News 
Market Data 
Discover
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
robcobb
2m
$NLST At this point I don’t know what evidence Judge Scarsi will allow or disallow. I know that if he would allow the evidence that Judge Gilstrap would not allow in the Samsung 463 case ,where Samsung cut off Nlst supply in order to try to bankrupt Nlst.At the 463 pre -trial Jason pointed out that Samsung would get Nlst patents if they went bankrupt! I wouldn’t have to hear any more than that if I were a juror in today’s first day of trial to rule in Nlst favor.There wouldn’t be any need for four days of trial for me.Nlst needs justice starting today. Next Monday will be Microns turn. I am very excited about attending and witnessing justice for Nlst!
NLST For those of you that have never read the JDLA agreement between Netlist and Samsung, here's a link to it. The JDLA starts on page 709 (on the docs) and goes to page 720.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.337169/gov.uscourts.ca9.337169.10.5.pdf
one way or another its going to be an interesting week !!!
yes judge scarsi, we ripped off nlst right from the beginning. that was our plan. https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_572683251.jpg
NLST Keep in mind the deposition testimonies I posted today (I believe) are being objected by Samsung. I included their objections in each post. Here is the filing from Sheasby regarding these exhibits. Will they be accepted by the court? I dont know. I'm not a legal expert. I post for informational purposes only, but they are worth reading in my opinion. In my opinion, they should be allowed. Netlist agrees. 
See comments for 2nd page of fling.
https://stocktwits.com/Durango24k/message/572686014
NLST Han, Kyuhan - Samsung VP of Device Solutions Deposition - See comments. Reposting this for easier reading
https://stocktwits.com/Durango24k/message/572683111
Well gdog, I will like it better in about .07 more.
I was tempted to double down at the open today, but chicken out. 
This one looks like it could exploded very fast.
I need some money for my 3 months trip to Europe.
NLST KIm, Ho- Jung - Samsung Employee Depostion - See comments
https://stocktwits.com/Durango24k/message/572679412
NLST Kim, Lane - Samsung Employee Deposition. See comments.
https://stocktwits.com/Durango24k/message/572678200
NLST Jeon, Byungyeop - Samsung Employee Testimony -See comments.
https://stocktwits.com/Durango24k/message/572676952
NLST A different witness from Samsung. See comments.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_572673961.jpg
https://stocktwits.com/Durango24k/message/572673961
NLST It seems there are some Exhibits of deposition testimonies filed today, with objections and responses. I'll include the interactions in the comments. Interesting to say the least.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_572670678.jpg
https://stocktwits.com/Durango24k/message/572670678
thx, i know all my options, but i'm not typing anything credit or debit into a pc.
its one helluva mess to clean up that much i'll tell ya. when i went to social security to sign up for retirement they asked me if i ever was on ss, i said no and asked why, they just told me dont worry about it we'll take care of it. all the other incidents i had to personally take care of. never again !!!!
As far as that goes, you could probably load up a pre-paid debit card with say $40, and then use that to open up the Pacer account. But whatever.
That's unfortunate. On the other hand? I've used credit cards on the internet for the last 30 years and have NEVER had ANYTHING go wrong with the theft of one. Except ONE time (on a corporate American Express) where someone stole it and used it to purchase THOUSANDS of dollars of stuff.
Yes, as far as I can tell, the trial is still on for tomorrow.
i havnt used my credit card on the internet since i had a major issue with identity theft. as far as the rest of those documents are concerned. are we still going to trial tomorrow ?
Why don't one of you guys open up a pacer account?? It costs ZERO MONEY to do so. They give you $30 worth of downloaded files FREE every quarter. Each page of downloaded files costs TEN CENTS. If a document has more than 30 pages, they charge you $3.00 for it, but you get the rest of the document at no extra charge. Yes, if you exceed the $30 per quarter, they charge your credit card you put on file. Otherwise, they don't charge ANYTHING.
I've been on it for a year now, have downloaded hundreds of pages, and have not had a penny charged.
It would help if several of us had pacer accounts. When the files start flying fast and furious, some of us could download files and put them on the board, when the others came up against the $30 limit per quarter.
Case 8:20-cv-00993-MCS-ADS Document 532 Filed 05/13/24
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.532.0.pdf
hope for the best!
Netlist Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (8:20-cv-00993)
District Court, C.D. California
oh shit........whats in it now ??????????
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17206527/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?order_by=desc
which rhymes with procrastinate !!!
so far !!!! lol !!!!
everything there going to attempt will be as under handed as possible. in fact i wont be surprised of anything that goes awry as we move forward through this week. alls i want is a trial to commence tomorrow with a decision by friday. just hope for the best! the rest is out of our hands.......
The fact that he IS still an attorney and is still listed as an attorney for Samsung in the #0093 BOC case means that he can either stay in the background or he can still be an active attorney in the case.
I just think it SUCKS that Samsung got a last-minute full month's continuance (and then some), by telling the court that Yoder couldn't possibly continue due to his illness. Yet he is apparently still listed as an attorney in the case. I'll bet he is pulling the strings of anyone that will take the lead spot too.
It was all just another ploy by Samsung to keep delaying this case.
alls good !!!
jet, i'm not even remotely thinking you would lie to me. yes i found the tab and he is listed. i will admit i dont know the capacity in which yoder is, or isn't now legally representing samscum. his name on that document is either there by error, because its a format letter for this case, or he is still in the background. for right now i'm not worried about it. in fact i really wish the bumbling idiot would be in front of scarsi. wouldn't you !!!! lol !!! imagine scarsi asking him, which of your statements should we use today ?
The bolded type in my post lists Yoder as an "attorney to be noticed", and still on the list of attorneys. It comes directly from the list of attorneys for the #0093 BOC case.
Go to the website of the Pacer #0993 case. I think I have seen you post up the docket list before, right? If you are able to open up that page, you should be able to open the "Parties and attorneys" tab at the top of the docket list, even if you do not have a pacer account to download docket Items.
But seriously, I have no reason to lie about this. Why would I??
do you have a link to the opened file ? i dont have pacer.
Look in the list of attorneys for both parties, under the "Parties and Attorneys" tab at the top of the docket list. I believe Yoder is STILL listed as an attorney in the case. His name has no "termination" listed, as others in the list do.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17206527/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/
Michael G. Yoder
(949) 760-9600
Fax: (949) 823-6994
O'Melveny & Myers, LLP
610 Newport Center Drive
Suite 1700
Newport Beach, CA 92660
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
i dont see yoders name listed in the link in the post your responding to ? is he in the back ground for consulting, i wouldnt doubt it. as far as any other documents that are older i would imagine his name would still be there.
I see that Yoder is STILL listed as an attorney of record in the CA BOC case.....
Tomorrow the case starts. I wonder if it will finish up by Friday?
robcobb
5:56 AM
$NLST Here’s the lawyer lineup for tomorrow.Looks like after losing Yoder Samsung is still sticking with what is left of the O’Melveny team! I read all their profiles and I can’t figure out who will be the lead lawyer for Samsung . I guess we will find out soon.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_572577417.png
Stokd NLST I wholeheartedly expect—rarely if ever I provide predictions or pretty sure of something—Gilstrap will deny Samsung motion to stay & vacate 463 judgment till CAFC appeal on all patents in the case are concluded. If you read it—thanks again to whoever made it public which makes it easier to address/discuss—you will understand why.
I wasn't going to address or post about this sur-reply, given the substance was already contained in the motion itself and Netlist's first response in opposition. And with the BOC trial within days, wanted to stay focused on the immediate. And at this point, the back and forth rearguing of a motion is just noise to me... all I'm interested in is Gilstrap's decision.
Last night there was also some docs filed in BOC case—more noise by Samsung—their objections to Netlist's recent motions for subpoena power and accurate Korean translations. And another proposed jury verdict form with parties competing versions. It'll play out with trial in days.
Stokd NLST Someone last night posted that Samsung is pathetic, with a description of a doc of Netlist's opposition to Samsung's renewed stay motion. Implying Samsung is trying to stay BOC case.
Given we have a BOC trial with Samsung on Tuesday, with folks on edge enough considering the games infringers play to delay trials... it's a bit misleading to not specify and make clear—given they can see the case it's in—that it's to stay/vacate Samsung463 case which is post trial. Samsung filed that motion Apr10—been shared/discussed/on my chart—Netlist already responded, Samsung replied, Netlist last night filed Sur Reply—the last brief on the motion and now awaiting Gilstrap's decision.
Let's be aware of everything at play and post responsibly by indicating which case a doc belongs to, without comments that can inaccurately imply something.
My Pacer ext to make docs public still not working since update, but someone else made it public—link below for anyone interested.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.211544/gov.uscourts.txed.211544.600.0.pdf
993 vs scamsung, 10 entries today..................
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17206527/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
NLST Part 2, Netlist Witness List in comments.. https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_572495310.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_572495472.jpg
Short interest in NLST fell over 5% (5.6%) in the last short Interest report.
Down 503,499 shares to 8,485119 shares short. Last report had shorts at 8,988,618 shares.
|
Followers
|
307
|
Posters
|
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
1
|
Posts (Total)
|
25980
|
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
| Moderators papaphilip gdog 100lbStriper Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs | |||
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote: 
https://netlist.com/
brings over two decades of high-tech management experience to Netlist. He most recently served as President of Infinilink, a DSL equipment manufacturer, and as executive vice president of Viking Components, Inc. Prior to that, he spent 15 years with LG where he held various senior management positions in the U.S and Korea. Mr. Hong holds an MS in technology management from Pepperdine University and a BS in economics from Virginia Commonwealth University.
AI
