Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
so in other words. NWBO lies in their PR when they write: "The Company and its consultants are working intensively to finalize this last key section of the MAA, after overcoming an unexpected delay in that regard." It's interesting with all the made up stories people come up with instead of trusting what the company writes directly in their press releases. Even at longs, the mistrust is so overwhelming that they make up stories because the truth is not even acceptable with them. There is a delay compared to their own proposed timeline due to something they had not foreseen. Nothing more, nothing less..
that the process they are now describing also shows that their previous time estimate was untrue from the start is a completely different story, but we have also seen that repeatedly before..
yes yes of course, people said exactly the same thing, about the journal, about DL, about TLD, about the peer reveiw journal... of course there will be a small increase in SP but only a small one.. and there will be no BO the next a few years, then SP will be too low for BP to come up with an offer that is acceptable...
maybe because the management has said they would expand the specials and we all know they rarely deliver on what they promise
there are several who have been trying to tell people here for years that sawston is linda power's future cash cow and not the nwbo's. Advent is being built so that they can exist independently of NWBO, so of course they have many other plans than those that have anything to do with NWBO. Oh, people have no idea how the profit distribution will be.. so until it is clarified and transparent, the share price will not change much, even with approvals.. but people will not believe that either..
how can people here day in and day out keep talking about BO. It is completely utopian that there will be a BO with our current MC. It may be that you can find individual examples of BO that exceed 100 and 200% when it comes to "smaller" amounts, but when it comes to 2-digit billion amounts, it has NEVER happened and NEVER will happen that a BO for 400, 500 or 700% more that the current MC, for obvious reasons. So that some people sitting here claiming to be professional investors and talking about an imminent BO is absurd and nonsensical.
The next thing we have to hope for, is a partnership and then an approval so that we can generate some turnover and profit, only then will our MC be ready for a BO.
I think they are approx. 4 months ahead of us
What a joke!!
it's a sad day for patients when money and lobbying have so much influence.
let's hope there is an adult present who is not bought and paid for by BP and who thinks about patients...
there is a big difference that means everything in this context ... our drug is safe.
If data is as good, with 50 mg dose, as we hope for, then even a corrupt FDA can't avoid at least giving a conditional approval
read this article and tell me one good reason why Anavex cannot get the same approval
https://amp.scroll.in/latest/996981/us-fda-conditionally-approves-controversial-alzheimers-drugs
We need to go to Nasdaq …
LP do the RS and lets uplist..
“ANAVEX®2-73 met the primary endpoints ADAS-Cog[1] and ADCS-ADL[2] and key secondary endpoint CDR-SB[3] with statistically significant results.”
If AF or you know its a lie, I'm impressed you got hold of that data and i am quite curious how you got it since AVXL only got it yesterday...
is there anyone at the conference to let us know what is happening?
exactly.. if they don't come up with a partnership and a financial and strategic plan, they might as well rip off the plaster and make an RS so we can get back on Nasdaq..
there is a flaw in your assumption and argumentation. Linda Powers does not have the same interest in making the stock rise in the same way that retail has. Any reasonable investor will want to reduce his risk by seeing a steady increase in the real value of his investment at any given time. Linda P, on the other hand, wants to keep the share price down, as her warrants then get a much cheaper acquisition price. The endgame may be the same, but since Linda is sitting on a lot of knowledge that the ordinary shareholder does not have, the path towards the endgoal is very different comparing, what Linda wants, to what a reasonable shareholder wants.
Hope most people are aware of this difference when investing in biotech and start-up tech companies.
More likely they didn’t pay the bill
my point is not that retail goes bankrupt, but in the event that the broker who has made a naked short sale goes bankrupt... in that case the “shareholder” will have lost everything since the stock he thought he had dont exist... and there is no one to cover the loss..
does anyone know for sure what happens if a broker who has done naked shorting goes bankrupt ... it could easily happen if there really are so many counterfeit shares.. then the retail loses the money since they really don't have any shares...
if there really are over 1 B naked shorts then there will be many, many of us who are going to lose everything at a BO.. there is no way that the MM who have sold phantom shares can cover those losses and they will then go bankrupt and leave the loss to those of us who have received these phantom shares.
What to do??
Totally nonsensical speculations.
another pump.. why all this fuss, we all know that the SP will fall with a bang on Friday or at the latest on Monday when it turns out that SNO was a nothing burger.. again..
or will people claim that NWBO, after LL's lecture and the publication of an article that everyone has been waiting for for 2 years, has no intention of PR this..
I know the management has behaved like pure amateurs in the past, but not doing a PR on the biggest news in the company's history, can't be true..
So maybe one should start hyping ASCO 2023..
Eye roll
in fact, OU (0,17) is the closest
and it is with a number without reservation..
will be interesting to see if his bid still holds on December 31st.
. now starting to compare a review of an abstract by NWBO with a peer review article in a top journal?
There are a huge difference in how and what these two very different reviews are about.. .
and no, there won't be a peer reviewed article in a top tier journal so dont try to spin a story about an abstract being just as good
you can just buy a few days after SNO.. most likely the price will be the same or less than it is now and if a miracle were to happen and there was such good news that the share price would rise, it would be a minimal increase then you can just buy there with less risk..
Maybe it is the other way around.. smart..
I sure hope they do
but arguing against an FDA approval due to a lack of production capacity in the US does not connect with the arguments about Cognate. Starting to bring in the argument about automation doesn't make sense either, since after all, several products have been approved that are just as production heavy as DCVax without Flaskwork..
am so tired of strange and incoherent arguments every time the questions don't really fit into people's narrative..
BW
if that's the best reason then it doesn't look that positive... unless you want to start arguing that the FDA can't approve DCVax L without making it SOC.
I thought people were still waiting for a peer review article in a top teir journal... amazing people after so many years still trust Linda and Les and all their promises.
When and how will Linda Powers tell shareholders that it will be necessary to invest in production facilities in Germany or the Netherlands. Cognate 3.0 .. LOL
Haha… Best post this year
No. 1,2, 4 and 5 will never happen
And 6 with US are years away,.
So $3-$5 will be max for years
you are absolutely right.. those fairy tales and dreams of unlimited wealth and "the sky is the limit" are so nonsensical that it would be laughable if it wasn't for all those who, years ago trusted Linda Powers and lost > 95 % of their investment.
But we know that every year some adventure dreamers disappear and some new ones just come, who think they know everything and acting like hotshorts... but they alway suddenly disappear again when it dawns on them that they have woken up in "Groundhog Day"..
——
I believe they really intend to sell the rest after the JA/submission of MAA whenever those arrive, to a large private equity group at higher SP
——
Used for years
I believe they really intend to sell the rest after [ —— fil in the blanks ——— ] , to a large private equity group at higher SP.
——-
Never going to happen…
——
Only thing that can give this Stock a higher SP is profit… they have used all other chances
you are completely wrong.. they do much more than those things.
I can give examples.", they develop Advent ( Cognate version 2.0 ) for shareholders' money, they change strategy every time their old strategy fails and that is often.
When all this has settled down, a 1/20 R/S will happen, then money will be raised to build production capacity in the EU.. ( cognate version 3.0 )
Linda Powers forever
the interesting question is not really if they presented TLD. It is quite obvious that they did. the interesting question is why they did it?
and the most obvious answer is that they began to see that they could not agree with the peer review. Whether it was some conclusions or just individual formulations that created problems is hard known. But it is quite obvious that some fundamental issues that made them choose a new strategy…again...
LOL
still waiting for an article in a top medical journal?
let me explain to you one important thing, you are waiting for something different than the management is waiting for….
direct quote from NWBO's PR june 5. : "This Phase III trial reached data lock and top line data was recently presented"
So it is not me who says it, it is written in black and white in NWBO's PR from June 5, 2022
and as for Linda Power's sale of shares in 2019 which you deny took place.. then you use a link as evidence that actually shows this sale..
so you send a link yourself that proves you wrong...
it is more tragic than comic
Linda F Powers's largest sale order was 4,362,785 units , worth over $741.67K on January 29, 2019
you are spreading fake news..
they did release TLD..
this is a direct quote from NWBO's PR june 5. : "This Phase III trial reached data lock and top line data was recently presented"
but then again it doesn't fit into your narrative.. but funnily enough you have repeatedly used the given TLD as an argument against those who think the data is bad and those who think they failed the trial.. again you just randomly pick what you can use and denies it a second later.
LOL
so you think she has given false information to the SEC about a sale of shares.. that is an interesting position
you mean like when Linda Powers sold in 2019?
. Management has been overly cautious with regard to public statements. Should that suddenly change once they file a BLA and will be under reveiw by the FDA for an approval. They are going to be completely silent on DCVax-L between BLA filing and eventual approval. To sit here and write that the management suddenly wants to change the communication strategy in the most important phase for 20 years is incomprehensible to me..
But he is right about —
“ The Company has not to date submitted an application for commercial approval of DCVax-L.”