Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Scientists use fertilizer to quickly produce methane from old oil wells
2 hours ago
CALGARY - Researchers at the University of Calgary say they may have tapped into a vast new source of clean energy by harnessing the power of oil-eating bacteria that dwell deep beneath the surface of the earth.
The naturally occurring microbes convert crude oil into methane in a process that normally takes tens of thousands of years. The researchers were able to get the same result in just two years by feeding fertilizer to the tiny critters.
Methane is the main ingredient in natural gas - a fuel that expels fewer greenhouse gases than conventional oil when burned.
"We've got a process that naturally turns oil into natural gas," said Steve Larter, the University of Calgary petroleum geologist who led the research published Wednesday in the science journal "Nature."
"Why not just speed up the process by just lobbing in some fertilizer."
The discovery has been enticing to energy companies, who until now have been able to recover only about 17 per cent of oil from the ground.
"This is deemed fairly interesting technology, especially since we get such poor recovery from standard recovery methods of heavy oil," research co-author Jennifer Adams said in an interview.
"To get heavy oil out you've basically got to melt it ... it's like turning gold into lead," Larter said on the journal's website.
The scientists hope to do some field tests in 2009.
The researchers admit proving their process could work on a large scale, economically and in real world conditions, is the big unknown.
Adams said a few companies have expressed interest so far, but she wouldn't say which ones.
Larter said it was hard to come up with just how much energy they could produce, but speculated it could be near the equivalent of the world's conventional oil reserves.
"You're talking a very substantial amount of energy," he said on the journal's website. "It's potentially a game changer if it can be demonstrated."
The bacteria, which have existed underground for hundreds of millions of years, ferment the oil and expel natural gas without requiring oxygen.
Others have tried the approach used by Larter and his colleagues before, seeking to speed up the process by injecting more bacteria. But Larter says the key is giving the microbes their own version of vitamins.
"You'd basically feed them Miracle-Gro or fertilizer to accelerate their growth rate," he said.
The discovery could have big implications in Alberta's oilsands, which according the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers contain up to 175 billion barrels of oil. Canada's reserves are second only to Saudi Arabia's in size.
The problem is that the process of extracting the tar-like bitumen takes up a lot of money, energy and water.
Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, or SAGD, oilsands operations use natural gas to heat up the bitumen, making it less viscous and therefore easier to draw to the surface. Enviromentalists have decried that process as a waste of the clean burning fuel.
So the discovery is good news for Simon Dyer, a senior policy analyst with the Pembina Institute, a think tank that advocates sustainable energy.
"I can certainly say that Pembina Institute is supportive of any sort of technology that is going to reduce the environmental impacts associated with oilsands development and the massive amount of energy and greenhouse gases and water use associated with current oilsands production," he said.
But in order to get a project like this off the ground, there needs to be the political will, Dyer said.
"We're continually approving new oilsands projects based on old technologies and we're going to be locked into using these more destructive technologies even if better approaches are waiting in the wings," he said.
"I think the real obstacle is that we don't really have the regulatory framework that demands best practices or the sort of improvements to the environmental performance that would encourage the economic development of these technologies."
Speaking to a business audience in Regina on Wednesday, Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall said new technology is key to developing his province's oilsands resources.
The province contains 27,000 square kilometres of potential oilsands reserves. If technology increased recovery rates by five per cent, the province's remaining recoverable reserves would more than double from current levels, Wall said.
"Saskatchewan has an energy diversity that no other Canadian province can match in terms of primary energy supply," Wall said. "Oil is a critical part of that diversity, but we need research and new technology to unlock the resource that we have in not only oil sands but light, medium and heavy crude as well."
Have to agree on PBG, Bobwins!
Been awhile since posting, been busy elsewhere and have kept only two oils for awhile. (And, yes John, i see your posts and appreciate them. Will buy you a beer if I ever get up to the northland.)
PBG is my secone biggest position to POT Leaps. Have had it since $8.57 and am adding to it Mon. By the way, Tackler, you looked at SUF a while back and it has since gone through a Gunnerman removal and is ready for process confirmation in the near future. Might be worth another look.
DrBob follows and knows more about PBG than anyone I know.
This is his post on SI:
*** My take on PBG.TO's Qtr Rept:
What strikes me is that they are no longer being conservative in their description of THAI:
"THAI(TM) is a field-proven technology that will be deployed globally.
"The activities are now at the stage where we expect to have a pipeline of licensing opportunities and projects for the implementation of THAI(TM) on a global basis."
Thus, Petrobank Energy is now saying to the world unequivocally that THAI works and they are going to be JV'ing it all over the world. Duvernay is just the beginning.
They also state:
"Petrobank's wholly-owned subsidiary, Archon Technologies Ltd. ("Archon"), has also been actively evaluating the acquisition and development of several new technologies and innovations around the base THAI(TM) and CAPRI(TM) technologies to capture the full commercial benefits of a THAI(TM) project.
These technologies are in the areas of sulfur recovery, innovative additional surface upgrading processes, produced water processing, oxygen enriched air injection to increase combustion efficiency, CO2 capture, and heat recovery for power generation.
Archon has its own research and development facilities in Calgary and a full time staff of researchers who also perform fluids and gas analysis for the current WHITESANDS project. We operate the only three dimensional combustion reactors in the world capable of evaluating the combustion properties of any oil.
Archon is building a portfolio of technologies to provide an integrated solution designed to maximize the overall efficiency and economics of a THAI(TM)/CAPRI(TM) project. Archon is also the vehicle for licensing any of the technology or intellectual property to third parties."
Thus, other companies that may try to replicate PBG's patented THAI process, will have the disadvantage of not knowing these associated technologies and techniques and methods that maximize THAI or THAI-like processes.
So other companies can try to re-invent the wheel so to speak, at their own added expense, lower efficiencies, and time-delays and frustrations, or they can negotiate with PBG and get it right the first time.
And if they try to duplicate THAI in the U.S., Canada, or Venezuela, where it is patented, they will get their butts sued.
In terms of other aspects of the report, the EPS of .25/share is pretty good, as it shows that PBG has great leverage with every additional 1,000 bbl/day production.
Cash flow is increasing quickly now and when Whitesands is no longer just capitalized accounting-wise, but gets to be included as part of the regular revenues and income, it will make a big difference to the bottom line.
As will the time when the reserves are stated in THAI terms instead of SAGD.
Arguably the most important event for Petrobank Energy in terms of a company-maker, is the expected announcement in 2-3 months that they have reached steady state, which will include actual optimal production numbers of around 1,000 bbls/day of oil per well and upgraded bitumen to perhaps 15-20 degrees API, and that is without CAPRI.
This much-anticipated announcement will blow the socks off of the heavy oil and oil industry because it will prove the enormous commerciality of THAI and engender serious interest from major oil companies to JV with PBG, and start some of them to think about acquiring PBG.
I would not want to be a non-shareholder of PBG.TO when this occurs, and it, steady state, could occur in late December or January.
Of course there are other price catalysts for PBG such as more drill results from Petrominerales Energy and further increases in Bakken production.
Technically, PBG tested the low 49 area and could firm up on Monday and rally next week to test its ATH 54.10, with a 6 handle in its sights in the near future. I expect one or more broker-dealers to up their target to $60 next week.
PMG was a little weak today as well but has had a big run and is pausing to refresh, before it takes off again to test its ATH 20.76 in late November or December.
Sure am glad I bought more PBG shares today, Friday, and this week, on every dip, so now I am overweighted in PBG vs. PMG shares, and am very overweighted in those two vis-a-vis my overall portfolio.
jmho,
drbob
ok, this is my biggest holding so excuse the irrational exuberance but Petrobank is on fire. Read this report and you can see big results coming. Doubled production from last year to 9975boepd for Q3 and already hitting 16,000boepd in November. That means Q4 is going to be 50 to 60% better than Q3. Three more THAI wells by early 2008, hooking up Corcel wells in Colombia(first one is a monster at 10,000bpd possible after above ground facilities are built)and those beautiful little BAKKEN wells. 4 rigs drilling as fast as they can with 80 wells goal for 2008. Petrobank is headed for $100 in the next 12-24 months. If the Jt Venture with Duvernay works out, there will be a line out the door to JV with them. This is a must own for unconventional energy. Bobwins
Petrobank Announces Record Production and Third Quarter Results
Friday November 9, 5:57 pm ET
CALGARY, ALBERTA--(Marketwire - Nov. 9, 2007) - Petrobank Energy and Resources Ltd. ("Petrobank" or the "Company") (TSX:PBG - News; OSLO:PBG - News) is pleased to announce record third quarter financial and operating results. Each of Petrobank's three business units is operating on an accelerated growth profile. Both the Canadian and Latin American Business Units are setting new production highs fueled by light oil production growth. The Heavy Oil Business Unit has proven the THAI(TM) technology in the Canadian oil sands and is now advancing our global THAI(TM) business plan.
ADVERTISEMENT
[Blocked Ads]
HIGHLIGHTS
- Production doubled in the third quarter of 2007 to 9,935 barrels of oil equivalent per day ("boepd") from 4,939 boepd in the third quarter of 2006. Canadian Business Unit production increased by 115 percent to 5,413 boepd while production from the Latin American Business Unit increased by 87 percent to 4,522 barrels of oil per day ("bopd").
- Production in early November exceeded 16,000 boepd, including 8,130 bopd from the Latin American Business Unit (excluding our Corcel-2 well) and 7,885 boepd from the Canadian Business Unit.
- Capital expenditures were $135.4 million: $79.0 million in Canada; $41.1 million in Latin America; and $15.3 million in the Heavy Oil Business Unit.
- Funds flow from operations increased to $42.3 million compared to $14.7 million in the same period a year earlier. On a per diluted share basis, funds flow from operations increased by 129 percent to $0.48 in the third quarter of 2007 from $0.21 in the third quarter of 2006.
- Net income increased to $21.0 million, a 306 percent increase from the third quarter of 2006. On a per diluted share basis, net income increased by 257 percent to $0.25 in the third quarter of 2007 from $0.07 in the third quarter of 2006.
- In August, the Company acquired a 23,040 acre oil sands licence in Saskatchewan at the Crown Land Sale.
- On November 1, 2007 the Company announced the first THAI(TM) licensing agreement in Canada and acquired a 50% interest in certain heavy oil lands and related assets in the Peace River region of northwest Alberta.
- The Company expects minimal impact to existing cash flows as a result of the proposed royalty changes in the province of Alberta. The majority of the Company's Canadian oil production is in the province of Saskatchewan and the majority of our natural gas production is on First Nation lands in Alberta, which are not subject to Alberta Crown royalties.
The following table provides a summary of Petrobank's financial and operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. Consolidated financial statements with Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") are available on the Company's website at www.petrobank.com and will also be available on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com.
Three months ended Nine months ended
September 30, % September 30, %
Financial 2007 2006 change 2007 2006 change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
($000s, except where
noted)
Oil and natural gas
revenue 61,567 24,639 150 127,897 73,499 74
Funds flow from
operations (1) 42,316 14,706 188 82,131 45,208 82
Per share - basic ($) 0.55 0.22 150 1.09 0.68 60
Per share
- diluted ($) 0.48 0.21 129 1.01 0.66 53
Net income 20,978 5,169 306 41,281 20,486 102
Per share - basic ($) 0.27 0.08 238 0.55 0.31 77
Per share
- diluted ($) 0.25 0.07 257 0.53 0.30 77
Capital expenditures 135,417 57,904 134 373,736 158,356 136
Total assets 930,855 395,654 135 930,855 395,654 135
Net debt (2) 37,762 70,366 (46) 37,762 70,366 (46)
Common shares
outstanding, end of
period (000s)
Basic 76,897 67,293 14 76,897 67,293 14
Diluted 90,083 71,346 26 90,083 71,346 26
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operations
Canadian Business Unit
operating netback
($/boe except where
noted) (3)(4)
Oil and NGL revenue
($/bbl) 76.56 72.13 6 71.00 64.52 10
Natural gas revenue
($/mcf) (5) 5.35 5.39 (1) 6.51 6.23 4
Oil and natural gas
revenue (5) 62.86 44.28 42 56.87 44.61 27
Royalties 4.18 6.00 (30) 4.71 6.94 (32)
Production expenses 8.26 8.63 (4) 8.31 6.47 28
Transportation
expenses 0.18 0.42 (57) 0.24 0.43 (44)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating netback 50.24 29.23 72 43.61 30.77 42
Colombian operating
netback ($/bbl) (3)
Oil revenue 72.74 64.58 13 66.84 63.20 6
Royalties 6.32 5.16 22 5.60 5.07 10
Production expenses 7.42 7.80 (5) 7.40 7.56 (2)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating netback 59.00 51.62 14 53.84 50.57 6
Average daily
production (4)
Canada - oil and NGL
(bbls) 3,745 756 395 2,531 802 216
Canada - natural gas
(mcf) 10,006 10,578 (5) 12,053 13,267 (9)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Canada
conventional (boe) 5,413 2,519 115 4,540 3,013 51
Colombia - oil (bbls) 4,522 2,420 87 3,146 2,133 47
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Company
conventional (boe) 9,935 4,939 101 7,686 5,146 49
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Invest in Alberta Real estate
visit:
http://www.westerninvest.com
Ya keep em coming John, hopefully Ed will act bravely and fix the mess.
Royalty review just good business
Diane Francis
Financial Post
Saturday, September 22, 2007
The Americans are frothing at the mouth. So are oil company CEOs, but Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach was absolutely correct in commissioning a report to examine oil royalties in Alberta.
The report, made public this week, recommends increasing overall royalties by 20%, equivalent to $2-billion based on 2006 revenues.
It's important to note that what is being discussed is not taxation but the royalty paid to Albertans who own the lion's share of subsurface mineral rights in the province. And they are not getting as much revenue from their resources as competing jurisdictions are, according to the report. Industry spokesmen dispute the numbers and say Alberta's take is already high enough, and any higher will drive away investment.
"We will make sure we get it right," said the Premier in a luncheon address at the Global Business Forum in Banff attended by CEOs and others.
That's, quite frankly, his job to juggle public and private interests for mutual benefit, which is why the most critical figures in this report are comparisons.
For instance, conventional oil and gas royalties and taxes in the U.S. average 67% while they are 50% in Alberta, said the report.
Non-conventional oil production -- offshore and heavy oil -- is another interesting story. Heavy oil royalties in Cold Lake are 60% compared with Nor-way's offshore royalties of 76%, California's heavy-oil royalties (and taxes) of 67.5% and Venezuela's 72%.
If these figures are substantiated then the argument for higher royalties is compelling. If not, then the recommendations should be placed in a dust-bin.
There are also those industry sources who say that even if Alberta's numbers lag and royalties go up, activity will fall, which will hurt Albertans. They point out that there are already idle rigs in the province, mostly due to low natural gas prices and high costs driven by the oilsands boom.
The boom has imposed a "tax" on most Albertans and they're not happy about it. Housing costs have leaped along with rents, labour rates, labour shortages and there are crowded schools, hospitals and roads. It's Albertans, who own the oil, whose tax dollars are financing the enhancement of provincial infrastructure.
Unfortunately, the review comes on the heels of Ottawa's income trust debacle and has led many, including American investment guru Dennis Gartman, to conclude that Canadian governments are revenue-grabbers without reason. He said he's exiting Canada.Many American investors followed his advice and hammered stocks. One analyst called the province "Albertastan".
To me, both the markets and media have been hysterical about nothing. Stelmach is not some fiscal confiscator. He's the CEO of the most valuable jurisdiction in the Western hemisphere and his review of royalties is simply prudent business practice.
As for the trigger-happy Mr. Gartner, I say good riddance and good luck. Where will he and his investing flock find another oil Promised Land? California? Norway? Venezuela? Or perhaps Putin's Russia?
dfrancis@nationalpost.com
© National Post 2007
Alberta's fate in Eduardo's hands
Don Braid
Calgary Herald
Saturday, September 22, 2007
The government is already polling furiously to find out what Albertans think of the startling royalty report released this week.
But the strategists think (or hope) they already know the answer -- most people will find it quite good in part, but too radical to be swallowed whole.
Specifically, they expect the majority to be uneasy with the recommendation against "grandfathering" existing oil and gas deals.
If that part of the report is adopted, new royalties would be charged on all old projects.
The very idea of rewriting
legal deals is so inflammatory that it has already prompted a private warning to the government from Washington. (As usual, the Americans can find us on the map when there's money at stake.)
That single suggestion is the basis of the spreading comparisons between Venezuela's Hugo Chavez and our own
Premier Eduardo Stelmach.
The linkage is ridiculous. Chavez nationalized some companies. Stelmach will drive energy investment out of
Alberta the day ND Leader Brian Mason seizes the Petroleum Club.
Historically, the very notion of an Alberta Tory government turning hostile to the industry is absurd. For 35 years, Toryism and oil have gone together like coffee and cream, with huge benefits to politicians, business, and the province at large.
But the balance has gradually shifted over a long period of rising prices and profits. The companies, and many individuals, have grown wealthy from an oil and gas regime that is now too soft. It has to change.
In this situation, the great political trick is to keep the golden goose healthy, while diverting some of its daily feed back to the public good.
That's why the anti-granddaddy bombshell is having its political uses. Oilpatch leaders will probably agree to significant royalty increases, just to make sure that existing projects are grandfathered.
They also know -- as does Stelmach -- that industry reaction to the report is not uniformly hostile.
Alberta oilmen who span the world get annoyed at the deals offered state oil companies in Alberta, when the terms in their home countries are always more stringent.
And you won't find a brighter icon of Big Oil than Sam Spanglet, the retired Shell executive who sat on the panel. The Liberals accused him of conflict of interest because he still owns some Shell options. "The review process is tarnished from day one," Liberal Leader Kevin Taft fumed in February.
But Spanglet, to the Liberals' shock and awe, turned out to be a man of high integrity.
He was the toughest questioner on the panel and now backs the report. Spanglet says the industry should stop whining and control its costs -- implying that the royalty regime is so lush there's not much incentive to do that.
Now, why would a guy like Spanglet take this view if there were no truth in it? Why would these establishment panelists, all with a strong understanding of the industry, risk their Pete Club invitations if they didn't believe passionately that they're doing the right thing for the province?
Maybe they went too far. It seems unfair to change existing deals. But the panel's general call to action is irresistible.
Successful Alberta premiers, from Ernest Manning to Peter Lougheed, never lost sight of some vital points: the province owns the oil; the companies pay for the privilege of profiting from it; the government sets the rate of payment; and one fine day that rate will change. That's the deal, and everyone knows it.
Industry leaders can warn of disaster all they like. They can threaten to pull out. They can even compare Stelmach to a South American populist/nationalist demagogue.
But no premier who wants to survive can submit to threats and bluster, or leave the decisions to the oil industry.
If he remembers all that, and gets the details right, Eduardo from Andrew could be one popular leader within a few months.
Chicken Little still hasn't got it right
Royalty review recommendations evoked much sound and fury -- apparently signifying nothing
Gary Lamphier
The Edmonton Journal
Saturday, September 22, 2007
EDMONACAS, Albertazuela - Sadly, the party may be coming to an end. At least, that's the ominous warning from Big Oil.
A stunned silence is said to have descended on downtown Calgary, as shell-shocked energy execs ponder the potentially devastating implications of this week's royalty review report, which calls for a $2-billion -- or 20 per cent -- increase in the province's annual oil and gas take.
The very future of Alberta's $140-billion oilsands megaboom -- the province's primary economic driver -- now hangs in the balance as Ed Stelmach's neophyte Tory government stares down the powerful oil lobby, and considers whether to adopt the royalty panel's recommendations.
Why, the well-coiffed salesmen at Calgary's Bentley dealership must be tossing and turning in their sleep, fearing a slowdown in luxury car sales.
Talk about drama. Talk about high stakes.
Talk about a world-class gusher of ridiculously overblown rhetoric.
Welcome to Albertazuela -- or "Albertastan" as one overheated energy analyst dubs it -- where the fear mongerers want you to believe that any talk of updating the province's royalties (especially the decade-old oilsands royalty regime) is merely the first step toward embracing the extremist, nationalist policies of Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez. Give me a break. What complete and utter nonsense.
Of course, the oil lobby will never admit this in public. The suits are well paid, thank you, to represent the interests of their shareholders, and that's just what they'll do.
Damn the facts.
As the review panel's 104-page report confirms in exhaustive detail, the Alberta government's resource take now lags that of many other jurisdictions around the world -- including several (obviously communist-infiltrated) U.S. states.
While oil prices have quadrupled since 1996, when the oilsands royalty regime was adopted, Alberta has stood pat as other jurisdictions hiked their royalty rates. No wonder the number of multi-billion-dollar oilsands projects in this province has mushroomed in recent years, despite the huge cost overruns.
And no wonder Pedro Van Meurs, one of the world's top experts in royalty rates, regards the self-serving rhetoric of Calgary's oil companies -- many of which racked up record-level profits in 2006 -- as entirely predictable.
"The reaction from the oil industry is always 'don't do it, leave it alone,' " he told Journal reporter Archie McLean, after the royalty report was released Tuesday.
"Obviously, that is what they're supposed to say." Right.
Ironically, several industry reps who attended the review panel's hearings referred to a decade-old Van Meurs study, showing Alberta ranked high in terms of the overall government take. But they conveniently ignored a Van Meurs study done earlier this year, which came to the opposite conclusion.
"The (review panel's) recommendations are entirely reasonable. If I was premier I would implement them in their entirety," says Van Meurs. Full Stop.
Needless to say, oil and gas stocks, especially those most exposed to the oilsands, have been savagely crushed since the review panel released its report, and the hysterics in Calgary began screaming from the rooftops.
Why, the Toronto Stock Exchange's lead energy index plunged a staggering, ah, 2.7 per cent in value over the past three sessions. One has to reach all the way back to mid-August, when the index fell 4.5 per cent over three days.
Sure, most oilsands stocks took a slight hit on Wednesday, and many were down again Thursday -- no doubt partly driven by the alarmists themselves, who were doing their best to scare the daylights out of investors.
But by Friday, the correction was already over, and virtually every oilsands stock on the board was back in gear.
Moreover, although major players like Suncor and Canadian Natural Resources hit all-time record highs on Tuesday, not a single newspaper reported this Wednesday, when the stocks fell. It didn't fit the prevailing narrative of doom and gloom, I suppose.
What matters is whether Stelmach has the guts to stand up to Big Oil.
Although the premier told reporters he wouldn't be "intimidated" by the oil lobby the day after the report came out, he sounded much more conciliatory by Thursday, telling reporters at a business conference in Banff that he's ready to discuss the report with industry.
Meanwhile, Murray Edwards, vice-chairman of Canadian Natural Resources was busy damning the report's "draconian" proposals and "shrill" tone.
I'm guessing Edwards was feeling considerably more sanguine by the close of trading Friday. Canadian Natural's shares jumped $1.64 or 2.2 per cent on the day, leaving the stock within four per cent of its all-time high. Looks to me like investors already smell a deal coming.
glamphier@thejournal.canwest.com
© The Edmonton Journal 2007
This pro-business panel put Albertans first
Graham Thomson
The Edmonton Journal
Saturday, September 22, 2007
I hope you'll bear with me through another column on the royalty review report.
It'll be my third this week and I'm beginning to wonder if I'm obsessed with the thing. I mean, I carry a copy with me wherever I go like a teenager with an edition of Catcher in the Rye.
I've read the report so many times it's as dog-eared as a beagle puppy -- and, I have to say, it's just as adorable.
It is a clear-headed, powerfully written, 104-page indictment of how Albertans have not been treated fairly on energy royalties despite government protests to the contrary the past five or six years.
I even took the report to bed this week to reread the bits about how to fix government ineptitude, increase royalties and ensure we as Albertans get "our fair share."
For an observer of Alberta politics it's as good as porn. I should be reading it under the covers with a flashlight.
And I have to admit to a guilty pleasure when realizing how the report has sent a shock wave through the energy industry and Alberta's governmental establishment. As wake-up calls go, this is a howitzer.
Critics of the report are slamming it as something of a communist plot, calling it draconian and warning if its recommendations are adopted our province will become akin to socialist Venezuela or a third-world "Albertastan."
The report's critics make it sound as if the report was written by Alberta NDP leader Brian Mason.
Mason, of course, had nothing to do with the report. Neither did Liberal leader Kevin Taft.
The report was written by a six-member, blue-ribbon panel named by the government. The members included two economics professors, a chief economist for an Calgary-based energy research firm, a businessman, a forestry executive and a former senior executive with an oil company.
If anything, the panel was seen as too pro-business. In fact, the appointment of Sam Spanglet to the panel caused a stir back in February when news broke that the former oil executive still had "a couple of million" dollars worth of stock options with Shell Canada.
At the time, Liberal leader Taft said "this royalty review process is tarnished from day one."
And the NDP's Mason said in February, "It looks to me like most of the members of this committee are attached to the corporate sector in some way."
As if to bolster the opposition's accusation, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers was reportedly pleased with the panel's members and their credibility.
It seemed just about everyone was predicting the panel would deliver an industry-friendly conclusion.
Viewed through that perspective, the recommendations in "Our Fair Share" are all the more remarkable. The expert panel of strong thinkers, some of whom did indeed have ties to corporate Alberta, came up with a logical and potent argument government must raise royalties on energy development by $2 billion a year.
As the report repeatedly points out: "Albertans own the resource."
That statement goes to the crux of the report's argument. And the report does a wonderful job of dismantling claims by companies that the energy industry is already paying its fair share in royalties.
On page 23, for example, the report points out "The panel was constantly told by companies and by energy industry trade groups that Alberta ranked very high in Government Take." However, those companies and groups were citing from an outdated 1997 report by an international expert. The review panel commissioned the same international expert who compiled new data and concluded "the very opposite is now unequivocally true."
The report's recommendations have the energy industry and its supporters in such a tizzy they're issuing statements that can only be described as pretzel logic.
To argue, as some have done, that it is better for the oil companies to keep surplus profits because they will generate more wealth is missing the point that the energy resources belong to the people.
The government collects the royalties on our behalf. You could certainly argue over how best to handle that money, but the $2 billion in extra royalties recommended by the review panel is our money to spend.
Or save for the future.
Or you could certainly make an argument for lower taxes or even rebate cheques.
But letting oil companies keep the money and then hand it over to shareholders would be cheating us and our children.
As the report says: "Alberta's natural resources belong to Albertans."
It's a quote worth clipping and sending to energy companies. So is, "Albertans do not receive their fair share from energy development."
It is such a great report I just might read it again tonight. Could somebody get me a flashlight?
gthomson@thejournal.canwest.com
© The Edmonton Journal 2007
I think this guy probably has the right idea:
153-unit condo for Lamont next to Upgrader Alley
'Low-end' project aimed at oilpatch construction workers
Ron Chalmers
The Edmonton Journal
Saturday, September 22, 2007
EDMONTON - Upgrader Alley has attracted a 153-unit condominium project to the town of Lamont.
Wim Jonk, owner of Wimco Properties, hopes to start work in January on his 4.5-hectare site in this town 20 kilometres northeast of Edmonton.
He bought the land in April and already has received a re-zoning from agricultural to residential use. Wimco's architect, A & E Architectural & Engineering Group, in Edmonton, is finalizing a development application, while Jonk is talking to contractors.
He expects prices in the three-storey wood-frame structures, with plastic siding and surface parking, to range from $160,000 to $250,000.
"I'm going low-end," Jonk says, although every unit will have a balcony facing an interior park on the spacious grounds.
"Later, there will be some commercial, perhaps a bakery and coffee shop and offices," he speculates. "That will take some years."
Sales of the first of three residential buildings will start when construction starts. Timing of the other two buildings will depend on sales.
Jonk says he launched this project in a town of only 1,700 people because "the land was fairly cheap and the upgraders -- and thousands of construction people -- are coming into this heartland area."
The Shell and BA Energy upgraders are under construction in the area, with six other upgraders planned.
Jonk expects buyers to include engineering and construction workers on nearby projects, other workers who will commute to Strathcona County, Edmonton or Fort McMurray, current Lamont residents and investors.
The condos will be just inside Lamont's western town limits.
This is Jonk's first development since selling his staffing service in Holland and moving to Edmonton last December.
rchalmers@thejournal.canwest.com
© The Edmonton Journal 2007
Royalty storm can't dampen upbeat mood at oilsands trade fair
Firms display inventions and muscular machines
Gordon Jaremko
The Edmonton Journal
Friday, September 21, 2007
EDMONTON - Not a discouraging word was heard Thursday as dealers in industrial supplies from cleaning fluids to computer software courted potential customers at Edmonton's first annual oilsands trade fair.
"The mood's very upbeat and positive," said Garry Bondarevich of Stewart Weir & Co., an engineering and surveying firm heavily involved in bitumen belt and upgrader alley projects.
"We're a little bit concerned," said his show booth partner, Ron McGaffin. But the province's proposed royalty hikes, revealed on the eve of the trade fair, did not cast the same shadow on the industry as on stock markets, where shares in oilsands developers dropped, he added.
"We're desperately looking for engineers and surveyors. We're short. We have the work but can't find the people," McGaffin said in reporting the industry did not change overnight after the provincial royalty review panel released its report Tuesday.
"It's a tempest in a teapot," said exhibitor Bill Hume.
As a mining engineer with North American Construction Group, a major oilsands construction contractor, he pointed out that an immediate bitumen belt slump is unlikely. "The projects that are out there working now are committed for the long term," Hume said.
"There was no panic," North American business development manager Barry Grundy agreed.
Hume added that as an avid oilsands investor in his personal affairs, "I was upset" at first by the royalty report and the market reaction. But after working out the effects of the proposed increases he said "it's been a bit overblown."
If the proposed royalty increases go into effect, the extra burden on the industry works out to about 32 cents per barrel of production currently, 86 cents in 2010 and $1.35 in 2016, the engineer calculated.
Linus Hakimattar, an exhibitor for the IBM "oilsands centre of excellence," called morale at the trade fair "very positive. With oil and the Canadian dollar at all-time highs there's a lot of optimism about the long-term future," he said.
He echoed fair goers in predicting "a political settlement" on royalties between industry and government.
"There's a lot of tire-kickers here," said Stuart Wright, demonstrating a line of industrial cleaning products that his Evergreen Solutions already markets to oilsands projects.
"Conventional oil and natural gas drilling has been on the down slide for six months. That has nothing to do with any talk about royalties," said Wright.
When it comes to the oilsands fair, "there's no sign of a slowdown" in early work on the second annual Edmonton show next year, said event director Wes Scott of dmg world media (Canada) inc.
This year's inaugural show outperformed its former Fort McMurray location by attracting more than 600 exhibitors and registered visitors.
gjaremko@thejournal.canwest.com
© The Edmonton Journal 2007
Close
Stelmach's moment of truth
Will he have the backbone to bring in royalty changes and face down the oilpatch?
Graham Thomson
The Edmonton Journal
Thursday, September 20, 2007
CALGARY - When Alberta government MLAs left their special caucus on Wednesday, they didn't walk out as much as they scurried out.
They scurried past the news media and out the door of McDougall Centre, refusing to comment to reporters who had spent hours waiting for the meeting to break up.
Even MLAs who stopped to answer questions were scurrying verbally -- using all their political skills to speak without saying anything.
Not one of them wanted to give a definitive opinion on the most explosive issue to hit provincial politics in years: the report by Alberta's royalty review panel claiming we don't get our fair share from energy development.
The MLAs' reaction shouldn't be surprising. They are still reeling from the report that hit them like a runaway oilsands truck on Tuesday. The report offers a logical, comprehensive and powerful argument that government should substantially raise energy royalties.
Some MLAs talked but it's obvious they don't know what to say.
"It's the report we asked for," said Health Minister Dave Hancock.
"It's got a lot of good information in it and it requires a thorough reading and understanding and digestion."
"I agree that Albertans need to be treated fairly," said MLA Jack Hayden. "We definitely need to treat Albertans fairly."
"It's been a while since there's been a review and it was time to do another one," said MLA Doug Griffiths.
Harvey Cenaiko, a Calgary MLA who won't be running next election, came the closest to giving an opinion. "The contents of the report are very good," he said.
But nobody came out and said the report should be adopted or rejected.
In fact, nobody admitted to actually reading it. MLAs said they hadn't had time.
During Wednesday's caucus, they were briefed by Bill Hunter, the chairman of the panel that wrote the report.
Afterwards, Hunter said diplomatically he got a varied response from MLAs in the meeting. Some MLAs congratulated him, others were skeptical of his findings that Albertans were shortchanged by $1.9 billion in royalties last year alone.
PERCEPTION OF INEPTITUDE
One MLA told me later that Hunter had received a "frosty" reception from some in the room.
These are the MLAs who won't or can't believe the government was so inept as to let billions of dollars slip through its fingers over the past five or six years.
They support the energy company argument that, if adopted, the report's recommendations would damage the industry by raising royalty rates too high.
Their argument is not just economic, of course, it's also political.
If Premier Ed Stelmach accepts the report's recommendation he will be admitting the government under former premier Ralph Klein was inept -- and that government was made up of just about every MLA in Wednesday's caucus meeting.
And that is why Bill Hunter's report is so exceptional. It is not just a smoking gun proving Albertans did not get their fair share of energy revenues, it is still very much a loaded gun pointed at the head of the Stelmach government.
If he accepts the report, he risks implicating himself and fellow MLAs as being derelict in their fiduciary responsibilities under Klein. If he rejects the report, he might as well hand it over to the opposition to use as their platform in the next election.
No matter what decision Stelmach makes, he risks shooting himself in the head.
He is in a precarious position which is all the more exceptional because he did this to himself by commissioning the report as part of a promise made during the leadership race.
For that Stelmach should be given considerable credit.
He formed the review panel, gave it a generous mandate and set it loose upon the energy sector. When the panel submitted the report on Tuesday, Stelmach made it public minutes after receiving a copy himself.
It is the kind of behaviour that would have been unthinkable under the Klein government that saw controversial reports as akin to radioactive waste suitable only for disposal deep underground or, if technology allowed, being shot into the sun.
Stelmach won't say what he'll do with the report until mid-October. However, on Wednesday he hinted broadly he just might accept it.
When asked what he would say to critics who think he doesn't have the backbone to implement the report's recommendations, Stelmach said: "They're in for a surprise. I won't be intimidated, as I said before, by any position taken by either the oil industry or others that may take a different opposing position. We're there to make the best decision."
That decision will come mid-October. We'll see then if the rookie premier will demonstrate leadership and take a strong stand -- and end 10 months of Stelmachian scurrying.
gthomson@thejournal.canwest.com
© The Edmonton Journal 2007
More room to manoeuvre
Royalty report allows Stelmach chance to fine-tune new terms
Calgary Herald
Thursday, September 20, 2007
Premier Ed Stelmach's government cannot ignore the royalty review it asked for, but neither should it adopt it paragraph by paragraph, as review-panel chairman Bill Hunter demanded last week, saying it should not be "cherry-picked."
The report is a radical document, here and there recommending arbitrary measures over market solutions, that old contracts not be grandfathered, and treating consultation with industry as a barely necessary inconvenience.
Yet, strangely that all works to Stelmach's advantage.
For, change is in the offing, and the energy industry, especially that part of it working in the oil sands, knows it. The 1997 agreement that coaxed today's extraction complexes into existence, has more than done its job. It makes sense to rewrite the rules so that future projects yield a higher return to the taxpayers.
The problem for any Alberta government would be the howls emanating from the industry.
Enter Hunter, with "Our Fair Share." By presenting such an extreme solution, it gives Stelmach room to come back with less onerous terms, that would still extend the province's total take -- even if not by the $2 billion that Hunter says would have come its way, had his principles been applied to 2006 production at 2006 prices.
Where Stelmach can easily give is in dropping such recommendations of the Hunter panel, as that old contracts not be grandfathered.
Alberta's energy industry has been built on trust, and the expectation that a deal made with government, would stay made. Yet, this report effectively proposes the province unilaterally terminate contracts entered into in good faith between former governments and investors, and arbitrarily establish new ones.
It was a surprising, even offensive, recommendation. One wonders how rich last year's $2.1 billion bonus bids would have been, had the Hunter review's proposals governed the market.
Nor is it conducive to investment that consultation with industry be for appearances sake only. Speaking of a new regimen to establish a market price for bitumen, for example, the report first dismisses market forces as "unlikely to resolve this issue in the best interests of Albertans," then continues, "Consultation for this purpose, as a point of clarification, would not entail or imply negotiation nor is it intended to introduce any sense of veto power or consent requirement on the part of the oilsands industry."
Stelmach should be able to give that away with little fuss, as well. Then, he may start to pick cherries.
While high oil prices do not translate directly into surplus profits -- exporters lose on the Canadian dollar's galloping value much of what they make on oil's galloping price denominated in US dollars -- industry has this ace: An insatiable market, just across the border, in a tense world, with the ability to pay. A government that acknowledges its higher costs, and defers to Alberta's tradition of honest dealing, can reach a satisfactory arrangement with industry.
Above all, Stelmach is as entitled as the Hunter panel -- as leader of an elected government, more so, perhaps -- to decide what is, in fact, fair.
It is an unfortunate hole in the Our Fair Share report, that nowhere does it define "fair."
What is fair? An agreed rate of return on investment, or revenue? A 50-50 split between Alberta and the producer? Two thirds-one third, as Hunter suggests for oilsands and natural gas? To the extent the report answers the question, it infers that Alberta should be in the middle of a pack that includes countries with vastly differing geologies and recovery costs, and not a few political systems.
To that point, it is hardly an argument for Alberta being shortchanged, that it squeezes less from producers than Angola, or Venezuela. Fair, then, becomes what Hunter thinks is fair.
And, that's fair enough, as long as everybody knows there's no objective standard in use here, and that Hunter appears at home with arbitrary dictums.
He presents his report as a whole prescription for Alberta's royalty future, but it would be better treated as the opening bid in a process to recalibrate the province's royalty structure.
Stelmach and his cabinet must examine it carefully. Then, they must decide what they think is fair to both Albertans and the industry, and act accordingly. But make no mistake, there is no question industry will pay more: The question is: What is really fair?
© The Calgary Herald 2007
September 20, 2007
Oil suits reeling at royalty report
By NEIL WAUGH
They didn't actually have grief counsellors standing by in the Calgary oil towers yesterday morning.
But there was enough outrage and anguish for the Bow River to burst its banks with crocodile tears.
"At first blush," gulped Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers spokesman Greg "Sky is Falling" Stringham, "this is far worse than anticipated."
He branded Bill Hunter's insightful probe into Alberta's oil and gas royalty troubles and ways to fix them a "bad report."
And warned darkly of political consequences.
Expect Ghost Resources or Mirage Oil and Gas to announce the never-was Phantom Project is on hold any day now.
"It's only a report so far," he said. "The real crunch comes when they decide what to do and what to take out of the report."
Which, in a sentence, is Big Oil's strategy as the Stelmach Tories attempt to claw back $2 billion a year in energy revenues - largely from Calgary's oilsands aristocrats,who have been awarding themselves multimillion-dollar annual salaries while the owners of the resource get a penny on the dollar payout until the massive capital costs are recovered.
Hunter and his panel revealed a disturbing problem when they recommended "ring fencing" around each oilsands project to make it "absolutely clear, transparent and auditable" what are the "eligible expenditures."
Hunter is upfront and explicit about what the problem is.
"Albertans do not receive their fair share from energy development," he spat in his letter to Finance Minister Lyle Oberg, who still appears to be a royalty review skeptic.
"And they have not been receiving their fair share for quite some time," he added.
Former Tory energy ministers Pat Nelson, Murray Smith and Greg Melchin should hang their heads in shame. Even Premier Ed's energy czar, Mel Knight, appears to be in trouble here. His defence of the indefensible at the Energy and Utilities Board has not impressed the premier's office.
And now he and his bumbling bureaucrats will be tasked with cleaning up this mess of their own creation.
Hunter complained at his press conference of the morass of regulations and royalty rates which he branded "patches on patches."
He said their entire department was in a conflict of interest as both development promoters and royalty collectors.
There was also a sweet smell of vindication wafting through the legislature yesterday as Hunter's report pretty well confirmed everything this column has been saying for the last three years.
Oilsands royalty rates are ridiculously low.
The report recommends the rate after payout be jacked up from 25% to 33%. And there should be a "severance tax" that kicks in when oil hits $40 US a barrel and rises at 0.1% per buck increase. Plus the above-mentioned "ring fencing."
The panel went beyond its mandate and recommended an upgrader tax credit to encourage more bitumen refining. The premier and his caucus will make the final decision.
Maybe Stelmach already has done so, despite distressing reports of intense lobbying (I thought these guys were supposed to register?) of government MLAs by the oil tower spin doctors.
NDP Leader Brian Mason scolded that the report doesn't go far enough. But he privately admits the Tories just chopped off one of his platform legs.
Alberta Liberal energy critic Hugh MacDonald confessed "everything we have touched on has been addressed in this document."
And yesterday the premier warned the oil suits that if they think he's going to blink after they started leaning on the MLAs, "they're in for a surprise. I won't be intimidated," Stelmach snapped.
Expect the premier to outline his royalty plans to Albertans on his Ed TV broadcast in late October, and to make royalty reform his Bill No. 1 in the spring session.
That will be followed by a budget speech from Treasury Board president Lloyd Snelgrove (Oberg will have worn out his welcome by then) announcing a nice personal tax cut thanks to new oil- sands billions. The election will soon follow.
Gonna get a lot of press this one
September 19, 2007
Stelmach ready for oil wrestle
CALGARY — Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach says he “won’t be intimidated” by the oilpatch as his government decides how to handle a report urging the province to grab $2 billion more annually from oil and gas companies.
Emerging from a government caucus meeting on the “challenging” royalty review report Wednesday, Stelmach said he expects it to provoke strong views from the energy industry and all Albertans.
A final decision on the royalty regime will be announced within weeks. To see the report, click here.
“The report’s significance is huge. It’s huge for Albertans, for the future of this province and really for the country of Canada,” Stelmach said.
“We will be listening to all Albertans, but I won’t be intimidated by any positions taken. We’re going to review it, calculate it carefully and see what the implications are because this is really setting a policy for the next 20 or 30 years.”
The royalty review panel’s report, called “Our Fair Share,” said Albertans have been shortchanged by the oilpatch for quite some time.
And it said oilsands projects should pay roughly 36 per cent — with no retroactivity for older, existing facilities. But it said a royalty holiday would continue for new projects to encourage companies to undertake the multibillion dollar commitment required to produce oil in the northern Alberta oilsands.
High-production oil and natural gas wells should also pay higher royalties, although a large number of low-production wells would pay less.
The report also raised questions about how the Alberta government regulates the energy industry, noting that the Department of Energy shouldn’t be responsible for maximizing activity in the oilpatch and ensuring Albertans get their fair share from royalty programs.
Former premier Ralph Klein, who refused to increase Alberta’s take from the oilpatch over the past half-decade as oil and gas prices soared to unprecedented levels, lashed out at the panel Wednesday.
“My province has a fair, clear and comprehensive regulatory regime where the rules are the same for everyone — and those rules don’t change on a whim,” Klein said during a speech to a petrochemical convention.
“Predictability and stability are what separate Alberta from places like Venezuela, where the government holds foreign companies hostage by arbitrarily imposing massive hikes in royalties and taxes.”
Klein refused comment after his speech.
Alberta businessman Bill Hunter, who chaired the royalty review panel, said Wednesday that great efforts were taken to make sure Alberta remains the best “investment opportunity in this world for oil and gas.”
And Hunter disregarded initial oilpatch reaction that said the report was too punitive and would cripple the sector.
“We used international analysis that say our neighbours get much more than we do. We’re in the basement in the rating of our government take,” he said.
“I think the point of our recommendations is that as Albertans, we own the resource and there’s an expectation that we should get 100 per cent of the rent. And it’s up to industry to convince us why we would take anything less than 100 per cent.”
Stelmach said Alberta’s response to the report needs to balance the needs of Albertans as owners of the resource against the energy industry’s need for a competitive fiscal regime in an era of swirling cost pressures.
On the Toronto stock market Wednesday, shares in most of the major oilsands players slid by several per cent.
Energy analyst Andrew Potter said in a research note that he’d expected a “slight negative reaction” in the markets, although most of the news was likely anticipated and already discounted in the share prices.
Pretty quiet here with all the hubbub about the royalty review elsewhere.
Nuclear power buyer not for real
Firm behind Peace River reactor plan calls claim a misunderstanding
Gordon Jaremko
The Edmonton Journal
Monday, September 10, 2007
No deals or commitments have been made, said Energy Alberta Corp. public relations director Guy Huntingford, who called the claim an unfortunate misunderstanding.
There was one inquiry about the potential for such a large power supply, he said.
Huntingford said Energy Alberta, created by Calgary entrepreneurs Wayne Henuset and Hank Swartout as a marketing partner for Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., is still meeting with prospective customers who can't be named for confidentiality reasons.
The company did not purchase the Peace River site, but rather reserved it by purchasing an option to buy the land if needed for the planned $6.2-billion reactor, Huntingford said.
When Peace River was announced as the location for the proposed nuclear plant on Aug. 27, many Albertans were left wondering who Energy Alberta's claimed mystery buyer could be.
"We are really wondering who that buyer might be," said Marwan Masri, president of the Canadian Energy Research Institute.
The most popular guess, an oilsands project, especially puzzled those at the institute, a semi-official agency supported by government and business foundations that has access to industry information. Its data identifies the northern Alberta bitumen belt as a net electricity supplier, not a buyer.
A CERI study, done while Energy Alberta and AECL negotiated the Peace River reactor location, concluded northern Alberta will soon produce more electricity than it uses.
"Alberta's oilsands operators are an independent breed. The less they have to rely on anyone else the better," said a summary of the CERI report. "They need lots of steam and some electricity to produce the bitumen and synthetic crude oil, and prefer their operations to be self-sufficient if at all possible."
By spinning turbines with steam from thermal production processes, a chain of "co-generation" plants makes power for oilsands complexes and sells surpluses into the Alberta electricity grid.
North of Fort McMurray, Suncor has 410 megawatts of power generation. Syncrude makes 350 megawatts.
The Athabasca Oil Sands Project generates 340 magawatts with co-generation units at its northern mine and Scotford bitumen upgrader near Edmonton.
The Horizon and Long Lake mega-projects, currently under construction in the Fort McMurray region, both include power plants.
The oilsands project that would be closest to the proposed CANDU reactor, Shell Canada's Carmon Creek development 40 kilometres northeast of Peace River, has its own plan for steam-powered co-generation.
All the projects make excess electricity and currently sell an estimated 500 megawatts into the grid.
At Cold Lake, for instance, Imperial Oil makes 170 megawatts, enough to pump out 150,000 barrels of oil per day, with about 50 megawatts of electricity left over for sale to the grid.
Chevron Canada gave a one-word answer when asked if it would want atomic power for its Ells River project west of Fort McMurray. "No," said company spokesman Dave Pommer.
Royal Dutch Shell subsidiary Sure Northern Energy is also not using nuclear power for its bitumen leases in a new development area northwest Fort McMurray.
"It's premature for us to have made any commitment with respect to power needs," spokesman Kurt Kadatz said. "It's not really a project yet."
Test drilling is underway to determine the nature of the deposit, he said.
Companies with projects in upgrader alley northeast of Edmonton say they will decide later on a mixture of do-it-yourself power generation and purchases from the provincial grid.
No Edmonton-area development would come close to using the amount of power the Peace River reactor would generate.
The biggest project, Shell's 400,000-barrel-a-day chain of four new Scotford upgraders needs 425 megawatts -- about 19 per cent of the initial 2,200 megawatts the Peace River nuclear plant would initially produce. Regulatory applications say co-generation is a possibility and do not even mention atomic power as an option.
Only one known project, a plan by TransCanada Corp., involves electricity on the scale offered by Energy Alberta.
But TransCanada's Northern Lights Transmission proposal is dedicated to exporting excess electricity produced by oilsands complexes. The plan calls for a new power line out of Fort McMurray to run south through eastern Alberta then angle west into the northwestern United States.
TransCanada and CERI estimate oilsands co-generation could produce more than 3,000 megawatts of surplus electricity for export.
There have been no talks or contacts between the nuclear power promoters and Northern Lights, said TransCanada communications officer Shela Shapiro.
Oil patch feeding frenzy predicted
DAVID PARKINSON
September 7, 2007
The Canadian oil patch could be hit by a major round of takeovers by multinational giants in the next year, Jeff Rubin of CIBC World Markets predicts, as the global energy industry looks increasingly to Alberta's rich oil sands as one of the few major world oil reserves unfettered by political meddling.
Speaking at a conference for institutional clients, Mr. Rubin, the investment bank's chief economist and chief strategist, anticipates oil sands firms will receive premiums of 40 to 45 per cent - roughly in line with the prices paid in major takeovers in the energy sector as well as the premiums paid for major Canadian mining companies in the past year.
"The Canadian oil sands, as the single most important energy asset in the world open to private capital, its ownership will reflect the global oil industry. And the process in which the global oil industry is going to assert ownership over that sector is by buying out the people who own it now."
He said the oil sands offer both deep reserves and a government that doesn't insist on owning a piece of the action - which has fast become a rare combination as governments stake a bigger claim on key oil resources. In such places as Venezuela, Russia and Kazakhstan, governments have demanded ownership in major deposits, delaying development, chasing away major energy companies and costing them billions in writedowns.
"The fact of the matter is that most oil reserves in the world are now the exclusive preserve of state oil companies." As a result, he said, "the Canadian oil sands represent somewhere between 50 and 70 per cent of the investable oil reserves in the world."
He said that given the strong cash flows generated at current commodity prices, big oil companies wouldn't have to rely on debt markets to finance acquisitions, meaning the crunch in credit markets wouldn't pose an impediment.
Mr. Rubin also predicted that global oil prices will continue to climb, as the global economy remains "better than just fine," despite stumbles in the U.S. economy linked to the subprime. He predicted West Texas intermediate oil prices would average $80 (U.S.) a barrel in the fourth quarter, $90 a barrel in 2008, "and will hit triple digits by the fourth quarter of next year," fuelled by surging demand among developing economies.
Mr. Rubin's bullish outlook for energy is a key factor behind his prediction that Canadian stocks are poised for strong gains. "The meltdown of the U.S. subprime mortgage market will be temporary and a non-lethal shock to a continuing bull market in Canadian equities," he said.
He forecast that the S&P/TSX composite index would reach 15,000 within the next six months, and would reach 16,200 by the end of 2008 - up 17 per cent from yesterday's close of 13,795.69.
"If we're talking about the TSX, what really matters is how strong the global economy is, because so much of the TSX is energy and resources."
Statoil forges ahead in Alberta oilsands
Engineering studies now underway
Ashok Dutta
Calgary Herald
Friday, September 07, 2007
Norway's Statoil will carry out three stages of front-end loading (FEL) studies for its proposed 200,000-barrel-per-day oilsands upgrader to be built at Fort Saskatchewan, as part of efforts to handle rising capital costs and get a better estimate on required investment levels.
FEL is defined as basic engineering to determine the various elements of a project or a processing plant.
"We are at the tail end of FEL-2," Geir Jossang, president and chief executive of Calgary-based North American Oil Sands Corp., said on Thursday. "The next stage will be to complete FEL-3, before preparing a basic design to serve as the basis to move forward."
He did not commit to any timeline for completing the various stages of engineering studies, stating that it was still early stages.
NAOSC is 100 per cent owned by Statoil and is the owner and operator of 1,110 square kilometres of oilsands leases in the Athabasca region, estimated to contain recoverable resources of 2.2 billion barrels. The portfolio is expected to yield more than 200,000 bpd of synthetic crude oil at the end of the next decade through construction of an upgrader.
"At present, we are producing globally 1.2 million barrels per day of oil equivalent," said Statoil's president and chief executive, Helge Lund. "Of this, the Norwegian continental shelf accounts for one million barrels and the remaining volume is from outside of Norway. Looking ahead, we want to maintain output levels until 2015. The aim will be to increase production elsewhere and our entry into Alberta's oilsands has to be viewed in that context."
In August, NAOSC said it had received approval from the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board for its Leismer demonstration plant in northern Alberta. First production is planned for late 2009/early 2010. The steam-assisted gravity drainage project calls for bitumen production from 22 horizontal well pairs linked to four well pads. Site preparation is already underway for the Leismer plant.
"We are at the very beginning of the project and our first goal will be to produce 10,000 bpd," Lund reiterated.
"Rising costs is not specific to Calgary, but is today an industry-wide issue. However, there are valid reasons for Statoil to invest in Calgary."
According to Lund, the lure of long-term barrels, political stability and access to the world's largest oil consumer have been major deciding factors.
"We also wish to strengthen our heavy oil portfolio," he said, adding that Statoil already has a 10 per cent stake in the Sincor extra heavy oil project in Venezuela. The $4.2-billion project, which is a joint venture between France's Total and Caracas-based PDVSA, is designed to produce about 200,000 bpd of heavy oil.
In late August, Statoil also announced that it was awarded 36 leases in the Alaminos Canyon and Keathley Canyon in the Gulf of Mexico.
"Globally, there is a shift towards the development of heavy oil resources," commented Paul Horsnell of London-based Barclays Capital. "Even conventional giants like Saudi Aramco, which is still home to the world's largest reserves of light oil, has embarked on the 900,000-bpd offshore Manifa field."
Lund believes that there is logic for international and state-owned oil companies to look into "unconventional resources" to meet the growing global energy demand.
"Oil output from OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) nations are expected to peak around 2105 and the world will depend increasingly on a few nations . . . Russia, Middle East and Canada," he said, adding "The way to make up for it would be to access tight gas and oilsands resources."
Admitting the offshore sector is also receiving a fair share of attraction, he pointed out that Statoil's expertise in handling complex subsea pipelines, production platforms and related structures will come in handy for its future operations.
"We think Statoil will have an edge, but a lot needs to be done further to develop new technology," Lund said.
Colin Lothian, Middle East senior analyst with Edinburgh-based Wood Mackenzie, said two significant challenges for oil companies looking for oil offshore are rising costs of operation and the availability of rigs.
"Reservoirs to depths of 3,500 metres and more are being targeted now by the industry," he said.
Offshore Canada will also be a target area for Statoil, which is bracing itself for a merger on Oct. 1 with the oil and gas assets of fellow Norwegian producer Norsk Hydro.
"We view the fields as a good portfolio of assets," said Lund.
Norsk Hydro is a stakeholder in the Hibernia, Hebron and Terra Nova fields in offshore Newfoundland. Shares of Statoil closed at $30.67 US Thursday in New York, up one per cent.
adutta@theherald.canwest.com
© The Calgary Herald 2007
Alberta deals OSUM a blow with test decision
NORVAL SCOTT
September 6, 2007
CALGARY -- Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach bowed to public pressure late Tuesday and stopped companies from testing for oil beneath water bodies in the province, a decision that was welcomed by environmental protesters but could threaten the future of OSUM Oil Sands Corp.'s crude project at Marie Lake.
Privately held OSUM had secured approval from provincial regulators to test for oil contained underneath the lake, which is 300 kilometres northeast of Edmonton, and plans to develop a crude project there. But Mr. Stelmach overturned that decision, calling the technology that OSUM plans to use to extract crude as "unproven" ... "I have decided that seismic testing on Marie Lake will not proceed," he told reporters in Edmonton late Tuesday.
That's a setback for Calgary-based OSUM, which is essentially being prevented by Alberta from pursuing a crude project on land leased to it for that very purpose. OSUM bought the Marie Lake lease last fall for about $3-million in a Crown land sale held by the provincial government's Department of Alberta Energy.
The company had hoped to extract 30,000 barrels of crude a day from under the lake via shaft-and-tunnel technology, accessing the oil via wells drilled from below the crude reservoir, rather than from above.
Last month, Alberta Sustainable Resources Minister Ted Morton approved OSUM's plans to test for crude at the site, albeit with strict environmental and safety conditions. But local residents object to the plans, alleging Alberta Energy failed to consider whether Marie Lake is suitable for development. The residents say seismic testing could damage the lake's fish stocks and ecosystem. They also registered concern about the potential impact of the oil project itself, which has yet to receive regulatory approval.
OSUM, which recently raised $56-million to pursue development of Marie Lake and other projects, says seismic testing has occurred on many lakes in Alberta without incident, and notes that its shaft-and-tunnel plan was developed in the Alberta government's underground test facility near Fort McMurray in the 1970s and 1980s. It also says the tunnel system has a smaller environmental footprint than traditional oil sands extraction methods, requiring fewer wells and less steam production.
But after protests last week at his riding office, the Premier overturned the regulator's decision on testing. No company will be allowed to test under any Albertan water body until ministers complete a policy for bitumen extraction in such regions, said Alberta Energy spokesman Jason Chance. He couldn't estimate how long before a policy is in place.
Mr. Chance did say Mr. Stelmach's decision was made specifically in response to concerns over the shaft-and-tunnel technology, rather than the seismic testing, but wouldn't comment on why the testing has been prevented from taking place if it wasn't a concern.
OSUM CEO Richard Todd said he learned of the Premier's decision only late Tuesday, when told by journalists, He said the company has not received a formal written indication of why the seismic application for Marie Lake has been suspended.
"We're a responsible corporate citizen who has had their regulatory approval overturned. My question is, is Mr. Stelmach really open for business to responsible Albertan companies or not?" he said in an interview. He said OSUM aims to pursue "every alternative to recover the costs of this knee-jerk action."
He added the company is treating the suspension not as a cancellation but as a delay, and looks forward to demonstrating the benefits of its technology to the provincial government and regulators.
Alberta Oilsands acquires Athabasca leases
Alberta Oilsands Inc (C:AOS)
Shares Issued 39,025,144
Last Close 9/5/2007 $1.34
Wednesday September 05 2007 - News Release
Mr. Shabir Premji reports
ALBERTA OILSANDS INC. OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL UPDATE
Alberta Oilsands Inc. (AOS) has acquired 22.5 sections (14,400 acres) of contiguous oil sands leases, at 100-per-cent working interest, in the heart of the Athabasca oil sands fairway near Fort McMurray.
To date there have been five penetrations drilled on the acquired oil sands leases surrounded by approximately 100 wells drilled on adjacent sections that confirms the presence of the reservoir oil sands with bitumen pay thickness ranging from 25 to 60 metres. The Alberta Energy and Utilities Board crude bitumen reserves atlas estimates that the leases contain undiscovered resource in excess of two billion barrels of original bitumen in place (OBIP).
Drilling is planned for the 2007/first quarter 2008 season to further delineate the potential for an in situ project. The prospective zone on the oil sand leases is the McMurray formation, which comprises high-quality fluvial and estuarine channel sands. The company has engaged Ryder Scott Petroleum Consultants to complete a National Instrument 51-101-compliant resource assessment on the acquired leases.
The acquisition of the additional oil sands leases increases the company's land base to a total of 107.5 sections (68,800 acres). The acquired leases in conjunction with AOS's Hangingstone assets will form the basis of the company's plan for a series of successive in situ bitumen extraction projects, likely applying SAGD (steam-assisted gravity drainage) technology.
In addition, AOS has acquired and interpreted 60 kilometres of trade 2-D seismic on its 23-section Hangingstone parcel. The data reveal four main anomalies indicating potential bitumen pay similar to the Hangingstone Meadow Creek reservoir to the south.
Shabir Premji, executive chairman of the company, stated: "AOS is very pleased to have added this large-scale oil sands property to its portfolio. We intend to aggressively pursue moving this resource to the reserves category."
As at Sept. 5, 2007, AOS had positive working capital of $14.5-million.
Pengrowth to apply the Powerwave Process
09:00 EDT Tuesday, July 31, 2007
FSC / Press Release
Edmonton, Alberta CANADA, July 31, 2007 /FSC/ - Wavefront Energy and Environmental Services Inc. (WEE - TSX Venture, WEESF - OTCBB_Pink_Sheets), a leader in technology development and implementation for improved oil recovery and optimized groundwater remediation is pleased to announce that it has entered into a pre-commercialization agreement with the heavy oil business unit of Pengrowth Corporation ("Pengrowth") to implement the Powerwave Process in an active waterflood.
Initially three, (3) Powerwave Mantis tool systems will be installed at an undisclosed Pengrowth operation in Alberta. Pengrowth's interest in Powerwave is to improve water injection rates and achieve more uniform water distribution in the reservoir as a means of increasing overall oil recovery.
Wavefront President and CEO Brett Davidson stated, "As one of North America's leading energy income trusts we are very pleased that the heavy oil business unit of Pengrowth has chosen to apply Powerwave. Pengrowth now joins Encana and ARG Resources to the growing list of oil producers who have entered into agreements with Wavefront to utilize Powerwave to unlock more oil from their reservoirs. Wavefront continues to pursue additional high-profile opportunities and anticipate similar announcements in the coming weeks."
About Wavefront Energy and Environmental Services Inc.
Wavefront is a technology-based company with a focused, strategic plan to leverage the value of our intellectual property in order to maximize oil production recovery operations, as well as provide additional solutions for environmental applications.
For further information please contact: D. Brad Paterson, CFO
780-486-2222 x224 Tel
investor.info@onthewavefront.com
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WAVEFRONT ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC.
"D. Brad Paterson" (signed)
D. Brad Paterson, CFO & Director
Cautionary Disclaimer - Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements contained herein regarding Wavefront and its operations constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Canadian securities laws and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements that are not historical facts, including without limitation statements regarding future estimates, plans, objectives, assumptions or expectations or future performance, are "forward-looking statements". In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as 'may', 'will', 'should', 'expect', 'plan', 'anticipate', 'believe', 'estimate', 'predict', 'potential', 'continue' or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. We caution that such "forward-looking statements" involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Such factors include fluctuations in the acceptance rates of Wavefront's Powerwave and Primawave Processes, demand for products and services, fluctuations in the market for oil and gas related products and services, the ability of Wavefront to attract and maintain key personnel, technology changes, global political and economic conditions, and other factors that were described in further detail in Wavefront's continuous disclosure filings, available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Wavefront expressly disclaims any obligation to up-date any "forward-looking statements", other than as required by law.
THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NEITHER APPROVES NOR DISAPPROVES THE CONTENTS OF THIS RELEASE WHICH WAS PREPARED SOLELY AT THE DISCRETION OF MANAGEMENT
Source: Wavefront Energy and Environmental Services Inc. (TSX-V: WEE) (Pink Sheets: WEESF) http://www.onthewavefront.com
Maximum News Dissemination by Filing Services Canada Inc.
Ph: (403) 717-3898 Fx: (403) 717-3896 www.usetdas.com
© Filing Services Canada
Land sales continue at red-hot pace
Tom McMillan
The Leader-Post
Friday, August 17, 2007
With Saskatchewan's oil and gas sector in full boom, Crown land sales are moving at a record pace.
In August, the province's sale of petroleum and natural gas rights continued its torrid pace, generating $38.2 million in revenue, Saskatchewan Industry and Resources said Thursday. The demand is being attributed to high oil prices and the first-ever public offering of oilsands rights.
"These results are the latest indicator that the oil and gas industry's confidence in Saskatchewan is growing," Government Relations Minister Harry Van Mulligen said on behalf of Industry and Resources Minister Maynard Sonntag. "This could be the beginning of substantial oilsands development."
Oil companies purchase the Crown land for the right to explore and capitalize on reserves located underneath. To date, more than $151 million in revenue has been generated in 2007, making it already the fourth-best year on record. There are two more offerings still to go this year.
The sales also continue the torrid pace set in 2006, when the province generated $176.5 million in bonus-bid revenues -- the second-highest total in Saskatchewan history.
August's sale included 12 exploration licenses sold for $14.5 million and 257 lease parcels that brought in $20.4 million. The highest price paid for a single parcel was $5.1 million by McCrank Steward Johnson, which purchased a 36-section exploration license 58 kilometres south of Weyburn.
"These sales are an excellent indication that oil companies are considering our province a good place to invest," Van Mulligen said.
This interest is being fuelled by the continued pursuit of new oil reserves and the increasing viability of targeting Saskatchewan oil.
The province's oil and gas reserves are often deeper than Alberta's, but oil prices well over $70 a barrel now make the extraction costs acceptable.
"The oil is now more financially viable for these companies to target and that seems to be spurring most of the growth," Mulligen said.
The Weyburn-Estevan area saw the most activity, with $27.7 million in bonus bids suggesting continued interest in deeper-oil targets. High interest in oilsands produced $5.3 million in the Lloydminster area, followed by the Swift Current area at $3.8 million.
Saskatchewan's oilsands have traditionally been slow to develop because the reserves are located roughly 300 feet below the surface, compared with 30 feet in Alberta.
Sales of the new oilsands dispositions included six exploration licenses that attracted $3.3 million in bonus bids.
"As supplies of oil dwindle, there will be increasing interest in this," Van Mulligen said.
"The technology is being worked on to utilize these reserves."
The most unusual aspect of the August land sale was the first public offering of oil shale exploration permits in the Hudson Bay area.
One permit went to Noble Hydrocarbons Alta Ltd., which committed to spend over $1 million, and Cavalier Land Ltd., which committed to spend $300,000 exploring the area.
The next sale of Crown petroleum and natural gas rights is Oct. 1.
© The Leader-Post (Regina) 2007
Troubled markets may impact oilsands financing
Borrowing costs create roadblock
Shaun Polczer
Calgary Herald with files from Reuters
Saturday, August 11, 2007
Troubled global financial markets threw up additional roadblocks to financing more than $100 billion worth of oilsands projects this week in the form of potentially higher borrowing costs.
Toronto's main index fell nearly 300 points in early trading Friday before recovering to finish 12 points lower at 13,466.28.
Fuelling the volatility were concerns over U.S. subprime mortgages and the spillover effect a meltdown could have on other sectors of the lending market.
According to Mark Freisen, an oilsands analyst at Calgary-based FirstEnergy Capital Corp., borrowing typically makes up more than half of the capital requirements needed to build massive new oilsands projects. "They all use significant amounts of debt," he said. "It's often a big component of the financing for these kinds of projects."
Although the full impact of the subprime woes has yet to be felt, higher interest charges could potentially add another layer of inflation to a sector of the oil industry already reeling from large capital cost overruns.
But Freisen said the reverse could also be true, where oilsands projects are seen as less risky compared to other capital-intensive investments.
"It could make the credit market more difficult," he explained. "But to put a silver lining on it, a good quality long-term asset like the oilsands might be seen as a safer place to be."
Rob Pearce, president and CEO of Northwest Upgrading Inc., plans to raise more than $1 billion to finance the construction of a new heavy oil upgrader near Edmonton.
Pearce acknowledged a potential "spillover effect," but remained confident his company will be able to find the cash it needs to bring the upgrader on stream by 2010.
"We have a large need for capital . . . and our financing plans have a significant debt component," he said. "But it's still a good borrowing environment and it still makes sense for these types of projects. These are very long-term assets and I think (the lenders will) take comfort in that."
Likewise, Marshall McRae, CCS Income Trust's chief financial officer, said the sub-prime woes would not jeopardize the company's $3.5-billion privatization announced at the end of June. That's because the $1.9-billion debt portion was firmly committed before the deal was made public.
However, McRae admitted that the plan might not have gone ahead if it were announced today.
"My understanding is that it's become difficult to put this type of transaction together because of the troubles in the debt market," he said.
Meanwhile, the contagion caused by the growing number of defaults on high-risk mortgages rippled through oil markets as governments from Europe to Japan raced to inject liquidity into the global financial system.
Central banks worldwide have injected at least $323 billion over the last 48 hours into capital markets rocked by problems at banks and funds exposed to bad loans in the U.S. mortgage sector.
The subprime crisis weighed on oil prices Friday, but declines were limited as market fundamentals overcame early losses.
New York crude fell to
$70.10 US, before rebounding to $71.47, about 10 per cent off last week's record high of $78.77. London Brent crude was down 49 cents at $69.72, off lows of $68.95.
"I suspect the speculative interests are moving to the sidelines, raising cash and attempting to avoid risk," said Mike Fitzpatrick, vice-president at MF Global.
Selling in oil has been orderly in contrast to the volatile swings in other markets and futures positions have not been cut dramatically.
"At this stage, the recent drop is viewed by some as a classic correction in a bull market," said Addison Armstrong, analyst at TFS Energy in Stamford, Conn.
Expectations that oil demand would remain robust have helped to put a floor under oil prices. The International Energy Agency said Friday world oil demand will grow at a faster pace in 2008 than this year and repeated its call for more OPEC oil.
China's imports surged 39 per cent in July versus the year-ago period, according to customs data, the fastest pace since January 2006.
OPEC has rejected calls from the IEA and oil importing nations to increase production, noting that oil inventories in consuming nations remain high.
spolczer@theherald.canwest.com
© The Calgary Herald 2007
Fort McMurray house prices hit $605,000
Calgary Herald
Saturday, August 11, 2007
So you think the average price of a single-family home in Calgary is crazy these days?
In the oil boom city of Fort McMurray, craziness has reached new heights.
The local real estate board says the average price of a single-family home has cracked the $600,000 mark for the first time.
In July, the average price rose to a staggering $605,495 -- a 29 per cent year-over-year gain.
Last year at this time, the average price of a single family-home in Fort McMurray was $469,877.
By comparison, the Calgary Real Estate Board website was reporting Friday the average price of a single-family home in Calgary in the past 30 days was $507,108.
© The Calgary Herald 2007
August 10, 2007
Oil fight brews
Marie Lake residents outraged by seismic tests
By RENATO GANDIA, SUN MEDIA
Tory MLA Denis Ducharme is slamming Sustainable Resource Development Minister Ted Morton's decision to allow seismic tests by a Calgary-based company on Marie Lake, one of Alberta's remaining pristine bodies of water.
He's also "very disappointed" that he found out about the decision through the media.
"I found that his lack of professional courtesy to me was unacceptable," Ducharme, of the Bonnyville-Cold Lake constituency, told Sun Media. "I'm certainly going to be having a discussion with the premier regarding this decision."
Ducharme suggested Morton's hands may be tied by the province's oil development policy.
"Maybe there are some changes that have to be done," he said. "Unfortunately, Mr. Morton did not show leadership."
Sustainable Resource Development approved Oilsands Underground Mining (OSUM) Corporation's seismic testing Tuesday in Marie Lake, which residents say will damage the ecosystem.
Peter Putnam, CEO and president, did not immediately return a call from Sun Media.
The company will use a so-called underground mine-based in situ process - inserting pipes under the lake to recover the oil.
Though the department approved the tests, spokesman Dave Ealey said, there are conditions the company has to meet before it can proceed.
The company has modified its test plans due to concerns expressed by nearby residents in the Cold Lake area, about 300 km northeast of Edmonton.
Marie Lake resident Hal Bekolay plans to greet seismic crews in his boat drinking coffee. "They're not going to get me off the lake unless they arrest me," Bekolay said. "It's my lake more than it's theirs."
Bekolay said residents were disgusted with the government for letting the tests go through.
"We are going to protest. If they have to lock us up, big deal. We're not taking it sitting down. They're going to have to do something drastic to get rid of me."
Edmontonian Doug Goss, who owns property by the lake, said the premier has broken his promise.
"The premier himself said that there's no seismic activity to be done on the lake until all the questions raised in the House are answered and they haven't done that."
The company plans to use instruments that will produce sound at 220 decibels, Goss said. This will affect the fish and other aquatic life in the lake, he said. Tests may also be conducted 24-7.
"Is everything for sale in Alberta?" asked Liberal MLA Bill Bonko, adding all Albertans should be concerned about the environmental hazards and quality of life issues the tests will produce.
NDP MLA Dave Eggen said it's disturbing that the government would sell leases under a lake when there are many other leases available elsewhere in the province.
Morton couldn't be reached for comment.
BQI Schart TA signal strong bull wave -
BQI TA LT #1 bull wave done -
BQI TA LT #1 correction wave done -
BQI TA LT #2 bull wave started -
Elliott pattern the 5-wave cycle -
its 4 more bull waves to GO -
More N/R upon the company’s September-October -
update -
BQI’s stock will be propelled upwards towards -
$22 per share as the 2nd LT bull wave breaking out? -
and some investors speculate on the potential -
economics of a joint venture with a Big Oil company? -
BQI LT will be the largest oil tar sand res. -
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=6668
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=5409
Ps.
I’m think many of today’s current shorters666 are
cognizant of BQI’s potential upside and are not well aware
of the timing of the September-October update -
(banksterz666 who gained trust from rich widows etc.
try to follow the 911banksterz destructionz habitz?) -
the 666shorterz use 888fiatz who got fooled to trust
the 666? -
and it will make the potential repercussions of a very
bullish BQI Potential Short Squeeze -
when more beaware -
of BQI large oil res. with new updates -
the oil investors will get the info! -
That, coupled with the fact that -
the current 666 short position is large -
( 12.4mm shares and 8% of the float)
and likely predicated on huge 666 loss? -
The great fundamental issues with Oilsands Quest -
should prompt much more 666short squeezes over the next -
couple months (in any fair market with less 666) -
before the September-October update.
And that is my take of the anatomy of a BQI -
short squeeze -
(it would be huge in any fair market) -
Imo. Tia.
http://www.888c.com/
God Bless
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=6668
Oilsands work just getting started
Companies have global-level growth plans for Alberta's rich-making resource
Gordon Jaremko
The Edmonton Journal
Monday, August 06, 2007
Edmonton / A year after former Shell Canada president Clive Mather gave out a hint, the scale of development on Alberta's horizon is coming into sharper focus.
"What we're saying is this is only the beginning," Mather said as he escorted U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman on an oilsands tour north of Fort McMurray.
"There's an awful lot more to come," Mather said. Syncrude Canada chief executive Charles Ruigrok echoed his Shell peer, saying the province's 141,000-square-kilometre bitumen belt is catching and holding the attention of global industry and finance.
Bodman asked the question also on Albertans' minds when he finished his state tour at a gala lunch with business and government leaders in Calgary. How big will the oilsands industry grow?
In January and last week, the Athabasca Oil Sands Project gave some answers in applications for regulatory approvals of its growth plans.
The Athabasca group alone -- led by 60-per-cent owner Shell and backed by Chevron Canada and Western Oil Sands with 20 per cent each -- has set its sights on achieving production of 770,000 barrels per day from its 1,200 square kilometres of Fort McMurray bitumen leases by about 2020.
It took the entire industry 67 years and 56,772 wells to build up Alberta output of conventional liquid oil into the 800,000-barrels-a-day range, from the first discovery at Waterton in 1902 until 1969, show records of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.
The oilsands are "world class," Texas giant Marathon Oil Corp. added in announcing its $6.5-billion takeover of Western.
Shell emphasized that all its majority share of the Athabasca reserves will be processed in Alberta, yielding maximum value to the firm's Canadian operations and the provincial economy.
Marathon, a 120-year-old American industry mainstay with few Canadian assets, will eventually export most of its minority of the Athabasca bitumen to its seven U.S. refineries and 5,700 service stations.
Chevron has yet to make known plans for all its share of Athabasca reserves, or for an estimated 7.5 billion barrels of bitumen in 730 square kilometres of leases known as Ells River that the firm bought west of Fort McMurray 16 months ago. But the Shell program alone spells more than a decade of heavy industrial work in the Fort Saskatchewan area east of Edmonton. Forecast expenditures of $22 billion to $27 billion include nearly $8 billion in wages for local workers.
The Scotford mega-upgrader will be built as four 100,000-barrels-a-day plants. It will be a continuous construction project lasting about 13 years provided oil markets, government policies and economic conditions stay favourable.
Shell wrote an invitation to industrial housing builders into its construction applications to the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board and Alberta Environment.
The region could use the sprawling, hotel-like worker complexes known as "open camps" that have sprouted in the Fort McMurray region, the documents predict.
It would be a good idea "if one or more third parties were to construct and operate open accommodation camps in the region," the applications suggest.
"Shell would consider working with camp providers to house out-of-region workers and transport workers by bus between the camp and the project," the applications promise.
Building each of the four upgrader plants will require 3,000 to 4,000 trades personnel at construction activity peaks.
But the mega-upgrader is just the biggest of many large projects in the 310-square-kilometre Alberta Industrial Heartland district northeast of Edmonton.
Counting all currently known developments "the cumulative construction workforce is expected to remain high, at more than 8,000 workers, from mid-2008 to early 2013, with a peak of about 13,300 workers in late 2011," Shell forecasts.
"Based on an estimated 7,500 local trades people available, additional workers from outside the region or province will be needed."
In highly skilled occupations needed by industrial projects, Edmonton oilsands jobs will be more like careers than the traditional feast-or-famine pattern of construction contracting.
Shell vowed "to use the project's lengthy construction schedule to offer the opportunity of long-term, stable employment as a means of attracting and retaining industrial workers and potentially attracting out-of-region workers."
When finished, the chain of four upgrader plants is expected to create 1,438 permanent jobs including 1,138 full-time staff and 300 contractor positions.
Since the Edmonton area already has a population of more than a million, Shell predicts it will absorb the upgrader people without repeating the notorious boomtown trauma of Fort McMurray.
Environmental effects on local air, water, vegetation and wildlife are also forecast to be modest compared to total accumulated results of decades of Edmonton development.
But road planners and motorists will have to adjust.
"The long construction period will result in the local road network having to support not only construction-related traffic, but also overlapping increasing volumes of operations-related traffic," the upgrader construction applications say.
Shell is volunteering to work with regional authorities on road improvements recommended by a recent Strathcona County engineering study.
gjaremko@thejournal.canwest.com
© The Edmonton Journal 2007
ya looks like somethings driving it
$33
This is pretty well the lone bright spot today
PBG ath again - yawn
PBG ath
Canadian Natural reviews second quarter progress
2007-08-01 03:15 ET - News Release
Mr. Allan Markin reports
RE-RELEASE: CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED ANNOUNCES SECOND QUARTER 2007 UPDATE ON THE PROGRESS OF THE HORIZON OIL SANDS PROJECT
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has provided a regular quarterly overview on the Horizon oil sands project.
"Canadian Natural achieved a major milestone on our Horizon project during the second quarter of 2007, with overall work progress at the end of the quarter reaching 75 per cent complete and field construction approaching two-thirds complete. All major vessels have either been erected or are currently on site. Work scheduled for the coming months will focus on mechanical construction, which is scheduled to be completed through a combination of lump-sum and reimbursable contracts. We continue to effectively execute our well-defined strategies," commented Real Doucet, senior vice-president, oil sands.
"The project remains on track for targeted start-up in the third quarter of 2008. Project progress slowed slightly during the quarter due in part to labour productivity, the temporary work shutdown on the tank farm and delays associated with a realignment of certain contract packages to match scope to the marketplace contractor supply to better manage costs.
"Despite the challenges of a construction market in Alberta operating at high capacity, we have been able to build our on-site manpower to over 7,000 personnel. With the success of our fly-in/fly-out program and managed open-site policy, we have been able to add workers as required.
"Management of costs continues to be a focus for the project team and we currently remain within our forecast estimate of 5 per cent to 12 per cent above our original $6.8-billion board authorization for construction capital spending.
"We are also well into our planning for commissioning and start-up. Our commissioning plans are established to identify the priority systems that will be required later this year and early in 2008. We are currently hiring and training operating personnel, setting up procedures and systems, and continue to develop our start-up strategies to ensure we stay on track for first oil."
HORIZON PROJECT STATUS SUMMARY
Mar 31, 2007 June 30, 2007 Sept 30, 2007
Actual Actual Plan Plan
Phase 1 -- work progress
(cumulative) 66% 75% 77% 88%
Phase 1 -- construction
capital spending(1)
(cumulative) 69% 79% 77% 85%
(1) Relative to overall phase 1 project construction capital
of $6.8-billion
Accomplished during the second quarter of 2007
Detailed engineering:
* Overall detailed engineering 97 per cent complete and substantially completed in most areas.
Procurement:
* Overall procurement progress is 95 per cent complete;
* Have awarded over $5.4-billion in purchase orders and contracts to date;
* Delivered to site over 30,000 standard loads;
* Operations and maintenance service and supply agreements are in negotiation.
Modularization:
* Delivered an additional 172 oversized loads to site during the quarter for a total of 1,424 loads, which represents approximately 86 per cent of the total requirement.
Construction:
* Overall construction progress is 63 per cent complete;
* Mine overburden removal has moved over 37 million bank cubic metres, which represents approximately 54 per cent of the total to be moved and is 1 per cent ahead of schedule;
* Construction of cofferdam for the tar river diversion completed in mining;
* Fabrication of crushing plants, surge facility and conveyor structure is 100 per cent complete in the ore preparation plant;
* Started erection of conveyors in ore preparation;
* Completed hot water tank in extraction;
* Hydrotested primary separation cells and hot water tank;
* Completed construction and hydrotesting of inclined plate settlers in froth treatment;
* Flare stacks installed in upgrading;
* Mechanically completed cooling tower piping;
* Mechanically completed inhibited water and cooling water pump-house buildings;
* 42-inch water pipeline completed;
* Wet gas compressor received and installed;
* Completed installation of coker and diluent recovery-unit process structures;
* Completed interconnecting welding of primary upgrading's piperacks;
* Energize main electrical substations R1/R2.
Milestones for the third quarter of 2007:
* Complete construction of Raw Water Pond;
* Extraction plant hydrotesting;
* Start of precommissioning activities in all bitumen production areas;
* Permanent power energized in R1/R2 corridors pump houses.
* Electrically energize main electrical substation;
* Start commissioning of Recycle Water Pond.
The company's results for the second quarter of 2007 will be released on Aug. 2, 2007. A conference call will be held on that day at 9 a.m. MT, 11 a.m. ET.
We seek Safe Harbor.
Nice timing.
$78 oil
WTO buyout offer
Should be a good one in August
Alberta Oilsands expands drilling program
2007-08-01 00:40 MT - News Release
Mr. Shabir Premji reports
OPERATIONS UPDATE: ALBERTA OILSANDS INC. EXPANDS DRILLING PROGRAM AND INCREASES OIL SANDS LANDS TO 85 SECTIONS (54,400 ACRES)
Alberta Oilsands Inc. has added an additional drilling program to commence in late fourth quarter 2007. The company is now planning two drilling programs of up to 40 wells over two large oil sands land blocks.
AOS has acquired an additional 62 sections of oil sands leases since it announced the initial acquisition of 23-section oil sands land on March 26, 2007. The additional oil sands leases increases AOS's land base to a total of 85 sections (54,400 acres), all at 100-per-cent working interest. All of the sections are located in the regional Hangingstone area. The sections were acquired over the past four months at Crown land sales.
The first drilling program will be on the 23-section "AOS Hangingstone prospect" parcel with up to 30 wells, at a minimum drill density of one well per section. Ryder Scott Petroleum Consultants, an independent petroleum consulting firm, has confirmed undiscovered resource of 1.15 billion barrels of bitumen in place (May 17, 2007, news in Stockwatch). This block is located approximately 22 kilometres southwest of Fort McMurray. The parcel is within three kilometres of the highway which provides good access to the lands. This land block is surrounded by a number of SAGD (steam-assisted gravity drainage) projects, which are in various stages of development, all within a three-to-10-kilometre radius. These SAGD projects include: Petro-Canada's Hangingstone Meadow Creek projects, Japan Canada Oilsands Company Ltd. (JACOS) Hangingstone project and Value Creation Inc.'s (VCI) Halfway Creek project. In addition to the drilling program, an 80-kilometre 2-D seismic data acquisition program is being permitted.
The second drilling program will begin to delineate the other prospect covering 47 sections. A 2-D seismic acquisition program is being planned by the company for this area. The company has secured services to ensure that delineation activities will start in the fourth quarter of 2007. AOS has engaged Ryder Scott Petroleum Consultants to evaluate the possible bitumen resources attributable to the recently acquired sections. The results will be announced as they become available.
UPDATE 1-Marathon to buy Western Oil Sands for $5.56 bln
(Recasts with acquisition, adds details)
NEW YORK, July 31 (Reuters) - Marathon Oil Corp <MRO.N>
said on Tuesday it agreed to buy Canada's Western Oil Sands
Inc.<WTO.TO> for about $5.56 billion, giving the U.S. oil
company a foothold in one of the world's most promising streams
of new crude oil.
Marathon said it will pay about $3.6 billion in cash plus
34.3 million shares or securities exchangeable for shares. It
will also assume about $650 million of debt.
The company also said its second-quarter profit fell on a
decline in oil and gas output and the absence of a year-ago
gain from the sale of Russian operations.
Houston-based Marathon has long been looking for a partner
in the Canadian oil sands. Still, it is expensive and requires
special equipment to turn the tar-like sludge that comes from
the region -- called bitumen -- into usable fuel.
The company plans to link the Canadian fields with its
refining operations in the United States.
The deal also requires Western to spin-off its subsidiary
with interests in Kurdistan -- WesternZagros -- before the deal
closes, Marathon said.
Marathon said it would get access to proved mining reserves
of 436 million barrels of bitumen through the deal and a total
net resource of 2.6 billion barrels of bitumen that can be
recovered through mining or "in situ" processing, which uses
heat or solvents to remove the bitumen.
Marathon's net income slipped to $1.55 billion, or $2.25 a
share, from $1.75 billion, or $2.08 a share, last year.
Excluding one-time items, the company said it earned $2.25
a share. On that basis, the average forecast of Wall Street
analysts was $2.13 a share, according to Reuters Estimates.
The second quarter was a mixed bag for the integrated oil
sector as soaring refining margins were offset by lower
commodity prices and output at some large oil companies.
(Reporting by Michael Erman)
Shell upgrader doesn't come cheap
Company says building costs will be spread over two decades
The Edmonton Journal
Tuesday, July 31, 2007
EDMONTON - Shell Canada predicted Monday its bitumen mega-upgrader project east of Edmonton will eventually cost $22 billion to $27 billion, but said the spending will be spread over 15 to 20 years.
Construction applications to the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board and Alberta Environment call for the 400,000-barrels-daily complex to be built as four plants beside Shell's current Scotford upgrader near Fort Saskatchewan.
The cost prediction is "an early assessment" required for regulatory review of the previously announced project's likely economic effects, said Shell oilsands communications manager Janet Annesley.
Estimates that will guide construction decisions on each 100,000-barrels-daily stage in the development will come later, Annesley said.
Building each plant will require 3,000 to 4,000 trades personnel at construction activity peaks. Each plant will employ about 300 permanent operating staff.
Shell's plan calls for regulatory approval of the entire mega-upgrader complex and possibly a start on building the first plant in 2009, with production beginning in 2012. "The timeline for the remaining three phases will depend on various regulatory, project and market factors," the construction application says.
Advance approval for all four plants will "enable the pace of project development to be well planned and executed. This will help to reduce and level impacts of intense construction of these large facilities in the Scotford area," the application says.
More applications will be made by the end of this year for matching additions to Shell's Athabasca oilsands mine north of Fort McMurray, Annesley said.
© The Edmonton Journal 2007
Canada to face oil pipeline shortage: regulator
Fri Jul 27, 5:32 PM
CALGARY, Alberta (Reuters) - Canada's crude-oil pipelines may have to ration space as early as this autumn because of a surge of new oil production from the Alberta oil sands, the country's energy regulator said on Friday.
The National Energy Board said the pipeline industry may face a capacity crunch as oil output this year rises to 2.9 million barrels a day, 9 percent more than in 2006.
Almost all new Canadian oil supply comes from the oil sands region of northern Alberta, where more than C$100 billion worth of projects to exploit reserves second only to Saudi Arabia are planned or under way.
Most of the that production is destined for the huge U.S. market and a number of new pipelines are on the drawing boards to handle the expected flood of oil.
However none of those new lines, which include projects planned by Enbridge Inc. and TransCanada Corp. , is expected be completed before 2009.
Without that new capacity, pipeline firms may have to periodically resort to apportionment -- rationing available space -- as soon as the fourth quarter, with restrictions remaining in place for 18 months until new lines are built, the regulator said.
The NEB's assessment contrasts with a study released by the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers last month.
CAPP, the oil industry's main lobby group, said it believes there is enough oil transport capacity in place or being built to handle rising output through 2012.
But CAPP said developers must now concentrate on a new round of expansion beyond that period, given how long regulatory and construction phases take.
It predicted Canadian crude oil output could hit 5.3 million barrels a day by 2020, double the current amount.
In the 1990s, pipeline apportionment was a big issue as capacity lagged demand for crude movement on Enbridge's major artery to the U.S. Midwest.
Shippers over-nominated for space in efforts to reserve as much capacity as possible, creating what the industry termed as "air barrels."
Since then, Enbridge and other operators have added capacity as production, especially from the Alberta oil sands, has climbed. Numerous expansions to U.S. and West Coast markets are on the drawing board or under way.
Monday » July 23 » 2007
Potential greenhouse breakthrough is years away from being adopted
By burning bitumen as fuel and capturing the carbon dioxide, natural gas is conserved and total emissions are lower
Gordon Jaremko
The Edmonton Journal
Monday, July 23, 2007
On paper, Quadrise Fuel Systems, Paramount Resources and Colt Engineering own a technology that will cure big oilsands woes.
The approach promises to cut costs and conserve energy by replacing natural gas with a new fuel for thermal processes of "in-situ" underground bitumen extraction.
Greenhouse gas emissions would be cut because the method would harness carbon dioxide made by burning the new fuel as an industry production tool.
The exhaust would be injected into geological reservoirs, where it would stay permanently after enhancing natural gas and bitumen production.
As a bonus, the carbon-dioxide injections would restore access to natural gas in the bitumen belt. The method promises to help firms including Paramount which had to shut in wells and abandon reserves after the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board found gas production threatened to stunt oilsands development by lowering underground pressures.
As a second bonus, users of the new approach stand to gain emissions-reduction credits for sale on the carbon-trading market that climate-change policy is supposed to create eventually.
Enter MCAST, short for MSAR carbon sequestration technology. MSAR stands for multiphase superfine atomized residue. MSAR is a patented new fuel made from raw bitumen or low-grade heavy oil that resembles paint and burns with exceptional efficiency when sprayed as a fine mist and ignited in industrial boilers.
The Canadian invention is being introduced to big energy users from power plants to refineries by an international marketing network.
The bitumen production method devised by Quadrise, Paramount and Colt adds carbon capture and storage technology, a specialty pioneered by the Alberta Research Council, to the MSAR fuel system.
"We'd love to have seen it being used commercially yesterday," Quadrise business development vice-president Rodger Bernar said in an interview. But in practice the system will likely take until about 2012 to mature into a candidate for adoption by oilsands operations, he predicted.
Industry has to be convinced new methods work reliably over a prolonged period, Bernar said. That takes field tests big enough to demonstrate economic as well as technical advantages, he added.
Quadrise, Paramount and Colt expect to spend the rest of this year organizing an MCAST field test in the Surmont oilsands district south of Fort McMurray.
Then it will take another year to 18 months to build a pilot plant and put it into proper running order. And then two to three years of operating the system in all conditions will be needed to convince industry engineers that the new approach works.
No firm schedules are set yet for either the field trials or adoption of the system on a commercial production scale. The federal and provincial governments are unpredictable factors in the technology development process.
MCAST looks tailor-made to qualify for help from federal funds earmarked for greenhouse gas reduction projects, and for help from a similar program promised by the Alberta government.
The oilsands technology trio has applied to Natural Resources Canada for about $1 million and intends to seek similar help from Alberta when the province clarifies its intentions, Bernar said.
The companies are only asking the governments to cover about one-tenth to one-fifth of the project's total costs.
But the authorities refuse to be rushed.
Just to qualify as a candidate for help from Ottawa's greenhouse gas reduction program, the plan by Quadrise, Paramount and Colt has to clear an environmental counterpart to a tax audit.
The proposed pilot plant is going through a review by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. Formal "screening" of the industrial research plan started July 9 as a thorough check into potential effects on land, air water and wildlife.
Government policy will also play a critical role in determining the fate of the new technology if the field trials are successful, Bernar indicated.
MSAR has already been proven to work in prolonged tests. The new fuel system performed well in a pilot plant for the Joslyn oilsands mega-project north of Fort McMurray.
But the Joslyn trials vented carbon-dioxide exhaust into the atmosphere. Even if the larger MCAST bitumen and natural gas production system turns out to be a technical breakthrough, governments will have to contribute an economic reason for industry to make it a business winner, Bernar said.
Carbon-dioxide capture and storage is expensive. Forecast costs of a collection, pipeline and underground disposal system currently proposed by a consortium of other Alberta industry branches run into billions of dollars. Government help sought by the group is also measured in billions of dollars.
Climate-change policy will only generate significant industrial action by creating seriously expensive penalties for carbon emissions and genuine rewards for reducing them, Bernar predicted.
Projects on the scale of oilsands plants do not lightly switch production methods. "There have to be sufficient economic drivers for someone to proceed," the technology pioneer said.
gjaremko@thejournal.canwest.com
Conoco Has Big Plans for Alberta Oilsands, CEO Says
http://www.resourceinvestor.com/pebble.asp?relid=34055
LIC may get a pump whe PP closes WATCHING CLOSELY
Lexacal reaches agreement for oil sands treatment
2007-07-20 12:22 ET - News Release
Shares issued 12,613,991
LIC Close 2007-07-18 C$ 0.15
Mr. Robert Chase reports
LEXACAL'S WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY REACHES AGREEMENT ON DEVELOPING REMEDIATION OF OILSANDS DRILL CUTTINGS
Lexacal Investment Corp.'s wholly owned subsidiary, New West Drilling Fluids Inc., of Calgary, Alta., has reached an agreement with a private company to apply a remediation process to the treatment of oil sands cuttings. New West Drilling will be conducting laboratory and field testing to determine if the process is viable, and if so, will apply to the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board for regulatory approval to use the process in the treatment of oil sands drill cuttings. New West Drilling is in the process of treating waste drill cuttings provided by a number of oil sands operators.
We seek Safe Harbor.
______________________________________________________________
Lexacal arranges $750,000 private placement
2007-07-17 16:31 ET - News Release
Shares issued 12,613,991
LIC Close 2007-07-16 C$ 0.15
Mr. Robert Chase reports
LEXACAL INVESTMENT CORP. PROPOSES PRIVATE PLACEMENT
Lexacal Investment Corp. has proposed to complete a non-brokered private placement of up to five million units at a price of 15 cents per unit to accredited investors. Each unit will comprise one common share and one-half share purchase warrant exercisable at 20 cents per share and expiring two years after the closing date. The warrants forming part of this placement will have a provision that states that, after four months from the date of the placement, should the weighted average trading price of the shares exceed 35 cents per share for a period of 15 consecutive trading days at any time during the two-year period, the company may give notice to exercise. If not then exercised within 30 days, the warrants will expire. Closing is anticipated to occur on or about July 31, 2007.
The company plans to use the proceeds to retire term debt and for working capital purposes.
A finder's fee of 8 per cent may be payable on a portion of the private placement. In addition, an 8-per-cent finder's option to buy additional units for a period of one year from the date of closing may be granted on a portion of the private placement at the issue price.
The common shares and warrants comprising the units will be subject to a four-month hold.
We seek Safe Harbor.
______________________________________________________________
Lexacal unit to begin drilling for Petro-Canada
2007-06-07 18:43 ET - News Release
Shares issued 12,613,991
LIC Close 2007-06-06 C$ 0.11
Mr. Joe Scarlett reports
LEXACAL INVESTMENT CORP. ANNOUNCES COMMENCEMENT OF MAJOR PROJECT
Lexacal Investment Corp.'s wholly owned subsidiary, New West Drilling Fluids Inc., of Calgary, Alta., will commence a multiwell Athabasca oil sands drilling operation for Petro-Canada Inc., project name MRX, in Fort McKay on Friday, June 15, 2007.
New West will be using its patented Bitudril drilling fluids system, and will provide all drilling fluids engineering and supervision for the entire project.
The project consists of 40 horizontal well pairs and one horizontal re-entry for a total of 81 horizontal wells with measured depths of approximately 1,250 metres and horizontal sections approximately 800 metres in length. The project is scheduled for 18 months with approximate gross revenue of $3.8-million to New West.
New West is a full-service drilling fluids company to the oil and gas industry in Western Canada. Its products and services are unique to the industry because they are developed to address client-specific problems in drilling, completions and workovers. New West's products maximize efficiency while minimizing costs and environmental impact.
Reliance ready to invest in oilsands
Indian firm will 'move fast' once target found
Ashok Dutta
Calgary Herald
Thursday, July 19, 2007
Leading Indian private-sector integrated oil company and operator of the world's largest refinery, Reliance Petroleum is eyeing opportunities for multi-billion dollar investments in Alberta's oilsands, terming the province's resource the "energy of the future."
Atul Chandra, president of international operations, told the Herald in an interview from Mumbai on Wednesday the energy giant is considering several options with respect to Alberta. Among them: exploration and production of heavy oil, mining and extraction of bitumen and the construction of an upgrader to produce synthetic crude oil.
"We continue to meet people from the industry, including officials from Alberta," he said. "A delegation (from the Alberta government) visited us last year and invited us to invest in oilsands. We will look for a threshold resource of at least 500 million barrels. Any investments will have to be matched with our portfolio."
Reliance's current portfolio includes oil exploration and production rights in Oman and Yemen and 90 per cent interest in India's largest gas field. It is also the owner and operator of the 540,000-barrel-per-day (bpd) export refinery at Jamnagar in Western India. The facility is undergoing an expansion to add 580,000 bpd by December 2008.
Chandra pointed out that although no "specific" oilsands property has been identified for acquisition, Reliance will "move fast" once it has narrowed down a target.
Other international oil companies on the prowl for oilsands interests or assets include Italy's ENI, Spain's Repsol and India's state-owned Oil and Natural Gas Corp.
Jason Chance, spokesman at Alberta Energy in Edmonton, said efforts by Reliance would be yet another example of growing oil interest in Alberta.
"Foreign investors recognize we are politically stable and have a trained workforce," he said. "New investments imply potentials for new jobs, value-addition, economic benefits and royalties."
According to Chandra, access to long-term barrels of oil will be a prime driver behind investments by Indian companies in Alberta's oilsands sector.
"Globally, the total discovered oil reserves is two trillion barrels. Of this, one trillion has already been produced. Oilsands and shale constitute another seven trillion barrels-in-place and this is convertible to recoverable resources of two trillion barrels. Most of the deposits are in Alberta and it is the energy destination of the future," he pointed out.
Pauline Dingwell, Canada analyst with Edinburgh-based Wood Mackenzie, said a luring factor for Reliance will be security of long-term supplies.
"They have made no secret of it," she said. "Undeniably, Alberta has a large resource base, but rising capital costs of projects may act as a deterrent."
Admitting that spiralling project cost is an issue that Reliance will have to contend with, Chandra felt an oil price of $60 per barrel would make any investments worth the while.
"Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) will be an important issue," he said, without giving any figures. "Our aim will to be in the total value chain and not just in mining and extraction of bitumen."
WACC is defined as the expected return on capital by an investor.
Vishvjeet Kanwarpal, chief executive at New Delhi-based Asia Consulting Group, said at present the desired WACC for oil companies after Venezuela's resource nationalization drive is 25 per cent.
In Alberta, the rate of returns on projects is estimated to be 10 to 12 per cent per year over a 30-year period.
"We can either invest on our own or in a joint venture. Each partner will bring on board strengths. Upgraders are key elements in oilsands projects and we have the experience of building and operating the world's largest refinery," Chandra said.
U.S. oil giant Chevron Corp. has a five per cent interest in the Jamnagar refinery. It also has working interests in two oil sands project -- Athabasca Oil Sands Project and Syncrude.
Chandra suggested that synthetic oil produced from its oilsands operations would likely be sold to the U.S.
"Based on our product slate, if we get the desired value we may look into importing Canadian oil," he said in reply to a query if Reliance would ship oil from the western Canadian coast. "In today's world of high oil prices, it is light oil (price) that is moving up and not heavy oil. This is creating a differential of $12 to $25 per barrel. We will buy the cheapest oil and produce premium brands to be sold in Europe and the U.S."
In spite of a recent decision by the Chinese National Petroleum Corp. to exit the oilsands, Chandra replied that the door will still open for Asian companies to import western Canadian extra heavy oil.
"China or no China, we will import if the basic economics work out," he said.
Kanwarpal said that fast-growing for energy will be the deciding factor for securing foreign sources of crude.
"The Chinese dragon and the Indian elephant have varying perceptions of energy security. The former is swift and changes pace, but the latter takes time to decide. However, once the elephant takes a decision it moves along unmindful of consequences," he commented.
India's oil demand is estimated to reach 7.5 million bpd by 2025, from 2.2 million bpd today.
adutta@theherald.canwest.com
© The Calgary Herald 2007
More selling out ...
Globe says Husky foraging for more refining capacity
2007-07-16 03:56 MT - In the News
The Globe and Mail reports in its Monday, July 16, edition that Husky Energy says it is on the lookout to acquire more North American refining capacity to process future output from its oil sands projects. The Globe's Norval Scott writes Husky still needs more refining capacity despite its acquisition of Valero Energy's 165,000-barrel-a-day refinery in Lima, Ohio, for $1.9-billion (U.S.) this year. While the company has evaluated many options, including purchasing another refinery or building a new greenfield facility, those appear expensive and Husky may seek to swap its oil sands equity for an interest in a United States refinery, as EnCana and ConocoPhillips did last year, said Husky vice-president Gary Mihaichuk. "Quite frankly, there aren't a lot of refineries for sale, so if you try and buy one the price is really high, considering how well the refining industry is doing right now," he said. "A practical solution may be a joint venture with someone, along the lines of the EnCana-ConocoPhillips deal." Husky expects to extract 500,000 barrels of crude a day from its oil sands operations alone by 2020, with the 200,000-barrel-a-day Sunrise development expected on stream in 2010.
Nice
Just been watching the sand box out of the corner of my eye this week
Been preoccupied elsewhere.
PBG break $30 today?...
Oilsands break-even hits $54 per barrel
Project costs up 16 per cent in one year
Ashok Dutta
Calgary Herald
Wednesday, July 04, 2007
The break-even oil price for Alberta's oilsands mining projects has risen an average 16 per cent in the past 12 months -- driven primarily by the high cost of manpower and materials -- a U.S. investment bank said in a report on Tuesday.
"We now think the economic WTI (West Texas Intermediate) break-even for mining projects is about $54 per barrel, up from our previous estimate of $45 last year," said Arlington-based Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group Inc. "For SAGD (steam-assisted gravity drainage) production, the break-even economics remain better, closer to WTI $30, slightly higher than our previous estimate of $27.50."
Break-even price is a combination of capital costs, along with the cost of servicing the capital.
WTI prices climbed to a new 10-month high of more than $71 per barrel on Tuesday, extending recent gains into a fifth straight session.
"The five-day run-up was fuelled by a combination of technical and fundamental factors, including terror plots in the U.K., falling U.S. petroleum stocks and violence in Nigeria," said the New York Mercantile Exchange daily bulletin. "NYMEX August crude traded 30 cents higher on Tuesday at $71.30."
The past several months have seen some of the province's best known oilsands operators dealing with rising costs. The latest was on June 28, when Petro-Canada unveiled an estimated $14-billion investment for the first phase of its Fort Hills project to include a 160,000-barrel-per-day mining facility.
The planned expenditure was calculated on a base oil price of $45 per barrel.
The FBR report was silent on cost escalations for upgraders, but senior analyst Mark Friesen of FirstEnergy Capital said it constitutes about 45 per cent of an integrated oilsands venture.
"They (upgraders) are long-lead projects and require a great deal of front-end loading and engineering work," said oil and gas equity analyst Justin Bouchard of Raymond James. "Some estimates were done three years ago, but things have changed lots since."
Maroof Shah, managing director of Calgary-based Peggy Enterprises Ltd., felt that multibillion dollar hydrocarbon projects in the Middle East and Far East are prime reasons for prices being driven hard.
"Saudi Arabia is further expanding its supremacy as an oil superpower and also emerging as a leading petrochemical producer," Shah said.
"In China, labour costs and productivity are not issues, but they are importing in large numbers speciality process equipment," he said.
Shah was until recently senior adviser to Riyadh-based pertrochemical giant Saudi Basic Industries Corp. and helped in setting up procedures for best practices.
Rising capital costs may eventually lead to further mergers and acquisitions by 2008, the FBR report pointed out.
"The high level of heavy oil-oilsands activity and decreasing natural gas activity reflects 'fuel switching' at the margin. As more oilsands projects get developed, this will cause a structural uplift in Canadian natural gas prices relative to crude oil, which should bring the long-term oil-gas ratio back from over 10 currently, to under six over the next two to three years."
The report added: "Production growth from the oilsands will not be slowed down by economics alone, as much as from labour shortages and productivity issues, project development delays and optimistic timelines for new take away pipeline capacity."
"Oilsands M&A should increase by 2008 and should attract increased activity once current royalty and emission issues are resolved, especially given the reducing economic interest being offered to large IOCs (international oil companies) elsewhere in Venezuela, Russia, higher political risks in Nigeria and Angola and decreasing reserve lives of IOCs and their need to re-leverage balance sheets to obtain optimal equity returns," it said.
On M&A, Robert Plexman, managing director of equity at Toronto-based CIBC World Markets, felt that the Alberta oilsands patch will witness a migration from asset-rich, but financially challenged firms to large oil and gas companies.
"We have recently seen some of that in the Statoil-North American Oil Sands Corp. play," he said.
"The process will continue probably beyond 2008, as it takes about seven years from the concept stage, to go though the regulatory approvals for a take over, construction of facilities and finally produce first oil."
Bouchard felt that an underlying tone at present is for junior oil companies to "hold their breath" and wait for the opportune moment.
"Some IOCs, like BP, ENI and Repsol are notably absent. They are floating around and looking for the right opportunity. A look at the latest oilsands map indicates several companies with small pieces of land. We will see a consolidation," he added.
Post says Petrocan figures $33.4-billion ought to do it
2007-06-29 06:41 MT - In the News
Also In the News (C-TCK) Teck Cominco Ltd
Also In the News (C-UTS) UTS Energy Corp
The Financial Post reports in its Friday edition that as oil prices sailed past a nine-month high of $70 (U.S.) a barrel Thursday, Petro-Canada and its partners pushed forward with Canada's largest oil sands investment yet -- a $33.4-billion oil sands mining venture. The Post's Claudia Cattaneo and John Harding write the group says it said can generate a reasonable return even with $45 (U.S.) oil. The move casts aside uncertainty about the future of the once-beleaguered project, known as Fort Hills. "The No. 1 message we get is that these companies are willing to go ahead with high levels of oilsands spending because they are very bullish about oil prices," said Mike Tims, chairman of Peters & Co. "It's also reflective of how tough it is for oil and gas companies globally to add oil supply." Fort Hills, a partnership between operator Petro-Canada, UTS Energy and Teck Cominco, is proceeding as a massive commitment that will yield 280,000 barrels of synthetic crude oil a day by 2014, even after its backers stepped back six months ago to evaluate its economics. Ron Brenneman, Petrocan's chief executive officer, told analysts in a conference call, "We fully recognize the execution risk with this venture."
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |