Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
“ Insiders are very positive buying more shares than they are selling in Voip Pal.Com Inc
In the last 100 trades there were 420 million shares bought and 16.71 million shares sold.”
"Idiots that sold yesterday are regretting now"
"No one is hyping this stock. It's quite the reverse"
"Um, they have to submit their stock sales well in advance"
Well, that's bullshit then.
More than half the time their Form 4s are late - assuming they bother to file them at all, which as we have seen they often don't. Form 144s are almost as rare as hen's teeth and not adhered to anyway.
I feel like it's time for me to repost this truism:
"When penny stock CEO self-enrichment schemes like VPLM fall below 2 cents and begin their inevitable (although often punctuated by brief spikes) decline to the trips, it becomes clearer who among their followers are sheep who have been woefully misled and misdirected by the crooked CEO and his equally crooked IRP, and who are the wolves in sheep's clothing who have actively connived with the CEO to transfer his marks' money to their own pockets while pretending to be among those very marks.
While I already have a pretty good idea who on social media (DB/Rich, obvs!) falls into each camp, it will be fascinating to get a more forensic feel for this over the coming months."
"It’s at a level now where the .005 options would not result in much of a profit."
“ What kind of narcissist is this?”
Not sure why anyone thinks IPIX was going to be involved with the 510(k) anyway.
The only official indication we have is that IPIX was an investor in BeaMed.
That doesn’t alter the fact that Leo Ehrlich bunged $4 million of shareholders’ cash to an offshore company without so much as a by-your-leave.
If anything I suspect all this Sturm und Drang is designed to remove the focus from Leo Ehrlich’s part in this gross breach of his fiduciary duty.
Rich Inza is a crook who breaks securities laws every day with his VPLM pimping.
Just like Malak with his utter contempt for the SEC and their requirement to report material events.
Any company that has Ben Carson on its BoD is doomed to failure.
“Microsoft was once a penny stock!”
“ When was Microsoft stock a penny stock? Mmmm. Never!
ByABC News
September 27, 2007, 9:34 PM
Proponents of penny stocks often try to convince investors to take a chance by spreading false success stories. One of the most popular has to do with Microsoft starting as a penny stock. It's not true, but I'll show you how the fraudsters try to trick you.
Here's the truth: Microsoft's stock debuted on the Nasdaq market on March 13, 1986. Its price at the end of that first day was $28. Microsoft's stock price, as quoted in newspapers and now the Internet, has never fallen below $1 a share. In fact, the stock's lowest quoted price in its history was $21.51 on June 13, 2006. You can see for yourself using this stock price spreadsheet from Microsoft, available here:
Check out the second column, called "Pre-Split Closing Stock Price." This number shows you the stock's price, as quoted by a broker or in the newspaper.
But, wait a second! What about the first column, called "Post-Split Closing Stock Price?" It shows Microsoft having a stock price of just under 10 cents a share on March 13, 1986. Does that mean the penny stock hucksters are right?
Not at all. That first column tells you what the stock price would have been in 1986 if you had considered the effect of all the company's later stock splits.
At no point did Microsoft's stock actually trade for 10 cents a share. It debuted at $28 a share. The 10-cent price is merely a reflection of the company's nine stock splits, which mathematically affects past stock prices in relation to current stock prices.
Don't be fooled.”
"I saw no reason to dispute the interpretation of these facts as presented by the well-qualified authors at stockinvest.us."
"I completely reject your opinion that the analysis is somehow "fake." "
"Insiders are very positive buying more shares than they are selling in Voip Pal.Com Inc
In the last 100 trades there were 420 million shares bought and 16.71 million shares sold."
"It's okay if we disagree"
That site (https://stockinvest.us/stock/VPLM) got one thing right:
"OTCBB:VPLM
Strong Sell Candidate
Voip Pal.Com Inc Stock Forecast
OTC Bulletin Board > Communication Services > Telecom Services
Is Voip Pal.Com Inc stock A Buy?
Voip Pal.Com Inc holds several negative signals and is within a very wide and falling trend, so we believe it will still perform weakly in the next couple of days or weeks. We therefore hold a negative evaluation of this stock. Due to some small weaknesses in the technical picture we have downgraded our analysis conclusion for this stock since the last evaluation from a Sell to a Strong Sell candidate."
Going to comment on the fact that the claim about insider buys vs. sells was completely false, or are you just going to let that ride?
That statement was total tripe. I suspect AI is used to compose those write-ups.
"That does not mean that the data is false, Dontnosheet."
"I found this in-depth perspective from a stock analysis site"
"PURGE THE WEAK HOLDERS!"
“ Race to the finish line, love it!”
“ It’s all about processing things and understanding how things work.
A lot going on that one has to be intelligent enough to understand the process, especially in patent cases.”
“ What, do you think they’re selling because they know of bad news?”
Hundreds of millions of free options and a Form 144 filed just today:
https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/vplm/sec-filings
The greed of the VPLM insider vultures is only matched by the stupidity of those who still think this is a legitimate company (and by the dishonesty and criminality of their social media sock puppets, and their IR person who masquerades as a normal investor).
So over on the other board, some of VPLM's apologists are trying to claim that two VPLM Directors bought shares (they used the word "more" which would be a misstatement, because they've never bought any).
In reality they were granted over 100 million free options at the ultra low price of 0.005, already in the money.
Malak gave himself 90 million free options.
https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/vplm/sec-filings
No doubt they will dump these as soon as they can, just like they have all the others - the options are exercisable immediately.
VPLM insiders - all reward, no risk.
VPLM retail shareholders - all risk, no reward.
"Did you see the pre-clinical PRs showing efficacy in animal models, better than existing antivirals? or Phase I PRs about safety?"
“ they did seem to show that NV-387 was safe in humans with their Phase I India trial, with NO dose limiting toxicity,”
I suspect that question has little relevance to IPIX nowadays.
That $4 million of your money that Ehrlich gave to his off-shore buddies without so much as a by-your-leave is long gone.
The only outstanding question is how much of it ended up in Ehrlich’s personal bank account with the rest of the money he stole from his retail shareholders.
When penny stock CEO self-enrichment schemes like VPLM fall below 2 cents and begin their inevitable (although often punctuated by brief spikes) decline to the trips, it becomes clearer who among their followers are sheep who have been woefully misled and misdirected by the crooked CEO and his equally crooked IRP, and who are the wolves in sheep's clothing who have actively connived with the CEO to transfer his marks' money to their own pockets while pretending to be among those very marks.
While I already have a pretty good idea who on social media (DB/Rich, obvs!) falls into each camp, it will be fascinating to get a more forensic feel for this over the coming months.
In the meantime, you can rely on the fact that those who regurgitate the lie that in some way Amazon are behind this ludicrous and vexatious lawsuit are simply peddling Inza's lies on his instruction and therefore are part of this criminal conspiracy.
Which, frankly, is not a good a smart thing to be doing for all kinds of reasons.
Mr. Market (and the insiders) knows what to make of this vexatious law suit.
Sell!Sell! Sell! Sell! Sell!
LOL.
“ Yes, Amazon is conspicuously absent from the class action.”
“ This looks a little like David attempting to bring down Goliath”
Vexatious indeed:
“ “This lawsuit is yet more nonsense by an unsuccessful serial litigant seeking a windfall,” a Verizon spokesperson said Monday in a statement. “The factual allegations are baseless, the legal claims are frivolous, and the damages figure is pure fantasy. We are confident a court will see this complaint for what it is ………..”
“We dispute the allegations in these lawsuits and will vigorously defend ourselves in court,” an AT&T spokesperson said Monday in a statement.”
More paid PR bullshit, you mean.
The first lie comes in the second sentence:
“ The lawsuits claim that the three major U.S. mobile service providers, who control over 97% of the smartphone market”
Given that TORVF is a scam so obvious you can see it from space, that shouldn’t come as a surprise.
LOL!
“Don’t look at our illegality, look over there instead! !” says Emil Malak.
BTW even if successful (it won’t be, once again VPLM will be crushed) just how will this benefit VPLM shareholders, and just how will VPLM pay the legal fees associated with this when they once more lose?
This is going to be fun to watch but not for the reasons Rich/DB thinks.
This isn’t nuanced. Only a legal counsel that had its head up its own ass would think that major defeats in pivotal law cases weren’t major events and didn’t need to be the subject of an 8-k.
In this and in other SEC requirements such as timely and accurate reporting of insider sales VPLM deliberately chooses to spit in the face of the law.
Which is probably not a good thing.
“ legally king Tut doesn't have to give press reports”
"There are many reasons cases could be dismissed, isn't there?"
"FINAL JUDGMENT
At the Final Pretrial Conference held July 9, 2024, the Court announced on the record that
(1) Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Amend Answer to Add
Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 88) is GRANTED; (2) Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions Based on
VoIP-Pal’s Violation of Court Order (Dkt. No. 219) is DENIED; and (3) Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Dkt. No. 136) is GRANTED. The Court issued a
written opinion granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement on July
29, 2024. Dkt. No. 272. The Court now enters its Final Judgment as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that final judgment of non-infringement is entered in favor of Defendant
and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall take nothing in this action.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any and all motions not previously ruled upon by the
Court are DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s remaining counterclaims and defenses
are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s defenses to Defendant’s remaining
counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice.
Case 6:21-cv-00674-ADA Document 273 Filed 08/15/24 Page 1 of 2
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant may file a motion for attorney’s fees and
costs, with supporting documentation in accordance with Local Rule CV-54(b)(2), within the time
frame prescribed by the Local Rules.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the
case.
SIGNED this 15th day of August, 2024"
Of course. Jean François Amyot and his boys are used to the trips.
Nothing to worry about if you’re one of the corrupt insiders.
On the other hand if you’re a retail shareholder you’re totally screwed.
So the much maligned Nuuut’s claim to have received an email from the court clerk seems to have been in fact true, at least as far as T-mobile is concerned:
“ $VPLM Email response today from Kevin Yang Law Clerk for Judge Albright.
Thank you for your email. At the July 9 consolidated final pre-trial conference for both the VoIP-Pal v. Verizon and VoIP-Pal v. T-Mobile cases, Judge Albright orally granted both defendants’ joint motion for summary judgment of non-infringement. Accordingly, the previously scheduled trials have been taken off calendar. A written opinion memorializing the terms of Judge Albright’s ruling will issue in due course.”
Game over.
Watch for the pimps trying to make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear, though.