Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Agreed, me too!
IMHO
News out…..VPLM files motion for Reconsideration in the Mobile Gateway Patent Cases.
I heard!
Exactly!
Agreed! Once the market gets a better understanding of the revenue these shipments will produce, the PPS will follow.
Future looks bright.
IMHO
Looks like in another patent lawsuit between ParkerVision vs Qualcomm, that was dismissed on a summary judgement, was just overturned on an appeal. .
I don’t know much about the case, whether it was dismissed with or without prejudice.
Very encouraging!
Keep the faith !
IMHO
Well, apparently you’re not able to understand. You’ll need to be intelligent enough to comprehend how the patent process works.
Not easy for the weak of heart to grasp it.
IMHO
It’s all about processing things and understanding how things work.
A lot going on that one has to be intelligent enough to understand the process, especially in patent cases.
IMHO
Have you figured it out yet? It’s all about understanding the process what the insiders are doing!
What, do you think they’re selling because they know of bad news?
LMAO
Nyt. I’ve never believed a word you have to say. It’s all about processing what’s happening
NYT, do you actually believe anyone even reads your rants of nonsense posts.
LMAO
IMHO
Just trying to put the pieces together. That’s all. Trying to remain positive after all these years.
Lack of communication is extremely frustrating, to say the least. Trying to comprehend the value of my investment.
IMHO
Looks like the shareholders of VPLM and the market didn’t react as well, as I believe management thought they would, to the recent Antitrust Lawsuit. I’d recommend more media coverage aka Emil doing interviews, on major outlets. Mad Money would be great.
Some are still baffled where the short term benefit shareholders will see from this. Possibly to increased awareness in VPLM and encourage another company to acquire VPLM. If that process hasn’t started yet, then it’ll be 18-24 months before completion. No one acquires a company for over a billion dollars, in a few months. That’s not going to happen.
The question that’s yet to be answered is, if the goal is to force an acquisition to put this to rest, why then can’t just any other company just file their own antitrust lawsuit? How does it go away by just acquiring VPLM? Unless that company wants to continue the lawsuit.
My only thought is an interested party, aka Amazon put VPLM up to this, prior to acquiring VPLM. Probably a pipe dream but, not sure what other explanation there could be. Antitrust lawsuits have about a three year timeline. IMHO
Doing my best to remain positive in the short term. But, if this antitrust lawsuit was what everyone was so excited about, then it was a BIG THUD!!!!
Hopefully, the Mobile Gateway motion to amend, will give shareholders a more positive outlook, in the short term.
Amazon trial date, with not much in filings since early February, remains a big, big mystery!! Why hasn’t there been any updates from the company, on the status of this case?
IMHO
No October patent court date!!
IMHO
Imagine that
What did you expect them to say? “Oh no, you got us “!!!
LMAO
I appreciate your enthusiasm and I get what they’re trying to accomplish. But, I’m really trying hard to grasp what just happened. Not only is this baffling to me but, to number of long time positive VPLM shareholders. I’m just curious, please explain to us, how acquiring VPLM is going to stop other companies from filing antitrust lawsuits, as well. Does acquiring VPLM, RESOLVE THEIR ISSUES? Now, that it’s been exposed, what now?
Shareholders would really like to know how this process plays out. Timeline is three years of litigation. How exactly is VPLM going to pay for not only the antitrust lawsuit but, the class action lawsuit, not to mention the remaining cases? Does this mean more dilution. If someone is funding this, how many shares would be diluted.
The only explanation that I can see, is an interested party required VPLM to file this antitrust lawsuit, prior to acquiring them. This might just be a pipe dream but, this is the only explanation I can see, why they filed it now. IMHO
Shareholders have been waiting and waiting patiently for some type of announcement that generates revenue for the company . aka, sale of the Euro/India patents. They apparently have the right people in place to be doing the negotiations. Were shareholders mislead or did something fall through? Or are they still in negotiations?
Shareholders would love for some updates. Shareholders deserve to know the status of the pending cases.
Where does VPLM stand on the recent Mobile Gateway summary judgement. Have they filed a motion to amend, yet? Or has that been denied by Albright? If so, does VPLM now have to appeal Albright’s decision? What, what is VPLM course of action?
Now, there’s just one, aka AMAZON, waiting for a trial date. What a freaking mystery this has turned into. The last filing was early February, except for the last filing by VPLM regarding their request for a stay. It’s seems there’s some issues regarding this case. Not too sure what could possibly be the hold up. We just had a favorable ex parte reexamination decision. Not to mention the favorable Alice decision with Mobile Gateway. BTW, wouldn’t it be great if VPLM receives another favorable ex parte reexamination decision regarding the Mobile Gateway, in the near future.
It seems like Emil has admitted in the recent CEOCFO Magazine, “antitrust justice is our hope”. Now, this isn’t very encouraging to shareholders, when he’s placing our shareholder value on an antitrust lawsuit.
I really hope there’s something we’re not aware of, that very encouraging to our shareholder value.
IMHO
In terms of number of patent lawsuits, if you read the June 3rd PR, it states additional lawsuits vs Verizon and T-Mobile on both the ‘815 & ‘005. This equals four.
Then the additional lawsuit vs T-Mobile on the ‘606. This makes it five.
Then throw in the ‘606 with Amazon, this brings the total of six “ different patent lawsuits”.
PLUS, whatever the number of patents remaining in both the RBR & Mobile Gateway cases “without prejudice”!
Aren’t both the Apple & AT&T cases, still “without prejudice “?
…
IMHO
I believe there should be three with T-Mobile aka ‘815, ‘005 and ‘606 equals three.
The one with Amazon aka ‘606 and then two with Verizon aka ‘815 & ‘ 005.
If I’m not mistaken.
IMHO
It’s states, “WITHOUT PREJUDICE”!!!!
To my understanding, I believe according to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, a litigant has 28 days to file a motion to AMEND a judgement after a federal court enters a judgment. This rule allows a district court to correct its own errors and avoid the need for unnecessary appeals.
IMHO
Yeah, 500,000 units??? What’s the revenue on this ??
And the PPS didn’t move?
Something isn’t adding up!!!
IMHO
Should I sell my silver?
Clarification….Interested parties, regarding VPLM’s India patents. I assumed VPLM’s Euro patents, would be included, as well.
IMHO
I feel your pain. I’ve heard rumors over the last eleven plus years myself. Never ends.
The recent summary judgement was a big blow to shareholders. The cases haven’t been dismissed, they’re going to be delayed. How long, nobody knows for sure. My guess into 2025.
In the meantime, ir would be nice, if a successful ex parte reexamination decision comes in for the Mobile Gateway. Although the validity of the patents isn’t the issue. Hopefully, there’ll be more clarity on the options VPLM can take to resolve this issue.
Then we have the mystery of why no trial date has been set for Amazon. They’re the most likely candidate to own VPLM’s patent portfolio. IMHO
The only public knowledge of any interested parties, are regarding our Euro patents. Could this be what’s possibly finally coming to fruition?
The saga and drama continues……….Miracles do happen, and VPLM will need one.
IMHO
FYI …..Highly unlikely it was done just yesterday!!
VPLM successfully defeated an ex Parte reexamination challenge against the ‘606 back on or around November 20, 2023.
VPLM waited eight months, to do so?
IMHO
I believe we’ll see a nice steady PPS gain from here. We were at $.01 not too long ago. I foresee $.02-.03 by end of the year. But, who knows, could go higher. But, one thing for sure, we’ve bottomed. IMHO
A big birdie, told me.
Hopefully, we’ll see a nice PPS appreciation from here…..IMHO
Yes, and I heard this time this is REAL!! The agreement has already been signed and the employees have been hired.
Hopefully, we’ll now see the PPS appreciate to a few pennies, like in the past.
IMHO
WOW, NEWS, NEWS….PRESS RELEASE!!!!
Rumors of our death have been greatly exaggerated!! LOL
IMHO
FYI, Huawei was DISMISSED ”WITHOUT” PREJUDICE, May 13,2024
Imho
I didn’t say it was true.
That poster was referencing a so called decision that was to have happened on July 9th. I wouldn’t imagine there would be more filings, since then, if that were true.
If you can find he’s email, the best bet would be to contact that law clerk that was named in that post. Good luck finding it.
IMHO
Because July 18th comes after the so called emailed referencing a decision on July 9th . IMHO
Agreed….if in fact this clerk’s email is public, they need to be contacted and questioned whether this dismissal for non infringement is true.
If it’s not true, VPLM without a doubt NEEDS TO ISSUE A PR AND ADDRESS THIS ASAP. I believe a few years ago, another penny stock had done the same thing. This needs to be done to stabilize the PPS.
If it’s not true, this needs to be looked into with serious consequences.
Please read my previous post on the responsibilities of a judge’s clerk, regarding non public disclosure.
IMHO
Nonsense, read my previous post (s). There’s nothing on Pacer about a decision about dismissal for non infringement .
There were recent filings and this so called decision was to have been made last week. Go figure.
A judge’s clerk can’t email a shareholder inside non public information.
VPLM should address this inaccurate information in a PR.
Fake news IMHO
A law clerk cannot disclose a judge’s ruling before it is made public without the judge’s authorization. Law clerks are expected to be confidential and professional and are subject to the same ethical provisions as judges, including the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct. These provisions include a strict obligation to keep confidential information about case-related matters private, even after their court service ends. This includes information about past cases, the decision making process, opinion drafts, and internal memoranda. Law clerks are also prohibited from making public statements that could affect the fairness of a pending matter., including anonymous disclosures on blogs.
IMHO
Hopefully, this so-called clerk, didn’t mess up.
Definitely caught a lot of shareholders attention. As of now, I’m calling BS.
AGREED…..Doesn’t it seem odd a so called shareholder would receive a response back from a clerk to a Judge? Are they even allowed to do so?
If so, NEVER JUDICIAL RULINGS BEFORE ANYTHING COMES OUT OFFICIALLY!
The only official ruling is; Jury Trial cancelled UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT!!!!
Has this poster on that site been a basher in the past?
Fake news? Just saying…Something doesn’t add up. Seems like this could be inside information if it hasn’t been official filed!
IMHO
Apparently so, worked for me
It’s www.voip-palusa.com