats who will actually present) amd mkst important try and get a general sense of how Judge Andrews is feeling on all this.
I suppose since they were sued? Or you could day since the first IPR petition by RPX. I've seen that schedule amended a good 6 times.
So I have re-visited my thoughts around the June 13th date. We have lead it to be this significant end all-be all event where this perfect scenario plays out. I would certainly like that but looking at the timelines of these proceedings, I have a modified version.
I think there is a reasonable chance the stay is granted. Mind you this is granted and "pending resolution of Arris IPR" I only think this because of typical timeframe of IPR. So the petition was February then we recently have seen preliminary response. This is typical couple months. I think ultimately that the IPR will be denied institution but the way it plays out to me is stay granted (meaningless) then IPR denial by July/August (Which follows along with timeframe again). Then settlement discussions or dragged out to trial (doubt).
The kicker is all the previous Chanbond wins and consistent delays by the defendants. If im the judge, that makes my decision happen on June 13.
Dyl
Long UOIP
Quick to click new post instead of reply lol. Thanks though!
Dyl