Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
There were 2 courts...so your theory is flawed.
It's incomplete. Very simple
Impeachable to anyone who knows the legal system well enough to know the process is incomplete
Absorbezz is not competition to Ifus. They simply haven't sold or even built a company to do so. The company that owns 60% has his own issues and now can't do anything to build a company..
Even he started to build now, just establishing and nurturing the market takes time. They wouldn't in a position of competition for 5 years
I'll take the word of the gurus and experts over a blogger any day.
Amazing none of this is true. Nice try at spinning this though
Actually you did many times along with many many other predictions that never materialized.
I've impeached that several times, what else ya got?
Absorbezz is a fraud spinoff of Ifus nothing more
I think the shareholders are both more qualified and in a better position to judge MW'S performance. I'm very happy with his performance
Hmmm well let's do a little recap. Cases closed, boots get zippo; patent from ABSORBEZZ-REJECTED! ; No sales coming out of absorbezz...JS drank the Budwiser (Perfection???)...must have been while he was on his 6 week binge.
Any who, Ifus strong....btw, no one cares what the VWAP is lolol...no one uses it lololololk
Yeah, I don't think the perfection of a product would include the patent bring REJECTED!!!! Tossed Out! No Thanks, don't bother to try again. ...lol. Cracks me up!
Absorbezz won't reapply, they have nothing to use to back up their claim. The first application was fraudulently signed, under oath and the study they try and use is owned by Ifus.
I think this would also violate the court settlement with the dullards. I'm sure they can't use Ifus or se propietary or virtual property in any capacity for Absorbezz to operate.
VWAP is useless info for penny stocks, every stock guru and expert agrees. I've found none that believe VWAP is useful and ALL state clearly "too many variables to consider and to be effective DD." Lastly, I've never met a serious penny stock investor who uses VWAP. Useless data that's incomplete at best.
Yeah seeing this is very good. Good job posting. That post should be stickied..
I love it. Absolutely correct. Great Christmas present.
Last thing. I've posted that when the cases were over to the boot boys, they get to play with the shareholders. If either had any liquitable assets, I'd go after it. But they don't. Not that we can get our hands on and your right, hefty bill goes with it
I'd consider this bogus company they've set up and they give up all rights to their product....Settlement leverage lol.
Criminal case costs us nothing. My lawyer is a close personal friend and shareholder. Cost is negligible. The facts are in hand at the office with the application. Their signature with the application is knowingly fraudulent.
Then the study they attached with the application was proprietary. Corporate Theft is a criminal offense, not just a civil matter.
Yes, but the application the dullards submitted, they lied on the application. The signature you provide is under oath.
The shareholders are mobilizing to address this legally.
Look under the owners names. SA and JS.
Not sure where theses fantasies cone from but here goes.
I have the file and the evidence and testimony for tortious interference is overwhelming. We had guys we flipped from their cabal ready to testify against the dullards. They couldn't even keep their own camp on order. And that's only one charge. The rest would have and still may lock these two yo yos up.
Sue MW? For what? Makes no sense for a shareholder to go after the principle. Besides, he's dine nothing wrong. We still support him.
The file is loaded with other stuff and imo the dullards need to be brought to justice.
As for identifying me? Come get some! I'll let the cabal in on a little secret, filing suit against me would be tossed at the first hearing. Jurisdiction matter.
Neither SA or JS have the resources to file suit on anyone anymore, both are broke. SA assets are frozen already with pending Rico and Corruption charges and ....poor Joe. So poor he can't pay attention. SA legal fees are nothing less than astronomical. 22+ indictments against him. He has ties to others involved in stock fraud, money laundering and corruption. He's got nothing left. The money he's duped out of hard working people who invested in his scam is now gone!
Nice job and great investment
The issue per share in damages isn't important anymore, SA and JS are broke. I'd want the to forfeit their shares and any other interests in the company, hand over the patent and fire their paid blogger.
What a joke. The SA Cabal cares about no one. Not one apology to the shareholders for the damage they've done. The costs they've incurred on the company.....time for payback and this doesn't come from MW. We have a relationship, but it has limits. Business is business. At the end of the day, I'm in this to make money....so it's clear to me.
My DD is solid and very little does come from MW, plain and simple. I've been to the site and have seen and posted. I've been to the courthouse and have the state file and the evidence posted in it and how well it was laid out. I've talked to the guys on site, talked to distributors and know the true facts of the company. I've done a background on SA and JS and know their histories...(not good for either, especially my Hero Joe-Wife beating drunkard-coward pos) and have dug into this company far enough to know its well worth my investment.
There's nothing any of the SA and Cabal can post that would change my mind, I'm only missing 2 pieces of hard evidence in hand to clear it all up, even though I know the details.
Court documents-depositions from JS and SA are very revealing. They have specific information about posters in here and I know who's who.
IFUS Strong has a meaning for me....All Day Long Ifus Strong!
I think your missing the point. First, there is a federal process. A case ending in a judgment is not over by any stretch. A person cannot collect merely on a judgment. There are other hearings necessary to complete the process...
It's all mute....recycled discussion. Very soon thae federal file will be updated with the information necessary for the dullards and their cabal to fill in the blanks..although I know they already know the truth.
Not one dime will be collected from the fed case....it was served up with some humble pie by these same dullards begging to let them off the hook.
Again, not worth discussing. It's over and any future investor can contact me by PM and give me your email and I'll help with DD (at least truthful DD). It wont be any "drive by DD" or "unforensic accountant" nonsense, or ridiculous unfounded predictions....
Here's more bad news for the dullards. Just off the phone with my lawyer who is also an Ifus shareholder. We've agreed there's nothing stopping any Ifus shareholder from filing the docs and a complaint with the patent office. You remember. The place where the two dip shizas went and file a patent form under oath their product is unique. And that they used a study they didn't own to support it? The filing us immanent imo and I now look for real justice to be served.
Merry Christmas Dullards. It ain't over yet!
These 10 are the perfect Christmas gifts to shareholders lol
Really? I'll let you in on a little secret. Follow the current trail and check the link between mw and js. I think you'll find different.
I've read it and the case is not closed. Shows pending. Why? All the necessary hearings aren't done that's why. See previous posts (or go to Miami State Library, I hear it's online these days). There are more necessary hearings.
Agreed. It's the same relevance as another case where a pos pump n dump artist will soon wish he had Miami State. Mr Kevin Sepe and his mobsters. I'm told SA is connected to him and this clan. Sepe may be sharing a cell with SA. I see a marriage proposal in their future.
SA is the type of chicken shiza to turn on people. Expect him to roll over of Sepe with his 22 indictments in the fold. Sepe and his stick scams are as busted as SA. Probably the same cases.
I also hear Sepe has a particular interest in this board...don't know why but my DD digging hat is on to find out why. With his connection to SA I'm sure that's the link.
Yes and she presided over the federal case NOT the state case. The state case sets the precedent here. Fed case was washed in settling the state case.
Try Miami State Library where the US Supreme Court ruled "not said, not implied either." Straight forward to me. Those links are incomplete at best.
Not to worry. The file with those same links will soon be updated. Where the federal case was dissolved in settlement from the State case.
Oh the things you can do with the freedom of information
I think one court threw out the counter claim and the other didn't. State file says the dullards made several attempts for summary judgement, get the case dismissed and get evidence thrown out and ALL unsuccessful. This is the unimpeachable fact. It's public record.
Nice try wuth ths twist. We've all heard this before but found (via solid DD) none to be true. If his were remotely true then why even move forward with the state case? Logic would dictate the state judge would throw out the case when the fed case was decided. But....it wasn't and ergo not thrown out.
The fact is, the state file is still loaded with evidence of criminal acts on the boot boys. It's overwhelming. Tortious interference, fraud (committed under oath), corporate theft and more.
Let's add all this up. 1. Who sought criminal counsel? A: dullards..and this counsel encouraged them to settle...no escaoe; 2. There's an interesting document in the state file in which the dullards endorsed. The business plan detailing the potential of Ifus has their signatures on the cover letter as the basis of the loan. It's obvious their motives. Proves intent; 3. There is a witness list that includes associates and collaborators that were being called by MW. If think this was the final nail in their coffin. Witnesses who had first hand knowledge of their pre meditated criminal behavior and their depositions are damming to the dullards. Eg they were sunk. They were exposed, vulnerable and caught!
This is no fantasy, all this is in the state file. It would not take much at all to convince a judge and jury and get a conviction.
Lastly are the dullards depositions with I/We didn't know/realize we were breaking the law (which this argument is sunk with witness testimony). I'm telling you they had no defense.
They had as much chance winning as the Browns winning the Super Bowl this year.
Even funnier are the predictions from the SA cabal. Same record as Cleveland Browns. 0-14.
Any who, now back at the ranch. Ifus has all the leverage. Dullards served the fed case up as sweet as can be.
No fact to this post at all and should be un stickied. Purely supposition and completely (or incompletely) unsupported with no evidence.
Better than no trade.
Your under this false impression your helping me...your not. I've done my DD and none of what you've said adds up. I've never known MW to refuse a site visit. I've offered you and another to go to the site and I'll pay for it....business class round trip. I've offered to meet the "drive by DD dude" on the day he said he drove by and no takers ....odd considering he's (allegedly) in the same area less than 20 minutes away and you have yet to accept in more than 15 months.
Next us this so called fact...I've seen the depositions AND the illustrious forensic accountant report. The fins (remember the two pages) numbers are different, yet the cabal NEVER talks about those numbers, only the oral testimony which is also wrong and completely and deliberately misstated.
Last is the conjecture on "what MW apparently said." That's impeachable purely based on 1. You obviously didn't hear it; 2. You obviously don't know anyone who heard it; no one else has ever heard MW say it.
Again, nothing adds up.
Show me! I've talked to mw and have never been lied to. So show mw one lie he's told. And not just conjecture, I want unimpeachable proof.
Yeah I've never been a big fan of social media communication but so understand it has its place.
I'd like to see MW have a shareholders monthly conference, be able to address Q&A and give us direct information.
I'd also like to see PR's but think those are coming.
I'll talk to MW and see where we are in all this.
Honestly, I'd rather have no trades slump than a dilution dump day after day where flippers are the only ones making out.