Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Fire DeMarco NOW
On Thursday Housing Secretary Sean Donovan stated, “We believe, the president believes, that the decision that Ed DeMarco made is wrong.” That’s not enough. President Obama has the power and obligation to remove DeMarco. In failing to do so, it’s President Obama who must face our anger and frustration for his inaction.
write the President...tell him to FIRE DeMarco NOW
Going to dust this off and post some optimism...
http://www.andrewtobias.com/cgi-local/display_col.pl?120315&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+AndrewTobias+%28Andrew+Tobias%29
Thanks Metacomet!
RIP Coug.
No time to run this failure of a thread.
Just time for our SI thread.
http://siliconinvestor.advfn.com/subject.aspx?subjectid=55094
Come by if you wish.
Well you're a fine humanoid.
So there.
Happy New Year to you too good friend! That was a fine card.
My best to those with a good heart.
http://www.jacquielawson.com/viewcard.asp?code=2165954197481&source=jl999
You be rather ignorant you be.
Keith nailed it tonight...
Medical mobster protection money.
Make us pay so they can take our money and later say they can deny the claims. what a deal for them.
They just keep sucking the money up to the top.
Nothing about what is going on in this administration is sane. They're putting something in the koolaid they didn't use before. Everybody seems like an idiot.
That make believe tug of war good cop bad cop has run its course. Time to give us the option to fire the reps.
Obviously the vote is useless. We're just voting for who receives corporate bonuses for voting their way.
All the President's Climategate Deniers
Michelle Malkin
Wednesday, December 02, 2009
"The science is settled," we've been told for decades by zealous proponents of manmade global warming hysteria. Thanks to an earth-shaking hacking scandal across the pond, we now have mountains of documents from the world's leading global warming advocacy center that show the science is about as settled as a southeast Asian tsunami. You won't be surprised by the Obama administration's response to Climategate.
With pursed lips and closed eyes and ears, the White House is clinging to the old eco-mantra: The science is settled.
Never mind all the devastating new information about data manipulation, intimidation and cult-like coverups to "hide the decline" in global temperatures over the last half-century, they say. The science is settled.
Never mind what The Atlantic's Clive Crook, after wading through the climate science e-mail files of the U.K.'s Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, called the overpowering "stink of intellectual corruption" -- combined with mafia-like suppression of dissent, suppression of evidence and methods, and "plain statistical incompetence" exposed by the document trove. The science is settled.
Never mind the expedient disappearance of mounds of raw weather station data that dissenting scientists were seeking through freedom of information requests from the Climatic Research Unit. The science is settled.
In March, President Obama made a grandiose show of putting "science" above "politics" when lifting the ban on government-funded human embryonic stem cell research. "Promoting science isn't just about providing resources -- it's about protecting free and open inquiry," he said during the signing ceremony. "It's about letting scientists like those who are here today do their jobs, free from manipulation or coercion, and listening to what they tell us, even when it's inconvenient -- especially when it's inconvenient. It is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda -- and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology."
Yet, the pro-sound science president has surrounded himself with radical Climategate deniers who have spent their entire professional careers "settling" manmade global warming disaster science through fear mongering, intimidation and ridicule of opponents.
-- Science czar John Holdren, who will testify on Capitol Hill this week at a hearing on Climategate, infamously hyped weather catastrophes and demographic disasters in the 1970s with his population control freak pals Paul and Anne Ehrlich. He made a public bet against free-market economist Julian Simon, predicting dire shortages of five natural resources as a result of feared overconsumption. He lost on all counts. No matter.
Holdren's failure didn't stop him from writing forcefully about mass sterilization and forced abortion "solutions" to a fizzling, sizzling, overpopulated planet. And it didn't stop him from earning a living making more dire predictions.
In 1986, Ehrlich credited Holdren with forecasting that "carbon-dioxide climate-induced famines could kill as many as a billion people before the year 2020." He went on to Harvard and the White House. On the "Late Show with David Letterman" earlier this year, Holdren fretted that his son "might not see snow!"
Canada Free Press (CFP) columnist and Canadian climatologist Dr. Tim Ball notes that Holdren turned up in the Climategate files belittling the work of astrophysicists Sallie Baliunas and Willie Soon at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in the Solar, Stellar and Planetary Sciences Division. Holdren put "Harvard" in sneer quotes when mocking a research paper Baliunas and Soon published in 2003 showing that "the 20th century is probably not the warmest nor a uniquely extreme climatic period of the last millennium." First, deny. Next, deride.
-- Energy Secretary Steven Chu picked derision as his weapon earlier this year when peddling the Obama administration's greenhouse-gas emission policy. "The American public … just like your teenage kids, aren't acting in a way that they should act," The Wall Street Journal quoted Chu. He dismissed dissent by asserting that "there's very little debate" about the impact of "green energy" policy on the economy.
There's "very little debate," of course, because dissenters get crushed.
-- The Obama team's chief eco-dissent crusher is climate czar Carol Browner. She oversaw the destruction of Environmental Protection Agency computer files in brazen violation of a federal judge's order during the Clinton years requiring the agency to preserve its records.
Over the past year, the EPA has stifled the dissent of Alan Carlin, a senior research analyst at the agency who questioned the administration's reliance on outdated research on the health effects of greenhouse gases. Recently, they sought to yank a YouTube video created by EPA lawyers Allan Zabel and Laurie Williams that is critical of cap-and-trade. Browner reportedly threatened auto execs in July by telling them to "put nothing in writing … ever" about their negotiations with her.
And she is now leading the "science is settled" stonewalling in the wake of Climategate. "I'm sticking with the 2,500 scientists," she said. "These people have been studying this issue for a very long time and agree this problem is real." Book-cookers are good at making it seem so.
In any case, last year, more than 31,000 scientists -- including 9,021 Ph.D.s -- signed a petition sponsored by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine rejecting claims of human-caused global warming.
But hey, who's counting? The science is settled.
http://townhall.com/Common/PrintPage.aspx?g=106121fd-c78f-49ba-a0dc-cc1acf609952&t=c
Been watching 'The Same Time Next Year', and saw the spot when Kennedy and Nixon were in debates. I remember that time frame because I was in grade school, and that debate was so important they made sure we could watch it at school.
Some of the school rooms had a black and white tv and we were called into the rooms so we could witness history.
Wonderful when we were taught to listen and think.
The health care bill is now down to 35 % approval LOL >> It's losing steam everyday >> folks are seeing thru the smoke and morros.
jason
LMAO this is such drivel >> U blaim all Beck fans for being unhealthy ?? I must have been watching different tea parties >> They all were pretty active healthy folks >> U mean to tell me liberals are healthy sos not to put a drain on health care ?? They are usually the whiners and the "poor little oh me croud" >. I know because I'm in the health care field. Another thing >> those scooter chairs should NOT be funded by tax payers and don't know to many conservatives that would try and get one for free. Hows about paying for the damn thing UR self >> OH thats right liberals are pros at scamming the tax payer and even have orgs to help them do so ie ACORN. The unhealthy issue is UR mind IMO.
Liberal thinking is a mental dissorder in it's self so UR drival posts don't even have merrit ..
Obamas health care is all about infusions of stolen money into the government and inch us even closer to socalism. He could give a rats ars about drowning us in debt OR UR health.
Keep that head in the sand >> the ants have already eaten about half UR brain !!!
jason
Until we get big business out of the pockets of the people in Congress, the vote is just to determine who gets the big payoffs.
If I'm paying attention properly, neither side is innocent.
We need a no confidence vote, and we need to be able to fire these worthless Pr*cks when they vote the big business conscience.
We have nothing if we have no vote that gets us representation.
They have a wonderful healthcare plan mostly paid for by the taxpayer. Their wonderful retirement benefits they vote for themselves and fund it with taxpayer money. Lets not forget their raises voted for by themselves not the voter.
Getting into public office is the real deal.
F*ck the voter that helps put them there.
I have to make up new words to describe how fed up I am with this highway robbery.
Graph of the Day for November 25, 2009
Randall Hoven
"Figure 3 shows the maximum capital gains tax rate and capital gains realizations as a percentage of GDP. The major spikes in realizations correspond to changes in tax rate. The simple correlation between the two time-series is -0.64, which suggests that realizations increase when the tax rate decreases."
Source: Congressional Research Service report, The Economic Effects of Capital Gains Taxation.
Hoven's Index for November 25, 2009
The Congressional Budget Office's error in revenue estimates for 1990-94 from capital gains taxes (the period of high capital gains tax rates): $737 billion (estimate higher than actual).
Economist Allen Sinai's predictions in 1997 of the marginal effects of a capital gains tax cut if enacted then (and it was):
* Increase in real GDP annually: $51 billion.
* New jobs by end of 2000: 500,000.
* Increase in real business spending annually: $18 billion.
Source: US House of Representatives Joint Economic Committee Study, 1997.
Actual results (total, not just marginal effects of tax cuts) from 1997 to 2000:
* Average annual increase in real GDP (4Q96 to 4Q00): $436 billion.
* New jobs (Dec. 96 to Dec. 00): 11.5 million.
* Average annual increase in real gross private investment (4Q96 to 4Q00): $142 billion.
Source: St. Louis Fed (links embedded above).
Graph of the Day Archive.
Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/11/graph_of_the_day_for_november_23.html
Left Wingers Jump to Conclusions: FAIL
Posted by Gregory of Yardale at November 24, 2009 2:09 PM
You may recall back in December, a census worker named Bill Starkman was found hanging from a treee in Kentucky. The left immediately jumped to the conclusion that right-wingers were to blame.
* The Idiots at the Democratic Underground Message Board (DUMB) quickly posted a ‘Handy Guide to how Republicans and Fox News are responsible for Census worker being hanged'.
* Rachel Maddow suggested Sparkman was killed simply because ‘he was a federal employee'.
* Liberal bloggers were quick to accuse ‘right wing zealots' trying to ‘take their country back.
* Time chalked it up to government distrust, a sentiment fanned by ‘talk media, tea parties and white-hot town-hall meetings'.
* The Huffington Post immediately assumed this was a case of right-wing paranoia.
* True/Slant opined that the body of Sparkman should be shipped to Glenn Beck.
* Think Progress pointed the finger at Michelle Bachman and her ‘inflammatory and fear-mongering rhetoric against the Census'.
* New York Magazine linked the death to that of ‘some wide-eyed, hysterical woman' named Michelle Bachman. (The irony in this is that the reference to a wide-eyed, hysterical woman was made in an article mentioning Nancy Pelosi).
* AIDS-addled conspiracy theorist Andrew Sullivan immediately fingered “Southern populist terrorism, whipped up by the GOP and its Fox and talk radio cohorts.”
Today, the police have ruled the death a suicide.
And as for our own local progressive nitwits, Ghost of Wellstone was quick to insinuate that anti-Government right-wingers were responsible.
As far as the census worker, we don't know who killed him. Yet, "FED" being written on his chest, begs the question Posted by: Ghost of Wellstone at September 29, 2009 10:17 AM
Andy42302 got even more specific and implied that Michelle Bachman was to blame.
While Bachmann may not be directly responsible for the brutal slaughter of the Census worker, the obvious resentment expressed by the perpetrator(s)is directly proportional with Bachman's latest irrational diatribes about those scary, stalking, and intrusive Census workers. Posted by: andy42302 at September 30, 2009 5:44 PM
Neither of them doubted for a minute the man was murdered, and jumped right to the conclusion the right was to blame.
Not everyone is quite ready to give it up the conspiracy theories just yet.
Who wins with a suicide determination ?
Local Police. Homicide of an on the job census worker brings in the FBI. Not a welcome presence in rural Kentucky.
Insurance carriers. They don't pay out.
Comments
They're all just sooooo much smarter than everyone else. FAIL!
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2009/11/in_which_we_poi.html#more
Health Care Legislation Creates Over 100 New Bureaucracies
11.23.09 @ 4:24PM
MEMO FOR THE MOVEMENT:
Health Care Legislation Creates Colossal New Bureaucracies
RE: The 2,032 page Speaker Pelosi Healthcare bill that was approved by a narrow margin in the House of Representatives on November 7th and the 2,074 page Senator Reid Healthcare bill just introduced creates over 100 new bureaucracies that are sure to be inefficient with taxpayer money.
ACTION: We urge you to contact your Congressman and Senators, as well as to inform your local activists and friends that this bill is a regulatory nightmare destined to create lots of pork barrel projects, more government agencies and endless edicts from Washington, DC that waste taxpayer money.
ISSUE-IN-BRIEF: The health-care bill in its current form would create a regulatory mess estimated by one Senator to add100,000 new administrators in over 100 new bureaucracies. Many of these bureaucracies will get between doctors and patients. Others are simply a waste of money. Among the many new bureaucracies are:
· Health Benefits Advisory Committee
· Health Insurance Exchange
· Public Health Insurance Option
· Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research
· Comparative Effectiveness Research Commission
· Patient Ombudsman for Comparative Effectiveness Research
· Accountable Care Organization Pilot Program
· Community Based Medical Home Pilot Program
· Independent Patient Centered Medical Home Pilot Program
· Qualified Health Benefits Plan Ombudsman
· Grant Program for Health Insurance Cooperatives
· Telehealth Advisory Committee
· Prevention and Wellness Trust
· Personal Care Attendant Workforce Advisory Panel
· Community Prevention Stakeholders Board
To pay for all this new bureaucracy there will be dozens of new taxes totaling nearly $800 billion and extending to items such as wheelchairs and hospital gowns. Almost every major recent public opinion poll has shown more Americans oppose Obama/Pelosi/Reid Care than support it. Just this week, in The Wall Street Journal, the Dean of the Harvard Medical School gave the health care reform debate "a failing grade."
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE BUREAUCRATIC MESS THAT THESE BILLS WILL CREATE PLEASE VISIT THESE WEBSITES:
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner~y2009m11d2-Pelosis-health-care-bill-creates-111-new-federal-Obamacare-bureaucracies
http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/15/truth-and-consequences-of-health-care-reform/
http://townhall.com/columnists/JosephCPhillips/2009/11/16/health_care_and_the_moral_imperative
http://spectator.org/archives/2009/11/11/the-absolutely-worst-bill-ever/
http://www.gop.gov/policy-news/09/11/05/nov-5-2009
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704795604574519671055918380.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703399204574505423751140690.html
http://www.newsok.com/sen.-tom-coburn-says-bill-creates-expanded-bureauc
http://www.newsok.com/sen.-tom-coburn-says-bill-creates-expanded-bureauc
racy/article/3417005?custom_click=pod_lead_politics
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/14/AR2009111402597_pf.html
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124202/No-Clear-Mandate-Americans-Healthcare-Reform.aspx
Tom Schatz, President, Council for Citizens Against Government Waste
William Wilson, President, Americans for Limited Government
Matt Kibbe, President, Freedom Works
Grover Norquist, President, Americans for Tax Reform
Wendy Wright, President, Concerned Women for America
Jim Martin, President, 60 Plus Association
Marion Edwyn Harrison, President, Free Congress Foundation
Herman Cain, President, THE New Voice, Inc.
T. Kenneth Cribb, Jr., former Chief Domestic Advisor to President Reagan
Richard Viguerie, Chairman, ConservativeHQ.com
Tony Perkins, President, Family Research Council
Alfred Regnery, Publisher, American Spectator
James C. Miller III, former Reagan Budget Director
Tom Winter, Editor in Chief, Human Events
Karl Ottosen, Untied States Federation of Small Businesses
its about time.......hope they have the balls to keep that in the final bill and its not just a bargaining tactic
Pelosi To Dems: Time To Take A Stand On Public Option
Nancy Pelosi is ready to rumble. The House Speaker told her Democratic caucus Tuesday night that she plans to bring a health care reform bill with a robust public option to the House floor for a vote, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) tells HuffPost. But first she needs to know that the party is with her.
The Congressional Progressive Caucus has been tallying support for a public insurance option tied to Medicare reimbursement rates over the last several weeks. According to people in the room Tuesday night, Pelosi told her members that the caucus is close to the 218 votes needed to pass the bill. She went on to say that the few remaining undecideds - or undeclareds - needed to let Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) know by Wednesday where they stand.
The caucus will meet again Wednesday evening to retake the Democratic temperature. If the 218 votes are there, the party will plow forward and go to conference committee negotiations with a strong hand.
The challenge from Pelosi to her caucus puts the onus on her to find the votes. "Do I think it will get to 218? I have such confidence in our speaker Nancy Pelosi, that when she is determined, as a strong woman - I can't guarantee everything - but I do believe she's determined to go into the conference with the Senate with a strong public option," Rep. Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday.
"As with so many other issues, the American public is way ahead of even those of us in Congress," said Rep. Donna Edwards, a progressive Democrat from Maryland. "It's good fortune and a lot of hard work on the part of the Speaker and the Democratic caucus for us to finally come where the American people are."
A progressive public option also puts pressure on Senate negotiators hammering out the final health care bill in the upper chamber. A robust public option on the House side could give Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) the political wiggle room to include a more conservative public option in his package. It would then come down to a duel between the chambers.
Pelosi was "upbeat" as she delivered her news and made the call to the caucus, said one person in the room. A Washington Post-ABC poll released Tuesday showed support for the public option climbing nationally.
The robust public option's ability to save money bodes well for its future. Pelosi shared the outlines of a preliminary Congressional Budget Office estimate of the costs of the House bill, telling the caucus it came in at well under $900 billion over ten years.
President Obama has demanded that the package come in at under $900 billion. "Without the public option, which has been scored as a big cost saver, it will be hard for us to meet the $900 billion mark and provide the affordability to Americans that is absolutely essential," said Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.).
Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/pelosi-to-dems-time-to-ta_n_327979.html
DEMS GO TRUST-BUSTING
WASHINGTON A House committee has voted to strip the health insurance industry of its exemption from federal antitrust laws as senators announced plans to take the same step.
The moves Wednesday signaled a growing determination by Democrats to punish the insurance industry for its criticism of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul agenda. The House Judiciary Committee voted 20 to 9 to repeal a 1940s law that exempted the health insurance industry from federal controls over certain antitrust violations including price-fixing.
Lawmakers said they wanted to include the legislation in a larger health care overhaul bill taking shape in the House. In the Senate, Majority Leader Harry Reid announced plans to repeal the antitrust exemption as part of its health care legislation.
Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/senate-dems-aim-to-strip_n_328362.html
The Real Hoax Is Health Care
by Laura Flanders
An attention grab that held millions of Americans transfixed. A story that seemed to be about life in the balance. It dominated the airwaves, the social networks, held Americans in its clutch. And then it turned out to have been nothing but a hoax. A play for attention that distracted the entire country.
Now that the Balloon Boy's story is blown, can we call out the health care hoax?
The anti-health care lobby is taking all our attention hostage. And a nation's hopes (and votes) for quality health care are floating away, leaving real lives in real danger.
If you're angry and feel played by the Heene family of Colorado, you'd better be furious at the private insurers.
If you want Richard Heene and his wife to be jailed and their kids taken into protective care - you better be fighting for all Americans to be taken out of the custody of abusive wealth-insurance companies.
We know now that the Heenes were smart about how to manipulate the media in part because they'd starred in two episodes of Wife Swap. Cigna, Aetna, United Health own the news. They and their guns-for-hire lobbyists underwrite just about every pseudo-news show. Call it "News Swap." (Theirs for the real stuff.)
And right now, with their House Republican pals they're planning to stop a health care bill by spending the next three weeks arguing over a phony-facts study that claims that the Democrats' measure will be a bad deal for small businesses, senior citizens, and women and children,"
At least the empty balloon that the Heene's floated was harmless. The anti-health care lobby is taking us all for a ride. Where is the sheriff when you need him? And where are the felony charges?
Published on Monday, October 19, 2009 by GRITtv
A Reality Check From the Brink of Extinction
by Chris Hedges
We can join Bill McKibben on Oct. 24 in nationwide protests over rising carbon emissions. We can cut our consumption of fossil fuels. We can use less water. We can banish plastic bags. We can install compact fluorescent light bulbs. We can compost in our backyard. But unless we dismantle the corporate state, all those actions will be just as ineffective as the Ghost Dance shirts donned by native American warriors to protect themselves from the bullets of white soldiers at Wounded Knee.
“If we all wait for the great, glorious revolution there won’t be anything left,” author and environmental activist Derrick Jensen told me when I interviewed him in a phone call to his home in California. “If all we do is reform work, this culture will grind away. This work is necessary, but not sufficient. We need to use whatever means are necessary to stop this culture from killing the planet. We need to target and take down the industrial infrastructure that is systematically dismembering the planet. Industrial civilization is functionally incompatible with life on the planet, and is murdering the planet. We need to do whatever is necessary to stop this.”
The oil and natural gas industry, the coal industry, arms and weapons manufacturers, industrial farms, deforestation industries, the automotive industry and chemical plants will not willingly accept their own extinction. They are indifferent to the looming human catastrophe. We will not significantly reduce carbon emissions by drying our laundry in the backyard and naively trusting the power elite. The corporations will continue to cannibalize the planet for the sake of money. They must be halted by organized and militant forms of resistance. The crisis of global heating is a social problem. It requires a social response.
The United States, after rejecting the Kyoto Protocol, went on to increase its carbon emissions by 20 percent from 1990 levels. The European Union countries during the same period reduced their emissions by 2 percent. But the recent climate negotiations in Bangkok, designed to lead to a deal in Copenhagen in December, have scuttled even the tepid response of Kyoto. Kyoto is dead. The EU, like the United States, will no longer abide by binding targets for emission reductions. Countries will unilaterally decide how much to cut. They will submit their plans to international monitoring. And while Kyoto put the burden of responsibility on the industrialized nations that created the climate crisis, the new plan treats all countries the same. It is a huge step backward.
“All of the so-called solutions to global warming take industrial capitalism as a given,” said Jensen, who wrote “Endgame: The Problem of Civilization” and “The Culture of Make Believe.” “The natural world is supposed to conform to industrial capitalism. This is insane. It is out of touch with physical reality. What’s real is real. Any social system—it does not matter if we are talking about industrial capitalism or an indigenous Tolowa people—their way of life, is dependent upon a real, physical world. Without a real, physical world you don’t have anything. When you separate yourself from the real world you start to hallucinate. You believe the machines are more real than real life. How many machines are within 10 feet of you and how many wild animals are within a hundred yards? How many machines do you have a daily relationship with? We have forgotten what is real.”
The latest studies show polar ice caps are melting at a record rate and that within a decade the Arctic will be an open sea during summers. This does not give us much time. White ice and snow reflect 80 percent of sunlight back to space, while dark water reflects only 20 percent, absorbing a much larger heat load. Scientists warn that the loss of the ice will dramatically change winds and sea currents around the world. And the rapidly melting permafrost is unleashing methane chimneys from the ocean floor along the Russian coastline. Methane is a greenhouse gas 25 times more toxic than carbon dioxide, and some scientists have speculated that the release of huge quantities of methane into the atmosphere could asphyxiate the human species. The rising sea levels, which will swallow countries such as Bangladesh and the Marshall Islands and turn cities like New Orleans into a new Atlantis, will combine with severe droughts, horrific storms and flooding to eventually dislocate over a billion people. The effects will be suffering, disease and death on a scale unseen in human history.
We can save groves of trees, protect endangered species and clean up rivers, all of which is good, but to leave the corporations unchallenged would mean our efforts would be wasted. These personal adjustments and environmental crusades can too easily become a badge of moral purity, an excuse for inaction. They can absolve us from the harder task of confronting the power of corporations.
The damage to the environment by human households is minuscule next to the damage done by corporations. Municipalities and individuals use 10 percent of the nation’s water while the other 90 percent is consumed by agriculture and industry. Individual consumption of energy accounts for about a quarter of all energy consumption; the other 75 percent is consumed by corporations. Municipal waste accounts for only 3 percent of total waste production in the United States. We can, and should, live more simply, but it will not be enough if we do not radically transform the economic structure of the industrial world.
“If your food comes from the grocery store and your water from a tap you will defend to the death the system that brings these to you because your life depends on it,” said Jensen, who is holding workshops around the country called Deep Green Resistance [click here and here] to build a militant resistance movement. “If your food comes from a land base and if your water comes from a river you will defend to the death these systems. In any abusive system, whether we are talking about an abusive man against his partner or the larger abusive system, you force your victims to become dependent upon you. We believe that industrial capitalism is more important than life.”
Those who run our corporate state have fought environmental regulation as tenaciously as they have fought financial regulation. They are responsible for our personal impoverishment as well as the impoverishment of our ecosystem. We remain addicted, courtesy of the oil, gas and automobile industries and a corporate-controlled government, to fossil fuels. Species are vanishing. Fish stocks are depleted. The great human migration from coastlines and deserts has begun. And as temperatures continue to rise, huge parts of the globe will become uninhabitable. NASA climate scientist James Hansen has demonstrated that any concentration of carbon dioxide greater than 350 parts per million in the atmosphere is not compatible with maintenance of the biosphere on the “planet on which civilization developed and to which life on earth is adapted.” He has determined that the world must stop burning coal by 2030—and the industrialized world well before that—if we are to have any hope of ever getting the planet back down below that 350 number. Coal supplies half of our electricity in the United States.
“We need to separate ourselves from the corporate government that is killing the planet,” Jensen said. “We need to get really serious. We are talking about life on the planet. We need to shut down the oil infrastructure. I don’t care, and the trees don’t care, if we do this through lawsuits, mass boycotts or sabotage. I asked Dahr Jamail how long a bridge would last in Iraq that was not defended. He said probably six to 12 hours. We need to make the economic system, which is the engine for so much destruction, unmanageable. The Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta has been able to reduce Nigerian oil output by 20 percent. We need to stop the oil economy.”
The reason the ecosystem is dying is not because we still have a dryer in our basement. It is because corporations look at everything, from human beings to the natural environment, as exploitable commodities. It is because consumption is the engine of corporate profits. We have allowed the corporate state to sell the environmental crisis as a matter of personal choice when actually there is a need for profound social and economic reform. We are left powerless.
Alexander Herzen, speaking a century ago to a group of Russian anarchists working to topple the czar, reminded his followers that they were not there to rescue the system.
“We think we are the doctors,” Herzen said. “We are the disease.”
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C.
Published on Monday, October 19, 2009 by TruthDig.com
Big Bank Profits Spark Rally in Cocaine, Hooker Sectors
Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andy-borowitz/big-bank-profits-spark-ra_b_322088.html
Conservatives and Off-Base Lefties: Can You Top This?
Well over half the people who walk the face of this earth come from among the three Abrahamic traditions or faiths: Judaism, Christianity and Islam. It is no secret that there has been no love lost and little understanding between Islam, the fastest-growing of the three, and the other two.
Now, along came a newly installed civic leader, a President of the United States, generally recognized as the "leader of the free world." Since what is known as "the free world" is predominantly Christian, the new president can also claim to be the most significant leader on the world stage of that Abrahamic faith, Christianity. Among his earliest actions, the new United States President stunned the world by reaching out to Islam -- not from Washington, not by way of TV or the Internet -- no, he traveled to Egypt, put his body and his presidency on the line, and spoke to Islam as he would speak to us. "I know there are many -- Muslim and non-Muslim -- who question whether we can forge a new beginning," he said, emphasizing that, "It is easier to start wars than to end them."
And then, speaking from the epicenter of the Muslim world, to all the world, and to the essence of our humanity, he spoke this truth: "It is easier to blame others than to look inward, to see what is different about someone, than to find the things we share."
And who, for the love of God in three faiths, topped that this year?
Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/norman-lear/conservatives-and-off-bas_b_316948.html