Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[BBANBOB]

JHD


HOW MANY BIG negotiated contracts have you done over the years???????????????????????????????

WHEN YOU had the UPPER HAND in negotiations did you ONCE EVER NEGOTIATE yourself in to a position that you would come out on the short end of the stick

IT DIDN'T THINK YOU DID

Edit

And at the same time DID you ever negotiate a contract where YOU COULD go back and change a court ordered approval of said negotiations or ANY CONTRACT after it was agreed to and signed by all parties???????

I DIDN'T THINK SO

This as you know is what one poster here is trying to CONvince people here that is what happened concerning the payout MATRIX 75/25

COMMON SENSE and LOGIC, USE THEM THEY ACTUALLY DO WORK

[Oberthal]

Could you explain what the impact this has on us?

[jhdf51]

P's could be the big winner here...

JHD

[jhdf51]

Such a short term unpredictable stock....

[lodas]

Releases by Holders of Claims and Equity Interests
(a) Global Third Party Releases. On the Effective Date, for good and valuable consideration, and to the fullest extent
permissible under applicable law, each Entity (Creditor or holder of an Equity Interest) that (i) has held, currently holds or
may hold a Released Claim or any Released Third Party Causes of Action, (ii) is entitled to receive, directly or indirectly, a
distribution or satisfaction of its Claim or Equity Interest pursuant to the Plan, and (iii) elects, by not checking or checking
the appropriate box on its Ballot or election form, as the case may be, to grant the releases set forth in this Section 41.6, on
their own behalf and on behalf of anyone claiming through them, shall be deemed to have and hereby does irrevocably and
unconditionally, fully, finally and forever waive, release, acquit and discharge (1) each and all of the Released Parties, from
any and all Released Claims and/or any claim, act, fact, transaction, occurrence, statement, or omission in connection with
or alleged in the Actions or in the Texas Litigation, or that could have been alleged in respect of the foregoing or other
similar proceeding, including, without limitation, any such claim demand, right, liability, or cause of action for
indemnification, contribution or any other basis in law or equity for damages, costs or fees incurred by the releasors herein
arising directly or indirectly from or otherwise relating thereto and (2) each of (a) the AAOC Releasees, (b) the Senior Notes
read post 725277 as posted by newflow.......

[Royal Dude]

LMAO My way, I think you like it :)

[MY way]

9. How are Common Shares distributed by DTCC? DTCC is not a public company, so who decides the
number and value of Common Shares?
Since only Participants are qualified to own Common Shares, there is no “market value” for the Common
Shares. The price at which Common Shares are transferred from one Participant to another (the “Share Price”),
is determined using a formula set forth in the Shareholders Agreement.
10. How much will each Participant have to pay, on average, to hold Common Shares?
The Share price for the 2024 reallocation is $59,327.12 per share. This Share Price was determined using the
formula set forth in the Shareholders Agreement.
The actual amount of Common Shares that each Participant will own is determined by its respective use of the
services of the Clearing Agencies, and whether it is a Mandatory Purchaser Participant or a Voluntary Purchaser
Participant.
11. Does DTCC pay dividends on Common Shares?
DTCC does not, as a matter of policy, pay any dividends on Common Shares.
12. What powers or benefits are conferred upon shareholders of DTCC by virtue of their owning
Common Shares?
The holders of the Common Shares are entitled to elect all of the directors on the DTCC Board, other than the
two directors who are elected by the holders of the Series A Preferred Shares and the Series B Preferred Shares.
The holders of the Common Shares are also entitled to vote on any matters submitted to shareholders for a vote

[MY way]

n will payments for Common Shares have to be made?
During the first week of April 2024, Voluntary Purchaser Participants will be notified through the DocuSign®
electronic signature service of their opportunity to purchase or obligation to sell Common Shares. During the
third week of April 2024, after DTCC has received elections to purchase Common Shares from Voluntary
Purchaser Participants, Mandatory Purchaser Participants will be notified via email from Computershare Web
Service that a notice concerning their obligation to purchase or sell Common Shares is available on
Computershare’s Investor Center.
All payments for purchases and sales of Common Shares will be settled on the Settlement Date, which is
currently anticipated to be April 30, 2024.
5. How is payment finalized?
A purchaser or seller that is a Participant of DTC will have its settlement account at DTC debited or credited, a
purchaser or seller that is a Participant of NSCC but not a Participant of DTC will have its settlement account
at NSCC debited or credited, a purchaser or seller that is a Participant of the GS Division but not a Participant
of DTC or NSCC will have its settlement account at the GS Division debited or credited, and a purchaser or
seller that is a Participant of the MBS Division but not a Participant of DTC, NSCC or the GS Division will
have its settlement account at the MBS Division debited or credited.
6. How many Participants currently own Common Shares? How many Participants are Mandatory
Purchaser Participants?
Currently, there are approximately 263 Participants that own Common Shares. With the new Mandatory
Purchaser Participants, that number is expected to increase to approximately 283.
7. Who owns DTCC?
DTCC is owned by the holders of its Common Shares. The Common Shares are owned by Participants of the
Clearing Agencies. DTCC also has three classes of preferred shares, the Series A Preferred Shares, the Series
B Preferred Shares, the Series C Preferred Shares, and the Series D Preferred Shares (collectively, the “Preferred
Shares”). The Preferred Shares are owned by Stock Clearing Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of New
York Stock Exchange LLC, the successor-in-interest to New York Stock Exchange Inc. (“NYSE”), the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., the successor-in-interest to the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. (“FINRA”), and institutional investors.
Participants of the Clearing Agencies are required or permitted (depending on their category of participation)
to own Common Shares in amounts proportionate to their use of the services of the Clearing Agencies. The
system of Participant ownership was originally set up to support DTC, and was adopted by DTCC when it was
formed in 1999.
In connection with the integration of NSCC as a subsidiary of DTCC, the common stockholders of NSCC,
Securities Clearing Corporation (a subsidiary of The New York Stock Exchange, the predecessor in interest of
NYSE) and National Clearing Corporation (a subsidiary of NASD, the predecessor in interest of FINRA),
exchanged their common stock of NSCC for the Preferred Shares. As holders of the Preferred Shares, NYSE
and FINRA each have the right to elect one member of the DTCC Board but no other rights.
8. How many Common Shares are currently issued?

[MY way]

uestions and Answers on the DTCC Common Stock Reallocation
1. What is the purpose of the requirement that Participants own shares?
Having all Common Shares in the hands of Participants ensures that such Participants (1) are appropriately
invested in the business of DTCC and (2) through the election of members of the Board of Directors of DTCC
(the “DTCC Board”), are given a voice in the governance and activities of the Clearing Agencies, including the
kinds and quality of services provided and the service fees charged.
2. How does the reallocation work? Will all Participants be required to purchase Common Shares, or
only some Participants? Will any Participants be required to sell Common Shares?
Certain Participants, which are referred to as “Mandatory Purchaser Participants”, are required to purchase and
own Common Shares in amounts proportionate to their respective use of the services of the Clearing Agencies.
Accordingly, any such Participant will be (1) required to purchase Common Shares to the extent, if any, that a
share deficiency exists (i.e., the amount of Common Shares such Participant currently owns is less than the
amount such Participant is required to own) and (2) required to sell Common Shares to the extent, if any, that
a share excess exists (i.e., the amount of Common Shares such Participant currently owns is greater than the
amount such Participant is required to own). Other Participants, which are referred to as “Voluntary Purchaser
Participants”, are permitted but not required to purchase and own Common Shares in amounts proportionate to
their respective use of the services of the Clearing Agencies. Accordingly, any such Participant will be (1)
permitted but not required to purchase Common Shares to the extent, if any, that a share deficiency exists (i.e.,
the amount of Common Shares such Participant currently owns is less than the amount such Participant is
permitted to own) and (2) required to sell Common Shares to the extent, if any, that a share excess exists (i.e.,
the amount of Common Shares such Participant currently owns is greater than the amount such Participant is
permitted to own). Some Participants are not offered Common Shares at all and are therefore not entitled to
purchase any Common Shares.
Under the Shareholders Agreement, the Mandatory Purchaser Participants are those Participants that utilize the
core services of the Clearing Agencies, including the depository and book-entry transfer services of DTC and
the guaranteed services of NSCC and FICC. As a result, the Mandatory Purchaser Participants consist of: (1)
a “Participant” other than a “Limited Participant” of DTC (as defined in the DTC Rules); (2) a “Member” of
NSCC (as defined in the NSCC Rules); (3) a “Member” other than a “Comparison-Only Member” or
“Sponsored Member” of the GS Division (as defined in the GS Division Rules) or (4) a “Member” other than
a “Cash Settling Bank Member” of the MBS Division (as defined in the MBS Division Rules). A Mandatory
Purchaser Participant must also be a Qualified Person as defined in the Shareholders Agreement.
Under the Shareholders Agreement, the Voluntary Purchaser Participants are those Participants other than a
Mandatory Purchaser Participant, as more specifically set forth in the DTC Rules, NSCC Rules, GS Division
Rules and MBS Division Rules. A Voluntary Purchaser Participant must also be a Qualified Person as defined
in the Shareholders Agreement.
3. What will happen to Common Shares that Voluntary Purchaser Participants choose not to purchase?
The Mandatory Purchaser Participants will be obligated to purchase on a pro-rata basis any Common Shares
allocated to, but not purchased by, the Voluntary Purchaser Participants.

[MY way]

Reallocation
Under the terms of the Fifth Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement (the “Shareholders Agreement”) of
The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (“DTCC”), participant/member firms (“Participants”) of DTCC’s
U.S.-registered clearing agency subsidiaries (the “Clearing Agencies”) -- The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”),
National Securities Clearing Corporation (“NSCC”) and Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”) -- are
required or permitted (depending on their category of participation) to purchase and own shares of DTCC common
stock (“Common Shares”) in amounts proportionate to their use of the services of the Clearing Agencies.
Participants using the core services of at least one of the Clearing Agencies are required to purchase and own
Common Shares (“Mandatory Purchaser Participants”). Participants using most of the other services of the Clearing
Agencies are permitted but not required to purchase and own Common Shares (“Voluntary Purchaser Participants”).
Participants using only certain ancillary services of the Clearing Agencies are not offered Common Shares.
The Shareholders Agreement provides that DTCC shall periodically reallocate entitlements to purchase and own
Common Shares to reflect changes in use of the services of the Clearing Agencies. Mandatory Purchaser
Participants are required to purchase Common Shares up to the amounts of their entitlements and sell Common
Shares down to the amounts of their entitlements. Voluntary Purchaser Participants are permitted but not required
to purchase Common Shares up to the amounts of their entitlements and required to sell Common Shares down to
the amounts of their entitlements.
This reallocation process is required to be done at least once every three years. Since the last reallocation occurred
in 2021, a reallocation is scheduled for 2024. The 2024 reallocation is currently anticipated to be completed on
April 30, 2024 (the “Settlement Date”), and will be based upon the use of services of the Clearing Agencies from
January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023. Voluntary Purchaser Participants will be notified through the
DocuSign® electronic signature service of their opportunity to purchase or obligation to sell Common Shares during
the first week of April 2024. Mandatory Purchaser Participants will be notified via email from Computershare Web
Service that a notice concerning their obligation to purchase or sell Common Shares is available on Computershare’s
Investor Center during the third week of April 2024, and these purchases are expected to settle on the Settlement
Date. Please refer to the following pages (Questions and Answers on the DTCC Common Stock Reallocation) for
additional information.
Questions or inquiries regarding this Important Notice should be addressed to your Relationship Manager, or to
Annette Nichols, Corporate Secretary, at [phone] or [e-mail].

[lodas]

L.G. when you signed a Release Document, you signed away all rights to former assets in WMI for NOW, FUTURE, AND FOR FOREVERMORE!!!!!!!!!..... read the document that newflow posted about the settlements for different class claims, and read exactly what the release signatures stated.... it states if one does not sign the document, they will be excluded from any settlements that will occur when the chapter 11 is settled... if you do not sign, THEN YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SUE FOR VALUES HELD IN YOUR FORMER ASSETS OF WMI!!!!!!!!!!!!!..... simply put, because you signed a release does not mean, or guarantee that you are the owner of the former estate, which by the way, does not exist anymore... it was cancelled, and emerged as a new entity called WMIH...., as well as any values you once held in the now DEFUNCT COMPANY CALLED WMI.....this was evident when WMI said all common and preferred shares were cancelled, and extinguished, and all rights to former prospectus are NULL AND VOID,,,,, read the post that newflow put up on the board about releases, and their purpose.... Lodas

[Royal Dude]

This is Big. Please read the timing for our distribution. Please review for the process in April and research the formula they use. We will end up owning DTCC where our value is?

Questions and Answers on the DTCC Common Stock Reallocation 1. What is the purpose of the requirement that Participants own shares? Having all Common Shares in the hands of Participants ensures that such Participants (1) are appropriately invested in the business of DTCC and (2) through the election of members of the Board of Directors of DTCC (the “DTCC Board”), are given a voice in the governance and activities of the Clearing Agencies, including the kinds and quality of services provided and the service fees charged.

10. How much will each Participant have to pay, on average, to hold Common Shares? The Share price for the 2024 reallocation is $59,327.12 per share. This Share Price was determined using the formula set forth in the Shareholders Agreement. The actual amount of Common Shares that each Participant will own is determined by its respective use of the services of the Clearing Agencies, and whether it is a Mandatory Purchaser Participant or a Voluntary Purchaser Participant.
https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/pdf/2024/4/1/MBS1317-24.pdf

[Large Green]

Diamond, the bottom line is ALL INVESTORS who signed timely releases by March of the year 2012 will at MINIMUM do EXTREMELY WELL considering, however, as is always the case, some will do MUCH BETTER than others.



...

[BBANBOB]

LG

Yeppers just like the """TENDER OFFER I brought forth several; years back that had some about to go bat chit crazy""

[Large Green]

This is hard to say as there are a few ways this could go.

1) They could be bought out lock, stock and barrel

2) They could be issued the 36M share that COOP has repurchased based on an investor's original purchase subject to the Reverse Splits taking the outstanding stock down to around 100M before the COOP repurchase program started

3) There are some more thoughts but I will leave you with the aforementioned

4) Just know that COOP has had shelf ready, authorized, and ready to issue on a minute notice ten million preferred shares which have NOT been subject to (RS) Reverse Splits or other reasons. They will use these at some point. COOP originally planned for these preferred shares or they would not have brought them forward from the (ED) Effective Date of 3/19/2012 and forward of the 12-1 Reverse Split in October of the year 2018 which AGAIN did not affect the Preferred, authorized shelf-ready shares.



...

[BBANBOB]

LG

I agree and so do many others here

Contract law via negotiations is PRETTY RIGID YOU ABIDE by the terms of the contract as written PERIODDDDDDDDDDDDD there aint no DO OVERS

And the DIPs DID NOT NEGOTIATE THEMSELVES INTO A SUBORDINATE POSITION TO COMMONS, that just aint the way things happen and ANY THAT THIHKS that is the way it happens must be out in the desert and also is seeing an OASIS in the distance,, YOU KNOW A """MIRAGE """SOMETHING THAT DOES NOT EXIST

COMMON SENSE AND LOGIC USE THEM THEY WORK

[diamondguru-one]

what are you thinkin for U's ????

[PickStocks]

Yes….never a recommendation….”NEVER a cowboy recommendation to Buy, Sell, or Hold ... NEVER' ... “

Can not post all the messages where you recommended that your followers buy in the single digits as you posted…..your so call recommendation…to follow you….then sell at 46…50…..tell your story again….lol

[Large Green]

BBANBOB, you asked and wrote the following to AZC,

___________________________________________

WIth ALL of your NEW FOUND wealth, did you ever bother taking BOPS advice and taking the GSA/POR to a ""LAWYER"" and having them give you an opinion based on the 8k and PR on the payout matrix and how it was as well stated in the GSA?????????????? As to the 75/25% payout on any and all distributions???

OF COURSE, YOU DIDN'T you wouldn't dare
____________________________________________

When there is an agenda to push outside of the norm, there is no way one would pay a specific lawyer with subject matter expertise for an opinion when more than likely the legal opinion would NOT support the agenda being posited.

All one needs to know if they signed timely releases by 3/2012 is they own the former WaMu Estate and whatever may come from that whether Safe Harbor protected or NOT, otherwise since there was an (OC) Ownership Change on the (ED) Effective Date of March 19, 2012 there would be dual ownership of assets and that can NEVER happen in Delaware Bankruptcy Courts



....

[DarkB4Dawn]

FDIC status letter Feb. 22, 2024, for EOY 2023.

pg. 4 , 11 MMF cases , hopefully an update on closures in the near future.

https://www.fdic.gov/resources/resolutions/professional-liability/annual-reports/pl-2023-annual-report.pdf

[BBANBOB]

I see you're letting your ARROGANT ASS hang out yet again

Can't wait to see how this all turns out

Just like any contract, all conditions of said contract follow it forever and always, NOT JUST WHAT YOU WANT.

WIth ALL of your NEW FOUND wealth, did you ever bother taking BOPS advice and taking the GSA/POR to a ""LAWYER"" and having them give you an opinion based on the 8k and PR on the payout matrix and how it was as well stated in the GSA?????????????? As to the 75/25% payout on any and all distributions???

OF COURSE YOU DIDN'T you wouldn't dare

I know for fact if if IFIN YA LIE IN AN 8K and or a PR, you probably would be up chit creek with NO BOAT

[PickStocks]

AZ past predictions…lol…RD had better predictions than AZ…cactus likes to claim others information as his own….

[AZCowboy]

~ Yeppers, ... associated with the humorous', "registrant" COOP being used, (LOL), and aligning the FDIC/WMI's GSA, the Approved Plan (7), and the JPMC P&AA, ... As Boris (thankfully) updates us, Yes I believe, the Litigation is completing', ... BUT NOT in those hilarious and poorly researched overweighted' numbers' ... (dmdboplggbbub etc) LOL' ~

Nope NOT Hardley ... I bought so much WaMu, (more than willy), and thankfully have now been able to cover ALL WaMu expenses with the COOP profit taken out', ... now, yeppers', it's all good for this ol' cowboy' ... whatever the outcome and completion is ? ... is all now freebies and taxable' ...

ol' cowboy's W-9's submitted with release, per individual ... uq, P, and K, ownership. ... were all submitted properly to brokerage' ... ol' cactus's WMB Notes were Direct Purchased' ...

and yep, as posted by ?, I wouldn't mind seeing with a link' as proof, what I'm accused of predicting either', LOL' ... thought I always used ... In MY Opinion, or My Conclusions Are, etc. etc. etc. ... oh, and Do Your Own DD, ... NEVER a cowboy recommendation to Buy, Sell, or Hold ... NEVER' ...

No Margin, ... ALL ol' cowboy 100% CASH' ...

anyhew ... enjoy the day'

just sayin'

AZ

[lodas]

PickStocks.....you forgot to mention that AZCowboy is in complete agreement with Boris in every detail concerning the expected recovery which is coming on the April 24 eclipse...., and the LIBOR settlements coming soon.....I still cant get Boris to give the link that WMI won a 307 billion dollar Duel Track, well documented RICO lawsuit against the FDIC in judge collyers courtroom....be careful AZ of letting Boris "watch your six"....you may get a kick in the rear........Lodas

[novascotiaSTS]

Just have a look at AZ‘s past predictions over the last several years - its really not complicated.

[PickStocks]

Yes…tell us again how smart you are…how you bought coop single digits and sold at 46 and 50…..how you and Gallagher are such good friends…..how you can not reveal XXXX is because of the patriot act…..you can not make this up…..lol

[vodkadejour]

"it looks like a reveal is coming soon of who xxxx is!"

I absolutely wouldn't expect that. I believe there will never be an answer given for that. Love to be wrong, but thats the pattern.

[JusticeWillWin]

Q1 ended yesterday, SIGNIFICANT MOVE for COOP coming soon IMO!

[nhtrader]

AZ thx for your steadfastness! I still need to payoff my kids college tuition and it looks like a reveal is coming soon of who xxxx is!

[vodkadejour]

Because if so I'd come away with a mere $25K... not exactly a windfall. Can anyone expand on what "one to one" means?
Thanks in advance!

[AZCowboy]

~ LOL' ... Every Now and Then ?, COOP gets' a ray of sunlight', through the daily cloud' covering, causing the dim lighting' ... LOL ~

"Abba Da Ayy" ... ol' cactus is extremely pleased that the cowboy' choice was to "RELEASE" ... Especially the cowboy' owned WMI Common Share WMI Estate Ownership (wamuq), and the P's continuously associated with the Preferred Managing Sub" ... still SEC trackable LOL ...

ol cactus', DIRECT PURCHASED The WMB Notes' ...

Go COOP' ... wrap it up as COOP' ! !, and do what COOP needs to do' ... by the (XXXX) directives' ...

LOL' ... "One doesn't ever need to be the smartest person on the room, ... One only needs to be smart enough to KNOW who the smart people are" ... LOL'

... "Watch Your Six" ... and ... "Know What YOU Own" ...

just sayin' :) ...

AZ

[PickStocks]

What funny is you are still referring to XXXX just so you can claim to be the smartest person on the board…..just too funny…

[AZCowboy]

~ Hello JJFlash, watching this "COOP" ? sure is interesting as merely' a 2018 Acquired loan servicing Subsidiary Group ! ! ... SEC reporting with only one operational sub' ... "Hilarious" ~

Yepperini, ... ol' cactus is (LOL) DONE' (more, LOL) ... trying to breath a dash of ACTUALITY and REALITY Into a few that are still hanging onto wording that was specific only to the wmi-lt and the continued misunderstood retained earnings' ... it's all simply become silliness to waist (or, is that waste ? LOL) any time on, in my opinion LOL ... doesn't matter though ... "it is what it is"

Excellent logical Point!

"(If ? our returns were to be so easily ratio divided by the wrongfully promoted, 75/25' nonsense, then only ONE Cusip would have been used' ."

A few current' evolutionary' cowboy thoughts, just for ol' times sake ...

... IF' ? ... the FDIC is able to complete the seizure of WMB' ? and complete the PA&A's full transition to JPMC', per the GSA', and Plan 7', ... then (XXXX) will no longer be able to legally' remain in the back-round merely using a "registrant" to portray merely a portion of the ENTIRE "Corporate Structure" ... "SEC Allowances"

JPMC, Publically rocks out the WMB Bonds, ... and (XXXX) acknowledges the values of the entire estates, Reorganized Corporate Structure' ...

IMO, ... the COOP shares calculations, COOP needing to buy back roughly 36 million of the original 100 million. to square things up, RESEACH Thanks to JB92106 and DarkB4Dawn, makes complete sense' ! ! ... as well as Boris's work on the completion of the claims ...

those 75/25 ratio splits of value and the misread Feb MOR retained earnings numbers have all been "sloppy and poorly researched material", just like the koolaid-flavored coffee' ... that ?, was all done on purpose to disrupt the plan'

Anyhew, ... Have A Nice Day ... ol cactus pulled out the available Gallagher/KKR Ride profit made available to everyone' a few years ago now ... Now ? it's a gentle wait (or is that weight LOL) for the final completion, ... with everything ol' cowboy' spent on the Great WaMu ... now covered and all WaMu ownership, Now Free ... a special luv for those WMB Notes, and the CT's ...

just sayin'

AZ

[UpTickMeA$AP]

Another day in fantasyland. Another day of babbling.

$COOP went from $6 to $77 without any of your fantasy nonsense, and will continue to perform as it's value increases.... without it.

Have a wonderful day babbling about delusional fantasyland nonsense. 😂

[vodkadejour]

Pardon my daftness, but by "one to one", surely you don't mean that for every "P" someone held they will get one COOP share (currently worth $77?? The other "one" that they get for each P must be something else, could you clarify for those of us without finance degrees please.

[BBANBOB]

It will happen imho when COOPS gets it's 2.5%

[PickStocks]

The UW’s were not fighting to stay in class 19…..the coffee lady was fighting for 1% that they would receive…in the end it was the coffee lady fighting really hard to get paid for filing appeals and be paid 3 million or so and that was turned down..

[JusticeWillWin]

COOP absolutely UNDERVALUED====>fair PPS is at least $200

Check COOP's current P/E ratio: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/COOP/key-statistics?p=COOP

COOP's trailing P/E is only: 10.68
COOP's forward P/E is only: 6.23

The P/E ratios in this list (data is as of January 2024)
Financial Svcs. (Non-bank & Insurance) covering 172 companies is the correct row:

http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/pedata.html

Financial Svcs. (Non-bank & Insurance)
The average P/Es are:
Current: 34.63
Trailing: 25.59
Forward: 25.54

So COOP's P/E is way too low and COOP is absolutely undervalued.
The PPS should be $200 at least, if not even $280 to $315 considering the forward P/E in my opinion!

[Large Green]

Diamond, I believe former Preferred WILL BE one to one.

In my view, this is why the UWs spent millions, received a one year delay to cast their timely signed releases then fought Alice for several years to the very end ensuring they STAYED in CLASS 19.


…

[Bizreader]

I don't know what a "great" outcome is here. Obviously, receiving monetary value is not the number 1 outcome so far. Sixteen years of educational dialogue concerning the cost and value of out overall justice system is obviously one outcome which no one can deny has been somewhat educational.

Further outcomes are yet to be enjoyed however monetary outcome would be great. After all I've paid my dues, now I need to get some recompense.

[WAMUSHAMU]

Um sure

[newflow]

"LITIGATION TRUST"? https://www.fidelity.com/misc/wamu/WAMU-Class-19-Beneficial-Ballot-93934W-AA-3.pdf
Page 7/13 What is this Litigation Trust?.

[diamondguru-one]

LG you feeling a 1 for 1 for escrows. ????

[PickStocks]

I am a legacy holder of wamu…..I for one do not care about the pity you spread….i for one bought many wamu shares even after the Wamu P’s drop to 10.00 and sold in high 60.00’s….and bought back end with P’s and U’s. Then I sold again after WMIH at 1.50 and doubled my shares at .49. And sold again at 2.50 and bought back in at 1.00…..sold it all at 15.00….then bought back in at 5.00……and held and kept buying as it continues to grow…I for one did not sell when it 50.00 and continue to see coop rising….

[newflow]

https://www.kroll.com/en/insights/publications/issuer-services/soliciting-tabulating-votes-chapter-11

[b3]

You are correct. But I say it for myself too. I had a large amount of WAMU before the FDIC Midnight Raid, but fortunately I was able to buy more cheap shares.
But I have only made money as COOP has increased from $40 to $78. That is where I have done well.

[ron_66271]

It’s Because LIBOR Hasn’t Settled Yet.

XOME can’t be monetize when the valuation can’t be determined due to the interest rates manipulation by the big banks.



Ron

[PickStocks]

What are the outcomes…..a great outcome would be a distribution would you not agree….

[PickStocks]

Great opinion….now there just needs to be a distribution to make it true…do we wait another 15 years.

[Large Green]

TO ME, SEEMS VERY LIKELY TO HAPPEN ALMOST ANY DAY - RECENT COOP FILING – THE PUZZLE NOW FIGURED OUT – JUST MAYBE

https://archive.fast-edgar.com/20240318/AS2E422CZ22EI2Z2222P2CEZA7GSZZ62B262/

JUST maybe with the help of BBANBOB plus some others who agreed with us like Cura Asada, Dmdmd1 and others that the COOP merger with NSM was not totally completed and POSSIBLY there is a positive finale. At least until they issue the owners of the former WaMu Estate who signed timely releases by 3/2012 shares.

These same investors just mentioned also agree that COOP does NOT own XOME entirely, as for years they have talked about monetizing XOME worth roughly one to two billion. Strange, after multiple years they cannot monetize XOME and we have said this is because COOP does not own XOME entirely until they finish issuing the shares. More than likely this ownership of XOME is tied up in a DST owned (75/25) by those investors who signed timely releases.

***NOW LET US LOOK AT SOME NUMBERS***

• Post COOP 12-1 RS around Oct/2018, the outstanding COOP shares became roughly 100M

• The recent filing above shows around 64M COOP outstanding shares after a multitude of COOP buy-backs

• The difference is now 36M shares of COOP which MAY BE owned by timely signed investors

• If these 36M shares (36M + 64M) are given back to timely signed investors, then this takes the outstanding COOP shares back to around 100M but lowers the COOP price to roughly $50.00 a share based on current prices of around $72.00

• Now we have heard that XOME should be worth around 2B or so, NOW figure in 2B ($20.00 a share) on those 100M outstanding shares and WOAH back to $70.00 plus a share

• NOW figure the 75/25 ownership on the 36M shares and guess what you have roughly 27M shares for the Preferred and 9M shares for the Common

• The other thought is there are ten million authorized and shelf-ready preferred shares that can be issued on a minutes notice that has been part of the plan since the (ED) Effective Date of 3/19/2012 so ALL 36 M common shares could go the the investors who released common share and the preferred investors receive 1-1 preferred which explains why the UWs want into class 19 so bad – yes, this is their expertise and they have always known the specific class the big money was to be recovered from…CLASS 19

• IF COOP issues 36M common shares at $71.00 per share that is 2.5B so if they give this to common shareowners that is roughly 25% of a POSIT of ten billion and they back preferred with 7.5B funding for a total of ten billion POSIT. NOW if COOP gets 2.5% of the 635B that Congress spoke about around year 2010/11 that means COOP gets 15.87B so with the ten billion funding of preferred and commons 36M shares at $71.00 it leaves roughly 5.6B for their own coffers driving the COOP common much higher

• Hopefully, these shares are coming soon to a timely-signed-released account near YOU



...