Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Seems to be the funnyman business. Just hope he wasn't joking about his visits to the Directors!
Thanks!
Great. You have covered my questions well. Pity I did not ask you personally because I had no wish to stir up a hornet's nest.
You are quite right - they are not microwave. But they are the existing competition and apparently they work and sell. Previous microwave 'solutions' do not seem to have done either. I hope WDRP's does both.
Hold on there, OMG! Have you looked around? Microwave tankless is not a new idea, and not the only market presence. See Pulsar's Vulcanus announced 2006 (doesn't seem to have done much - why not?) See also Eemax and Stiebel Eltron, Germany's largest heater manufacturer. Glad you said 'hopefully" because that's still where we're at, and we need to remember it.
Sushi LED - Do you know if there is a continuing connection with WDRP through Robert as inventor (and owner?) of Posilight? (Google Posilight, Dragon's Den etc.) Did Andrew say anything about this matter other than that the other company was not acquired in the past? I conjecture this is the cause of uncertainty on this issue.
Also can you cover information about tankless heater competition? Exactly what advantage derives from WDRP patents and proposals? There is some skepticism about WDRP becuse of the the existence of other tankless heaters.
Not at all - your deserve our thanks thoroughly. Thak you. So does Belize for his pioneering visits which have done so much to create confidence.
Sushi - Thanks. It gives me no surprise that they respect client confidentiality. Of course they should. I simply thought you might charm into some generally encouraging commentary.
Sushi - You seem to have a wonderful ability to extract information from the principals involved. How about a call to Design 1st - after Dave Meyer's visit? Good Luck and thanks again.
Great work this week - thanx!
Can you please enlarge on your last sentence? The reasoning for not issuing PR now is hard to follow. Also do you have any information on the status of the last patent application, and does this have any relevance here?
Don't tease - tell us, please. What did Robert say in his email?
Oh, and what's with all the broken glass, Belize? Seems like you have a good deal of explaining to do, one way and another. It's no wonder she's confined you to your playpen.
Mja, respectfully, possibly the profoundest comment about prediction is attributed to Yogi Berra: : "It is tough to make predictions, especially about the future." Despite what history - the chart - may say (which in any case is subject to interpretation) - uncertainty will rule until the future is revealed by fact. Design 1st says on its site that it reports weekly to clients regarding project development, which suggests that WDRP must already have several weeks of unreported feedback waiting for release. Good news? Bad news? No chart can tell us what may lie in store - though of course we can HOPE!
Everyone who has not looked at Design 1st's website should do so. If they can combine truly efficient technical heater performance with their design standards we can expect a fantastic product. Let's hope we get confirmation of their contract details and its successful performance very soon. Then look out, World!
Can someone please explain why the Ask should drop after a string of buys? Just now from 3.01 to 3.0 with no reds recorded. Don't have Level 2 so don't know whether this is MMs response to Buy Orders at lower price, or whether it's pure perversity? Insight will be much appreciated. Looking great despite shenanigans.
Good question. No answer?
Many a true word is spoken in jest - and all the possibilities you raise are exactly that - possibilities - until the real thing comes along. Why have so many thrown caution to the wind? Well of course I know the answer to that.
Seems clear enough to show that the announcement of the engineering contract is overdue. Like all the optimists I look foward to it eagerly. But like Beers I am cautious when essential factual information is not forthcoming. The cause for all uncertainty about wdrp is that the brilliant idea has not been translated into a working product - not even a prototype - and now not even the announcement that a prototype can and will definitely be engineered by someone else within a contractual time limit. The Company has made unususal efforts to maintain transparency, but its duty here extends to explaining delays and their cause as well as to announcing unspecified "progress" towards a much needed and hugely marketable invention. Beers is right about the volume of hypothesis posted because wishful thinking, which I fully share, repeated by rote achieves nothing. When the existence of a real proven working heater is announced will be celebration day - I hope it comes tomorrow!
Beer - What conclusions do you draw from that? You run into a lot of flak, but in my opinion you remain the best informed and sensibly cautious poster on the board - thanks!
Buzz factor is withdrawal of Avandia. Hope Company will release advisory very soon,
Can someone please explain the basis for overwhelming confidence displayed on this Board? History records minute 18 tons ore mined before Q.A was abandoned by the operators (and they weren't inexperienced idiots back in those days),recent exploration sampling apparently consists of a mere 4 surface rocks, CEO's performance and prs are mysterious and totally inadequate. and market valuation tells its own story. Yet the worse things look, the louder the RA RA RA. Naked shareholder self-deception? Where and what is positive in this picture? Please answer do!
You're right, we need to read the full report, but that raises the other question I posted yesterday. Apparently the Compnay have the report so Why didn't they release it? It whould be posted in full on the website. All the stuff about attracting JVs by hiding information seems absurd. Surely there would be more reason for interest if there were positive reasons for potential development were made public?
I'm not a geologist either, but I've often seen pyrites in CA surface rocks. Isn't it the origin of 'All that sparkles is not gold?' It's a very surprising point to highlight from the report, and its motivation is incomprehenible. Prs should be informative not puzzling.
Very sharp post, Singledude! The pr yesterday and its rapturous reception were astonishing. The only detailed reference being to pyrites - makes one's hair stand on end ... Funny joke, hunh?
The question is - why pr 'excerpts' and not the full report? That inevitably raises doubts in anyone's mind. What is left out, and why, etc? Because the report is too technical for shareholders to understand? So are the excerpts, so that is not an acceptable explanation. I do not understand why a legitimate 'transparent' Company cannot simply come clean with the facts and with explanation where it is needed. Ongoing concerns are increased rather than dispelled by semi-hype about further exploration on one hand and restricted information on the other. It's time to replace the mystery games 'teasing' with straightforward news revealing what -if anything - has been found so far and the indications for possible development.
Sorry did not make myself clear. I meant the State Mining Board - not the Company - for impartial technical information. Can't give you phone # or precise name but prs have referenced filing of the report to this organization. Perhaps when you emerge from the swamp?
Just a suggestion. Can our moderator please call the Ontario Board and ask for a technical opinion of the PR - what it says and what it does not say to a professional reader? Even though the Company has not released the full report - the reason for which is difficult to understand - there may be nuggets of real information buried in the text which could be clarified by an expert.
Speaking of UMC, has anyone heard a murmur about our 'distributor partner" in months? No reply to a month-old email asking about progress. Thought they were to be involved in the testing ....
You see? Can't even read my own typos!
Ta. Muat be going blind!
Please direct me to Mikey's board. Name does not bring up anything.
Thanks for responding. I am aware of all you rightfully say and appreciate your time. But please forward any information you can gather about this particular case.
Hello Leucro. Did you get through to Company for information on Monday's event? We deserve clarification.
Too right. The world is waiting for the sunrise ... This one for the postings. Has everyone gone to sleep? No trades, no postings, nada before pr. I was told to expect one late July and here we are.
I don't mean to argue with you - you are much more knowledgeable thn I - simply want to find out what happened. Can you trace the forms you mention? I don't know where to begin.
If the Company unloaded shares do I asssume correctly that that constitutes dilution which is reflected in new .03 levels? I can see Company could have needed cash to repay the short-term Note. (Also perhaps more positively for production and sales development which could ultimately benefit holders). But wsas this an acceptable proceedure, or does it not entirely undermine good faith and transparency and reveal FROI as simple scam? And how did they engineer the gap instantly on a Monday without a public word? I have not seen the notorious emails but would like to do so.
Foirgive these rambling and ignorant questions, and please reaply if you have time to do so.
Hard to reconcile your guarantee with Leucro's message 119.
Release date of this pr please? Cannot find anything new 07/20.
Thanks for comment. I did not get email either although I receive many. Still think the huge gap-up on a Monday before buy orders could be filled, followed by immediate massive short selling strongly suggests improper manipulation.
Can you confirm and quantify Company's action? How was gap-up contrived without news or positive basis? Can moderator obtain correct information from Company?