Site Suggestions

[RMS555]

Site Suggestion: when there is a post that has been reviewed by iHub Admin for being off-topic/spam/personal attack etc. there should also be an explanation on why iHub Admin kept that post removed.

The iHub user has no way of knowing why iHub Admin thought that post was off topic, even though the iHub user highly believes the post was on topic.

.

[RMS555]

Site Suggestion: "Stickies" on a company message board should expire after a year (especially "Board Warning" ones from iHub Admin). If someone wants to repost that same "Stickie" they can copy and paste into a new post for a new date. What is the use for information that is outdated being on the top and highlighted?


.

[janice shell]

If you dont care why even respond to that original post about not letting someone click emojis if they have never posted on a message board?

Because I'm a really shallow person. No real interest in anything of value or use.

And again, why would I want to get you banned from this board? Why would I care about that, given I don't care about anything else?

[RMS555]

If you dont care why even respond to that original post about not letting someone click emojis if they have never posted on a message board? Its ok if you were confused about those two separate Site Suggestions, I also get confused real easy. Or are you here on Site Suggestions just to antagonize a certain user.

janice shell was:
a) confused about two separate Site Suggestions
b) here to antagonize a certain iHubber
c) trying to get a certain user banned from a general discussion board again
d) all of the above

my answer is d.

what is your answer?

.

[janice shell]

I pretty profoundly don't care either way.

[RMS555]

Question: Do you agree that someone should be able to click ❌️ ⛔️ on posts even though they have never posted on any message board (while having an account for over 2 years)?

I believe a "dead" account is a "dead" account and shouldnt be able to use emojis unless they post at least once a month. That seems fair to me, how about you?

Thanks in Advance for your response.

.

[janice shell]

Both seem intended to achieve the same end. But as I said, IHub is quite good at rooting out multiple aliases.

[RMS555]

Apparently you are confused. It was two different Site Suggestions that you replied to!

Post 624:

Site Suggestion: iHub should verify all iHubbers again by having a code sent to the iHubbers phone.

It will weed out all the iHubbers that use multiple aliases and it will also weed out the aliases that are just here clicking emojis without ever posting on a board. That brings up another Site Suggestion (next post).

(bold emphasis mine) https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176251432

Post 625:

Site Suggestion: Before a new iHubber can click emojis or use Private Messaging they need to post at least once (and also keep posting at least once a month). There are multiple aliases that will click emojis but have never posted even though their alias has been up for years.

The ones that havent posted but click emojis make it look like its a fake alias/account. If an iHubber hasn't posted anything, then they shouldnt be able to emoji posts either. Im pretty sure this is the case with Moderators even though that "rule" is followed haphazardly.

(bold emphasis mine) https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176251505


You replied to two different Site Suggestions and that is why you got two different answers! I hope I cleared up your confusion.

.

[janice shell]

First you say:

I specifically stated in the next paragraph, the first 11 words:
It will weed out all the iHubbers that use multiple aliases

And now you tell me:

Just an FYI: that Suggestion wasn't about "catching" multiple aliases.

[RMS555]

Just an FYI: that Suggestion wasn't about "catching" multiple aliases. Apparently you have selective reading. Please reread that Suggestion and respond as to how you feel about it!

Thanks

.

[RMS555]

FFS please read the whole message before asking a question. I specifically stated in the next paragraph, the first 11 words:

It will weed out all the iHubbers that use multiple aliases

I dont think I am demanding anything..... it is just a Site Suggestion as the post states in the first two words, lol.

.

[janice shell]

Just an FYI: IHub is really quite good at catching multiple aliases. They don't need your help.

[janice shell]

iHub should verify all iHubbers again by having a code sent to the iHubbers phone.

Verify them as what?

You seem to be demanding rather a lot. Especially as a free member.

[RMS555]

Site Suggestion: Before a new iHubber can click emojis or use Private Messaging they need to post at least once (and also keep posting at least once a month). There are multiple aliases that will click emojis but have never posted even though their alias has been up for years.

The ones that havent posted but click emojis make it look like its a fake alias/account. If an iHubber hasn't posted anything, then they shouldnt be able to emoji posts either. Im pretty sure this is the case with Moderators even though that "rule" is followed haphazardly.


.

[RMS555]

Site Suggestion: iHub should verify all iHubbers again by having a code sent to the iHubbers phone.

It will weed out all the iHubbers that use multiple aliases and it will also weed out the aliases that are just here clicking emojis without ever posting on a board. That brings up another Site Suggestion (next post).


.

[RMS555]

Site Suggestion: Posts that call someone a "fool," "moron," "idiot," etc. should be a basis for removal. There are other ways to address someone that is posting to buy a stock (or even asking questions about a company).

iHubbers are here to invest their own money the way they please. If they lose their own money, so be it. No reason to demean other iHubbers for not doing their own DD/Research.


.

[IH Admin [Shelly]]

Noted

[mauiguy2]

In the "old days", it was easy to locate who has been banned from a board and for how long. I can't find this feature now. Does it still exist? If so, where is it? Thanks!

[RMS555]

Site Suggestions: If an iHubber wants to become a Moderator on a certain board whomever approves/disapproves should ask "why do you think you would be a good Moderator?" before that iHubbers request is approved/denied.

The reason I state this is because a certain iHubber has tried to become a Moderator on a certain board because the iBox information is not being updated. Some Moderators aren't doing their "job" and the ones that want to do the "job" aren't being allowed to.....

If anyone would like to know what board im talking about feel free to ask and check for yourself! Basic information is outdated and recent information is not being posted on the iBox. There are also Moderator spots open.

Thanks!


.

[IH Admin [Shelly]]

Noted

[RMS555]

Site Suggestion: There should be a double review for posts that are being reported as "off topic," "personal attack," "spam," etc......


The reason I state this is because Mod Squad or Admin remove a post that states:

(middle finger emoji) Jonathan Bishop and Your Pumpers!

which has everything to do with a certain company but leave posts up that have been reported multiple times as being off-topic/personal attack that state:

Wannabe.

or

rinse and repeat bagholder.

.

[IH Admin [Shelly]]

It's really kind of hard to get blocked by Admin. Once the Member accomplishes that (generally after at least one warning) then that just means that Admin has decided it's no longer worth their time or effort to try to help them further based on the Member's choice to harrass, insult, aruge incessantly with, etc.

Now, you've made your point here. It's been heard. Any further on this topic will likely result in a ban from this board.

[RMS555]

Wrong..... iHub Admins have me blocked, I can only PM one iHub Geek.

I wont tell you how it started, but "the" iHub Admin remembers.

So to get back to Site Suggestions: iHub Admins shouldn't be able to block iHubbers from private messaging and vise versa. Im pretty sure that is what my post started with but apparently you misunderstood that sentence.

How should I word the next post on Site Suggestions? I cannot PM iHub Admin because that user has me blocked or I have blocked them. Thanks

.

[janice shell]

There needs to be a way for communication between iHub Admins and iHub users.

There is. All members, free or paying, can send PMs to the admins.

[RMS555]

iHub Admins should not be able to block iHub users from private messaging and vice versa......

There needs to be a way for communication between iHub Admins and iHub users.


.

[Skankhunt43]

This guy is harassing myself and others in private messages. Can you ban his account?

[Skankhunt43]

Yeah that's possible. Or maybe you aren't worth having a serious conversation with. Stop cussing people out in private messages every time kegs goes down.

[RMS555]

iHub Admins should not be able to block iHub users from private messaging and vice versa...... It seems like there is a certain iHub Admin that wakes up in the middle of the night just to read/remove posts from a certain iHub user.

There needs to be a way for communication between parties.


.

[exisnet]

My mistake, first search came up with a quote only... found the board. ty

[IH Admin [Shelly]]

If you're saying that you'd like so see a new board, anyone can create a board. Go to Menu/Boards/Stocks/Create a New Board (right hand side).

If you mean something else, let me know.

[gdog]

I see I'm not the only one that found COP on scan this wk. Will be watching real close Monday.

[exisnet]

Need all NYSE and Nasdaq ticker boards - COP - no board

[Redoocs]

Respectfully, last comment from me.
DWAC was almost all political comments about how much some hated Trump and wanted the stock to tank because he was involved. Eventhough politics aren't allowed, whenever Trump is involved, politics and his policies are going to be mentioned. And again, if I remember roughly 4/5 mods were anti Trump and wanted to see the stock tank because of him. I don't know about the comments now because since I was banned I haven't returned to look at recent comments.
I just wanted to make some cash there.
Good luck, take care and enjoy your day.

[Homebrew]

All stock boards are no politics. That would have included DWAC. Some are labeled "No Politics" for emphasis.

....First, two years ago, if I remember correctly and I might not, it was called DWAC and wasn't a no politics board.

[Redoocs]

A couple of things. First, two years ago, if I remember correctly and I might not, it was called DWAC and wasn't a no politics board.
And, when the companies main shareholder is the former and soon to be next president, it is hard not to inject some form of politics because of his policies which can make or break the PPS into the discussion because you either love him or hate him.
Now, I don't vote for an R or D, I vote for the M party. The party that I think is going to make me the most money with their policies.
Enjoy your day.

[Homebrew]

DJT is a "No Politics" board. Some people ignore that rule, then complain. Always someone else's fault.

It was because the mods were against the person who started the company and deleted almost everything I posted to defend my position in the company. Which made me look like I was violating something, when really they just hated me trying to make some cash there.

[Redoocs]

It was because the mods were against the person who started the company and deleted almost everything I posted to defend my position in the company. Which made me look like I was violating something, when really they just hated me trying to make some cash there.

[Redoocs]

I did. When you are on a site where the mods disagree with you on you taking a position in a company they lost money on, think is a piece of shit and you defend it, they will delete your comments. With the site they banned me from, 5 out of the 6 mods hated the person running the company and had no problems stating their opinions and deleting most that went against their agenda and personal opinion.

[IH Admin [Shelly]]

I still think you're confused. On stock boards, people aren't banned because someone disagrees with them. Restrictions/bans are put in place because of TOS violations/deleted posts.

[Redoocs]

Just what did I post that admin disagreed with? I got PMs from mods stating that they disagreed with my position, hated the stock and who ran it. I also got a one post a day ban for defending my position in the company.

[gdog]

there was no post to me you need to read the post of the ole timers there they post when they bought when thye sold just like i did. i know cause I was one of them.

[Homebrew]

I don't know what the original posts were, but there are posts to you asking you to stay on topic.

what was off topic?

[gdog]

what was off topic?

[IH Admin [Shelly]]

It's a stock specific board and the Mods didn't ban you, Admin did.

[Homebrew]

Looks like you annoyed them with OT posts.

I was banned from a thread for no reason
go and take a look for yourselves and see if I broke any rules. https://investorshub.advfn.com/BOUNCE-2346

[Homebrew]

You can request review.

...some mods think they are something special and deleted comments that are relevant but go against their personal agenda or opinion.

[Redoocs]

They are there to enforce the rules. They should know better than to do something to get thrown in jail. With all due respect, they should know better and be relieved of being a mod.

[Redoocs]

I was. The site is DJT which I am invested in. I was banned for stating my opinion about the stock from the real DJT haters that are mods. I am invested to make some cash, not push my political beliefs on anyone there. Although politics do influence stocks. Just look at the spike in the market after the election.
Enjoy your day.

[gdog]

I know this won't faze you but until you at least look into why an assitant can ban me without a reason I won't post on IHUB I have to keep
hub open because I own a couple of stocks and this is where I get my info on them from ( and I do appreciate hub for that) but I sure don't have to post, hope u have a great day Shelly 20 yrs on a message board and banned for no reson

[IH Admin [Shelly]]

Mods are not automatically removed when they're suspended. Much of it depends on the reason for the suspension.