Enjoying the Updates on their instagram @kraiglabs

Like the clarity of the PR today. I hope we get more like it going forward.

Seeing some big blocks on the bid and ask, maybe we will finally see some of that delicious volume again that we saw back in april.

So why was cNITE earlier and now its listed as NITE?

Who can explain help explain this L2 chart? (https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/KBLB/quote)

What is the lowercase c infront of the market makers ID? Why do some MPIDs have it and others dont? ex. cPUMA vs MAXM? Aren't they both Puma Capital? What is the difference?

Why is the list sorted by MPID an not price in this case?

I know its an error on my etrade but they are showing EPS of 43. Wouldn't that be something!?! A man can dream...

I am glad we finally got Jon's update from his Vietnam trip, providing us through-put estimates we've been waiting for. Less smoke Less mirrors, finally

It is funny that we are worried about securing 50M financing and up-listing, that is chump change. We need a suitor like Softbank buy KBLB for 8B and pay Kim 1.7B to walk away. How hard can that be? WeWork did it and they produce just as much of a product as KBLB does. Maybe that's the plan after up-listing?

There it is, JR is the last inside board member...

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES CONFIRMS SELECTION OF JON RICE AS A NEW INSIDE DIRECTOR FOR ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ANN ARBOR, Mich., – October 23, 2019 –Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (OTCQB: KBLB) (“Company”), the leading developer of spider silk based fibers, announces today that it has selected Jon Rice, the Company’s COO, to join its Board of Directors, as the Company advances and strengthens its corporate governance.

Rice has served as the COO of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories since 2015. In this role, Rice has overseen and led operations at the Company’s domestic research and development headquarters as well as the recent breakthroughs in the scale-up of its international production operations, through its subsidiary, Prodigy Textiles Co., Ltd. Prior to joining Kraig Labs, Rice served in a series of leadership roles developing and marketing advanced power systems, developed under contract with the US Department of Defense, which were successfully leveraged into commercial spinoff products. Rice blends technical and business operations expertise, holding a degree in both engineering and a master’s in business administration.

“We are pleased to welcome Jon, with his first hand working knowledge and experience of implementing our operations, to the Kraig Labs board,” said chairman and CEO, Kim Thompson. “Jon’s role and understanding of our Company, from the inside, will serve as a crucial bridge between day to day operational management and board governance.

The addition of Rice to the board will strengthen the overall skill set, perspective, and experience necessary to support and drive growth for all of the Company’s stakeholders. Rice’s understanding of Kraig’s operations will provide a strong link to the board’s fiduciary oversight responsibilities.

Rice’s term is expected to begin this quarter.

Once formally seated, Rice, and the three recently announced new independent directors, will join Thompson to form the majority independent controlled board, which is intended to satisfy the uplisting requirement of a national exchange.

“I am excited for the opportunity to expand my service to Kraig Labs and our Shareholders in this new role, said Rice. “The advancement we are making in all aspects of our business model, from research to governance and commercialization, make this a fantastic time to be part of Kraig Labs and our exciting growth.”

To view the most recent news from Kraig Labs and/or to sign up for Company alerts, please go to www.KraigLabs.com/news

About Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (www.KraigLabs.com), a reporting biotechnology company is the leading developer of genetically engineered spider silk based fiber technologies.

The Company has achieved a series of scientific breakthroughs in the area of spider silk technology with implications for the global textile industry.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Information

Statements in this press release about the Company’s future and expectations other than historical facts are “forward-looking statements.” These statements are made on the basis of management’s current views and assumptions. As a result, there can be no assurance that management’s expectations will necessarily come to pass. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified by phrases such as “believes,” “plans,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “foresees,” “estimated,” “hopes,” “if,” “develops,” “researching,” “research,” “pilot,” “potential,” “could” or other words or phrases of similar import. Forward looking statements include descriptions of the Company’s business strategy, outlook, objectives, plans, intentions and goals. All such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements. This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

Ben Hansel, Hansel Capital, LLC

(720) 288-8495

ir@KraigLabs.com

This entry was posted on October 23, 2019 by Admin.

I understand what you are saying but don't understand why you are saying it. Is there something that you know or have seen that leads you to believe that the security of our facility, our staff, physical product, or IP is at risk and has not been addressed already through security measures? I'm not implying one way or the other, just wondering why you brought it up.

I don't follow what Truth is trying to imply about security. Is he/she saying stating that our "technology" isn't safe at Prodigy, our technology will never be safe there, or that security rather than production is the number 1 priority, or because they are so secure they are not allowed to tell us investors financing the project what is going on, something else...?

Sounds like the concern should be directed toward KBLB or IR rather than us powerless lemmings.

Is this Opinion or Fact? Inquiring minds want to know...

From 10/2:

Really glad that Jon was able to share those throughput rate and targets with us...Long live "Scaling" and "Ramping"

A COO can serve on the board of directors but isn't on the board until elected.

I would be elated if it was a shining star from that list of 200 applicants or an institutional investor about to make a large investment but really have no doubt in my mind that its just going to be Ken or Jon. And if the person already works there, are they going to get a PR as well?

Dog and Pony show i tell ya...

Thanks for the clarification of inside board of director.

Don't you think it is a little misleading that KBL stated they had narrowed their list of 200 applicants down to 7 finalists for the four director spots available?

I wonder if they couldn't seal the deal with the 4th and final applicant for outside director, so they had to fall back to electing an internal board director?

I am confused...I thought there was going to be 4 independent director board members. What the heck is an inside director?

Looks like it is still there?

Please name any of the "Successful Projects" you are referring to...

If it looks like pennystock, acts like a pennystock...its probably a pennystock

Until KT starts informing us lowly shareholders of the goings on regularly (corporate structure, financially, and operationally) people are going to believe that either nothing is going on or continue to blow their "DD findings" out of proportion and be severely disappointed whenever actual news comes out stating we are much less along than some predicted. People are desperate for news/reassurance that their hard earned dollars aren't going to get flushed down the drain like most pennystocks. "DD" from facebook, foreign news sites, and inaccurate news articles is not going to cut it anymore and the share price is reflecting that.

KT could certainly alleviate some of these skepticism by giving us some regular updates, pictures, or the slightest idea to anything that our monies are invested in. He hasn't done this in the past 8yrs ive been here so i don't expect anything different now.

Exactly. Until the company can justify how much our science is worth, maybe by selling something, any news about R&D is just fluff.

Agree! The public shouldn't know this person's name. Investors would come out of the woodwork trying to contact her to get inside info and would be distracting from her work and may even drive her to quit. Chances are shes a recent phd grad or young professional and not the seasoned superstar that everyone on this board is hoping for...Not to say that she isn't going to do wonders for the company working with TK but remember, KBL is on a tight budget.

There was a time before your arrival when no matter what the news was the SP would drop; flippers would sell to protect their holdings from decay. But that was also the time of the once-a-year news pop and then the remainder of the year was fluff about ramping up, new strains, buying a farm...You don't have to look to far back to see the trend.

Agree! These types of news releases are starting to remind me of our not-too-distant past mentality of "sell the news"

Without any detailed information from the company or marketing, its just another obscure carrot, KBLBs Specialty...

Something doesn't seem right with the table of values listed here...It looks like that $42M is a power of 1000 too high. Maybe the result of the table in the link?

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1278249/000127824919000006/xslForm13F_X01/aci_13f.xml

Column 4 shows the values of the securities x 1000, if Tower Bridge owns 100,000 shares of kblb at say $0.42, thats $42,000, not $42,000,000. As a sanity check look at 3M. They have 98,981 shares, multiply that by todays share price of $167 you get $16.5M, pretty close to the $17.2M listed in the table...not $17B.

Also, is Tower Bridge Advisors' portfolio really worth $893,000,000,000? That is more than most very famous portfolios.

My guess is that is an old number calculated before April 2019, 816M shares x $0.05 is roughly $41.5M...but i don't know much of anything.

I'm not saying it isn't possible that it is some sort of institutional buy in but KBL sure making us believe that the only way to get institutional buy-ins is to get out of the OTC. Also, wouldn't you think that if there was an institutional buy in of $41.482M there would be a major uptick in volume? Buying shares at the current price would be 172.85M shares to get to $41.5M .

Can you elaborate on this? Or where you found this?

That is only partially true. The most recent SEC 10K lists two approved patents and says that all others are still in process, see page 8 of 47

No, we have other criteria to accomplish before even worrying about the share price requirement. RS will be the last box to be ticked before up listing attempt. IMO

Nasdaq uplist

https://www.facebook.com/kingsmngt?__tn__=%2CdlCH-R-R&eid=ARBAgVEcnuWkgUO9aMIbUNZhTagBpoD5St373JYClfCu8Pit01r3nEBLQNwyjHmnfJikC0VMcN4WuYSk&hc_ref=ARTM-jvhfZeoBs-m7QCvFv8qerGIRjPur2nvdJDCP-NbYj7nWHMsyb6Ct06QvCBTnG0

looks like some sort of marketing group based out of Viet or Singapore that likes to post in Ken Le's comments a lot. From I gather that one or a couple of the people in Kings are either related to or are in close relation with Ken Le based on facebook photos. Nice looking web page tho, https://kings.com.sg/

Yes. I also know the future as well...jk. I would like to see this end green and continue green but what reason is there to believe there is anything significant to release other than its Friday and i want to believe that major things have happened since the meeting?

Agree. It looks more like confidence in anything happening after the bell today or before the bell Monday is pretty low.

Im aware of the news, i've had a position and been following news related to kbl since 2012. Just wondering what perceived event happening within the month has everyone so giddy and throwing out lofty price predictions.

What is big event is everybody expecting to happen this month that warrants a 4x price jump?

Does kim let us ride down to $0.10? That's the min his proposed split allows for us to go for the reverse split to $4. I guess we'll see

ha wut? Nadaq which is min $4 along with the other institutional requirements.

What exchange can you uplist to for $1?

Why is being above a dollar significant to you? Before and after a split you still own the same percentage of the company and still have the same amount of money in your account?

What premarket activity are you talking about? Etrade show 0 volume (not even carry over from the previous day's extended hours) and the bid and ask are at 0.276 and 0.282 respectively