Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Just a thought, but if all the subliminal barbs and one-upmanship were to cease and everyone just took a breather and waited for this thing to pan out on its own, life might, just might, be a trifle less tense. As if there wasn't enough crap going on in the world already!
Yes. It was short, to the point, non-accusatory and professional. I doubt seriously if Linda had anything to do with it. All Reggie, more than likely.
Wellsir, if you were to remove the word "revocation" from your vocabulary, I'm afraid you wouldn't have a helluva lot to say. Say what?
Re: the post to which you refer; is not "ce COMING DOWN" not more than opinion? Possibly 'irrelevant opinion'? IMO, if all opinions here are 'irrevelant', this board would cease to exist.
Just sayin'.
Now why in the hell would anyone bet their retirement on this Class A lotto play? Kinda reckless, n'est-ce pas? The ingredients were certainly there for a potential windfall but 'management' kept snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
Stay tuned. Just sayin'.
Actually, that's small potatoes when considering the "sucker punches" dealt out by 'management' over the years. Linda, are you still "jazzed"? Inquiring minds want to know.
Quote: (not mine) "100 % GUARANTEE $DBMM CE removal". I rest my case!
Shareholders "had to endure"? There IS an 'ignore' option for those who choose to elect to do so.
You state that dbmm "wants off the OTC". Well, who can blame them? Perhaps the next Q will deliver definitive, positive indication that they're headed in that direction ----- for the first time in over a decade.
Shareholders will "stay tuned", all right. Without CE removal, we have precious little choice.
The "100% revocation guarantee" chestnut is still in play, as is all the other guarantees of the CE being dropped being a foregone conclusion. No use in harping on either opinion. When the smoke finally clears, only then can the victor be announced.
With all due respect, the "distractions" to which you refer; Who, would you say, is at the root of said distractions?
May I begin by saying that I appreciate your intelligent response to by sincere question. The smarm factor runs rampant here at times. Thus far, their "well regarded" acquisition has performed miserably. The carrot being dangled, i.e., "new, long term investors" is, IMO, either a bagful of hot air or could even be considered insider information. NASDAQ? Be serious!
By all means -- keep going. IF the main interest here wasn't the possibility of a big payday due to the possibility of their digging themselves out of the very hole they dug for themselves, and IF you (or anyone else) were looking to invest in a company with real promise, real revenues, a balanced P/E and solid management, would dbmm be of interest as having met those, or any of those, parameters? This is a lottery play, pure and simple. Alibiing by repeating over and over their 'accomplishments' is folly. All IMO, of course.
So, exactly what might be considered "the best" of dbmm? I'll wait.
Huzzah! Excellent analogy from beginning to end!
"SEC needs to be put in its place." Yeah, Linda keeps trying to do that.
Yes. It appears as if the grasp on the obvious is growing tighter.
So, another "drop dead" date for resolving everything once-and-for-all has come and gone. Vegas should make odds on the next (if ever) date.
Maybe. Maybe not. "!LMAO!"
Beware the 'Ides of March'.
Fourteen years later now -- guess the well-thought message didn't have much of an impact.
Inference being?
A "zillion" times? Yeah, I guess. Hasn't seemed to stop anyone, pro or con, from revisiting, though. Has it?
Just spit-balling here, but it certainly does seem as if the SEC is poking their fingers into the company's eye. It couldn't be that, instead of acquiescing to the rules, Linda, et al, chose to fight back and even got themselves a vaunted attorney to irritate them (the SEC) even further? A true 'David & Goliath' tale that hasn't ended well thus far.
All IMO, of course.
My sincere thanks for all the kind words. It's a 'slice of life' I wouldn't recommend to anybody but will, in one form or another, happen to us all.
Peace!
Sooner or later, everyone gets the wake-up call as to what is and what isn't important. Mine came a short while ago when my wife of 51 years passed from a brain tumor. Best of luck to all.
Geez! I guess so. Triple-aught was my re-entry point as well. But, that was years ago. Long time to hold a grudge.
I don't recall reading anything to the effect that "buying is dumb".
OR, perhaps 'Tombstone'?
That was from 2014 which brilliantly illustrates the accuracy of their information.
"ASK YOURSELF WHY"?? Why is the board "NOT active, with NO interest," in a company supposedly engaged in a market with a "HALF A TRILLION DOLLAR market cap? The simple answer is that DBMM is nothing more than a momo play. IF the CE is removed (and the probability of that happening seems pretty good), players had better be ready to execute a comfortable exit point because this "NOW TOP 10 in U.K."
will, IMO, tank as fast as it rises. If they're in the TOP 10, given their penchant for never making a penny in profit and being in debt so far they have to be fed with a slingshot, I'd love to see how the next ten on that list are surviving!
Just sayin'.
I found it rather entertaining. Clearly, it's an amateur production, probably by someone here, but pretty good. But, like everything else, it ain't gonna do nuthin' to improve the situation.
IMO, of course.
I was overjoyed to read your 'roller coaster' missive. Very heartening. Particularly this part;
"..THEY WE'RE NOT WATCHING TV...........THEY HAVE SOMETHING FOR LONG SHARE HOLDERS AND NEW SHARE HOLDERS COMING ON BOARD, ONCE CE IS REMOVED TRADING RESUMES THEY WILL START BUSINESSES NOT AS BEFORE BUT THE NEW IMPROVED DBMM WITH MORE TEETH FOR SHARE HOLDERS TO SINK INTO."
Knowing what has been said or done by the company that brought you to these conclusions would do wonders for those without the same degree of optimism.
Respectfully
A somewhat healthier 10Q than the previous several could go a long way towards the removal of that CE.
Paper signer.
Investor Relations