Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What? That was a lot of nothingness, it’s unnecessary and silly. The company provided information, I’m not thrilled but I can deal with it.
FYI, I don’t do conspiracy theories, mx.
(Updated)There’s always tomorrow until there isn’t..will see updated-OS-soon-enough.
It’s considerate/good-intentioned to put “(Updated)” in front of an updated message so any future references to it will know that the person responding was given opportunity to respond accordingly with updates information.
Just so everyone knows, this message was updated only because the one preceding it was as well and has not yet displayed this fact.
Nonsense. That’s why you’ve been posting like there’s no tomorrow, communicating to yourself over and over. We have info from the company now, it’s so much better than countless conspiracy theories.
Nice way to misinterpret what I said.
Sounds like a fancy way of saying buy low - sell high
This is why I do it..for-the many that can’t.
I wouldn’t recommend it..price was inflated to sell to new-money by trader-groups…profits were used to buy new shares at deflated prices…just in time..let’s see what the updated OS shows.
Keep buying then. If you are so sure it's going to moon, then these prices are an absolute bargain. If you're not slappin' that ask, All your rhetoric is BS.
That really goes for any of the true believers out there.
Add it to the laundry list.
It beats you communicating the same thing over and over to yourself.
So many members..to communicate same thing to eachother lol
Ah… North Carolina. I knew it was one of the Carolina’s.
That's what I read. And the deal for pand ownership in Charlotte NC fell through
I was wondering why MX was turning up the ‘crazy’ volume …
They are restating their financials losing / removing the land purchase they had supposedly done ( was it South Carolina?) reducing their overall assets. Also stating they don’t have enough money to get people to to control / manage disclosures (I’m assuming 10Qs and 10Ks) and they don’t have enough external independent directors ? Well that’s not good also if they want to do Nasdaq eh?
At least they had the foresight to set expectations. SMH.
Of course maybe they are spending all money and effort for vume? …
“The impact of this restatement on the Company's third quarter 2023 unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements will be a $1,226,000 decrease in Total Assets and $1,226,000 decrease in Mezzanine Equity on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2023. There is no effect on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations, Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Deficit or Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023.
The Company entered into an agreement to acquire land per the Real estate Land Purchase and JV Real estate Development Partnership Agreement dated July 14, 2023. It was management’s understanding the due diligence was completed and that the Company could record the acquisition on its books and records as of this date. Subsequently, the Company learned of an undisclosed mortgage on the subject land that would have impaired the land and also discovered the inability to use as consideration its Series E Preferred Stock. Both parties on April 12, 2024 agreed to cancel the transaction.
Management has determined that the errors described above do not change management's previous conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2023. Due to the lack of personnel and outside directors, management concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective as of such date. The Company anticipates that with further resources, the Company will expand both management and the board of directors with additional officers and independent directors in order to provide sufficient disclosure controls and procedures.”
expect amended quarterlies for Q3 '23 by Apr 19. No mention of the timing of the annuals...
"the Company intends to restate the aforementioned financial statements by amending its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2023, as soon as reasonably practicable. The Company expects to file amended quarterly reports on or before April 19, 2024."
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/conv_pdf?id=17452013&guid=LsQ-kKwg3idfJth
8k out! Expect 10k out before April 19!
End of day …. From that calendar it looks like today is when the NT filings are due
Not broke but busted..this board has been busted…narratives by trader-groups have come out to play now that they’ve contributed some significant volume trading
Same to you and almost everyone!
Hahhahahaaa. lol
He doesn’t own much and is just here to create buzz. AI GG. Fodder. Anything to keep the board active I guess.
Good luck to you / us.
I do all this for the individuals who can’t
Your claim of“false-conspiracy”debunked with next OS-update…it directly contradicts trader-group-claims
VF. He’s trolling with you/us. He knows he’s incorrect that’s why he’s making shhh up to suit his whatever narrative. He can’t even support a single piece of evidence or link to support his claims. I’m sure he’ll have a reply for that but it’s smoke and mirrors.
He makes the board look bad and unfortunately feeding into his BS doesn’t help.
If the SP goes up, we make out… not him. He’s got a long way to go to get very linked in return. Let him be. It’s obvious what he is here.
Have a good day.
Like you’re doing right now with the false conspiracy theory, as always.
Their continued false/flawed narratives is more evidence piled on
That makes no sense. My questions are
Show me there’s been no dilution?
And while you’re at it, show me where I said?
“dilution happening AVG guys this not good”
as you incorrectly quoted me saying.
I didn’t say any of that, you’re just using it to cover for your false claims, again.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174234897&txt2find=Happening
You just posted to YOURSELF:
You know you lost this argument..next update significantly-exposes this.
The time period of no dilution..alongside AVG dilution claims.
Ditto, nice try, it’s not working. You’re avoiding the questions I’ve asked you.
Show me there’s been no dilution? And while you’re at it, show me where I said
“dilution happening AVG guys this not good”
as you incorrectly quoted me saying.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174234897&txt2find=Happening
So-much trader-group narrative for such simple rule..lol nice try
No, that’s actually you who’s stuck with the misinformation you’ve incorrectly presented, MX.
Now they’re scrambling cuz they’re stuck lol
What? You just made up your own rules that no one has heard of, that’s not how it works. Dilution is real, you post it all the time when shares are added to the OS.
Quote:
Section 404: Weighted Average Price/Special Pricing Formula Transactions
Q404.1: Member BD1 executes multiple trades to satisfy a customer order and then trades with the customer at a price equal to the volume-weighted average cost of the original trades plus a net difference in accordance with a net trading agreement with its customer. How should BD1 report the trade with its customer?
A404.1:The original trades and the customer leg of the transaction should be reported to the tape, and the report of the customer leg should include the weighted average price (.W) modifier. For example, member BD1 receives an order from a customer to buy 5,000 shares of ABCD security and accumulates the shares through five separate trades. Each of these five trades is reported to the tape. BD1 then sells the 5,000 shares of ABCD to its customer at its volume-weighted average cost with a net difference to reflect the compensation agreement between BD1 and its customer. BD1 should report the sale of 5,000 shares to its customer to the tape with the weighted average price modifier.
I’m looking ahead, not to the past..though past data has significantly contributed to the evidence against trading-group fraud
No, you haven’t, you’ve made up your own convoluted rules, again. Here’s actual rules from a regulator:
Quote:
Section 404: Weighted Average Price/Special Pricing Formula Transactions
Q404.1: Member BD1 executes multiple trades to satisfy a customer order and then trades with the customer at a price equal to the volume-weighted average cost of the original trades plus a net difference in accordance with a net trading agreement with its customer. How should BD1 report the trade with its customer?
A404.1:The original trades and the customer leg of the transaction should be reported to the tape, and the report of the customer leg should include the weighted average price (.W) modifier. For example, member BD1 receives an order from a customer to buy 5,000 shares of ABCD security and accumulates the shares through five separate trades. Each of these five trades is reported to the tape. BD1 then sells the 5,000 shares of ABCD to its customer at its volume-weighted average cost with a net difference to reflect the compensation agreement between BD1 and its customer. BD1 should report the sale of 5,000 shares to its customer to the tape with the weighted average price modifier.
Look at chart if you’re historian all-a-sudden..all the data contributing to charts is by traders. All my shares have qualified capital gains so I have not contributed to any data on the chart over 2 years. All traders.
I’ve skillfully outlined what next OS-update means..watch and learn.
Nope. No ode what you’re yapping about.
Last two years are the proof. Especially with your constant yapping about owning 10% of 1% anticipating OS of 1.6 billion when it just hit 1 billion OS. Where is it now ? lol.
You can GG all you want. Everyone here knows your M O. (and it’s not telling the truth).
Byeeeeee
Now you’re stuck..the proof will-have-been presented..you’re screwed when update comes and shares increased OS. You’re screwed if they don’t too since you’re supporting the lead AVG updater supposedly exposing dilution except that was proven a failed metric.
Sure. I agree with that. But that’s not happening here. Unless you are not in touch with the dates of Tptw stated PRs and their timelines? Is that the case? Are you out of touch with what the company has stated?
There’s no legitimate defense for trader-groups securities-fraud against TPTW
Bwahahhaaaaa lol. Right. Nothing to do with March 31 acquisition of Tekmovil that was missed at all ( that you were promoting)! Now telling that sweet sweet lie to squirm your way out of it again. Wash rinse repeat with the promoter making stories up to sell on those pump dates.
Nice story AI GG.
Let’s see if today’s the day they re-inflate price
Followers
|
657
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
56
|
Posts (Total)
|
163146
|
Created
|
05/18/10
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators peafunke joe botts JMC$ sloppyjones StarlingChaser |
Nothing in the contents transmitted on this board should be construed as an investment advisory, nor should it be used to make investment decisions. There is no express or implied solicitation to buy or sell securities. The author(s) may have positions in the stocks or financial relationships with the company or companies discussed and may trade in the stocks mentioned. Readers are advised to conduct their own due diligence prior to considering buying or selling any stock. All information should be considered for information purposes only. No stock exchange has approved or disapproved of the information here.
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |