Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
WOW...really? That is your thought process? Let's see...where to begin to enlighten you about the SP having a major impact on investors. You seem to be unable to grasp the concept of SP affecting SH's. But I guess that goes back to your post about "not being here to make money." Well...lemme tell you a little secret....everyone else here wants to make money!
Now let's break down that post of yours. Shall we?
First off...you said..."That depends on how you think shareholders are best served" Well obviously, and you fail still to grasp this concept, is for the share price to increase.
Next..."Good advertising only kills a bad product faster." Well that part of your post is self-explanatory.
Next...."We are probably close to that if you ignore legacy debt issues. DoD is sequestered and shut down shocked." You can't ignore legacy issues and make excuses for management. Again you are new to WSGI...and don't seem to have a full grasp on previous situations with previous management. Otherwise you wouldn't post non-sense like that..
Next...you seem to forget that most SH's on this board already went thru Huff and the like. And you deride the possibility of WSGI/Glenn posting fluff. But you have done it numerous times with your "projections" about order amounts/dollar amounts etc. Seems like the pot calling the kettle black IMO. But to each his own.
Not picking on you at all. Just my opinion.
I think his point was to make sure she is running a firewall also. Even if it is just MS firewall. Something is better than nothing.
The lawsuit doesn't have anything to do with the "short" position that BBB mentioned. I think the lawsuit involves separate manipulation issues on the part of LJC IMO. So I think there is still merit to the lawsuit based on LJC's activities.
In all due respect BBB....the short position is so miniscule...it literally has no impact whatsoever on the SP. It would be different if the "short" position was in the 10's of millions. But it's not. It's a non-factor on the SP IMO.
In case you haven't already read this, this should be something you'd find interesting.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/07/us/faa-drones-over-us/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
I read somewhere today that the OTC itself was having issues.
Just to check...you do realize it was WW who posted that right? You know, shaker of salt and all.
Week -10- Tennessee. Thanks!
There are alot of very tight games this week!
If Dallas loses...that will pretty much eviscerate the winners pool this week.
Week 9 - Kansas City. Thanks!
I mean seriously...what is your obsession with Tebow? He sux. Dude can't play in the NFL....he was only good in college(Ryan Leaf anyone?-Plus MANY others). Otherwise teams would be falling over themselves to sign him. He is NOT NFL material. Get over it already!
Actually...I think Raven is much more of a threat than TCOM.
Actually...he didn't mention the Argus at all. He asked about the TAO Sky Dragon. Why can't you comment on that?
Thanks. I just added that as well.
Just as soon as you take a roadtrip to Oklahoma and confirm unequivocally that there is no longer a teaming agreement in place. TIA!
I just added the Trident Group. Was just an oversight on my part. Ihub has nothing to do with the Intro box. Also, is there an actual name for the new consortium that I could add? Thanks
You should re-read it then. Because you are mistaken.
Week 8 - San Francisco. Thanks!
I wonder how long it will take for all of this to take effect? Anybody?
I really almost sold this a couple years ago when it was languishing the way it was. Glad I didn't.
All I can say is WOW!! I have held this company since like '04. Divvies were ok until the last couple years. The SP has definitely dropped over that time. But with this news....wonderful!!
Hahhahha.... that was perfect!!!!
If you actually read the TOS...then you would know that public figures in a company ARE on-topic. Because they ARE a public figure. But I guess you won't bother yourself with reading the TOS. Right?
Huge news today. SP has made a substantial jump.
Why is that?
Actually there should be NO response to that uninformed post. All you have to do is read his post to realize he is absolutely full of crap. Here is the actual line from his post that shows he knows nothing about WSGI. Here's the line: "this company's commitment to profit over safety, and quality is second to none." What profit? The guy is obviously full of crap.
Did you put yourself as first on the list?
With the new 3 column format and all....are you advocating a fourth column just for the previous aliases? There are many here who would actually require a seperate column just for their previous aliases. Sad to say.
Week 7 - San Diego. Thanks!
Post that on the Q & A Board. Not here please, Here's a link:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/The-Question-and-Answer-Board-504/
487k on the Bid @ $.013. Looks to be some buying interest this morning.
Did you not see rwehapi2003's posts? Ho do you arrive at that conclusion?
Thanks for the clarification on that!
I believe somebody posted a couple weeks ago that LJC had like 80MM shares. I could be wrong, and don't know the veracity of that figure. You'd have look back thru the posts to find it. Or maybe someone else remembers that post.
Actually...I'm referring to the shares they already have. Not new shares.
But....one question. Since there is no injunction against LJC, presumably they can continue to dump shares at this point for another couple months. Could that be the reason LJC requested the extension?
See....now ya done lost your edge. That was the best response to actual verifiable contracts and revenues? Your day is over. You have nothing of value left to offer. Good riddance IMO.
Week 6 - Cincinnati. Thanks!
That post was specifically what was on L2 at that moment. I did not continually check it afterwards. I just commented on what it was at THAT time. It could have changed 5 mins later. I dunno....just commented on the high Ask volume at that particular moment.