Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Maybe this will prove beneficial:
Hydrogen for Trucks Act
Bill Summary: The Hydrogen for Trucks Act builds on the Coons-Cornyn Hydrogen Infrastructure Initiative, a collection of bills to support the deployment of hydrogen technologies in high-impact end-use applications and the buildout of the requisite infrastructure needed to transport, store, and deliver hydrogen.
That's an interesting read. Thanks for sharing, Is there any affiliation with MOTNF or Progressus (AES100) technology?
That's an interesting read. Thanks for sharing, Is there any affiliation with MOTNF or Progressus (AES100) technology?
I appreciate your reply. The names of Andretti and Steinbrenner underwriting hydrogen fueling stations, along with 49% intellectual rights to Progressus' AES-100 hydrogen technology drew me in, thinking it will be a worthy long term speculative play. Coincidentally, MOTNF's earlier ventures have been in cannabis.
Thanks for that news update, as I have interest in Progressus Clean Technologies, but haven't received an update yet.
Thanks for that news update, as I have interest in Progressus Clean Technologies, but haven't received an update yet.
A PowerTap .pdf slide show can be seen here. It tells a great story for the company. https://powertapcapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/PowerTap-Sept-22-2021-updated.pdf
I'm in ... on both sides; that is, PowerTap and Aberdeen International, Inc. Looking forward to the future developments.
So, the concept of the Stratellite was real; and it looks like Amazon is bringing the plan of low altitude satellites to offer blanket coverage for the internet, around the U.S., forward. They are preparing to launch its first 2 satellites. DAMN IT! It's too bad that Tim Huff ever became involved with the venture, and that Vern Koenig's life was short-lived. I'm guessing Vern apparently sold off his intellectual property rights and the following development emanated from that intellectual property. Anyway, imho, this should have developed for GlobeTel/Sanswire/World Surveillance Group, Inc. Did I missed one, between Sanswire & WSGI.
Article from 2019: https://www.actiontec.com/blog/amazon-is-launching-a-home-internet-service-everything-you-need-to-know/
Amazon is Launching a Home Internet Service – Everything You Need to Know
Dec 12, 2019Blog
Amazon is a household name. The E-Commerce and digital retail giant recently announced their plans to offer a high speed home Internet service under a subsidiary called Kuiper Systems, led by former SpaceX vice president Rajeev Badyal. Amazon’s current plans include launching 3,236 satellites into Earth’s low orbit for their network. With that many satellites, Amazon’s broadband services would cover about 95% of the world’s population, reaching even remote and rural areas.
Low orbit satellites are the key to offering low latency, widespread broadband. Since high speed cable Internet isn’t widely available to rural areas, new low orbit satellite systems are a viable substitute to reach more customers. FCC studies have shown that 21 million Americans lack fixed residential broadband while 33 million Americans don’t have access to high speed mobile services. Amazon aims to close that gap with their long term Kuiper project.
Amazon isn’t the only company looking to the sky, hoping to be the first pioneer in the broadband space race. The FCC has approved nearly 13,000 low orbit satellites, including 11,943 for Elon Musk’s Space Exploration Technologies Corp. SpaceX recently launched two low orbit test satellites for home Internet services. Those tests have proven to be very successful as reports say SpaceX is planning to launch 4,425 satellites to power their Internet services. OneWeb is also in the race against Amazon and SpaceX with plans to launch 1050 satellites into orbit. OneWeb successfully launched six satellites in February and obtained a set of priority spectrum rights from the ITU in August.
Internet access is becoming less of a luxury and more of a necessity in households as more and more services become rooted in connectivity. While it’s too early to know the cost of Amazon’s home Internet service, we can expect that the competition between Amazon, SpaceX and OneWeb will drive costs down for a while. Given that Amazon is already a leader in Internet related products with a strong customer base, the company is posed to boost their business by providing the very devices they sell with broadband Internet access.
Updated info:
https://www.cnet.com/home/internet/amazon-to-launch-first-two-project-kuiper-satellites-in-late-2022/
I started out actively searching, hoping to find a potential ground-floor investment and ran across GlobeTel; like getting in on a fad before it gains popularity. GlobeTel's story was very convincing for me, and with former British Ambassador to the United States,Sir Christopher Meyer as COB, having a visibly positive relationship with then Pres. Geo. W. Bush following 9-11, investing in GlobeTel felt like a sure thing. Lower altitude satellites (Stratellites) sounded so achievable. Then Vern Koenig entered the discussion fray to explain the concept creating a full mental picture of the concept. I was further convinced from Timmy Huff's proclamation of GlobeTel's paradigm shift in technology. It all seemed so achievable. It would be very interesting to have some former executive/s of the company reflect on the company's legitimacy. Maybe, not quite enough time for statute of limitations has passed to avoid possible self-incrimination. Oh well, that's how the cookie crumbles with speculative investments; win some / lose some.
I was a small-time player, thank goodness.
I'm shocked that this board is still up. I'm equally surprised that none of the former company associates ever spoke publicly about Globetel/Sanswire/World Surveillance Group, Inc. after the company dissolved, freeing them of the NDAs that might have previously prevented them from discussing past antics. Is anyone still out there?
Why can't the name Djokovick (although it longer applies to present CEO) have the same status/stature when associated with XSNX as it does in the world of championship tennis?
I guess my question is ... do you think Porsche developed their product based directly on the battery research that they shared with LTC? I am guessing that they did.
What if ...? Maybe wishful thinking on my part, but what if LTC's early r&d with Porsche is coming to fruition with Porsche's new Taycan; perhaps? https://www.porsche.com/usa/models/taycan/taycan-models/taycan/
Same here, STK7767; '06. My present share count is negligible. My suspicion, going forward, is that if Djokovich continues at the helm, this new entity will follow the the same exact historical pattern that I (we) have watched for the past 14-odd years.
I feel all of you. I quit averaging down before it fell below .10 when the feeling hit me that I was throwing money into a grinder. Best wishes to the optimists.
Zweverke, I was just replying to STK7767's post. I don't expect any return/s from this catastrophic play. I've been here much much longer that I'd like to admit. I visit this forum on occassion now to see if there are any interesting discussions going on.
I would be happy with 0.15, and if that was to ever happen, there would be sooo many others much happier than me.
It's going to run alright (with all due respect) ... and take your invested dollars along with it!
...what DRamos said. I've been lurking in the background since '04. I really appreciate your input and willingness of sharing. ...if we woulda, coulda, shoulda a number of years back. Best wishes to you.
I'm still here as well, Hag, and thank's again for your persistence in keeping us updated with the developments of LTC. 3 cents is the level that I entered this play. Hindsight being 20/20,why the heck didn't I sell @ 9 cents?!
Lots of positive dialogue here; usually a good thing and marks stockholders' confidence. However, bare in mind the words of jihadijo: "This'll be one to watch grow in the next few months, as Cali's MJ market flourishes.
There has been positive news from XSNX since I first discovered this company in '05. My modest holdings will never recover. We've received lots of "good news" over the years, which has been reflected by straight-line/negative market reactions to the news and announcements. With more the 900m shares floating and 2b authorized for this company, those of you whose avg. pps is in the present range below .0009 to .0005 have great opportunities before you. Fwiw, this play is short-term. Good luck to you all and Happy New Year.
Happy New Year, ALL, particularly Hagimallis; and I echo hag's sentiment of the loss of Goldshield. I'm a small holder; been here since since around '06; have had the share price pass 9 cents per share, and held, thinking ground floor opportunity to full development and major market player. You guys (hagimallis) have kept all of us enlightened and have added perspective to OUR presence as investors in this company. Thank you.
Godspeed Hag. I'm not a frequent poster, but I've been invested and following here for more than ten years. Best wishes to you for a speedy recovery.
So sorry, and saddened to receive this tragic info. My prayers and condolences go out to you and your family, and all here (if I may be so bold) wish you comfort and relief during this saddened time. Believe me, he will be sorely missed here as well.
Q-reus
NoWammiesSTOP, no, you and guay are not the only ones here; just that so many have stopped posting; visit this site to see what's the latest dialogue/discussions. I compliment your positive outlook in investing with XSNX and wish all holders of this stock success. But for many who had faith in this company for positive investment returns, the journey has been one without positive returns. I've been invested here for maybe 10 years if not more. My ROI has been negative for at least eight of those years. There has been positive news on a quarterly basis and no real positive share price movement has EVER resulted from those reports. When I invested here, there were less than a BILLION shares in the authorized pool but now 2 BILLION are authorized. There is no incentive for me to move on because of the extremely low value of my holdings. I don't post anymore because I have nothing positive to say about the company or CEO Tom Djokovich. I've lost all hope, but best wishes to you and guay, and all of the holders of this stock.
Krisandtilly, I don't believe there will ever be any management changes. Also,there will be no RS, as there is authorization for 2B shares. My question is WHY?! There is obviously no plan for this stock to become a major player, imho. It has been an exercise in futility, on my part and others from earlier days of xsnx, hoping to get in on the ground floor of a trailblazing technological marketer.
Krisandtilly, there are a number of us who have tried to get Tom to "get with it!" through the years; all to no avail. I've lost ALL hope that this company or its stock will ever take off. Please pardon my negativity but, we will NEVER see a turn-around with XSNX. Be that as it may, good luck to you and all of us who have been hoodwinked by the definitive pitch man.
STK7767, the pps will never even come close to the projection that you're suggesting; not with 889 million plus shares floating around. Don't know if you are aware or not, but the company is authorized to make 2 billion shares available. With those numbers, we will never even reach a dollar. I don't anticipate "EVER" gaining a positive return on my shares; should I ever recover, you guys will be independently wealthy or at least wealthier. Good luck to you.
Thanks for the reply ZWEVERKE. '06 for me as well. I'm amazed that you still have hope for this one. I tip-toe to this board every now and then to see if anything has changed with the company. Still, the same ol'/same ol'!
With all due respect, ZWEVERKE, how long have you "believed" in this one?
Geez, I really really miss ECU some awful!
Hunter, this milk soured years ago for the investors. It would have been nice if Tom had been generous enough to serve those of us who doubted him these last few years a glass of that milk with a nice "crow" supper.
I feel you, SolarGuy1977; and tack on 2 more years for me. At this point in time, from when I entered, we should have self-powering (high-rise) business offices and all holders who might date back to pre-2010 should be financially independent.
Merry Christmas; Happy New Year; Happy Holidays, All.
Acumen, I admit it that I've been fooled... for years and years.
Jetmek 03052, ok; you were right all along, including the long list of past naysayers. I relent to your past and present observations. Motley Fool issued dire warnings and we wouldn't listen; maybe because Huff threatened to sue. As Cole pointed out: naive (on my part). The reason that I jumped back on the "secretive" argument is that the caliber of the professional backgrounds of individuals willing to head this company, considering reputations getting scarred by associating with an unsavory scam of a company. Also, there were names of individuals behind the scenes who had some interesting histories that involved non-related mysteries. That is my reasoning for the undercover questions. Explain the scam locating at Kennedy Space Center and securing gov't interests. So, in your opinion outside of intrigue, what keeps this company alive? The FTC/SEC allows it to live on.