Home > Boards > US OTC > Computers - Software >

Worlds Inc (WDDD)

Add WDDD Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: tryz, patentminer2013, Looking4BIGcash, PatentPlays, abcd12
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 2/24/2018 7:07:02 PM - Followers: 260 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 8

Worlds Inc


Founded in 1994, Worlds Inc. invented and patented technology to solve problems associated with large-scale 3D multi-user environments, known as virtual worlds.

Worlds secured an early priority date by filing a provisional application with the USPTO in Nov, 1995. Within a year, Worlds filed a non-provisional patent application, claiming the priority date of their 1995 provisional application.

Worlds has pursued additional claims associated with their invention through a series of continuing patent applications, amassing a substantial patent portfolio:

Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
Nov 13, 1995 app 60/020,296 provisional
Nov 12, 1996 6,219,045 Apr 17, 2001
Aug 3, 2000 7,181,690 Feb 20, 2007
Nov 2, 2006 7,493,558 Feb 17, 2009
Jan 13, 2009 7,945,856 May 17, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,082,501 Dec 20, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,145,998 Mar 27, 2012
Apr 8, 2011 8,161,385 Apr 17, 2012
Apr 11, 2011 8,407,592 Mar 26, 2013
Jun 16, 2011 8,640,028 Jan 28, 2014

Their patent portfolio remains in force until Nov, 2016 (20 years from the filing date of their first non-provisional patent application).

Worlds v. Activision


On Mar 30, 2012, Worlds filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Activision. Worlds’ lawsuit seeks monetary damages as well as a permanent injunction barring the manufacture and sale of infringing devices. Additionally, the complaint accuses Activision of willfully infringing and seeks an award of exemplary damages, attorneys' fees, and related court costs.


Susman Godfrey is representing Worlds, without fee, unless the lawsuit is successful or is favorably settled out of court. Susman Godfrey is considered the top litigation boutique in the country. Max Tribble, lead counsel of Susman Godfrey, is the lead counsel for Worlds. Tribble has an extensive track record of patent infringement lawsuit wins and settlements for plaintiffs in lawsuits against large corporations, including:

Paltalk v. Microsoft

Mass Engineered Design v. Ergotron & Dell, et al

Sky Technologies v. Oracle

Sky Technologies v. IBM

November 30, 2016

The Unites States Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a ruling in Bungie, Inc (Developer Partner of Activision Blizzard) v. Worlds, Inc. validating certain key patent claims governing multiplayer interaction. 12 Claims were validated over 3 Patents.

IPR PTAB Validation on Worlds Patent 8145998 Claims 2,3,7,8, 11-18

IPR PTAB Validation on Worlds Patent 7493558 Claims 5, 7

IPR PTAB Validation on Worlds Patent 7181690 Claims 4, 8, 13, 16

December 5th 2016:

Worlds (WDDD) as well owns  9.3%  of Marimed (Nasdaq; MRMD) as of the  12/31/16 financial statement

December 6th 2016

Worlds Inc. (OTC QB:WDDD) is a leading intellectual property developer and licensee of patents related to 3D online virtual worlds. The Company has a portfolio of 9 US patents (6,219,045; 7,181,690; 7,493,558; 7,945,856; 8,082,501; 8,145,998; 8,161,385 8,407,592& 8,640,028) for multi-server technology in 3D applications, notably Virtual Worlds. The earliest of these patents issued on an application filed November 12, 1996. A provisional patent application, serial number 60/020,296, was filed on November 13, 1995.

These patents are related to each other and disclose and claim systems and methods for enabling users to interact in a virtual space. Worlds Inc. filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Activision Blizzard, Inc., Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and Activision Publishing, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on March 30, 2012.

Activision's World of Warcraft and Call of Duty video games have been identified in the complaint as infringing on Worlds' patents. Max L Tribble, lead counsel of Susman Godfrey L.L.P, will be lead counsel for Worlds in the suit.

The Markman hearing for the patent infringement suit by Worlds Inc. against Activision Blizzard, Inc., Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and Activision Publishing, Inc. (Activision Blizzard et al) (Nasdaq: ATVI), was held October 3, 2014 to address various aspects of the infringement suit claims and how the words in the 11 disputed 'constructions' in the claims should be construed for jury consideration. On June 26, 2015 Judge Denise Casper of the United District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled in favor of certain Worlds key definitions and interpretations governing the construction claims. Activision Blizzard the defendant in this action became “time-barred” to file an action to challenge the Patents using the only “other” venue that has the authority to disqualify the patents, The United States Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

December 6th 2016: 
Worlds current Federal Trial is on mutual consent hold pending the disposition of the validation or denial action of the PTAB. The Company's principle goal will be to continue to grow its IP portfolio, while protecting and monetizing it through patent infringement litigation. In addition, Worlds Inc. intends to be active in the creation and acquisition of related digital media technologies and patents that complement their current patent portfolio and that broaden the features, versatility and reach of the technology to allow for its utilization in the broadest possible way.

December 20th 2016

Worlds to Appeal to Federal Circuit on PTAB Rulings, Claims Marketwire   "Press Releases"
BOSTON, MA -- (Marketwired) -- 12/20/16 -- Worlds Inc. (OTCQB: WDDD) intends to file an appeal of recent Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) rulings to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding Worlds' seminal technology that has been fundamental to the development of massively multiplayer online role-playing gaming (MMORPG) into a $20-billion dollar industry. Worlds' current investors plan to exercise their warrants to fund the appeals and ongoing business operations.

August 25, 2017
Appellate Case #17-1481 

Bungie, Inc. files a reply to the Unites States Court Of Appeals arguing that Worlds IPR case should be upheld from the previous PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) Order. The PTAB is an Executive Branch Agency empowered by Congress under the American Invents Act- Currently under scrutiny by the Supreme Court under
Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC  Case 16-712 ). The filing  for Bungie is open as of 8/29/2017 included below:

**UPDATED** Worlds Reply Brief to Bungies Reply of the above 9/22/2017

***UPDATED** 10/23/2017  Worlds case is partially dependent on the Wi-Fi One En Banc Appellate decision due out anytime. Worlds alleges that Bungie is acting in concert (privity)with Activision Blizzard ( a time barred Plaintiff for IPR purposes). Today there is no precedent to allow the PTAB Director or Board to be challenged with Judicial Review from the Courts. Wi-Fi one asks the courts to reverse Achaides and allow "judicial review"

"Should this court overrule Achates Reference Publishing, Inc. v. Apple Inc., 803 F.3d 652 (Fed. Cir. 2015) and hold that judicial review is available for a patent owner to challenge the PTO’s determination that the petitioner satisfied the timeliness requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) governing the filing of petitions for inter partes review?"
***UPDATED** 1/8/2018 Wi-Fi One WINS ruling on Judicail Review for the Time Bar. Worlds can advance  the argument the PTAB erred in allowing Bungie, Inc to file as they were Time Barred.
Current Price
Bid Ask Day's Range
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
PlusOneCoin Top Posts
No plusone'd posts yet. Be the first!
#30227  Sticky Note BOSTON, Feb. 09, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Worlds IveBeenBagged 02/09/18 03:32:36 PM
#30151  Sticky Note Worlds Inc. Patent history and litigation summary November DataStream 02/05/18 04:31:05 PM
#30098  Sticky Note WORLDS HEARING DATE FOR APPEAL Panel M: PatentPlays 02/01/18 05:39:48 PM
#29571  Sticky Note Huge news out on WDDD on SeekingAlpha financial tryz 01/21/18 12:35:36 PM
#30682   The question of Worlds Attorneys experience is obvious; PatentPlays 02/24/18 07:07:02 PM
#30681   Let's look at WDDDD from a longterm shareholder tryz 02/24/18 04:27:41 PM
#30680   I know what you mean. This reply abcd12 02/24/18 04:22:32 PM
#30679   Let’s look at Worlds from the perceived risk abcd12 02/24/18 04:04:40 PM
#30678   That's great! Too bad a completely different case AlphaInvestor8 02/24/18 12:49:38 PM
#30677   Judges will be chosen morning of. madprophet 02/24/18 11:23:49 AM
#30676   The list is a little dated: stark12 02/24/18 11:09:20 AM
#30675   We are getting closer to March 9th. I wonder bbhuey 02/24/18 09:48:47 AM
#30674   Here's the Court Document where Worlds Attorney forced PatentPlays 02/23/18 07:28:08 PM
#30673   Well, then it is ALL about the risk abcd12 02/23/18 06:02:27 PM
#30672   Perhaps you missed the part about "on a tradetrak 02/23/18 05:48:51 PM
#30671   Five years ago the share adjusted price was abcd12 02/23/18 03:21:29 PM
#30670   Right off the bat, when I read at JJCook 02/23/18 02:27:43 PM
#30669   well 2 weeks, 10 trading days madprophet 02/23/18 01:54:12 PM
#30668   That Specific Hudson Bay Financing no longer applies Captart7 02/23/18 01:48:08 PM
#30667   Every investor expects reward for risk. What many AlphaInvestor8 02/23/18 11:27:33 AM
#30666   Thanx TUT scrapper77 02/23/18 11:23:20 AM
#30665   Welcome back tutter!.....this board should be thankful and tryz 02/23/18 10:50:24 AM
#30664   We are under the ticker WDDDD for 20 tutter18 02/23/18 09:34:46 AM
#30663   gents,my quotes on I-hub shows .0615 and no scrapper77 02/23/18 08:52:05 AM
#30662   Oil States reply brief makes for some interesting IveBeenBagged 02/23/18 01:27:11 AM
#30661   I would suggest it might of stayed ther Long term 02/22/18 11:59:48 PM
#30660   Five years ago the share adjusted price was tradetrak 02/22/18 11:19:03 PM
#30659   That's it. Thank you. Captart7 02/22/18 04:43:31 PM
#30658 madprophet 02/22/18 01:57:11 PM
#30657   What is the link to current level 2 Captart7 02/22/18 11:38:18 AM
#30656   VHC had positive news. That trial may bring patentminer2013 02/22/18 10:34:12 AM
#30655   Boy, GREAT info that, Capt. Talk about loan sharks! abcd12 02/22/18 09:58:17 AM
#30654   Known toxic financiers AlphaInvestor8 02/22/18 09:47:54 AM
#30653   Eh lets make em" waulk tha plank! SCABS!! Bescaredxx 02/21/18 10:46:37 PM
#30652   Boy, GREAT info that, Capt. Talk about loan sharks! tradetrak 02/21/18 10:45:49 PM
#30651   Aye matey, the slave quarters are better than tradetrak 02/21/18 10:42:56 PM
#30650   Bescaredxx, be aware that Hudson Bay is involved Captart7 02/21/18 09:49:32 PM
#30649   Did everyone fall asleep? or did we just Bescaredxx 02/21/18 06:51:06 PM
#30648   Not likely you'll ever see that price again. crtdude 02/21/18 03:01:33 PM
#30647   Lots of buying on the ask. Could hit buylosellhi 02/21/18 01:51:52 PM
#30646   Too many people were worried about the Dark Captart7 02/21/18 01:28:24 PM
#30645   After reverse split, pps looks much better than Patience to success 02/21/18 01:07:54 PM
#30644   lol Arrrrgggh! ShadowSpy69 02/21/18 11:35:17 AM
#30643   Arrrrrgh! Land ho! Looks like me not gettin Bescaredxx 02/21/18 11:27:50 AM
#30642   As almost all of the world knows the sidedraft 02/20/18 03:38:34 PM
#30641   No problems... madprophet 02/20/18 02:32:41 PM
#30640   They did credit the 38.00 for me today too. Patience to success 02/20/18 02:31:40 PM
#30639   As would I. madprophet 02/20/18 02:27:47 PM
#30638   Myself and some other buyers would like to tryz 02/20/18 02:17:12 PM
#30637   I'd be shocked if there wasn't at least 22na22 02/20/18 01:48:10 PM
#30636   looks like TD reversed their reorganization fee for ShadowSpy69 02/20/18 01:36:40 PM
#30635   I'm riding 100% free right now..with dry powder madprophet 02/20/18 01:22:47 PM
#30634   I for one am pleased at how the WhiteOwl 02/20/18 12:37:33 PM
#30633   Agreed, this can easily hit .50 (or .10 buylosellhi 02/20/18 12:31:08 PM