Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Actually the prisoner gets to choose where he goes
Because Matt is not a violent prisoner he will go to a minimum security prison. Matt can choose which minimum security prison. Maybe he wants to be in Florida next to his mom and dad or maybe in California next to his friends. If he chooses California, he could even get out earlier. We are overcrowded and the state has ordered prisons to release non-violent offenders.
I always wondered how the feds found out
That'll teach you not to speed or run a red light
Will he go to prison in California? If so, he could end up with Elgindy. He doesn't get out until March of next year.
Just dropped by to check in on my son Matt
I've known him so long he's like a son to me...um, not really.
Everyone staying out of trouble over here?
Thanks, I am having fun
and npct still sucks.
More lawsuit info
Kathy Knight-McConnell vs Mary Cummins, 03 5035 US District Court Southern District of New York. June 10, 2005 Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald stated in her order that there was "lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue and failure to state a claim. For the reasons set forth below, defendant's motion is granted."
I won the lawsuit, Kathy lost
I'll post the judge's ruling later. I have a ton of work to do.
Matt, Cassandra and the LA lunch
Ya, I did meet up with Matt and Cassandra last weekend. Matt looks even better in real life, a total hottie. He was his usual well spoken self, witty, intelligent and a total gentleman. Cassandra is very pretty and has a great bod. She is also very intelligent, well spoken and knows her stock scams. Usually when I meet people from the boards they never say a word and are very shy. We actually had some good conversation and a good time. Thanks, Matt and Cassandra.
I made sure that Matt got a good glimpse of LA. I showed him all the sights and some of the freaks. Matt also had the pleasure of seeing (and smelling) my skunk. He also saw my "basher command center." Yes, a baby squirrel did take a dump on my desk in front of him. That's just what I do. I save animals and investors from evil.
Matt can tell you about the rest of his trip.
If you don't like my posts,
use a little willpower and ignore them, for everyone's sake.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Has bop done any original DD of his own?
or does he just nit pick other's DD?
All I know is that my research plays out, it always has.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Ask Matt about it
He messed up a job for a client of mine and when he realized that he messed the job up and cost me a bit of work, he kicked me out completely for posting that saras posts seemed hypocritical. Then the client emails me, refuses to pay and whines about the horrible and incredibly slow job matt did. It was within minutes. He kicked me out permanently he said then he opens my account up later and says he may have over reacted. Then I told him if I come back, you'll just boot me out for some silly post and sure enough, he did. I bet 95% of the people here have made stronger posts than the one that got me suspended yet they're still here and I've been in jail over a week.
Obviously matt is just an immature and inexperienced teenager living in his parents house running ihub out of his bedroom. Hardly a professional, for sure.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
bop, please show us an original DD that you've done
on something current that hasn't been played out yet. I'd like to check out what you consider good dd and a good call. Have you done any dd reports? Have you posted them? Have your calls been right on or not?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
if Matt just looks at the post
it won't matter if someone made a million tos complaints about the same post or if a million users made a complaint about the post. What matters is the post. If Matt happens to just see the post and no one made a complaint but it's a tos violation, he should delete the post and suspend the poster.
THE POST IS WHAT MATTERS, not the report of the post.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
I'm in jail because matt wants me out
this is matt's way of having me leave. He wants me out because he doesn't like all the stock promoters and pump and dumpers whining to him about me ruining their stock scams with the truth. This is still toutville obviously. You don't see sir auric, tony, or other scam busters here for this reason. tony and Auric both stated that they won't post here, even after Matt begged Tony publicly. Matt will only let me out if I promise to kiss all the promoters butts, and his own. You guys want me to be like a stepford poster "gee, this stock is great, I love each and everyone one of you." I'm not a fake and a liar. You guys here trying to teach me how to personally attack people backhandedly, under the table ought to be ashamed of yourselves. You are still attacking people, you're just doing it hypocritically.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
the most important thing is the post
if it's a TOS violation, the post should be deleted and the person suspended. It doesn't matter who's making the report. Matt has stated that he discriminately looks at tos reports. He also discriminately enforces the tos. He should just state that is big bold letters on the start page of the...
I Matt Brown can do and will do whatever the heck I want on this site. If I don't like the way you look, spell, your religion, color, sex, tax bracket, where you come from, your investment style or I'm just having a bad teenager day, I will toss you in jail, make fun of you, personally attack you, prohibit you from posting and do whatever the heck I want because it's my site, nah nah nah!
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
you don't pay attention to tos reports?
It depends upon whom it's coming from? I don't think that you are fairly dealing with the tos reports if that's how you're handling them.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
If I call Joe "strange," would that be a personal attack?
Just asking
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
maybe you should post when someone is suspended
so we know. Please posts links to this suspension, independent third party verification, perhaps a legal document? Then I can go see hollen in his other user names like last time. He doesn't even change his html posting and he posts the same thing on the same boards.
Please support your statement that I have 200+ posts deleted. Show me a link, SEC document, independent news item at least. One, if it's true, it might be because I post more. Two, more people attack me because I post the truth about companies being touted by unethical stock promoters. Three, I have to counter all the lies by the promoters like a certain someone saying "wow, look at all these big companies npct is doing business with" when they know it is definitely not the truth. Four, you have a ton of promtoers reporting my posts but I don't have the time to report all of theirs. The odds are against me.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Again, you're setting a horrible example, Matt
Talk about not being polite and being annoying.
I believe you are pulling the trigger on me and not on others just because you feel like it and because others complain about my posts, namely the promoters and their buddies. The post that got me thrown in here is more polite that others posts which are still here and on npct. I make one post that you don't like and I'm instantly thrown in here. Willy, bull, hollen... make a ton of total personal attacks some with profanity and all you did was delete their posts. That is not fair treatment.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
You're not setting a good example, matt
by using words like POS and such.
FTR I called the guy and told him about his misstatements. He told me he got the information from the CEO and I should talk to him instead. Then I reported the licensed analyst to NASD. Willy and Kloock, both company paid stock promoters, were posting his report without the disclaimer, intentionally. Who's a POS? Just asking
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
bull, I don't see much wrong with them either
That's my point. My post that landed me in the slammer was extremely polite compared to yours and willys. I feel I was put here for other reasons, namely matt just doing whatever the heck he wants; just a teenager with hormones and problems of his own.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
amuck, that's my point
what if I were to call someone a f**kface then I add, "I don't mean that as a personal attack." Does that let me off the hook? Not in my book. You guys have no idea what personal attacks are. You just want people to attack people backhandedly instead to just SEEM like polite conversation.
I believe that it's down right hypocritical to state "it's not okay to attack people directly but it is okay to attack them under the table." That's basically what you guys are telling me to do. If it'll make matt feel better, then I'll play by that rule here but don't go thinking that you guys aren't attacking people when you are. There is no way to debate without anything being flung about. You can't just all agree and say "POS stock is great!" Someone has to say "I believe you are wrong, your statement is incorrect, you are trying to mislead people here, your statement is hypocritical, you are a stock promoter paid by the company..." These are all personal attacks .
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
will do, original
if i ever get out of here.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
NO, I don't, original
I sent him the PM to show him that people are embedding images when he told me that embedding images is a tos violation and you can be suspended, deleted for that. Since then I've asked him if it's now allowed and he hasn't responded so I am assuming it's allowed.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
bop: response to your dd report
<snip>
~*~*~UNPAID DD ON NPCT~*~*~
This is completely irrelevant. Whether the DD is paid or not, if it is correct it's correct. If it is wrong, it's wrong.
me: it is relevant to show that I'm not a paid promoter or a person shorting the stock for profit. As per SEC regulations, I would have to disclaim this. I have no financial motive, nothing to gain and potential liability. It shows that I am posting this information nonanonymously in order to inform investors.
Some information about the public company Nanopierce and its CEO Paul Metzinger. (Some of the links go my website mary.cc. I have no cookies, virii, password grabbers... or anything in my site that is harmful, guaranteed)
A report like this should not deliver only "some" information. It can be focused only on a specific type of information and it is perfectly correct to do so. The portion in parenthesis comes across as an excuse for not providing third party confirmation.
me: I posted the bit about cookies because the paid promoters were yelling that i have cookies, password grabbers ... in my site to try and keep people from going to my site to view it. I post this in message boards as well as on that stand alone page. There are links in there to actual documents so there is third party confirmation. Some of the press releases are older and no longer on yahoo server so I copied them here.
1. The CEO was sued for fraud by the SEC three times. (see below for lawsuit dockets). He "consented to issuance of permanent injunction and entry of judgment against Metzinger." Look at all the charges against him http://www.mary.cc/npct/7.htm
Here is the judgment. He showed the SEC that he was penniless then agreed to rat out his companies and associates in exchange for the injunction and judgment. If he breaks the settlement agreement, he consents to be tried as a criminal in criminal court. Here are the documents.
http://www.mary.cc/npct/NP1.JPG
http://www.mary.cc/npct/NP2.JPG
http://www.mary.cc/npct/NP3.JPG
http://www.mary.cc/npct/NP4.JPG
Major red flags here. All corroborating "evidence" is available only at the reporters website and mostly consists of "pictures" of purportedly SEC documents taken by the reporter. Likewise the "evidence" indicates some charges and the referenced lawsuits, but the commentary is slanted towards the inflammatory that the individual is guilty of something. If the inflammatory commentary were removed and third party verification of the "evidence" presented this would be an outstanding bit of information in reference to company management.
me: I had to scan the actual documents as they are not available online. Search pacer and you wont' find them there, just a link to them and then it says it's not available. I scanned them because company paid stock promoter retyped them and edited them. I had to show she was lying.
Note: ADAPT did a most cursory search concerning the individual above. In addition to some verification of the above information we also found references to the individual prevailing in several appeals. That information should also be included in a report of this nature.
me: where is your proof that he prevailed in appeals? I don't see it, links, verified third party information? That seems a tad hypocritical to me.
2. The CEO was also sued for racketeering and was involved in a lawsuit over missing stock certificates.
No supporting evidence whatsoever presented in the report. This reporter appears to expect the reader to take everything at face value. a clear sign that the reader should be very careful in judging the accuracy of this information.
me: the docket information is right below this information. It's right here http://www.mary.cc/npct I post my dd in two parts, first part here and then the dockets.
3.The CEO's last company went bankrupt, i.e. Intercell. Other companies he was involved in went bankrupt also such as Faspaq. He also went bankrupt personally in 1989.
Again no supporting third party confirmation. Additionally, while worthwhile to know, this reporter is reminded of the standard disclaimer used by mutual fund salesmen. "Past results are not necessarily an indication of future performance"
me: again, I posted the dockets also. you just didn't read them.
4. NPCT was started as a mining company then became a distributor of skylights symbol SUNY which is a shell Metzinger's wife owned and now they sell hitech? The assets of npct i.e. patents and patent applications were bought with printed shares from a division of Intercell. Intercell considered their value ZERO. CEO Paul Metzinger is also the CEO of Intercell. symbol IICP.OB http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=IICP.OB&d=t
At last a third party link. Though not to the company that is the subject of the report(?). More unverified "facts". this is beginning to look more like an opinion column than a DD report.
me: go to any sec document site and you can see it all for yourself. Even look at the latest quarterly report and it states it there also.
5. No direct revenue, no profits. They had a tiny tiny bit of income for consulting about something which had nothing to do with the company.
This informationis too easily verified not to have been accomanied by the appropriate link. At this point the astute investor is likely to leave the document and proceed directly to the company filings to review thing for himself. The reporter has failed the reader by not providing the information promised in the header.
me: If you look at the link below, you can see all the sec filings for yourself. I provided a link. You just didn't bother to read it.
6. They have hired many, many stock promoters. One of them posted on the message boards that toxic funding is good and the funder was a good company when that was not the case. The company is currently suing the funder for stock manipulation and securities fraud. The funder Southridge Financial, Kernaghan are infamous as corporate loan sharks who short stocks. More information on them here http://www.mary.cc/tk
Again more easily verifiable information lacking verification. Though if taken at face value it appears that company may be trying to recoup losses as the result of misplaced trust in the past. The comments concerning the funder are irrelevant in this context.
me: verification is right on the board where this was psoted. RB user kknightmcc posted on rb and on her site i2i that the funder was good. This is toxic funding! It's very relevant. Only losers accept toxic funding as they can get funds from no other place.
7. They have an Open House every year which is basically just a stock promotion meeting. Here is a photo from it. They promote it heavily in Asia, Germany and the US yet they only had 35 people and I see at least five stock promoters in the audience. If this were a revolutionary product, how come more people weren't there? Why'd they even take a photo of such a small audience? http://www.nanopierce.com/daten/company/openhoeuse_event/oh_images/
Audience/Thumbnails/TN_the_audience1.jpg
Presented without the commentary this would be a good piece of DD. The questions asked are an obvious attempt to direct an action by the reader. a definite no-no in a proper DD report.
me: your own twisted opinion, a big no no to me.
8. Most of the DD on this company is paid promotion such as wallstreetreporter.com , investortoinvestor.com (Kathy Knight, Kent Klook), Investor Relations Worldwide Corporation asianinvestoronline.com (owned by a Colorado company) , WillyWizard.com (Hal Engel) , marketreporter.com , ceocast.com, nanotechinvesting.com is company site, stockreporter.de, Charles Van Musscher of Gruenwald, Germany, The Geneva Group, Inc. of Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida and probably others. Check out their disclaimers on their sites. They have been paid to promote NPCT. Check out annual SEC reports and search/find for Investor Relations and you will see their names and compensation. Here are just a few from the SEC documents which you can recognize from the message boards especially Hal Engle, Kathy Knight and Chad Beemer who do not post anonymously.
7/1/98 . Common Stock 186,500 Investor Relations Putter Consulting
7/1/98 Common Stock 24,500 Investor Relations Kathy Knight- McConnell
7/1/98 Common Stock 6,250 Investor Relations Hans Kast
7/1/98 Common Stock 6,250 Investor Relations Roger L. Smothers
6/3/99 Common Stock 100,000 Investor Relations Harold Engel, Jr.
6/30/99 Common Stock 144,000 Investor Relations Stock Enterprises
6/30/99 Common Stock 250,000 Consulting Services Bert Roosen
6/30/99 Common Stock 30,000 Investors Relations Chad Beemer
6/30/99 Common Stock 10,000 Interest on Rose & Richard Gram
Again, presented without the commentary that attempts to steer the reader to a desired conclusion this would be an excellent bit of DD.
me: your own twisted opinion, a dd no no for sure. I spelled it all out for everyone. If I just post the investor relations names no one will realize what I'm talking about.
9. Paul Metzinger is also CEO of Intercell. They did a 1:20 reverse stock split and their stock was at .14 That means it is really worth less than a cent. He changed the stock symbol also. He wasn't even in any type of business. His words again "I am currently assessing with the Board of Directors various business opportunities, which could well form the basis for the future business activity of the Company. There are several opportunities which we find of particular interest and which are in markets of substantial size upon which to build a real operating company. We have no specific restrictions imposed upon our search. I invite any shareholder who may be aware of a technology or a business opportunity, which they think may be of interest to the Company, to please contact me."
After a short respite we return to no verification.
me: if an investor can't even find an SEC doc, they have no business investing in anything. If someone's on a message board, they can find an SEC doc. If I post an excerpt, you would probably state that I'm lying.
10. Intercell also had problems with the SEC with their reports. They had to restate them. This straight from the CEO. "Our previously announced plan to restructure, recapitialize and refinance Intercell Corporation was, unfortunately, delayed because of a frustratingly long effort to accommodate the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission on certain technical accounting issues relating to the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999."
This is the first portion of this document to be presented in the proper format. Now if the reporter had only included a third party verification link of the quote it would be perfect.
me: the link is gone as the company restructed. This came form a letter to shareholders posted on SI years ago.
11. The CEO begs shareholders not to verify contracts with other companies. This is very troubling and suspect.
http://www.nanopierce.com/daten/investor/press_archive/shletter14_09_01.html
"We are currently engaged in extremely sensitive discussions with many major global players in the microelectronics industry. These discussions and future business relationships can and will be jeopardized if shareholders make direct contacts with any of these companies in what may be a well intentioned effort to find out what is going on.
Recently executives of one company, at the highest levels, contacted us expressing extreme and troubling concern about calls received from inquisitive shareholders. These executives felt "compromised” being faced with answering questions about what they deemed to be inside material information, which obviously they could not disclose or even affirm or deny. These contacts must stop otherwise we may lose the opportunity to ever again deal with these companies. It destroys our reputation to be a trustworthy partner." Then shareholders check out contracts as per SEC recommendation. Boeing said "Nanopierce who?" and Infineon clearly stated they are not doing business with Nanopierce. Others said no comment or did not respond at all.
Also, if you say you are in a related company and ask for a sample to try out, test, they say NO. What does that tell you?
Paul then states 10/2001 through his promoter Kathy that he will no longer be providing information to shareholders because of message board posters trying to verify his information. I personally believe he received a cease and desist letter from Boeing as Boeing told me they were going to find out what was up with Nanopierce.
This time we get a good link but the commentary is deliberately inflammatory. Recommendation that an investor make a false representaion to obtain a sample is extremely disturbing. As is the follow up that because the company doesn't hand out samples based on a phone call proving something is amiss.
me: I did not tell people to lie. I stated IF. A shareholder can ask for a sample and you get the same exact answer. You would think they would at least ask more questions before stating no.
12. NPCT stock promoter Stockreporter sued by the SEC for fraud in his promotions. Here is the npct stock promotion. Here is the SEC lawsuit against the Stockreporter. http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr16680.htm
This information should have been included in item #8 above. Properly constructed though.
me: It is included above. http://www.mary.cc/npct/sp.htm You jsut didn't bother to copy the link.
13. Here Metzinger claims there are huge oil reserves for a company when there weren't. http://www.mary.cc/npct/1.htm
Again the link is not third party verifiable.
me: Because it's dead. People don't keep news items up forever. Yahoo gets rid of htem in just a few months.
14. Here are some investors burned by Paul posting on Silicon Investors about him and his scams. http://www.mary.cc/npct/3.htm and yet another burned Intercell Investor, same scam over and over again. http://www.mary.cc/npct/4.htm
see item #13
me: there are links to SI posts in the actual report. You didn't even read it. YOu did not dd at all.
15. A recent unbiased article about NPCT. http://www.mary.cc/npct/5.htm This is the only honest article ever written about the company I believe. He did some good DD.
see #13
me: there is a link to the actual report which is still on line . YOu didn't even read it.
16. Metzinger rips off his business partners as well.
Paul shouldn't have a law license.
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=NPCT&read=59053
Paul doesn't keep promises to his partners.
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=NPCT&read=59052
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=NPCT&read=59050
Louis wins his appeal
http://www.courts.state.co.us/ctappeals/caseann/12-6-01.htm
Article about Paul and Louis
http://www.mary.cc/npct/6.htm
A poor mix of other opinions and bad verification. Given that so much of this document is unverifiable only the most desperate investor would bother researching these allegations.
me: There's a current lawsuit which spells it all out. I posted the actual lawsuit up there. YOu didn't read it.
The remainder of the document references court dockets. This is appropriate for a due diligence report. However considering the overall length of the preceding and it's questionable presentation the reporter has all but insured that no one will review the attached documents.
me: The dockets are all verifiable. Don't you have a pacer account? It's all from a pay service so I copy/pasted it out for the rest of the people.
In Conclusion: Had the report provided verifiable confirmation at respected impartial third party locations and dispensed with the attempts to guide a reader to a specific conclusion this would be a valuable document. As it stands it is almost worthless, save for it's ability to teach others how not to proceed in making a report and alerting one what to expect from the reporter in question in the future.
me: I did. You didn't bother to read them. Your dd of my dd was pure opinion. My dd post is correct. YOu did not research. You dismissed it because you just don't like the messenger.
Here are lawsuit dockets
105 METZINGER, PAUL codc 1:1989cv00227 02/08/1989 850 02/23/1989
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE vs. PAUL METZINGER
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (Denver)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 91-CV-65
Kanchanapoom, et al v. Zufelt, et al
Filed: 01/14/91
Assigned to: Judge Sherman G. Finesilver
Jury demand: Both
Demand: $5,000,000
Nature of Suit: 850
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Dkt # in USDC C Dist CA : is CV89-7321-RMT (Ex)
Cause: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PAUL METZINGER Paul H. Metzinger
defendant [COR LD NTC]
Paul H. Metzinger, P.C.
600 - 17th Street
#2309-S
Denver, CO 80202
U.S.A.
303-592-1010
PAUL METZINGER, P.C. Paul H. Metzinger
defendant (See above)
[COR LD NTC]
2/5/91 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Richard Metzinger,
defendant Robert H. Burgener, defendant E.M.I. Inc.,
defendant Crown, Ltd., defendant King, Ltd., defendant Sid,
Ltd. by Timothy James O'Connor, Mary Frances O'Connor (yk)
[Entry date 02/06/91]
It is ordered that the
second cause of action is dismissd as to Paul H. Metzinger
and Paul H. Metzinger, P.C. and First Trust Corp. It is
ordered tht the 8th and 12th causes of action are
dismissed.
U.S. District Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (Denver)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 96-CV-1300
Maxam Gold Corp v. Timberline Conslts, et al
Filed: 06/03/96
Assigned to: Judge Clarence A. Brimmer
Jury demand: Defendant
Demand: $1,667,000
Nature of Suit: 190
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MAXAM GOLD CORPORATION Michael H. Berger
fka [COR LD NTC]
Maxam International Waldbaum, Corn, Koff, Berger &
Corporation Cohen, P.C.
plaintiff 303 East 17th Avenue
#940
Denver, CO 80203
U.S.A.
303-861-1166
Raymond Harris
[COR LD NTC]
(To be updated)
Cary Ira Schachter
[COR LD NTC]
Conant, Whittenburg, French &
Schachter, PC
600 North Pearl Street
#2300
Dallas, TX 75201
USA
214-999-5100
FTS 999-5747
v.
TIMBERLINE CONSULTANTS, INC. John Henry Schlie
defendant [COR LD NTC]
John H. Schlie, Atty at Law
1120 Lincoln Street
#1600
Denver, CO 80203
USA
303-832-6890
RON KNITTLE John Henry Schlie
defendant (See above)
[COR LD NTC]
PAUL METZINGER John Henry Schlie
defendant [term 10/09/96]
[term 12/23/96] (See above)
He was sued over stock certificates.
U.S. District Court
District of Utah (Central)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 88-CV-897
SEC v. Faspaq, Inc., et al
Filed: 09/30/88
Assigned to: Judge Bruce S. Jenkins
Jury demand: Defendant
Demand: $0,000
Nature of Suit: 850
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: US Plaintiff
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 15:77 Securities Fraud
PAUL H. METZINGER
defendant
[term 01/30/89]
The SEC won the case against the main defendant. Paul had case against him dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction. SEC was supposed to refile against him in CO which is the proper jurisdiction but didn't.
Check out NPCT thread on http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/subject.gsp?subjectid=19793 especially the old posts. Look at all the promoters on the IHUB one also http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=98
Look at all the promoters here on Raging Bull. http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=NPCT
I have no shares. I have not been paid to post. I am not short. I just hate seeing people being fleeced by stock promoters. This company seems very suspect to me because of management's history and the fact they have no real income. If their patents were so hot, why wouldn't someone buy them or license them for millions? Why couldn't they have gotten a loan against the patents instead of the toxic funding? Why would they have sooo many stock promoters? When you see stock promoters saying this is a $60 stock when they're at .66 cents, you just KNOW something is funny here. As per Asensio's book "Sold Short" this company has almost ALL the signs of a stock scam, i.e. little or no revenue, a hot hot field, management with a bad past, restated earnings, change in auditors, lots of stock promoters, a hard to define product, lots of fluffy press releases, a past involving a mining company...
Sources of information
All legal information about lawsuits came from here. It's a pay site so you need an account, only 7 cents a page. Well worth it to do your DD on your investments.
http://pacer.uspci.uscourts.gov/
All SEC information came from their SEC filings. I use this source
http://www.amex.com/quote.dll?mode=stock&symbol=npct
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
they email me instead
guess I should have added that. Thanks for the personal attack. Dance around the words and they still mean the same thing. This game of rephrasing things is pretty stupid when you're saying the same thing. Why don't we all just post in piglatin instead, just as silly.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
northwest, please make 100 posts
stating how wonderful I am and then do 200 situps and I will lobby for my own release. Are you ihub admin now? matt should release me as per his own rules. If he does not, then he does not enforce his rules fairly and everyone should know that. He can prohibit anyone from posting for any reason he wants, even for no reason. If he does not let me out of here, I will know that it's for arbitrary reasons and not because of the tos. I have posted many posts of others here which are violations yet they are still posting.
your northwest have also been personally attacking me with your posts. If not by the words, then by the sentiment and tone. That should be enough for a personal attack as per matt.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
show me where it is
I would be very interested in seeing what you think about npct as an investment.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
so someone embedding images is akin to robbing banks?
what are you trying to say? I'm not clear on the concept? Are you saying that willy, hollen, sara are bank robbers?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
If the information is in the ibox
I am not allowed to post it again. It is considered spam as per matt. Ask him.
momo jobbie, momentum play.
When I post my DD, I get attacked by the promoters, pump and dumpers and a couple of their tag along duped longs. Those are the people I respond to in that way. Go to npct and see how I treat the real investors. Most don't respond to me on the boards because then they get attacked also. I feel sorry for people duped by lying ceo's and paid promoters. I don't feel sorry for hte lying ceo's and paid promoters. They are paid to post bold faced lies.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
why didn't you post it on NPCT?
where it would have been on topic. I don't understand.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
If others can embed when instructed not to,
then I want to be able to embed also. If someone PMs me with an embedded image, they get my ip/isp information if I open the PM. There are a few here who brag about being computer hacks.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
here are the posts northwest
My dd posts. Pure facts with a tiny bit of opinion.
http://www.mary.cc/jnot
http://www.mary.cc/npct
I make these posts and just get trashed personally, they don't even respond to the content.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
thanks bop
I shall reword my posts using "proper" and "acceptable" adjectives. I expect to not land in jail after I follow all these suggestions.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
northwesterner, I was permanently deleted for that post
which you say is better. That is my point. The rules aren't being enforced fairly. Matt permanently deleted me from ihub for that post. I couldn't even log in. He said I was out because my post was a personal attack. Then he lets me back in for other reasons which had nothing to do with ihub at all. I am back in jail for another post which people have said is also acceptable. Matt wants me in jail for other reasons. I told him when I agreed to come back last time that he'd throw me back in jail for no reason at all and he did.
This is the post that landed me in here over a week ago.
"Just because bull isn't hot on npct
does not mean that we are the same person.
If you were to show npct to 1000 regular investors, 99.9% would go "that's a lousy company." The other .01% would be someone who thinks they can do a little momo jobbie on the small company and maybe steal a penny or two from some unsuspecting fool. That is how a regular investor would look at it. I know that rubber, danny, hollen, sara are into momo jobbies. For instance, sara invested in astn, lfza, and npct. They are all otcbb companies with basically no income and definitely no profits. She's obviously not in those companies as real investments as they make no sense as real investments. She's looking for momo, that's all. That's all npct is at best, a momo play."
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
How's this then? theoretically speaking,
just posting in general, not directed toward anyone, just my most humble personal opinion, as always, yours truly, sweet honest mary.
"sara said npct looked good long term then she sells short term. Isn't
that a tad hypocritical? It makes it seem that you believe it's just a
pump and dump. At least we agree on that."
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
so I should be sarcastic, ironic, act dumb, ask questions?
Instead of saying "you mrs. stock promoter are a hypocrite because you said it was a good long play then you sold in the last pump and dump and bragged about it"
I should say "you mrs. stock promoter said that npct was a good long play then you post that you sold in the last run up. I can't seem to reconcile these statements."
just keep it backhanded, sarcastic, kick them under the table as they say? Just trying to learn how to play the game, say the same things and get away with it like the rest of you here.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
I'm embedding a tiny image
1 pixel by 1 pixel. That shouldn't be a problem for anyone. Just making sure it's okay. I see willy sent me a PM with a big gif in it and that was okay by matt. Diver dan has three medium sized images in his sig line. I sure hope he wasn't trying to snag my IP address.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
bop, yes I'm serious
I see others able to make negative comments about people and they don't get suspended. If I just need to rephrase things, I will do it. I just need to know the real rules of the game here instead of whatever matt feels like doing at any particular time to any particular person.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
so you just substitute the negative words?
for another word which has roughly the same meaning but just doesn't sound as bad? Can you give us some examples? Instead of calling someone a stupid idiot would you just say that they aren't smart? Instead of calling someone a big fat liar you might say that they don't tell the truth or they're a little fibber? I'm trying to learn how to do this type of acceptable backhanded type of communication that is okey dokey. I'm speaking in general terms. My post is directed to everyone. I'm seriously interested in learning how to say the same thing in a politically correct way.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
<img src=http://www.mary.cc/x.gif>
so it's okay to embed images
as I see everyone doing it and matt never responded to my post asking whether I could or not, I will embed an image. willy, hollen, diverdave, sara all embed images in PMs and posts so I am assuming it's okay, especially as I reported all those posts and nothing happened. Let's see if matt deals with me fairly.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!