Jetmek 03052, ok; you were right all along, including the long list of past naysayers. I relent to your past and present observations. Motley Fool issued dire warnings and we wouldn't listen; maybe because Huff threatened to sue. As Cole pointed out: naive (on my part). The reason that I jumped back on the "secretive" argument is that the caliber of the professional backgrounds of individuals willing to head this company, considering reputations getting scarred by associating with an unsavory scam of a company. Also, there were names of individuals behind the scenes who had some interesting histories that involved non-related mysteries. That is my reasoning for the undercover questions. Explain the scam locating at Kennedy Space Center and securing gov't interests. So, in your opinion outside of intrigue, what keeps this company alive? The FTC/SEC allows it to live on.
