Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
John O'Neill - Murdered On 911! -
Former FBI Deputy Director John O'Neill wanted to investigate
the terrorists who were planning to blow up the trade towers on
911, but he was prevented from ...
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/911%20Cover-up/john_oneill-murdered_on_911.htm
The Sad Truth About 911 -
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/911%20Cover-up/sad_truth.htm
The 911 Attacks Were An Inside Job!
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/911%20Cover-up/inside_job.htm
Wargames Were Cover For the Operational Execution of 9/11
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/911%20Cover-up/wargames_cover_for_911_attacks.htm
9/11: Smoking Guns -
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/911%20Cover-up/911_smoking_guns.htm
200 People Jumped To Their Death On 911 -
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/911%20Cover-up/200_people_jumped.htm
Official 911 Story is False -
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/911%20Cover-up/official_story.htm
Bush Sued for 911!
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/911%20Cover-up/bush_sued_for_911.htm
What Really Happened On 911?
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/911%20Cover-up/911.htm
911 Facts!
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/911%20Cover-up/911%20Facts.htm
ReThink911 Campaign by AE911Truth Sept 2013
http://www.reinvestigate911.org/
911 James Corbett: Starting a Real Criminal Investigation on the Events of 9/11 -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ef-SK_nN8Ko
Try Raging Blot, dumbass
What we need is a safe haven.
XKEMQ needs more stock boards on iNvEsToRsHuB
Oh well, I guess one out of two ain't bad..
Okiwin
As everyone knows I sit around and do a whole lot of thinking and I've always wondered about that gamma irradiation plant that SHESTCO's got going over there in Nigeria and what the implications were of using such a process.
Well I've done some searching around since our own government now wants to zap all of our spinach and lettuce to save us all from E. coli. I think there's a lot more to it than that and on top of it all they'll be able to lower their standards for produce to boot. Now you'll be able to eat produce that's now just coated in sterilized exciment. hahahahahaha
"Nuked Food" - The Dangers of Irradiated Food
you may have heard that the FDA is going to start irradiating more foods going forward. "FDA to allow food producers to irradiate spinach, lettuce" http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2008-08-21-fda-irradiation-spinach-lettuce_N.htm The public has been reticent to accept irradiated meats thus far and because of this the FDA is would like to label irradiated products as pasteurized to make it more accepted by the public. "FDA proposes softening irradiated food labels" http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2007-04-04-food-radiation_N.htm Here are some common sense reasons why you should avoid foods that have been through such a process
Nuked food is the common term for irradiated food - food which is exposed to high level radiation for the purpose of sterilizing it. This high level radiation penetrates the food which, as anyone who has paid attention in chemistry knows, raises the energy level of the atoms and molecules which the food is composed of. This results in myriad "free radicals" - atoms which have lost an outer electron due to having absorbed a shot of higher energy.
And instead of being chemically neutral, such an atom has now become strongly attractive. This will break and re-arrange many chemicals bonds in the atoms, molecules and chemical compounds of the cells of the food under radiation. So much so that the cellular processes of any micro-organisms in the food are disrupted, and the micro-organisms in the food are killed.
The cells of micro-organisms live and die by exactly the same chemical laws and processes that our cells live by. And if our cells were subjected to the same radiation, they would die just as surely.
The idea is that the radiation dissipates, and things return to normal. But we have come to know and understand that free radicals form stable compounds that are different from the original chemical compounds, and that the free radicals and the altered compounds are harmful to us in many, many ways - among them a trigger for heart diseases and cancer.
The greatest danger, in my view, is the havoc such free radicals can wreak in the delicate chemistry of reproduction, when our cells, or an ova, divide and replicate - a cell or an an ovum is about the same size as a micro-organism - and in the growth and development of the embryo, when it is acutely vulnerable to any abnormalities.
Personally, I cannot understand how people can be so irresponsible to allow and apply what is such a powerful free radical creation tool that it kills all micro-organisms in the food - micro-organisms which live and die by exactly the same chemistry as we do. To me this is incomprehensible.
Here then is a calm and cogent article by an accomplished and respected Cancer research scientist, plus a few abstracts (no abstracts were available for many more papers) of animal trials done with irradiated food, as listed in the Public Archives of the National Library of Medicine.
Original Article:
George L. Tritsch, PhD
Cancer Research Scientist, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, New York State Department of Health.
I am speaking as a private citizen, and my opinions are my own, based on thirty-three years of experience since my doctorate at Cornell Medical College, Rockefeller University and, since 1959, as a cancer research scientist and biochemist at Roswell.
I am opposed to consuming irradiated food because of the abundant and convincing evidence in the refereed scientific literature that the condensation products of the free radicals formed during irradiation produce statistically significant increases in carcinogenesis, mutagenesis and cardiovascular disease in animals and man. I will not address the reported destruction of vitamins and other nutrients (what? - more nutrient deficiencies?; my comment) by irradiation because suitable supplementation of the diet can prevent the development of such potential deficiencies. However, I cannot protect myself from the carcinogenic and other harmful insults to the body placed into the food supples and I can see no tangible benefit to be traded for the possible increased incidence of malignant disease one to three decades in the future.
Irradiation works by splitting chemical bonds in molecules with high energy beams to form ions and free radicals. When sufficient critical bonds are split in organisms contaminating a food, the organism is killed. Comparable bonds are split in the food. Ions are stable; free radicals contain an unpaired electron and are inherently unstable and therefore reactive. How long free radicals remain in food treated with a given dose of radiation or the reaction products formed in a given food cannot be calculated but must be tested experimentally for each food. Different doses of radiation will produce different amounts and kinds of products.
The kinds of bonds split in a given molecule are governed by statistical considerations. Thus, while most molecules of a given fatty acid, for example, may be split in a certain manner, other molecules of the same fatty acid will be split differently. A free radical can either combine with another free radical to form a stable compound, or it can initiate a [chemical] chain reaction by reacting with a stable molecule to form another free radical, et cetera, until the chain is terminated by the reaction of two free radicals to form a stable compound. These reactions continue long after the irradiation procedure.
I am bringing this up to give you a rationale for the vast number of new molecules that can be formed from irradiation of a single molecular species, to say nothing of a complicated mixture such as food. Furthermore, the final number and types of new molecules formed will depend on the other molecules present in the sample. Thus, free radicals originating from fats could form new compounds with proteins, nucleic acids [DNA], and so forth.
[ found at: http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/8979/page26.html ].
Abstracts: [from the public archives of the National Library of Medicine]
1) Micronucleus test in mice fed on an irradiated diet.
Jpn J Vet Res 1989 Apr;37(2):41-7
Endoh D, Hashimoto N, Sato F, Kuwabara M.
A mutagenicity study was carried out in mice fed on a gamma-irradiated diet. As an indicator of mutagenic activity, we observed an incidence of micronuclei in erythrocytes. The average body weight of the mice fed on the diet irradiated to dose range of 400-1,000 kGy decreased, and the mice fed on the 800-1,000 kGy-irradiated diet died during the period from 8 to 14 days after the start of feeding. On the other hand, when the mutagenic activity of the irradiated diet was tested by observing occurrence of micronucleus in erythrocytes, no significant increase was recognized. These results indicated that the irradiated diet had no mutagenic activity, even though it possessed a toxic effect on the growth of mice. PMID: 2779058 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2) Genetic effects of feeding irradiated wheat to mice.
Can J Genet Cytol 1976 Jun;18(2):231-8
Vijayalaxmi.
The effects of feeding irradiated wheat in mice on bone marrow and testis chromosomes, germ cell numbers and dominant lethal mutations were investigated. Feeding of freshly irradiated wheat resulted in significantly increased incidence of polyploid cells in bone marrow, aneuploid cells in testis, reduction in number of spermatogonia of types A, B and resting primary spermatocytes as well as a higher mutagenic index. Such a response was not observed when mice were fed stored irradiated wheat. Also there was no difference between the mice fed un-irradiated wheat and stored irradiated wheat. PMID: 990994 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3) Chromosome studies on bone marrow cells of Chinese hamsters fed a radiosterilized diet.
Toxicology 1977 Oct;8(2):213-22
Renner HW.
Metaphase preparations of chromosomes from bone marrow cells of Chinese hamsters were examined for mutagenic effects following the feeding of a radiosterilized diet. No increase in the incidence of structural chromosomal aberrations was observed. As far as numerical aberrrations were concerned, the proportion of cells with polyploidy increased to between 4 to 5 times the control level, irrespective of the moisture content of the diet. This polyploidy effect occurred very early, being detectable within 24 h, if the diet fed had been irradiated with an absorbed dose of 4.5 - 10(6) rad. The incidence of polyploidy remained below 0.5%, however, nor did it rise with higher radiation doses. When the feeding of the irradiated diet was stopped, the proportion of polyploid cells returned to the control level within a maximum of 6 weeks. If the diet was stored (initially) for 6 weeks following irradiation before being fed to the animals no increase in the number of polyploid cells was noted. These results are not interpreted as a mutagenic effect of the irradiated diet. PMID: 929628 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4) Irradiated laboratory animal diets: dominant lethal studies in the mouse.
Mutat Res 1981 Feb;80(2):333-45
Anderson D, Clapp MJ, Hodge MC, Weight TM.
In 4 separate dominant lethal experiments groups of mice of either Charles River CD1 or Alderley Park strains were fed laboratory diets (Oakes, 41B, PRD, BP nutrition rat and mouse maintenance diet No. 1). The diets were either untreated (negative control diets) or irradiated at 1, 2.5 and 5 megarad and were freshly irradiated, or stored. The animals were fed their test diets for a period of 3 weeks prior to mating. Groups of mice given a single intraperitoneal injection of 200 mg cyclophosphamide per kg body weight served as the positive controls. Freshly irradiated PRD diet fed to male mice of both strains caused an increase in early deaths in females mated to the males in week 7 and to a lesser extent in week 4. The increase due to irradiation was small by comparison with that produced by the positive control compound. The responses for the other irradiated diets showed no significant increases in early deaths although some values for Oakes diet were high. The effect of storage was examined with PRD and BPN diet on one occasion and produced conflicting results. Thus there was some evidence that irradiated PRD diet has weak mutagenic activity in the meiotic and/or pre-meiotic phase of the spermatogenic cycle which appeared to be lessened on storage; the inclusion of such a diet in toxicological studies would therefore need to be carefully considered. PMID: 7207489 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5) The effect of ionizing irradiation on sensory changes in feed in relation to their utilization by dogs
Vet Med (Praha) 1985 Dec;30(12):739-48, [Article in Czech]
Smid K, Dvorak J, Hrusovsky J.
To evaluate the effect of ionizing radiation on sensory changes of feeds in relation to their utilization by dogs, four groups of experimental animals were formed. Two groups were fed a ration where the main component (meat feed mixture VETACAN and loose feed mixture VETAVIT) was irradiated by radioisotope Co 60 at the dose of 25 kGy/kg for the period of 90 days. In the remaining two groups a non-irradiated ration was used for the same period. For both diets, control groups of dogs were formed and the feed ration was biologically fortified by a vitamin-mineral supplement to the physiological standard. It followed from the observations that the effect of radiation caused a significant qualitative decrease in the level of energy nutrients, particularly in the protein and lipid sphere. It is assumed that the extent of damage of lipid fraction is also accompanied by deficient vitamin activity and further by significant changes of taste and aromatic properties felt by animals. Irradiation of the feed ration caused a significant 20 to 25% decrease of food intake with a subsequent decrease of live weight and deterioration of physical condition. Irradiated diets without biological fortification caused significant losses of weight from the initial value mean = 39.5 kg to mean = 35.33 kg, in comparison with the non-irradiated rations through which the live weight was stabilized, and at biological fortification positively influenced. Irradiation of the feed ration during the period of study had not caused a response of the organism displayed in changes of physiological values of body temperature and heart and respiration rates in experimental animals. Radiosterilization of feeds had not caused any significant decrease of training ability and performance of dogs. PMID: 3937317 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6) Immune response in rats given irradiated wheat.
Br J Nutr 1978 Nov;40(3):535-41
Vijayalaxmi.
1. Rats given diets containing freshly-irradiated wheat showed significantly lower mean antibody titres to four different antigens, decreased numbers of antibody-forming cells in the spleen and rosette-forming lymphocytes as compared to rats given either unirradiated wheat or irradiated wheat stored for a period of 12 weeks. 2. The immune response in rats given 90 g protein/kg diet was essentially similar to that seen in animals given 180 g protein/kg diet. PMID: 568934 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
http://www.truehealth.org/nukedfood.html
Apparently there are a lot of folks up in arms about this. Remember that right now anything that is certified ORGANIC cannot be irradiated
FDA Unleashes Mass Irradiation of Spinach, Lettuce and Other Vegetables
FDA Unleashes Mass Irradiation of Spinach, Lettuce and Other Vegetables
By Mike Adams
Natural News, August 22, 2008
Straight to the Source
Web Note: National Organic Standards prohibit the use of food irradiation.
While the FDA proposed in 2007 to do away with irradiation labels in favor of misleading labels such as "cold pasteurization" "electronic pasteurization" or other euphemistic terms they have met with intense pressure from consumers, including the Organic Consumers Association. As industry has admitted "We have long argued that the use of the term irradiation or radiation has such a negative impact on the consumer that it basically acts as a warning label," said Jeff Barach, vice president of the Grocery Manufacturers/Food Products Association, an industry group.
FDA regulations still require that irradiated lettuce and spinach sold in retail stores be labeled as "Treated by radiation" and display the Radura symbol at the point of sale, although irradiated greens served in restaurants, schools, hospitals, and nursing home would not have to be labeled.
Ronnie Cummins
(NaturalNews) The FDA has announced that beginning today, spinach and lettuce sold across the United States may now be secretly irradiated before it reaches grocery store shelves. What's "secret" about it? The FDA previously decided that irradiation warning stickers would not be required on any food items because it would be "too confusing to consumers." (The word IRRADIATION apparently has too many letters to be understood to food buyers.) Thus, irradiated foods will not be labeled as such, and consumers are going to be left in the dark about all this (except for those who actually eat the irradiated food, in which case they will glow in the dark).
The FDA, of course, insists that the levels of irradiation used to kill e.coli will have no effect whatsoever on the nutritional value of the food. This astonishing statement comes from an agency that doesn't believe food has any nutritional value in the first place, so lowering the value to zero by destroying all the phytonutrients does not, in the opinion of the FDA, alter its nutritional value at all. Thus, destroying all the anti-cancer nutrients in a head of broccoli merely brings that broccoli into "compliance" as a non-functional food, according to the FDA.
Radiation, of course, destroys delicate phytochemicals in plants -- the very phytochemicals protecting consumers against cancer, heart disease, high cholesterol, inflammation and other diseases. Microwaving broccoli, for example, destroys up to 98% of its anti-cancer nutrients. (The FDA has not yet acknowledged this scientific fact, either.) In a similar way, irradiating food destroys much of its nutritional content, including vitamins, carotenoids, anthocyanins and other delicate protective nutrients that are right now providing the last, desperate nutritional defense against the American diet of meat, milk, fried foods and processed junk.
Irradiating fresh produce will leave the U.S. population is a state of extreme deficiency in protective plant-based nutrients.
Does the FDA plan to destroy the health of the U.S. population? Many people suspect that's what the FDA really wants. A nutritionally-deficient, disease-ridden population would mean a windfall of profits for the FDA's buddies in Big Pharma -- the folks who sell patented medications at monopoly prices. With the food supply destroyed by radiation, ordinary people would have virtually no remaining sources of protective phytonutrients!
In promoting this food radiation policy, the FDA has accomplished what all the terrorists in the world could not: The mass irradiation of the U.S. food supply -- much like setting off a dirty bomb over the nation's farms (but with less radiation). This destruction of the nutritional value of the food supply is a far greater threat to the health of the U.S. population than any terrorist event, including 9/11. And yet it is being done by our own people, TO our own people, by a lawless agency that answers to no one. FDA officials are not voted into office by the People; they are appointed by politicians. They answer to no one, they refuse to follow federal law, and they operate as tyrants over a quarter of the U.S. economy.
And now they have taken it upon themselves to destroy the national food supply.
We should be more than just alarmed -- we should be outraged! The FDA has committed an act of war against the People. With this decision, the FDA has firmly positioned itself as an enemy of the People, and a bringer of death and disease to the nation. Why are our elected representatives in Washington allowing this madness?
Think about this: If the FDA has its way:
* All your food will be irradiated, pasteurized or killed
* All your children will be vaccinated
* All your medicine will be based on pharmaceuticals
* All your free speech about health will be suppressed
* All informative labeling on food and supplements will be outlawed
* Growing and selling non-irradiated garden vegetables will become a crime!
Today it's spinach and lettuce; tomorrow it's all fresh produce
Don't think the FDA will stop with spinach and lettuce, either. They're already talking about irradiating tomatoes, peppers and onions. Before long, radiation could become mandatory for ALL fresh produce, and all the fresh fruits and vegetables that are supposed to contain health-protecting nutrients will be transformed into sterile, inert plant mass with no health benefits at all. (Brilliant scam, huh?)
This is by design. I believe the FDA wants the American public to be sickened and diseased. Why else would they ban Free Speech about healing foods like cherries, broccoli and garlic? Why would they outlaw the selling of herbs and nutritional supplements that claim to treat and prevent disease? The FDA wants you to be sick, enslaved and medicated, and irradiating the food supply is the quickest way to accomplish that.
He who controls the food controls the People.
He who destroys the food can profit from the People's sickness.
The FDA's crimes against humanity
In pushing this radiation agenda, the FDA is committing a crime against humanity -- a nutritional atrocity that violates fundamental human rights. And yet the FDA's top decision makers continue to operate with zero oversight and zero accountability. They make decisions in a corporate-sponsored vacuum, absent any input from reasonable, health-conscious consumers or scientists. And because they have been granted tyrannical powers by Congress, the FDA operates above the law.
It is not subject to any laws whatsoever; not even the U.S. Constitution which is supposed to protect the People's right to "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" (as stated in the Declaration of Independence).
The mass irradiation of the food supply is a violation of the "Life" part of that phrase, wouldn't you agree? If we can no longer buy nourishing foods with their nutrients intact, then we are all doomed to degenerative disease and death... but not before paying out our life savings to doctors, drug companies and hospitals. That's the evil genius of the food irradiation plot: It kills you slowly, at just the right pace to drain your bank account before you expire from malnutrition.
I truly believe this irradiation of the food supply is the beginning of the end of America. No nation can survive the destruction of its food supply. The FDA is dooming America to a slow, painful, medicated death. In a generation, this nation will be lost, destroyed from within by short-sighted tyrants who violated nature and left the People to rot.
What you can do right now to fight this latest transgression by the FDA For starters, you can:
1) Grow your own food. A little gardening is good. Grow whatever you can, even if it's just a few kitchen herbs.
2) Buy your food at farmer's markets, coops and CSAs. See http://www.localharvest.org/csa
3) Ask your grocery store if they are buying irradiated spinach. If they don't know, demand they find out!
4) Raise hell with your Senators and Congresspeople, demanding they pass new laws protecting consumers from the FDA and its plot to destroy the nutritional value of the food supply.
Also, listen to two podcasts I've posted on this topic. The first was recorded several months ago, where I publicly predicted the FDA would do exactly what we're seeing right now. Listen to that podcast here: http://www.naturalnews.com/Index-Podcasts.html#52
The second podcast was just posted today. I recorded it right before writing this article. It goes into much greater detail about the FDA's plot to destroy the health of the U.S. population. You can listen to that here: http://www.naturalnews.com/Index-Podcasts.html#61
Finally, don't stand for this food supply madness! Raise your voice. Write your local paper, call your representatives in Washington and tell them you strongly oppose the irradiation of the food supply. Teach people about phytonutrients. And stay tuned to NaturalNews as we continue to cover this important story.
The FDA has gone mad. Criminally mad. It is an agency that will literally kill you if given the chance, and it is up to all of us to stop this madness before we lose our health, our children and our very nation.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_14290.cfm
I didnt realize anybody was over here using my hole! Well keep up the chatter we holers love the freedom of speech. GoBama!
You are correct. Seems he thinks it's ME that made up the letters. Too funny for sure.
The letter is from the same group that wrote that letter that let us know that the equipment purchased last year was sitting in customs. We can't confirm how much of what they write is accurate, but they were dead on about the equipment when nobody but a few board members knew what was going on...
FOFLMAO, I see we are in ddaredevils prayers, he even has his fingers crossed for us. How fortunate we.
I see ddaredevil (what a joke moniker)is back ready and willing to beat down a stk he doesn't own.....hmmmmmm what a sorry sack, a truly broken individual , still harboring animosity towards the XKEM posters for his failed website to compete
w/I-HUB.
Next he'll be rolling out "dd" that is three yrs old to make his case as he did a few weeks ago.
What a shame.
Yeah, you're right, this is getting tiresome, but I'll answer this one and we'll see what happens...
1). I guess it's better to post with blinders on.
2). No, I don't expect weekly reports, just information when things like a state commits to an order or something else important. If I lead you to believe that I expect more than that, I apologize.
3). I'm certainly not going to hide the fact that I don't see a lot of positive things going on with Xechem. If I find something positive, I post it and it's been more that two. Am I looking for kudos for those? Hardly.
4). His vision is what got him fired. His vision had him planning for the future by building a facility to handle the future production needs, etc. The plans were in place, sales were increasing and the sales were going to fund those additional expansion plans and pay for the debt.
5) (your second 4) No, I'm not kidding. There was nearly a quarter million worth of Paclitaxol sitting there (it might have been more) and was trashed. Regardless of who could sell it or what you could do with it, is it acceptable to just trash it? Same with the XetaPharm products, drums worth, trashed. Those products had been put on hold to focus on Nicosan (you've very clearly stated that focusing on one product was the right thing to do, that's what they were doing), so it was sitting. So you're opinion is that if you're going to focus on one thing you should just throw everything else away?
6). I'm confused, "if you think the company needs surplus equipment from NB sitting in Lagos, make a bid." What would I need with equipment to put pills in bottles or lab equipment that was removed? Just because they don't think they need it, it's OK to let $6.3 million worth of equipment sit in customs and not retrieve it? It's been paid for, why wouldn't you pick it up? If they don't need it, why didn't they try to sell it months ago? Better yet, if Swift didn't need it, why didn't he cancel the order before it shipped? It's been stated that the equipment has been sitting in customs for roughly 10 months, he took over 13 months ago, the timing seems like he could have stopped it if he didn't feel it was necessary... I'm not convinced that the government has revoked Pioneer status and I have a hard time believing that the same government everyone is hoping will help Xechem succeed, has refused to help them reduce the amount required to get this equipment out of customs. Does that mean that the government isn't nearly as interested in helping Xechem out?
You're right, the company needs production, sales, marketing and distribution, have you heard anything the makes you believe that it's doing just that? I really don't care if they can make $340,000 a month worth of Nicosan (although I don't believe that they can based on comments from three different people that I believe know), can they sell that much? What's the plan to sell it? What's the marketing plan? What's the distribution plan? Yeah, I know some of these answers, but I don't have written documentation of what I know, so I'll keep it to myself...
lmf,
With all due respect, and I do respect you, these exchanges are boderline folly.
1) Your negative posts, opinion or not, wear on the PPS as you have professed to be with DP.
2) The co. has recently responded to S/H'rs concerns with a written update as well as an interactive CC. I assume you and others don't anticipate weekly or even monthly updates (except for material events, ie: large orders) as this type of hand-holding will never be provided by this or any co.
3) I am happy to see you saw fit to provide kudos for 2 posts out of which I count a hundred or so of your doubting Thomas responses. Tku.
4) re: DP and the bar of production and sales not set too high in favor of his vision ??? Pls excuse me but vision does not provide for debt service, expansion, sales, mkting, new product development or anything beyond ........gee wouldn't it be nice if....... This vision, this ROCK, w/o execution and sales and earnings provides for nothing, nothing beyond a shipwreck.
4) paclitaxol???? R U kidding ????? some pharma dist. is going to pick up a couple drums of pac, that have been sitting in NB and use this ???? H Shite Batman ! this is not a garage sale and if, IF, the pac was so valuable why didn't DP sell it long ago when it was available and the co needed $$$ ?????
This is tooooo funny lmf.
5) Finally, if you think the co so needs surplus equip. from NB sitting in Lagos, make a bid.
This co needs to have production, sales, mkting and dist. Not Pac., not other drugs yrs away from approval, not bldgs @ Shestco, not "vision", not LAWSUITS from self interested parties playing "CHICKEN". Anything else is folly and besides the point, imo.
Be well
BE LONG OR BE WRONGjw
I get knocked down but I get up again, You're never gonna keep me down-jpl
According to the CC, the Nigerian gov't changed terms or otherwise abrugated terms favorable and imposed onerous fees assoc w/ the receipt of property.
In any case and according w/ the CC, why would we spend much needed funds to rescue equipment we do not need. Is this concept to hard to grasp ?
I don't get the Q
The posts you list are facts, plain and simple. They haven't filed any reports, is that not true? I'm stating revenue figures as have been estimated. You think that me posting an opinion that I don't expect any revenue figures is going to help bring this stock down? There needs to be solid information from the company for this thing to get back to were you want it to be and my posts aren't holding it back.
Did you happen to miss the two posts recently where I found positive news from Nigeria?
DP didn't set the bar too high? Obviously you're not familiar with his vision of Xechem...
I have no problem with focusing on the main product, but why would they destroy product sitting in drums in New Brunswick when it could have been sold, even if it meant selling the division (XetaPharm)? Yes, I know this for fact, there were drums of product and now there aren't, if they stored them some place, everyone involved would like to know where they went. There was also a couple of kilos of paclitaxol (look up the price on that) that was apparently tossed as well since no one can find it. The hazmat team that came in removed them. Hardly a good option.
I really don't agree that they don't need the equipment since it's packaging equipment. They've got people dropping pills in bottles by hand when they could have it automated. They might be able to increase production of the API, put can they keep up with bottling if they are doing it by hand? Technically, they don't need it because they are making due now, but they spent the money for the equipment, what's the point of leaving it sit in customs? Two problems: 1). At any moment customs (especially in Nigeria) could auction the contents of the containers and 2). There is roughly $6.3 million worth of equipment in those containers, where would you rather it sit in customs accruing storage fees or on site where they can at least keep an eye on it? I'm concerned about things like rubber hoses and things like o-rings that are probably not built to withstand the heat in those containers.
I'll add this, aren't you in the least bit curious as to who's signature is on the purchase order for that equipment?
the equipment in customs sits there because we do not need it now (RS DID address this in the CC). To retrieve this equip would cause the co to expend needed funds on unneeded items.
Do you have/know the terms of that order?
More often that not, money is due upon shipment/invoice, not upon reciept to end user?
The money they would have to spend, is in dispute based on taxes/Duties impossed by the corrupt gov't, in my understanding, no?
OK, in your words, one negative post after the other, yet there has been no criticism of previous mgmt, your words:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=31358592
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=31359084
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=31357407
Here's a good one:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=31305158
and this:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=31303362
These few are over just a couple days, all negative criticisms of the co, RS and then you claim you do not want the stk to go down.
On a related matter, I see you posting that this s/b an int'l co. w/ a full product line but that RS does not seem to have this in his "plan" First, I won't be a backer of RS' plan unless we see results, this will tell all and it is of no surprise to anyone that so far not much to write home about. But surely DP did not set the bar too high here either.
However, I agree 100% w/ RS' decision to focus 100% of our rather meager resources on Nicosan as success here could fund many other things. This is precisely, imo, what a businessman does when faced w/ a choice and little $, keep the co going until your star product takes off. The strategy you allude to is very familiar here as it is/was DP's strategy: an unfocused chasing of too many projects while succeeding in none. It's called spreading your assets too thinly.
BTW, the equipment in customs sits there because we do not need it now (RS DID address this in the CC). To retrieve this equip would cause the co to expend needed funds on unneeded items. This is consistent w/ RS' plan to focus only on what makes Nicosan work. Your desire to have the equip. sit idly @ Shestco, adding nothing to the bottom line is reminiscent of previous mgmt. Ditto the completion of the buildings also unecc. at this time.
BE LONG OR BE WRONGjw
I get knocked down but I get up again, You're never gonna keep me down-jpl
You may not be defending anyone, but you're throwing a lot of accusations at me, such as trying to tank the stock and not having backup information to support what I say. You've questioned my integrity here by saying that my only reason for being here is questionable. I've repeatedly asked what back up information you want to see, if you want me to show you documents I've downloaded or have been given to me, just ask. If you want copies of checks, I'll get what I can. I can't offer to share emails I've exchanged with certain people because I don't have approval to do so. I could share the voice mail I have from Dr. Inyang of NIPRD...
I'm not here to damage the company, I'm here to find answers. If I find out that Dr. Pandey did things people have said he did, I'll be the first on to admit it publicly. Unfortunately people who have tossed out accusations don't seem to be as willing to admit that they are wrong when those accusations are proven to be false with facts. How many people said that he built a factory in India with equipment he sent there instead of Nigeria? Doesn't it seem coincidental that the story was that equipment sent from here was diverted to India to build a factory and 8 months later we find out that the equipment that was sent from here had been, and still is, sitting in customs? Has anyone stepped forward to say anything about that?
Does is start to cast a shadow on what's been going on here? How about the fact that in a Press Release dated June 4th it was stated that the company had employees in Edison, yet according to one of those employees, they had been laid off. Barbara told numerous callers that the buildings were about to be completed and equipment was being installed, she had to have been told that from someone in management and allowed to release it. Remember, you can't believe everything you read...
I do back a horse in this race and I feel fortunate and honored to be part of his "team". I'm also very much of the belief that Xechem can be an international pharmaceutical company with a decent portfolio of products...
You're right, I don't know how much common stock he owns, I haven't looked, nor asked. I know about the voting stock because we added it up one day.
Checks were made out to Xechem, I know you're of the belief because someone told you that they made the checks out to Dr. Pandey and he kept it, but I've seen copies of many of the checks, not all, but many. Have you seen any or know of anyone that has hard proof that checks were made out to Pandey and not given to Xechem? Toxikon is a company in Boston that did toxicity studies, not an investor. Indian Investors? Not familiar with anyone but one guy that invested from India. If you have proof that something happened that wasn't right, let me know. I'll ask again though, if a check was written out to Dr. Pandey, but deposited in the Xechem account, is there a problem with that? I know the checks from Robbins and Schingo were written to Xechem, not sure about Misra (who was already awarded a $1,000,000 judgment and they are working to get thrown out on technicalities).
lmf, I have said repeatedly that I am not here to defend RS, RP or S. Burg. I do not have a horse in this race but I do have a considerable "bet" placed.
My position is to support the individual(s) that can produce, nothing else. IMO, anyone else that does not share this position is not an investor/owner but something else. And, also imo they will soon be parted from their money.
First, in a public company ownership is defined by shares of the company, nothing else. This is the underpinning of this country's public capital structure.
To say someone is a "bit more of an owner" than the rest of us is romantic not factual.
As to the doc's you have downloaded and Misra,Toxikon,Schingo,Robbins, who did they make their checks out to ? Do you have these downloaded records ? Do you have the recorded checks from the Indian investors ? Who's name was on their checks ?
No, I'm not saying that he did all the work, far from it, but you said they did nothing, I'm saying that they got the ball rolling and had things in the works. I apologize if I made it sound like he did all the work...
No production? Are you aware that they left 2,000 pounds of API when Swift came in? No sales? According to the Quarterly report for Q1 of 07 sales were $130,000, not much behind the estimated says of Q2 of 08. Pandey started from 0, Swift started with a years worth of work and sales coming in, he just never improved sales.
sorry lmf that's the oldest sales excuse on the books. The guy that couldn't produce in a region complains that he did all the work and this new guy came in and took the orders.
Facts were no production and no sales under RP.
Facts are not much better under RS, so far and time is running out.
You're right, probably "his life's work" is too much, but 16 years building a company is a pretty long time. Add to that investing personal money to buy the company originally, then funding it when needed with personal funds, does make him a bit more of an owner that any of us. So technically, no, he doesn't own the company, but he's a major owner of the company. Take yourself back to May of 07 and think about where the company was and where it was headed. Sales were increasing, the facility was being built and plans were in place to get the US Clinical trials underway. Yet you say he did nothing. Where is the company now? Sales have increased because of the State sales, but if you move those out and look at revenues which equate to number of patients on the drug before the states start to distribute you'll see that the number went from $130,000 in Q1 of 07 to an estimated $185,000 in Q2 of 08. That works out to adding something like 900 new patients in 15 months. Now, having states buying will add patients, so that's obviously a good thing.
There are way too many things that are going on right now that don't add up such as the status of the New Jersey office and the employees, rumors of equipment being sent to India, but then finding out it's been sitting in customs in Nigeria, etc.
Keep in mind, the price of the stock was $0.02 when RP was removed, most here have been "wiped out" as you say in the past 13 months when the stock dropped to where it is today...
As for your thoughts of a "back door" attack, all Dr. Swift needed to do with any of the people and companies suing Xechem was work with them. He's saying Toxikon did no work, never called John Schingo just didn't pay him, stopped paying Dr. Misra's interest payments, told Beverly Robbins her loans were illegal, accused Colonel Pandey of going to India for six months without telling anyone and not working and they don't feel Dr. Pandey deserves his deferred compensation. What backup do I have? I've downloaded roughly 300 pages of court documents from Misra's, Colonel Pandey's and Toxikon's court cases, have Robbins' loan documents here and have spoken to her numerous times (and have a copy of the letter she sent to Swift and Mitch Goldsmith that was never responded to). The best thing about the court cases is that their main defense is saying the Leonard Muldry wasn't authorized to accept the summons even though he signed the document that said he was. He also filed an affidavit that said that since 2000 he hadn't been an officer or director of the company, when he was a director in 2004. If you'd like to see any of it, let me know, I won't even charge you the $0.08 per page the Pacer system charged me to download them.
BTW, I also learned the Dr. Swift has apparently moved to California (based on a document he filed in Colonel Pandey's case), so I'm wondering if he and Burg are thinking of moving the office to California since there's apparently no one in the office in Edison...
At what point do the problems the company has today become the responsibility of the current management?
Actually, I think you'll find that many of the states that are buying now were originally contacted and worked with long before the management change, these things don't happen overnight and most of the states came on in the first quarter of 08.
Are you saying that he should have been selling the drug before it was approved for sale?
He was removed because of allegations of misusing funds and a variety of other things. Things they haven't been able to prove to date. This isn't about not getting things done, he was getting things done.
My concern on the state sales is who's going to follow up with them and the patients? Are they just having open distribution without any education? They bought in first quarter, have they bought more? How many patients have the drugs been distributed to? Why is sales to states the only sales plan discussed? They can't work with anyone else in Nigeria such as doctors or hospitals? Aren't you a bit concerned leaving the work the company should be doing in the hands of politicians? I'm concerned that the states are buying the drug and it won't be a program, but a feel-good photo op and then forgotten, unless Xechem is part of the distribution and follow up. It's entirely possible that they are, but did he mention any of that in the Press Release or Conference Call?
WOW, nice to be back from a little vacation, feel so rested, lol.
how many states did RP line up during his tenure, during the 5 + years Niprisan/Nicosan was being administered on a ltd basis, pre-approval ?
Look, it is not a personal issue w/ RP (unless the India court finds him guilty) it is a matter of not doing what was necc. to move the co to the next level. Period.
CEO's, many of which spent 40+ years of their lives in one company that, when given the chance to lead fail, are removed by their BOD. Sadly, it happens everyday and is necc for the survival and prosperity of the enterprise.
"You don't think that his life's work, of getting this medication to the sufferer's of the world, counts for anything?"
First, this is not his life's work, he has many credits to his name.
Second, and most importantly, this is a public company: owned by the public, that's you, me and everyone else here. This is not a private company owned by RP and owing to him for his efforts. We have funded this company with our money. Some have been wiped out due to the promises of RP and S. Burg.
This is our company and if not run well by the mgr's who work for us RP or RS then we will have nothing, zero, zip, zilch, Nada.
No, having funded and having approved (which is what they are waiting for) are two very different things...
Then you could say that 36 states are buying, if they fund, I'm sure someone in the office is thinking about it. I'm sure they've made contact with all 36 states and the Federal Government, but you can't put "if they fund" in the books...
Per the CC three states have ordered and 4 more have placed orders that have yet to fund.
Pls re-read my post "if they fund" and review the CC.
40-love
Lets play Doubles...
METS06/Drifter...
You wanna be Fiats Partner?
July 11, 2006 06:30 AM US Eastern Timezone
Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo Launches Xechem's Sickle Cell Drug, NICOSAN(TM), in Nigeria
NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--July 11, 2006--Xechem International, Inc. (OTC BB:XKEM). Xechem International joins in congratulating its subsidiary, Xechem Pharmaceuticals Nigeria, on the successful launch of its new Sickle Cell drug, NICOSAN(TM), at a ceremony held on July 6th at Xechem Park, SHESTCO Complex, Abuja, Nigeria. The launching ceremony that was presided over by Nigeria's President, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, was broadcasted live throughout Nigeria. Days earlier, the drug was approved by Nigeria's drug and regulatory authority, the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC). Xechem has obtained the exclusive worldwide rights to manufacture, market and sell NICOSAN(TM) under a licensing agreement with Nigeria's National Institute for Pharmaceutical Research and Development (NIPRD), a federal governmental agency whose scientists are credited with developing the drug.
You don't think that his lifes work, of getting this medication to the sufferer's of the world, counts for anything?
Just throw him out, because of some unsubstantiated claims?!?
I'd like to see them proven, or even allegated...But SWIFT WILL NO COMMENT...
I'd also like an update from SWIFT for his "Plan moving forward"
Nice serve...
15-15
I know we aren't playing doubles here, but I'd like to ask a question and I'll go away...
"seven states ordering"?
Do you know something we don't?
I'd respond to the rest, but it's not my game, I'm just curious what you know that Dr. Swift doesn't because he's told us three states.
As I have pm'd you, I am not here to defend RS, RP, Burg or anyone else. I am for WHOEVER CAN SUCCEED.
RP had his chance. The BOD threw him out.
RS, after one yr has not knocked one out of the park yet, seven states ordering, base hits, doubles and maybe a triple, if they fund. New mfg process. Dealing w/ the end run, back door raid by the Pandey clan. Keeping Alembic and other creditors at bay. Tracking down (w/help) our assets in India.
That's five.
Your serve.
Don't know about you but I've been for privatizing roads, bridges, tunnels, airports etc for 20 years. Sounds good to me.
Wow - we actually agree...
Now, back to our previous program...
I'm bored, and have a few more minutes...
Tell me one positive thing Swift has done since taking over here?
One thing...
I'll let you serve 1st.
haha
previous mgmt: NY Spitzer, XKEM RP
current mgmt: NY Paterson, XKEM RS
Aside from Spitzer's wierdside, see any similarities ?
Both previous mgr's got us into this leaving current mgr's to clean-up.
Don't know about you but I've been for privatizing roads, bridges, tunnels, airports etc for 20 years. Sounds good to me.
Actually, no, not really fair enough.
You say that my posts are shot from the hip with no back up, yet I just read back roughly a month and am having a hard time finding anything that's without back up. Unless you're talking about posts that are my opinions, in which I state are my opinion. For instance, I state that there seems to be no sense of urgency in the management, which is my opinion. If you've got problems with something else I've said and want to know what I base my opinions on, feel free to ask. I have no problem with anyone scrutinizing anything I say. If I'm wrong, I'll admit it.
Nothing taken personal, I know that you and a lot of people have "real money" at risk, also understand that Dr. Pandey has 16 years and a few million in personal funds involved in Xechem and right now it would appear that the company is falling apart (which, is my personal opinion...).
July 30, 2008
ALBANY - Warning of an approaching economic calamity, Gov. Paterson yesterday called an emergency session of the state Legislature - and raised the specter that New York may have to sell off roads, bridges and tunnels to close a massive budget deficit.
In a rare televised address, the Democratic governor cited "private-public partnerships" involving the sale of state assets - widely condemned by critics as fiscal gimmickry - as one way to stem a tide of red ink brought on by the sagging economy and woes on Wall Street.
DICKER: Grim Dave Seems All Talk But No Action
EDITORIAL: The Gov's Fine Talk
"We can't wait and hope that this problem will resolve itself," Paterson said. "These times call for action, and today I promise you there will be action."
Profit-tax collections from the state's 16 biggest banks, which were at $173 million in June 2007, fell to $5 million last month, Paterson noted. That's a shocking 97 percent plunge.
But the governor's five-minute speech offered few specific solutions to a three-year budget deficit. The gap has ballooned to $26.2 billion from $21.5 billion - a whopping 22 percent increase - in just 90 days.
Next year alone, the state expects to face a budget deficit of $6.4 billion, up from a projection in March of $5 billion.
Paterson promised to examine ways to trim the state work force and consider deeper budget cuts beyond the 3.3 percent he ordered after taking office this spring.
"We're going to end the legislators' vacations and bring them back to Albany to reprioritize the way we manage New York state's finances," he said.
Paterson said he would ask lawmakers during the session on Aug. 19 to take up his proposal to cap school property taxes at 4 percent a year.
In a nod to the tax cap's chief opponent, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver (D-Manhattan), the governor also promised action on Silver's pet proposal to increase home-heating subsidies.
But Silver reacted coolly.
"If it is our intention to ask working families to shoulder the burden of these cuts, we must ensure that our most affluent citizens share that burden," he said.
Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos (R-LI) cautioned Paterson that any cuts to school funding were off the table.
The "sale" of state assets has been tried in the past during difficult economic times and has been met with condemnation from budget watchdogs.
The most famous - or infamous - example: former Gov. Mario Cuomo's sale of Attica prison to a semi-independent state agency in 1991 to raise $200 million. Many critics noted that the bond sale cost the state hundreds of millions extra over the next few years.
"One gets a little concerned when 'selling off state assets' and 'budget deficits' get mentioned in the same sentence," said Elizabeth Lynam, a state policy expert with the Citizens Budget Commission.
"If it's used to close a budget gap, it's a one-shot. It's doesn't help you in the long run. It's a fiscal gimmick."
Mayor Bloomberg last night praised Paterson's effort "to tackle the serious problems we face" this year.
"The governor demonstrated that he is ready to stand up to the interest groups that will no doubt protest before the State House, just as they took to the steps of City Hall earlier this year," Bloomberg said.
brendan.scott@nypost.com
How much?
NO, plaintiffs w/ judgements against the co. That would be the Pandey clan and friends.
Back door raid.
If you think RP and co. are not using lawyers to position themselves to be the possible recipients of corp. assets then I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale, interested ?
BE LONG OR BE WRONGjw
I get knocked down but I get up again, You're never gonna keep me down-jpl
don't tell me what to do and mind your own business. Ole tubmleweed can misspell his own posts in his own defense.
BE LONG OR BE WRONGjw
I get knocked down but I get up again, You're never gonna keep me down-jpl
dullard - Noun - Old-fashioned a dull or stupid person
Guess you'll have a hard time continuing this riviting conversation then.
Persons true motives come out when they can't even carry on a civilized conversation...
Have a good evenin !
LAWSUITS THAT MAY FORCE THE CO. INTO BK. HMMMMMMMMMMMMMM, JUST WHO WOULD BENEFIT FROM THIS ?
Swift?
With all due respect <sincerely>..
Be specific, what exactly are your issues of scrutiny?
I appreciate your efforts however your public remarks ARE subject to scrutiny.
You also stated this on the other board...
Problem is as I understand it, RP made solicitations for $$$ both here and in India and accepted checks w/o booking them. Checks that may have been made out to him.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=30665996
Can you prove that allegation?
FOFL, you of course are free to "ramble" on as is your wont and self chosen moniker. However, I am unaware of anyone who regards you or your posts w/ any seriousness.
As for my motives, my posts and actions speak for themselves. I'll be happy to debate them publicly w/ you if you care to bring a specific charge worth examining.
Be well tumbleweed
lmf,
Don't take it personally. I believe many of your recent posts have been "shot from the hip". Critical of the co and the BOD W/O back up. I neither have the time nor the inclination to review, cut and paste your posts to educate those that do not read the bd themselves.
As to your interests in XKEM, I'm for anyone.......ANYONE that can help make this a success as I have real money at risk here. In this regard I appreciate your efforts however your public remarks ARE subject to scrutiny.
Fair enough ?
I stand by my post and I am NOT off base.
Prove me wrong.
We stand up to scrutiny just fine, Fiat. It is you who doesn't and this post I am responding to is a continuing example of why. I don't post here becasue A) I really didn't know it was here and most important, B) I CAN'T post here because I don't carry a paid subscription anymore. Not because of anything else. While I suspect DD and EQ are in the same boat, I do not speak for them.
As far as I am concerned you are one of the worst at posting half-truths and trying to make false implications as far as xkem goes. In my mind, when considing your posts over the last year or so, If indeed you are being truthful about managing other peoples investments, then you have possible gotten yourself in so deep with these people and lossing their money that you are doing anything to try to cause xkem to go up to get you out of a bind.
However, I could care less if I am correct about this or not. In either case I do look at you as one with a bellyfull of self importance.
JMO
Tex
Not only is it clear that I'm aligned with him, I've actually said just that, I'm not hiding anything. I will be meeting with him in about two hours to discuss our next moves for both GDPAU and our efforts to help Xechem. I'll say it again, yes, I am aligned with DP, I believe in what he was doing with Xechem last year.
Without backup? What would you like to see? What information do you want from me to prove my positions here?
Without DD? You think I'm making this stuff up? Show me some proof that the allegations against DP are true to contradict what I've found that disputes it and we can talk.
You're right, I don't have many shares, I'm not here for a personal investment, I'm here because I want to help make Xechem a profitable company. I've committed to going to Nigeria and help turn around the sales and marketing efforts of the company if Dr. Pandey does return. I've spent numerous hours on the phone with investors, sat through numerous hours of meeting related to Xechem and have written far more about Xechem's history and it's future than I care to think about.
Tell me what you would do if you were in the shoes of the Colonel, Dr. Misra, Dr. Pandey? Would you just sit back and allow the company to not pay what is owed you? If you were Toxikon and hadn't been paid nearly $400,000, would you not file a lawsuit to get paid?
If you'd like to debate our respective DD here, I'm all for it... If you'd like specific information, just ask, I'll tell you what I know or what I can find out.
Followers
|
25
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
2251
|
Created
|
07/05/07
|
Type
|
Premium
|
Moderator clrmng | |||
Assistants TheRaveninexile LOCHUTE |
Posts Today
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
2251
|
Posters
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Assistants
|
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |