Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Franny whenever your and your pal UF post false information on the preferred, the stock goes down. There is some seller like FIFE AND GHS thinking how can someone actually believe it's a short. Actually I take that back, you never believed that.
Most ridiculous post yet. Plainly absurd. If they own it, then it should be listed as an asset in the Asset Section of the balance sheet. Of course, you have no clue so you will disagree
So that becomes legally tricky. Simply it was an exchange after you put aside the sham. The preferred for the common. So the preferred should have been cancelled. Just look at it this way. If I exchange a debenture on the books for common, the debenture (which is a security) gets cancelled.
The executives are playing with a legal inferno by continuing to use the preferred.
Although it is virtually impossible to pierce the corporate veil in Nevada, this may form a basis to do so.
I asked for your math, not your opinion. Do you know the name of the person who painted the tape. Do you know what brokerage firm sold it for them. Do you know if they needed to take a tax loss. No you don't. You see, I can play that game too. By the way, I believe you were roasted fairly well today on this board.
Utah. Since I like these executives and don't want them to get in trouble, sort of a dumb request on your part. If 15 idiots call the SEC, they will look into it, be careful what you ask for
I am going to answer it shortly. I have three other questions on the Preferred
LDD, what was the date of the 8K. Only have 3 questions after that.
I never reply to my own posts but have to admit, that is funny. Mr. Math, love it.
You are correct. In the fund world, that is a pimple on a dog's oss.
Hey Mr. Math. You were all Gidfy when the stock hit $1.80. In fact, you were giving people math lessons. My math says down 33% in 7 days. How is my math?
Correct. This is the guy who analyzes court hearingS but can't properly conclude that Niterra, a very small VC has not invested in SHMP
You sir have to understand that after the preferred stock sham, I do go beyond press releases and 8K's. You sir have an agenda to advance. I don't. If I did, I would post the information I don't.
Correct see my post.
Actually I believe Niterra Ventures operates as a small VC. VC's make investments. Total Niterra investment in SHMP. Zero.
Sir your conclusion is BS and you know it. You selectively disclose information to support your agenda. Niterra. What a bunch of BS.
Great so please post the date
Utah, why do you selectively choose to advance a false narrative. What was the date of the 8K that revealed the original conversion terms of the preferred? And why you do you and buddy choose to ignore facts. So what was the date?
Please focus on the most important subject. The preferred stock.
Great and what date was that 8K FILED that announced those conversion terms. Simple question
Can you please get Franny to admit those were the original terms which he still has not. Please ask him to reply to your post.
Then why have you and Franny refused to post on a public forum the original conversion terms of the preferred. If you are so confident it was legal, just please post the exact conversion terms as stated in the 8K
Simple answer, unsophisticated which is precisely why Franny will not post the original conversion terms of the preferred. They fear educating them. I disagree with UD a lot. I don't care for the personal attacks and I disagree with the scam label. However, he is spot on with the preferred.
Your feeling is incorrect.
Sir, it is not legal entrapment. It is to have a fair conversation about the Preferred. Why don't you ask him why he fears posting them? And why are you having an issue with what I'm asking. You have an issue with people attacking the company like UD. If we are having an honest conversation about this, why would anyone have an issue with people posting fact or asking someone to post a fact. I am not asking him for anything other than to state a fact.
I believe everyone will love any post that reveals the true terms of the Preferred stock. Come to daddy and please post them.
As a new person to the board, the most important issue is the original terms of the Preferred
Do we finally have an answer for the terms of the preferred as originally stated? The prevailing topic on this board.
I am admittedly not an expert in Form 4. However is this accurate.
Form 4 is required to be filed by a company or the individual at the company when there is a change in the holdings of company insiders. Form 4 must be filed with the SEC within two days of the transaction. Form 4 is a two-page document, which covers any buy-and-sell orders, as well as the exercise of company stock options.
They call them pixels. I call them spots. The pixels are their product and they can use the proceeds for any legal purpose. Nothing illegal but phenomenal question.
No because buying shares back is not the same. It would be if they were for example selling spots and then buying out other people who bought spots for a higher price. This is no different than selling any other product and using the proceeds to buy back shares. The spots are their product
Sir, my goal is not to make you look like a fool. Your well on your way. Who knows, an honest discussion on the original conversion terms of the preferred stock may help you. You sir will get free classes for life.
Can't move forward. I simply want to discuss facts. You're interested in telling tales to the uninformed. I called out UD and Joshy many times who use the word scam which I disagree with. However, you are party to the sham. That I know. You want to make me look stupid in front of the whole board, answer the question.
Please state the terms of the original preferred. I am asking you to state a fact. We can put this to bed quickly. I am kind of freaked out at this point. What is SHMP hiding and the resident preferred stock expert? Every question I will ask you about the preferred is fact. So answer the question. Terms please.
Please state the terms of the original preferred. At this point, I'm thinking you may know the lawyers and you're trying to protect them. Lol. What were the terms of the Preferred. I'm asking you state a fact. Isn't that what you want?
Can you please ask the preferred stock aficionado to state the terms of the preferred as originally announced.
And actually, you've avoided addressing it. So what were the terms of the Preferred. Why are you so frightened to post them? Hard to achieve any progress unless we get past that?
You are 199% wrong. Shame on people for trying to con innocent people. What were the terms of the preferred.
Amazing he won't post it. That is OK, we will keep the preferred stock the main topic on this board. I'm actually surprised he's so nervous to just post a fact.
Meanwhile he tries to mislead people on the Series A.
No maybe he doesn't want it on the record. Please ask him.