Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Great, I couldn't get my last letter to the POTUS about October's increased debth & breadth of GRU cyber attacks on EUCOM deployed forces and the potential SFOR solution to it posted here! Goodbye.
Agree and ACS is a good one for SFOR to have.
Are not the 4th Q numbers contained in the 10-K.
Let's hear Tuesday what Mark says during the Uptick interview and on Fox December 30th.
Nobody is, unless Congress does their job as stipulated in the Constitution. We are facing a potential Government shutdown!
Unless there is an operational wartime need things must go through the standard DOD procurement cycle with all the testing and evaluation of any new item not already in the pipeline. That's the way it is.
"Thrown in the trash" eh? Mark Kay told me he would show the original, letterhead responses I got to my letters that I mailed to him to interested shareholders. Including the one from the last POTUS with watermark. If you can't drive to NJ ask ZPaul nicely to repost the couple I sent him and read for yourself about upchanneling to: USGC Cyber, US Cyber Command and others.
There is "no money" for ANY new items not already in the DOD procurement pipeline until the United States Congress passes a funding authorization bill for the budget. That is the Federal "bottom line".
Really? Do you honestly believe Bo Dietl and KTLS would have been allowed in the room of the 16 August, Washington DC, DOD Contractor's, invitation only, simulated cyber attack exercise without DISA approval?
Hardly! On 16 August DISA allowed SFOR IP to be used at the invitation only DOD contractor simulated cyber attack exercise in D.C. That defensive software first had to get past the gate keeper, the DOD CIO office, then MITRE, then US Cyber Command. Relisten carefully to the ACS presentation to hear about this. The POTUS only signed off on the HR DOD Appropriations Bill last month but funding has not been authorized by Congress yet. Nothing new (yes that includes any vendors defensive software) that is not already in the DOD procurement pipeline can be ordered until that is done with the effective date of 1 Jan 2018 assuming Congress doesn't kick the can down the road with a continuing resolution at static funding levels on 22 December just before the Christmas recess. The gristmill of the Federal Budget turns excedingly slowly but exceedingly finely. Thank you for the opportunity to review this information for potential new investors! Hopefully KTLS met mission requirements at that try before buy DOD Contractors exercise and if so is the defensive software selected.
To be fair & promote our product I called and wrote the DNC about how if they just had SFOR's MT on Hillary's I-Phone it would not have been keylogged. I did that after the joint intel agency (17) report was published & concluded a key logger had been used.
If only he had SFOR's MT on his mobile device!
So everyone has wised up and would not dare to hold a short position in SFOR?
Time will tell.
Yes IMHO.
Back in January, in Judge Faulk's courtroom, the term "settlement talks" was used in reference to Duo, Centrify and Trustwave , not Gemalto. I stand corrected. Point Dr.Evil
Then why were things termed "settlement talks"? You read those words as did I.
So the patience of the court is infinite on this matter? Judge Stearns does not have the right to ask how the court's time is to be used either settlement talks or trial?
The COB on 12/20 will reveal which of our opinions, based on our reading of the 61 Order Monday, 9:04 by Judge Richard G. Sterns is correct.
Which way will procede towards settlement or the courtroom what other choice is there?
"The parties are to inform the court by 12/20/2017 how they intend to proceed in these litigations" It's a fish or cut bait situation! They have to make clear their decision to settle or fight, period. No more stall and delay tactics are being tolerated by Judge Stearns!
Researching a source now. So without source consider it IMHO until provided.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but both Gemalto & Trustwave have to decide if they want to pursue settlement or not on that date.
Wednesday's comin'! Let's see if my opinion is right or wrong early Thursday morning shall we?
No, the legal concept applies to any settlement. How many times have you read in a settlement that " the defendant admits no wrong doing" and then forks over a ton of money?
If Gemalto decides to settle on 12/20 those monies should be reflected in the 4th quarter. The annual, audited figures of the 10-K are now looking even better IMHO.
Good thing settlements cover-up any past sins eh?
The Thales $5.43 Billion bid beat the Atos bid by $330 million. That would be more than sufficient to cover a potential settlement of Gemalto with SFOR. A possible consideration by Gemalto's BOD in accepting this bid. My only question is what will Thales Group have to pay for licensing fees and royalities to SFOR going forward. Any ideas? If they hope to keep Gemalto's DOD contract to provide their entire SIPRNET with MFA/OOBA they might want to pay to play. Uncle Sam doesn't knowingly deal with thieves IMHO.
Don't you think Thales would want Gemalto to resolve/settle any litigation before acquisition? Particularly if an IPR validated any patents in the matter? I do.
Cool! A richer company, Thales, will be on the hook for any possible Gemalto SFOR IP infringment. Just like Microsoft was for Phonefactor's. Unless of course Gemalto decides to settle before 12/20. This news augers well for SFOR this week IMHO. Both Trustwave and Gemalto must decide on 12/20 what they are going to do.
You shouldn't worry. Tuesday's interview is an audio one. Mark does very well with those.
So, Ropes and Gray lawyers were unaware of the implications, if any, this would have when they did their DD before representing SFOR? I don't think they fell off the pumpkin cart with the village idiot yesterday!
Yeah, looking forward to Mark's Tuesday interview which should help with that.
So you put yourself in a position of chasing the pps North when it rises?
You're right of course. People should read this EOY 10-K (to be released 4/15/18) and the 1st quarter's 10-Q report (to be released a month later) to make an informed investing decision.
Thanks but the 10-K and 1st quarter's 10-Q is what I need to see.
Then in the immortal words of Gypsy Rose Lee "Let me entertain you. Let me make you smile!"
I'm saying it is a possibility that should not be totally discounted. Stranger things have come out of a Judge's chambers in American jurisprudence.
Closed in the green again! Have a great weekend SFOR investors.
Didn't say they have poor legal teams. Only that this game is far from over!