Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It is curious that they weren't listed by name there but I would think the last thing they're thinking about doing right now is adding insult to injury.
And of course they need buyers anyway
Remember the issues awhile back with, what was it ... Caldron Bank or something? They got popped and there was ties to IR there. Shortly thereafter was when they attempted the Dragonchow arrangement.
It's all tied together, we had speculated that something of this order might be in their future.
Probably means little in the grand scheme of things here, but at least, hopefully some justice for these scumbags.
Nice ...
LMAO!!!!
Still regret getting one of my co-workers into it.
Oy, the naiveté'
Uhg ... Billy Ball.
The A's default mode is to be the farm team for the rest of MLB.
We had our little stretch there but the off season proved it out once again.
See Gallo has cooled off. Good to see that he stuck though
2010?
Is that when our brains turned to mush and we fell under Daddy Dean's bed time story-telling trance?
Been pretty ugly season for us ... You guys turned it around, should be a good test the next couple of weeks.
Otherwise we might be doing the fire sale ... again.
At least Wash has a challenge with our short stop, should keep him busy if not totally perplexed for awhile.
Must be for acquisitions ...
Were coming for ya tonight.
That is, as long as we never use our bullpen.
Quasar Aerospace 69671 Unread
Not touching it
Since I'm under a self imposed ban over in Q-land.
This just hit my email inbox:
http://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/ViewImage.do?fileId=20151400278&masterFileId=20041038153
9.5B
Good grief ...
Yeah, the SEQ is like that.
Wait, there is no such thing in this context.
Yes, the 'SEQ' would be incorrect.
I don't believe so, no. It gets a bit complicated since splits are the jurisdiction of the state they are incorporated in.
Saw this recently somewhere, where the co. attempted to preform the split via their incorporated state (Believe Nevada)
but it still had to be approved by FINRA and they denied it.
So essentially it's a process with overlapping requirements.
In this case I'm pretty sure they would need to go dark first or just simply become current again but as I mentioned earlier they have a lot of other issues regardless.
Actually that may prove to be more problematic than just the recent denials for 'companies' that are tied to toxic financing.
When a stock R\S they are given a new CUSIP number, which in effect might as well be an entirely new company as the old shares are converted to the new number (also why these splits take so long to adjust in the various brokerage accounts).
The problem here is MTVX doesn't even have a dedicated MM since they never bothered to file a 211 due to their apathy, incompetence or intentionality. It's unknown to me if they could even request a split under those circumstances. Nevertheless they would certainly have to get a MM to sponsor them under a post split scenario and with the current SEC violations, the absurd SS and myriad of other issues it would be tough sledding.
But that's just one obstacle they would face. FINRA has a whole litany of requirements that they would be hard pressed to meet.
Here's a good read on 'going dark\darker', R\S et. al:
http://www.slk-law.com/portalresource/lookup/wosid/cp-base-4-5702/media.name=/GCY%20&%20WAB.Feb.%202010%20The%20Practical%20Lawyer%5B1%5D.pdf
Honestly, I think they capitulated some time ago. They stuck it to shareholders with grandiose claims and lied about their intentions, skewered their numbers (actual\potential) to draw in attention, allowed IR\Dragonchow to recoup and prosper at their expense, let Shyster and others reap a whirlwind and then just left it all for dead.
I would expect the silence to continue.
Most likely. The longer it goes the closer it gets to joining the list:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=114783119
NOTE: Delinquent SEC Filers (ie., no current Financials) are usually sent from the SEC reporting OTCBB to the non-reporting OTC Markets. It is imperative to differentiate between delinquent SEC Filers on the OTC from the non-reporting stocks on the OTC. Even if an SEC Filer submits Financials to OTC Markets but has not filed Financials to the SEC for an extended period of time those stocks WILL eventually be suspended and thereafter have their stock registrations REVOKED!! The first due diligence on any OTC stock is to check with EDGAR to see if that stock is registered with the SEC and if the stock is a delinquent SEC Filer. If a stock is a severely delinquent SEC Filer DO NOT BUY THAT STOCK under any circumstances, exampled by the 1361 delinquent filers that were suspended or ordered by an SEC Admin Proceeding to file Financials and were subsequently revoked.
Could be two years or two days.
Probably the later if they miss one of those payments.
They can't, it's not an entity to effectuate anything.
The SEC on the other hand has broad powers to impose it's will upon delinquent and spurious entities that refuse to abide by the rules.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2014/34-73522.pdf
Yeah, that's where the SEC steps in.
Perhaps, that is if they are running Unix or variations thereof.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seq_(Unix)
The SEC on the other hand can suspend this at anytime.
I thought it was just me ...
My reserve of undead brain cells being taxed to the nth degree of late with personal matters.
Hard to even comment on all this, seems both disturbing (The sting setup) and futile in the long run.
Good grief ...
Uhg ... Hey at least we got one ex-Shark on there this year.
Frikkin awesome ain't it?
Dubnation!
Link back
It's on the Dodge Facebook page. Use some logic, if this was all some creative conspiracy they would have brought a lawsuit a long time ago.
Not only against APT but BJ as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrett-Jackson
It is what it is, there's no smoking gun here.
Good grief man ... They obviously updated it a smidge, so what?
Even the collaboration aspect is a bit of reach, they allowed\sold\created a sticker or paint job and slapped it on the fuel tank of an existing Cruizer.
It was some sort of marketing bit between the two of them for the Barrett- Jackson show.
There's enough real dirt on this half covered turd, no sense in trying to filter the kitty litter for things that just aren't there.
You're really reaching with this. There's a variety of emblems historically ...
https://www.google.com/search?q=dodge+brothers+logo&sa=X&biw=1920&bih=900&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&ved=0CDQQ7AlqFQoTCNbDoqquhcYCFcYpiAodbwMA7A
Very interesting Blue
So how long before he's doing Subway commercials?
How 'bout them Warrior's !
First pitch even.
Poor Shark
That's a cool story with Ham, hope he can keep it together.
My A's ... Oy. Starting to figure it out of late but man it's been painful this year.
It's all about the Dubs right now so at least we got that going for us.
If that were the case then his involvement would include these instances as well:
https://www.google.com/#q=Contract+language:+%22sell%2C+covey%2C+transfer%22
It's not a loophole. It wouldn't make any sense grammatically, logically or even foolhardily.