Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Lesson learned. Never invest more than you are willing to lose. Great point.
So the FOIA is producing a result on the meeting with the FDA, after all?
Apparently that rules out the possibility that the meeting never happened and the report that there was a meeting was another stall tactic cooked up by "Deano". Whew. Glad THAT concern has been put to rest, at least!
I would think that there will be an announcement when images have been acquired.
I find it hard to imagine that information would come from someone on this board, instead.
When are we scheduled to hit a nickel? I keep seeing that prediction, but haven't heard much about it lately.
OK, so the lockup period is only 6 months.
I still don't know why one would choose to buy nickel shares that must be held through any positive announcements for 6 months when shares can be purchased for 50% more and played at the owner's convenience.
Can you explain why one would choose to hold nickel shares for 6 months? I haven't understood the rebuttal to that, yet.
Why would you want to buy private placement shares that require you hold them for what - a year? - when you could buy on a dip created by some of the previous shares being ready for sale? You'd have to sit on your shares while all of the action happens.
If enough people scream that the sky is falling while some of these shares that were freed up in November sell off, then perhaps some with no nerves will panic and sell. Then anyone can get shares that may cost an extra 50%, but they can be flipped and re-flipped when movement recommences - when resubmission is announced. There's an easy opportunity to double up from here on that alone.
Today is either:
A) "OMG! The share price is bottoming out!! Sell!! AAAAAHHHH!!", or it's
B) "Oh, look. The MM's are shaking the trees, making round trips, and trying to get as many people to sell as possible. The share price this afternoon will be right about where it was this morning."
I'm going to go with B). Good luck with A), and sounding the alarms as hard as you can.
It is a leap of logic and reason to assert that because Bogdan has the legal ability to appeal his case until he is in front of the highest court in the land that it means that Janes is therefore guilty until the appeals run out.
It sure is entertaining, though!
Is there a date set that Dean must meet for submittal? Does anyone know?
You didn't catch the part where I say "according to what I read here".
I was trying to throw irony in there by including the phrases "well-known fact" and "according to what I read here" in the same sentence.
Is it possible that now that he knows PMA is not in the cards, he is confident with the level of financing in place tied with his own money to make it through the FDA's process this time? Maybe he doesn't need to re-up on the toxic financing?
Just a thought.
THIS QUESTION HAS BEEN DEFINITIVELY ANSWERED!
It is a well-known fact, according to what I have already read here, that Dean had a pre-recorded video of a hand being scanned. All he had to do, with a little practice, was time his hand with the movement from the hand in the video, and...voila!!
This is all so self-explanatory, folks.
I thought Dean was supposed to have gotten in trouble for doing the same thing once already. Are you saying that - while the SEC, the FDA, the FBI P&G and AARP are watching - he's doing the same thing with 15 million shares?
He's just begging for a knock at the door, isn't he?
I look forward to the answer to this question.
If they are imaging using contrast, doesn't that mean they are only capable of imaging the vascular system?
Isn't that different from what IMGG is trying to do?
The article cited is from 2006, so I would think this would have been relevant a long time ago, if the two were producing the same kinds of images.
WHO WILL TAKE THE BET?
ONCE THE BET IS TAKEN, HOW WILL WE VERIFY WHICH HE SPENT MORE TIME ON?
WILL THE FBI, CIA AND SEC REFEREE THE BET FOR US?
OR IS THIS JUST ANOTHER OPINION THAT HOLDS THE SAME AMOUNT OF WATER AS EVERY OTHER OPINION IN THE WORLD?
WHY HAVEN'T YOU DONE THIS ALREADY?
Looking forward to hearing the results of your query/evidence submission.
Please keep the board informed.
It looks like the market has decided that .09 is support for IMGG, and no matter how many dozens of times the question of what did/didn't happen at the open house comes up, there are as many buyers as there are sellers at this price.
I hope to glean more information from anyone who can offer something more than 'it's a scam' and 'the OH was a lie' and 'it's all a ruse in order to sell shares at a nickel apiece'. If those things were true, there is definitely someone with deep pockets who would've already had this case proven and closed.
I look forward to a substantial post. I hope one comes.
How could a $200MM market cap be reasonable for a scam company? You would think that zero dollars would be the highest market cap possible for a scam, right?
You are saying two contradictory things in the same post.
Why is that? Why can't he?
I believe a conflict would occur if he was given a synopsis of the meeting.
Stating that a meeting happened when you said it would happen, which is sometime during the week of the 17th, is not really insider information, is it?
ok. just checking.
I had to ask, because the way your post is worded, it comes across as a fact that a money tv spot has been announced.
Has a Money TV spot been announced?
It looks like a clerical error to me. Otherwise, it makes no sense. If you take out 'Imaging 3' and replace it with 'Lux Digital Pictures' it makes sense. It looks like someone let an easy correction pass through.
Has anyone called this law firm already?
Was RSNA held in December of 2009, or October of 2009?
If this is true, and I am asking this for about the sixth or seventh time, WHY DIDN'T HE SELL A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF SHARES DURING THE PEAK SP OF OVER $1.50? HE HAD 60 MILLION SHARES - WHY WOULD HE HOLD THROUGH THE RISE AND FALL, IF THIS WERE A SCAM??
Anyone who claims he secretly sold a bunch of shares through friends and family needs to provide proof of such an accusation. It's a strawman argument.
WHY DIDN'T HE CASH OUT AT $1.95, THEN?
Any scammer would be smart enough to get out of the scam while it's hot, so why didn't Dean sell tens of millions of shares when it was almost $2 a share? Why would he ride them back to under a dime, so that he could keep the company car for the next couple of years? Tens of millions of dollars of SP value were not sold...why do you think that is?
Or maybe he won't, as the FBI and the SEC do not publish whom they are going to arrest ahead of time, and since there is no published evidence of such, his odds are just as good as yours or mine as far as any of us knows.
Oh. You see, that's what I thought too. I have read quite a few posts referring to jail time, a trial, the FBI, the SEC, etc., but I haven't found one link to anything other than the Bogdan case, which I have yet to hear about further.
So there IS no "there" there. I see...
When does the trial start?
Please tell us all who these three consulting firms were that were willing to freely spend their time poring over IMGG's NSE letter, just so that you could have your opinion verified.
Thanks.
In one post, you say you were there among the 'poker faces'. In the very next post, you say 'we are suppose to take your word now in a your little magic backroom meeting'.
In one post you claim to have been there, and in the next you refer to the event solely from the viewpoint of someone else. It doesn't jibe.
This is important because your posts may affect another's view of the stock. Were you there, or not?
Hey. Let's celebrate!! We're up today!!
Turkey sandwiches for all...
My point exactly. If this presentation is not viewed as a "public demonstration" by the FDA by the criteria you just mentioned, and if the device was just proven to work to people who claim to have seen it work, then...
...where is the bad news?
I was just trying to figure out if the rule about displaying the device that was mentioned earlier referred to attempts to display it as a commercial of sorts, either on the web or on TV (in highly-viewable public formats). We all, of course, remember a very recent presentation that, while not very successful, was shown on the web. I don't remember the uproar about that video.
Perhaps now that many are saying the device works, the newest and biggest concern about Dean is that he is showing the device when he should not be? I don't know, I just hope the posters who are affirming the device's efficacy are correct.
Could the fact that the demonstration was done in private to a select few and not later displayed in any other form mean that it was a private display instead of a public display?
Please excuse me for interrupting the "sky is falling" chorus, but - regarding the claims that BK is soon going to be dropped on everyone like an atomic bomb - hasn't IMGG been at the same financial point many times, only to be bailed out by Dean? I mean, we all already know that's what will happen, right?
Whew! At least we have another 6 months to let this particular cliffhanger resolve itself. Time will tell, and I am one that will be watching for this patent to get paid for like a HAWK!
Instead of challenging someone to find some information that you would accept, how's about you just quietly ask them yourself? I hereby submit that you be the one to ask these radiologists and "report back"...to us.
There are also calls for investigation by the SEC that can easily be addressed...by contacting the SEC. Please contact the SEC and report back on that as well, instead of challenging others for information they don't have.
I look forward to the results of all of the forthcoming inquiries.
I'm gonna hold you to all of that coming true, just as you claim it will. I also remember someone claiming that we would be sub-penny before the close on April 8th. That didn't happen, either.