Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[JMoneyHoops]

How do you know it isn’t ran by management?

[JMoneyHoops]

No it’s not mine

[grantastic]

Why buy shares in a company when you know the CFO/CEO/Chairman is lying in SEC filings?

Seems rather foolish

[grantastic]

Is that your twitter account? We all know it's not owned by anyone with control of MAXD

[JMoneyHoops]

#NewProfilePic pic.twitter.com/yWO3HZlvi7

— MAXD INVEST (@MAXDinvest) August 12, 2023

[jay14]

More conspiracy hearsays from a lonely noisemaker....

Harvey Vechery is new leadership,

And yet no words from him....

Yeah, it makes me wonder,
since that Court case is still pending....lol

No one knows what's going on!!!!

However Constance Nash has interesting verbiage
about noisemakers over on Yahoo conversations....

It's a great read of the true confidence men....lol

[J Galt]

Yes, it is against the law to lie in an SEC filing. Greg Halpern included many deceptions in the 8-K which I analyzed and posted about. Would the board poster care to dispute anything in that post? Greg Halpern lied on his Hoodwinkers website and his other websites. Would the board poster care to dispute anything in my responses to Halpern’s comments? Would the board poster like to stand behind any of Halpern’s published projections for the mining operation? How has the mining operation worked out for MAXD? How about my post from today? Point out one misrepresentation in the post. I verified there is no communication and no deal ongoing between Halpern and Vechery. Does the board poster want to stand behind that Halpern lie? Or does the board poster want to refer to me as being stupid and slink away?

Unlike Greg Halpern, I don’t call people “stupid” and have never referred to him in that way. He is not. However, he has proven to be unethical, immoral, and fast and loose with the facts, which his latest website clearly shows. On the other hand, I am not stupid. I have evidence. And I have knowledge of the facts I post. What does the board poster have? Words in an SEC filing that can't be backed up in reality? Or is the poster just going on Greg Halpern’s word? What is that worth?

[Coo breeze]

think about this, the Mexican mine was stated in a SEC filing last year, it is against the law to lie in an SEC filing, Greg Halpern is not stupid, what is Stupid is when posters make claims with no evidence and no knowledge of company operations like you're doing here

[J Galt]

Greg Halpern has registered and posted another website using Harvey Vechery’s name, without his knowledge or approval. Proving once again that he never absorbed Carnegie’s book, “How to Win Friends and Influence People.”

On this new website Halpern states, “Harvey Vechery and Greg Halpern have an amazing deal in the works. This major opportunity, called “Making Harvey Vechery Richer” with MAXD, has the potential to become one of the All-Time greatest small business success stories. Stay tuned…..”

Halpern further states, “Vechery and Halper’s significant capital investment rests on an impressive inventory of considerable undervalued ready-to-go-to-market MAXD assets.” Halpern continues, “The assets include: An epic fully paid, MAXD library of ready-to-go proprietary software code.” And “The assets also include Revolutionary patented MAXD technologies in high-definition audio and biometric security.” Halpern further states this plan “can be released to the public as soon as the 10th of August 2023.”

I wanted to wait until the 10th was in the rearview mirror before commenting on Halpern’s website post. As the date has passed and nothing transpired, I think the entire promotion was designed to entice investors to believe Halpern has deals pending.

Several points to consider here. The copy in this new website bears a remarkable resemblance to every past Halpern “once in a lifetime opportunity” promotion. The Hende Moto release, the Mexican Gold Mining release, the Mexican Land Deal and the $57 million-dollar valuation on the property. All bogus. All designed to entice the shareholders into believing that elusive pot of gold is under the rainbow just around the quarterly corner. This is nothing more than Halpern attempting to con investors into believing deals are in place, and when they don’t materialize, Halpern will blame Vechery and rally the troops to legally storm the castle. That’s just not reality based.

Greg Halpern is in violation of the rules set out in the court order by using the company name and symbol, as well as by representing himself as being connected to MAXD in any way. He is also in violation of the rules of reality as there are no ongoing conversations between Greg Halpern and anyone connected to Harvey Vechery, nor have there been since the court ruled on April 28th. The fact is that Harvey Vechery has not communicated with Greg Halpern so there can be no deal pending between them. You must ask yourself, why would Greg Halpern lie about ongoing deals with Harvey Vechery? What is his motive? In other words, how does it benefit Halpern to make readers believe there are ongoing talks? Is this a ploy to get bridge funding from some unsuspecting and naïve investor? Or is this to buttress his imaginary future lawsuit he threatened to unveil? Think about it.

[uber darthium]

I heard today that Greg was finally “coming out”

MAXD

[jay14]

Basically, crickets....

[grantastic]

"Why"? Because a lot of suckers can't believe they were lied to by OTC scamsters, and they argue with each other about who's at fault for the mistake of blindly believing press releases & phone calls from promoters.

The stock is at 0. Your shares are worthless. The company is dead. Why is this board even active?

[Coo breeze]

was today's volume, 100k an up tick , or sell , can anyone find out ?

BECAUSE if it's a buy then somebody knows something

[jay14]

Debate????lol more bellyaching
serving up that nothing burger!!!!

Hilarious quote
People do care about yesterday’s news

No they don't!!!!
What people care about is new leadership!!!!

Crickets....

[MD1941]

You're crying about two months and we had fourteen years of your failed leadership. How should we feel after fourteen years of poop sandwiches?

Team Halpern brought in less than $400k over fourteen years. Only $400k after all that big talk! What a joke!

[J Galt]

Another Seinfeld post about Zen nothingness. I ask for a debate over content and the board poster comes back with more childish insults. Point out the gibberish. The board poster has long since proven his inability to articulate a coherent argument, much less debate any of the points, but please try.

I am not part of “new leadership,” anymore than I was part of “old leadership.” Don’t confuse my posted words with those of a group which has not yet publicly spoken. As to the “new agenda,” I refer to my prior post where I discuss the reasons the Vechery Team has no reason to share anything directly with Halpern or his Halpernettes. Nor are they going to post what they had for lunch on the chat boards each day like Halpern did. Therefore, the board poster has no idea what the agenda is and where it’s going because they’re not clearing it with Halpern in advance.

People do care about yesterday’s news when Halpern makes false claims. Those claims need to be countered with facts, evidence, and the truth. Investors do care when someone is being deceptive as it can cost them money. Halpern has a long history of false promises which need to be countered. If Halpern stops making false claims about the past, then I won’t need to address those false claims from the past.

[jay14]

New leadership with nothing but
another poop sandwich filled with gibberish....

No one cares about yesterdays news about the former CEO....

What's important is the new agenda,
which seems to be going nowhere....

[J Galt]

As usual, the board poster doesn’t specifically address any of the content in my nine-post series or my follow-up posts. Readers should ask themselves why is that? Why the constant deflection? Could it be the comments by Halpern are indefensible?

Instead, there is the tired old “party of five” routine along with the usual sophomoric insults we’ve come to expect. Along with a few additional references to “yesteryear,” even though all the quotes I commented on have been posted in the last few weeks, starting on July 10th. Is ten days now considered to be yesteryear? I know philosophers have hypothesized about time being a flat circle, but ten days in our reality is still ten days on the calendar.

I wonder, does the board poster imagine his posts are effective in the way he thinks they are? Responding just to respond is up to the individual board poster but I think most readers want to debate the facts instead of throwing invectives around. Care to highlight anything you disagree with and debate about it? I’ve given you plenty of evidence to copy and paste in those nine posts, select a topic, and have at it.

As to the “crickets” comment, I’ve already heard from many shareholders, on both IHUB and YAHOO, who have read the posts and had additional questions, which I am addressing. As a matter of fact, I heard from more than your “party of five” after the first post went up. None of them have ever posted on the boards, by the way, they just read the copy. There are many more readers than posters on every form of social media, so the “crickets” description doesn’t apply.

One final point, the comments and threats made by Greg Halpern on his websites should not be condoned by the board poster or anyone else. Nor should they be ignored. Negotiations between adversaries should never be taken public and certainly not in the way Halpern has presented his case. These gutter tactics may be popular in Chicago, but most people look at those who employ them with contempt.

[jay14]

Cleanup aisle two, with more vomit verbiage and deliberative rhetoric!!!!

Same old copy and paste routine,
serving for a party of five....

Crickets....

[J Galt]

“Harvey Vechery has no set agenda for MAXD!!!!” Unlike Greg Halpern, the Vechery team doesn’t appear to be interested in posting their life story and game plan on the chat boards.

Did it ever occur to the board poster that Harvey Vechery could possibly have an agenda that Halpern might not know about? Could it be that Vechery has no reason to communicate or share that agenda with Halpern due to Halpern’s antagonistic behavior? Does anyone believe Vechery would ever talk to Halpern again after the offensive and deceptive material Halpern posted online? Could it be that the agenda is shifting due to the recent extortion and threats from Halpern posted on his website?

I don’t communicate with the Harvey Vechery in any way so I have no idea what his agenda is, but if I were being confronted with the full-frontal assault on the websites by Greg Halpern I would be spending a great deal of time with my legal team.

“It sounds like one last attempt to continue to discredit the former CEO....” The former CEO discredited himself through his 14 years of non-performance, his online Vimeo rants, and his postings of ping pong and martial arts videos, not to mention all the videos with his ex-girlfriend. He continues to discredit himself through postings on his Hoodwinkers and new websites. He needs no help from me for this process as he’s proven to be a master of self-immolation.

All I am doing is posting facts to counter his deceptions. Hurling personal insults and then declaring “protected by free speech” is not only unethical, immoral, and legally transparent, but also no way to win friends and influence people.

[jay14]

Let out that frustration.... It only proves one thing!!!!

Harvey Vechery has no set agenda for MAXD!!!!

8 weeks
and
no mention of anything from new leadership!!!!

[J Galt]

The information was posted on the Halpern websites on July 10th and I posted comments from it on the 11th. The board poster followed that by posting links to each site and requested readers visit the site. The poster even attempted to claim I was censoring readers from going there. Not true. To claim that this is old news is disingenuous.

“It'll only fuel GH even more, again, in my opinion!!!!” I think it’s becoming increasingly obvious that the mind altering “fuel” powering Greg Halpern has him making poor decisions and troublesome statements. The words he posted last week on his websites are insulting and inflammatory. And this board poster wants us to believe that this will incentivize Halpern to make more threats. To make more extortion attempts? To post more provocative statements? Every move he makes complicates the issues for every MAXD shareholder as he is antagonizing Harvey Vechery and only doing this for his own self-benefit.

“Compensation for being duped?” I’m not looking for compensation from anyone. Who did the duping by the way? It was Greg Halpern who duped all of us and is continuing to deceive us, but it’s no longer working.

[jay14]

The only relevant thing is the agenda setforth
from disgruntled minions
playing to a party of those that were duped!!!!

[jay14]

GH hasn't posted anything new on the those websites....lol

These are old
copy and paste post's on another website and
from many weeks ago, which
were just added yesterday, there
and here, today....

It's easy to see that there's
magpie dissecting from
disgruntled minions....

[J Galt]

The reason this information is relevant is because Greg Hapern is making threats on his websites. This information is not from “yesteryear” as Halpern posted the information on all three of his websites LAST WEEK! I put together a transcript and responded to it. It’s not “old news,” its fresh statements coming from Greg Halpern’s own mouth. In his own words!

Harvey Vechery is not “ordering these old statements,” and I am not in contact with him or anyone else on his “team.” These are my thoughts. I am not a “duped one” as I was on the MAXD bandwagon for many years, until I realized I was being "hoodwinked" by Greg Halpern. I have eyes and ears and tend to ask a great number of questions. For that reason, my opinions have changed over the course of time.

“Doesn’t benefit anyone?” Information is power. Once people know the truth, they tend to make better decisions. Greg Halpern is making demands of Harvey Vechery and posting threats online. He is claiming ownership of technology pledged to Harvey Vechery as collateral in notes.

Does the board poster believe these business practices “helps the company and hurts future investors?” If investors are seriously going to look at MAXD down the road, their investment will need to be based on the facts and not fiction. Once again, I ask the board poster to read my posts and point out any “disgruntled” information. Whatever that is.

[jay14]

Bais statements from disgruntled non legitimate shareholders, only an ex and current transfer agent....

It's clear that with no shares, invested
that it's easier to post old information that doesn't mean anything, anymore....
Sad....

It sounds like one last attempt to continue to discredit the former CEO....

Maybe posting hoodwinkers website notes would help,

but I don't think it helps,

especially
if something was to happen
with the company under new leadership....

Noisemakers only want one thing,
compensation for being duped
but
that will never happen,
Imo
with these old remarks keep coming back from yesteryear....

It'll only fuel GH
even more....
My opinion!!!!

[J Galt]

POST NINE OF NINE:
The last post is about Halpern’s obvious attempt to extort Harvey Vechery for his own personal gain. After trashing Vechery’s reputation with defamatory statements, Halpern makes the following statement: “Now, we can make this right if you want to take a new approach, but you would essentially have to buy out my position.” In other words, pay me money or I’ll continue to defame you. By the way, buy out what position? The position of no control and no directorship of a company on the verge of being delisted? The position in a company with millions of dollars in debt, no revenue streams, no business in the pipeline, and SEC problems in every direction. That position? I wonder what the price tag would be for that imaginary “position.”

“Make it right.” Right in who’s mind? Halpern has a distorted view of reality and believes making it right is a matter of paying him money, with no consideration to the millions of dollars Vechery has already “paid him” for nosediving the company into the financial Grand Canyon. There is no way to “make it right” for the shareholders. That ship sailed into the financial Bermuda Triangle years ago.

“New approach?” This is the same approach Halpern has taken from day one; he weaves stories of imaginary quadrillions and then changes the subject when it fails.

Halpern continues; “And then we would have to make this right, which means you would have to re-hire me and put up the money to make it right so we can build the stock back to the value that I was building it to before you, yourself, with your posse of (abusive word) caused the damage that resulted in there.” Translation? Pay me money. Re-hire me at my exorbitant and completely undeserved salary. Give me the money to run the company that has no revenue streams, no business in the pipeline, and no marketable technology. Just give me the money. And by the way, forget all the names I called you. Build the stock to the value it was before you and your (abusive name) caused the damage? Another insult, then back to the “pay me” game plan.

Oh, by the way, Halpern’s plan is to build the stock back to the value it was before.” From .000001 to .0001? That’s your game plan? Sounds like the same MAXD business plan that you’ve operated on for years. Forget about rebuilding the technology, forget about the existing shareholders with the higher share value, let’s just focus on enticing new investors to buy low and sell at the pump.

Halpern also said, “So that is what we should be talking about and when we are done talking about that we can kind of plan that will absolutely work in restoring the value and will eliminate this negativity.” Followed by, “it’s only going to get worse because if you haven’t seen by now, you can see I’ve posted (the website) and it took less than a week to make it. I’m going to show what a failure your business models are and what a failure all your businesses have been, How you’re just a vindictive person that really has no other purpose than to try to tear down other people’s stuff.”

MAXD had a business model? Failure? Vindictive person? Once again, look into the mirror! Whatever MAXD’s business plan was the result was total failure in all areas. Vindictive? What is Halpern doing with this video? With his websites? With his board postings? It’s vindictive on steroids. In this paragraph Halpern threatens that “it’s only going to get worse” and then tells Vechery he’s going to continue to trash his reputation unless he comes to terms with Halpern.

“I have a solution for that. This is like a ghost of Christmas past story. Your life as you know it now is going to get a lot worse. Or we can solve all this, and those things can come down overnight with a whole good story about how we resolved our differences and are going forward to build value again for us and the shareholders.” I think Halpern needs to go back and read a bit more Charles Dickens before using “A Christmas Carol” as an analogy for blackmail. The key phrases? I have a “solution” to your problem. “Your life is going to get worse.” “We can solve all this” and take the offensive website down instantly. We can make up a story for the shareholders so we can start deceiving everyone into believing we can build value. That’s a typical Halpern game plan right there! What value has Halpern built?

More Halpern speak, “That’s the only true way to handle this legitimate thing and get a solution that works for everybody including the shareholders and we’ll actually make you a lot of money.” Nothing to do with product development, lets entice Harvey back by deceiving him into believing Halpern will make him money. Like Halpern has in the past.

One more quote, “You have to understand that’s the only way to do it. The way you’re doing it is not going to work because I’m only going to accelerate my onslaught of telling the truth about you and you never intended to do anything because you’ve done nothing and you won’t be able to do anything because you don’t understand where to begin because you never built a successful business, much less a successful public company.” How could someone who utters disjointed thoughts such as these be successful in any business? The key phrases? “I’m going to accelerate my onslaught” unless you meet my demands. This is extortion 101. Pay me or the slander, libel, and defamation of character will continue.

[jay14]

Bottom line Harvey Vechery is new leadership!!!!

This copy and paste doesn't help the company and it only hurts future investors!!!!

It's becoming very clear that Harvey Vechery
has no plan
but to continue to place old information from yesteryear....
And
if HV isn't ordering these old statements
then it falls on the duped ones that have been bias from day one,
which seems to go back to 2004....lol

Truly sad....

[J Galt]

POST EIGHT OF NINE:
Greg Halpern violated the so-called “bro code” by exposing “locker room secrets,” about his friend, whether true of not, to the public on his personal defamation websites. Secrets that have nothing to do with a person’s ability to run a company, male or female. Half the country was disgusted by Bill Clinton’s behavior and the other half was disgusted with Linda Tripp for breaking the so-called “Sista code” by revealing their personal conversations. Half of the country despised Donald Trump for the network expose about grabbing women by certain parts, and the other half was disgusted with the network for airing the episode featuring supposedly private conversations which have nothing to do with the business at hand. It was obviously timed by the network to inflict the most political damage during an election year. The point is that most people don’t want to read unrelated dirt about their leaders. Especially when it has nothing to do with the company. I have heard many things over the years about Greg Halpern’s personal behavior, but I have chosen to stay away from the seedier issues as they are not fit for public consumption. His track record of failure on the business end is well documented and that should be enough.

The offensive statements Halpern made about Vechery’s personal life cannot be wiped away by saying “this is old news” and then moving on to your demand list. The damage is already done. Halpern has defamed Vechery and now wants to move on to the extortion phase of his rant without consequences for his actions. Most people will not forget the ugliness associated with the defamation rant before the demand. Harvey Vechery is not running for election. He is not campaigning for the hearts and minds of the MAXD shareholder base. He has legally taken over a company that owed him more money than the company had in stock. He removed a “looter” through legal actions so the company and its shareholders would no longer be damaged by his actions. Harvey Vechery is being attacked by Greg Halpern in a most heinous way for doing nothing more than exercising his legal rights as a shareholder. Halpern gains no respect for his actions and will be as removed from polite society as Linda Tripp was for her actions.

[J Galt]

POST SEVEN OF NINE:
“Because I’m the largest shareholder and you’re damaging my holdings. You’ve taken over so you have an obligation to do something with it.” Damaging your holdings? How is Vechery doing that? Greg Halpern is the man who intentionally placed MAXD on the Expert Market with a limited trading ability. Halpern is the one who promoted one pump and dump scheme after another, causing the stock to crater down to the triples. Halpern is the one who promoted fake mining deals, Mexican Land Deals, and Beluga Whale cars. Halpern is the one who antagonized the SEC by not filing reports on time and by filing complaints with the SEC. Halpern is the one who has driven every business relationship away and burned all bridges. Halpern is the one who terminated the former CEO John Blaisure, leaving no oversight and no board other board members. Halpern is the one who has registered attack websites and is posting defamatory material against Vechery. Challenging Vechery to “pay him or else.”

Harvey Vechery is not responsible for any of those actions so he cannot be responsible for “damaging your holdings.” If Harvey Vechery hadn’t been investing and loaning money to MAXD for all these years, there wouldn’t be any holdings to begin with. The MAXD company “body” is being kept alive on a respirator and Halpern is looking to Harvey Vechery to pay the past due electric bill before the service is terminated. What unbelievable arrogance!

[J Galt]

POST SIX OF NINE:
More quotes from Greg Halpern’s post: “You can have something removed is never going to happen. I. I have a first amendment right and can do this until eternity.” Another threat. Halpern is stating there is nothing Vechery can legally do about the Hoodwinkers website, or the other two websites in Vechery’s name. As usual, Halpern is wrong. Freedom of speech is not without consequences. He also states he will “can do this until eternity.” What kind of person is so vindictive about being legally removed from his leadership position, for a complete and total failure to lead by the way, that he would spend all eternity trashing, doxing, defaming, and insulting his former angel investor who was so good to him?

“This will go into my lawsuit against you that will go on for years and I’ll win.” Boasting about winning lawsuits with Halpern’s track record of losing takes some major league chutzpah. Especially when one can’t afford an attorney and would be going up against a huge law firm with plenty of money in the tank. Just because a suit is filed does not mean you will win. Z-Trim vs Halpern? Nash vs Google? Attia vs Google? The Vechery judgment and final order? Do any of those losses ring a bell?

“I have many other individuals who have been investors with me over the years who will follow on by essentially cloning my lawsuit. Won’t have to file class action will just clone my suit. Will bring it against you themselves because that’s a legitimate way to do it.”
“I’m going to file and that will be enough to take the rest of your life, Harvey and Scott, cost you whatever you have left, and it will all be gone.” Once again, just because you file a suit doesn’t mean anyone else will clone your suit. Once legitimate attorneys review the facts of the case, they will more than likely advise their clients to walk away. The evidence of malfeasance by Halpern is overwhelming. Be careful what you wish for.

[jay14]

More disgruntled information from Harvey Vechery's minions that doesn't benefit anyone these days....

Sad....

[J Galt]

POST FIVE OF NINE:
“Here it is again. Your perpetual lie that I was doing drugs or that drugs had anything to do with anything. That never happened in the first place.” Perpetual lie? Halpern’s ex-girlfriend is on record in her deposition stating she’s witnessed Greg “doing cocaine all day every day,” as well as Ecstasy, for the entire time she lived there, which was approximately seven months as I recall. She also stated Halpern used Harvey Vechery’s “$125k to buy drugs.” I know of at least three other people who have had access to Halpern’s house, when he still lived there, who stated Halpern is a habitual drug user and has a “drug closet” in his bathroom, described by one individual as being a “drug dispensary.”

In most cases of drug, alcohol, or any from chemical dependency, the first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem. Denial only impedes the process and prolongs the healing process. Who are we supposed to believe in this case? The ex-girlfriend and three other people, making the same claims, who had access to the house? Or the man supposedly doing drugs and denying it? Especially when the behavior defies logic and indicates impairment.

Most shareholders who watched Halpern’s Vimeo “I’m for the Dream” productions asked me “is Halpern on drugs?” Especially the episode where he fell asleep for ten minutes, with the camera rolling, and then opened his eyes and continued talking as if nothing happened. It was highly illogical for Halpern to have openly accused judges and Google executives of various forms of debauchery and illegalities when you are in court against them. Those aren’t the actions of a clear-headed thinking. The bottom line is if you don’t want to be accused of being on drugs, then don’t act like it. Normally I wouldn’t care about someone’s personal drug or alcohol habits as that’s their own business. Unless it impacts the business, which this obviously did. MAXD and the shareholders have suffered due to Greg Halpern’s behavioral issues and that’s an issue for all of us.

[J Galt]

POST FOUR OF NINE:
“The so-called claim against me that I’m looting the company. Nonsense. How can you loot a company when there’s no money to loot?” Once again Greg, why was there no money in the company coffers to loot? It was your business, and you are responsible for ensuring there is money in the account. Not Harvey. I suggest you look in the mirror and you will find the answer to that question. Who was responsible for earning money for the last 14 years? You were! Why did the judge make that statement in the Final Order? Because Halpern looted his angel investor, who was one of the largest shareholders in the company. Halpern looted every shareholder in the company by taking Vechery’s money to keep living in his lavish lifestyle, instead of paying the engineers so they could improve the technology. Halpern looted every shareholder by not decreasing his undeserved salary. Halpern has claimed that the SEC requires the company to have an employee? Well, where does it stated the employee needs to have an annual salary of $288k plus benefits?

Halpern looted the shareholders by accruing his salary with high interest rates for yourself. Halpern looted the shareholders with his unscrupulous high interest loans back to the company. Halpern looted every shareholder by not having a board of directors for oversight purposes. And now Halpern is attempting to loot the shareholders again by claiming rights to the MAXD Audio Biometric patent, without the authority to do so.

Yes, Greg Halpern has been looting the company all along, whether there was cash in the company account or not.

“I’m accruing salary that I won’t get paid unless it’s built into something by you now Scott, and you now Harvey.” Why did Halpern deserve to accrue a salary in the first place? What was Halpern doing to even earn a salary over the last few years? Why was the level kept at $288k when there was no production whatsoever? Where was the board oversight for this annual salary, or for that matter, for the accrual process on the preferred shares?

The accrued salary, loans to the company from Harvey Vechery’s loans to Halpern, and accrued interest on the false valuation of the preferred shares. All of this was nothing more than loading up a vehicle for Halpern’s financial exit from the company. He proved that when he announced last week he had “granted” himself the MAXD Audio Biometric patent in return for his falsely valued debt he claims is owed by the company.

By the way Greg, what happened to the seven figures that Harvey loaned you personally, for MAXD, because he couldn’t loan it to the company due to the Google lien on the bank accounts? What about the $500k to Formula Four? Did that pave the way to a home in Colorado? What happened to the $250k from Vechery meant for the engineers? Where did that go? John Blaisure didn’t sign the SEC docs, and was terminated for his refusal, because he knew you would use those falsely accrued dollars to run off with the company assets sometime in the future. Isn’t that what you are now attempting to do with Biometric? Isn’t that all considered to be looting the shareholders for your own personal benefit? Speaking of former CEO Blaisure, isn’t it interesting that this additional explosion of lunacy happened after he was terminated and there was no longer any oversite or differing opinions to counter your claims? The Mexican Land Deal, the Hende Moto Beluga Whale car, the mineral mapping and gold mining operations, the Japan plush bunny business, all happened after you terminated Blaisure. Oversight was needed to prevent further looting.

[jay14]

Here comes irrelevant information from Harvey Vechery's minions....

Yesteryear stories mean squat!!!!

New leadership is in control
and
there has been no mention of anything
on the status of the company since May 1!!!!

But
let's keep bringing up yesteryears news....lol

[MD1941]

Facts!
Nash lost in court.
Halpern lost in court.

I would think that the shady people are the ones that lost in court.

[J Galt]

POST THREE OF NINE:
“I didn’t lose the house. I sold it to Harvey Vechery through the bankruptcy by foregoing by claiming any rights to it. I gave up my $900 thousand dollar exemption and $2 million dollars in equity that he was able to cash back for himself. This made him halfway to whole. So, what is it you think I did to lose my house? I didn’t lose the house; I sacrificed the house because I didn’t want the house anymore. I had a smooth transition and we agreed on that’s what it was.”

Halpern did not “sell the house to Harvey Vechery through the bankruptcy.” Here are the facts: Halpern wasn’t making the payments on the house and had a 72-hour foreclosure notice tacked to his door. He panicked and filed for bankruptcy without hiring an attorney. Google was in first position on the house and even though Harvey Vechery loaned the downpayment money to Halpern, he was in third position behind Google due to the judgment and lien. The mortgage company had over $600k+ in penalties and fees due to defaults by Halpern which kicked in when payments were not made. Harvey Vechery paid the mortgage and all penalties and fees in full and leap-frogged over Google to take first position on the house. Vechery had to pay the HOA fees and property taxes, which Halpern had never paid, as well as repair, maintenance, and upkeep until the property was sold.

By doing that, Vechery prevented potential charges being filed against Halpern for fraud. which apparently were included in the original application documents. The bankruptcy judge ordered Halpern evicted from the house. As to the “$900k exemption and $2 million dollars in equity,” that’s not how it works. The equity was never Halpern’s as he didn’t make the payments. The full downpayment was from Harvey and was not paid back. Halpern did not make the payments. Harvey paid off the balance due on the house. Harvey then paid the additional balance due to the lender for the penalties. The lender owned the house until Harvey paid it off. Then Harvey owned it. Halpern never owned the house so there are no exemptions and there was no equity.

The sale made Vechery “halfway to whole?” Maybe in Pleiadean math, but not in our reality. By the time all fees were paid and Vechery totaled up the amount paid out, he was underwater when he sold it. That’s before considering the fact that the equity in the house was no longer Halpern’s to surrender. When a man loans Halpern the downpayment money to buy the house, lines up the lender to loan the money for the house, then pays off the mortgage in the bankruptcy court, then pays off the fees due to the lender for the foreclosure process and to forgo filing charges, then pays off all the unpaid back taxes and HOA fees, there is no logical claim to any equity in the house by Halpern.

If Harvey Vechery hadn’t stepped up to pay everything, Halpern would never have had the house to begin with, and he would have lost the house without Vechery’s help anyway.

Halpern states that he “sacrificed the house” that “I didn’t want anymore.” Is this the same house that Halpern begged Harvey Vechery to let him stay in. The house that Halpern openly bragged to everyone about. The house that Halpern filed bankruptcy to protect from foreclosure. The house that everything in Halpern’s life centered around. That house? “Smooth transition?” The court evicted Halpern from the house as they saw that all money for the house came from Vechery. He needed to repair it to get back on the market. The court, on behalf of Vechery, forced Halpern out of the house against Halpern’s wishes. Isn’t this the same house where Harvey and Scott showed up to do a walk through, only to find Halpern sleeping on the floor after he had already been evicted? Some would consider that to be breaking and entering. It certainly doesn’t appear to have been a house Halpern “didn’t want anymore.” Once again, Harvey had to tell Halpern to leave the house that “he didn’t want anymore.”

[J Galt]

POST TWO OF NINE:
This audio/video post is nothing more than the beginning of the Halpern end game. Just not the ending he expects to achieve. Halpern imagines he will be getting a pay day from Vechery but all indications are that’s not going to happen. It’s obvious that Greg Halpern wants MAXD to shut down so he can sue Harvey Vechery for failing to resurrect a financial corpse with rigor mortis already setting in. Even though Halpern is the one who committed the crime against the shareholders and harmed the MAXD “body.” The company is on life support and Halpern is distracting and insulting the EMS team while they are in the process of trying to keep it alive. By making threats in voice mails, on websites, and through online chat boards, by registering company and personal names on attack websites, and by openly defying a court order by stating he is claiming the Biometric technology, without authority or approval to do so, Halpern is causing the Vechery legal team to spend time and money countering these moves. These are hardly maneuvers made by someone intending to save the company. They are Machiavellian level and for the benefit of one.

“You’re going to be sued by me first.” As I’ve stated many times in my posts, this was Halpern’s game plan all along. This is what Halpern does. He attempted to take Google’s money, due to the Connie Nash patent infringement, and lost at each and every legal turn. An infringement MAXD had no part of I might add. It wasn’t a MAXD patent infringed upon, it was a Constance Nash patent. Halpern turned MAXD from a technology company to a patent troll vulture over money. He can’t make money on his own, so he finds someone with money and sues them. Now it’s Harvey Vechery’s turn to be the target. However, there’s a flip side to this action. If Greg Halpern files suit on Harvey Vechery, then Halpern must come out from under his rock to be served by the long arm of the law. Halpern must come out of hiding for depositions and interrogatories. What are the chances of that happening?

“You’re going to be sued by me first.” As I’ve stated many times in my posts, this was Halpern’s game plan all along. This is what Halpern does. He attempted to take Google’s money, due to the Connie Nash patent infringement, and lost at each and every legal turn. An infringement MAXD had no part of I might add. It wasn’t a MAXD patent infringed upon, it was a Constance Nash patent. Halpern turned MAXD from a technology company to a patent troll vulture over money. He can’t make money on his own, so he finds someone with money and sues them. Now it’s Harvey Vechery’s turn to be the target. However, there’s a flip side to this action. If Greg Halpern files suit on Harvey Vechery, then Halpern must come out from under his rock to be served by the long arm of the law. Halpern must come out of hiding for depositions and interrogatories. What are the chances of that happening?

“The damage to the company is from the damage you did to the company and its reputation and my reputation.” Halpern damaged his own reputation through his individual actions, first at Z-Trim which resulted in an $8m judgment for fraud, then at MAXD through his Constance Nash, Elli Attia, Google fiascos, then through his amateurish and pathetic “I’m For The Dream” Vimeo productions, then through his financed chat board leak and promotional campaign, then through the deceptions surrounding his personal bankruptcy, and finally though his open online warfare against Harvey Vechery and anyone associated with him, where slander, libel, and defamation of character is on the menu every day. If anyone is to be blamed for the status of the company or damage to the reputation, it is Greg Halpern.

The “liability is ticking.” It’s rather humorous that Halpern would start the time clock after 14 years of Zen Nothingness. Where was the “liability is ticking” mentality when he was in charge?

[J Galt]

POST ONE OF NINE:
PART ONE OF THREE:
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.” George Orwell said that in his book “1984.” The following series of nine posts will highlight that Orwellian condition we now exist in. Greg Halpern posted a doctored and edited audio recording between Harvey, Scott, and Halpern’s ex-girlfriend. The call was recorded in California and is against the law unless all parties know they are being recorded, which Scott and Harvey did not. It may have been through the “Trojan Horse” in his ex-girlfriend’s phone, as Halpern claimed, and whether or not the ex-girlfriend knew of the recording is a question for others. However, selectively editing audio recordings from phone conversations, and then posting them online with Halpern’s comments intertwined is not only deceitful to shareholders, but also unethical, immoral, and possibly illegal. I’ll leave that determination to someone else, but it’s certainly not anywhere near the truth. What is illegal, is the obvious extortion attempt included in the audio commentary. All the comments shown in bold are exact quotes taken from Halpern’s audio/video posting on his websites. As I have no issues with censorship, and since Halpern has promoted readers going to his websites, everyone is welcome to check out Halpern’s words for themselves. I will not post the links as that is against the rules.

PART TWO OF THREE:
Halpern begins his comments with a statement and a series of questions. “They got me out of the company. So, what are you going to do? You haven’t done anything.” You “haven’t paid the accountant. Haven’t become reporting again. Haven’t hired anyone to work the company. Haven’t worked with the technology, get it trading.”

This was my instantaneous thought in response: why didn’t Halpern pay the accountant? Why didn’t Halpern bring the reporting up to date? Why didn’t Halpern work with the technology? These are all responsibilities Halpern shirked during his time as CEO. Now he is blaming Vechery for his own inactions? The work the accountant performed was completed when Greg Halpern was in control of MAXD. Why is it Harvey Vechery’s responsibility to pay Halpern’s bills? Although it is ultimately the new owner’s responsibility to pay all the bills, Halpern confronting Vechery over his “leavings” is typical Halpern blame shifting. Furthermore, after three quarters of non-filing and a bogus 8-K, Halpern should probably pipe down when it comes to reporting.

PART THREE OF THREE:
Halpern intentionally took MAXD from the OTC market down to the Expert Market, and now has the audacity to ask Vechery why the stock is not trading? He knows why it’s not trading! Halpern knows the pathway back to the OTC is not only a time-consuming and expensive process, but also not guaranteed. It’s not just filing paperwork and pushing a button. The pathway requires a complete FINRA investigation, including all the fraudulent SEC filings. What does Halpern think this investigation will find? The pathway to the OTC Markets is not only a difficult one, but the odds of the company being reinstated by the SEC are not good.

It must go through specific channels and needs cooperation from the individuals in control of those channels. That cooperation is not guaranteed, and Halpern knows that. He also knows why. Insulting and threatening individuals in the rehabilitation chain is not a good idea. Similar to insulting federal judges just prior to a case in federal court. Halpern also knows what happens if the company cannot trade. He knows what happens if the SEC delists the company. Halpern’s track record with the SEC, along with the MAXD issues, is not going to help the case to get back on the OTC Markets. By making the move to the Expert Market, Greg Halpern was attempting to prevent Vechery from going after him, but saving his own skin was done at the cost and expense of the shareholders.

[jay14]

Seems Constance Nash has something to say about the poster too....

Dear Mr. Galt,
unless you are
Mike Turner of Globex,
you do not know a hair of what the current status is with Harvey Vechery, Vedanti Systems.
We never sold it.
Nor source code.
Jerry never bought split off of #2255-
but
Mike Turner's coverup of his scam against eTechInvestments is legendary.


Shady characters....

[J Galt]

Max Sound owns the source code, not Greg Halpern. The technology and source code were purchased from Lloyd Trammell in a stock transaction by Max Sound the company, not Greg Halpern the individual. I have shown the purchase information in the past and have included that information below. I have no idea what the board poster is referring to with the “fairy God mother” comment.

By the way, these comments play into the belief that the board poster is Greg Halpern. “This penny stock company DOES NOT OWN “MY” Source Code. Harvey does not own “MY” Source Code. Or did Halpern illegally sell the technology to the board poster in another “all about me” move?

“On May 11, 2010, The company acquired the rights to an audio technology known as max audio technology (MAX) through a share exchange whereby the company issued 30,000,000 shares of common stock to the individual in exchange for the rights having a value of $7,500,000 based upon recent market value (.25 per share)”

[jay14]

Constance Nash has remarks that seem to fit
hoodwinkers agenda of yesteryear....

This penny stock company DOES NOT OWN my Source Code.

Harvey does not own my Source Code.

That you don't want the fairy God Mother to let this pit go to the dogs is understandable.

But the investors are fed disinformation.


Like I mentioned crickets from new leadership
and

MAXD is not going anywhere soon....

[J Galt]

I doesn't matter to me if anyone else cares or not. That’s not why I post. I’m also not a spokesperson for anyone other than myself, as I have stated repeatedly, nor have I campaigned for that role. The reason why I mentioned I’ve been busy away from the boards is that I was slow in responding to the board poster, which is abnormal for me. How about responding to the content of the post instead of playing with punctuation marks?

[jay14]

Knock knock!!!! Who's there???? Crickets....

Slow in responding. Busy weekend. Busy family time

Know one cares,
or
made anyone spokesperson!!!! Lol

[J Galt]

Slow in responding. Busy weekend. Busy family time. This first legal step was the removal of Greg Halpern as the MAXD CEO by the court to stop the corporate bleeding, which was the post-judgement relief requested by the Vechery legal team. Once that was achieved, the legal team then moved on to the next steps in the process, which are still in progress. Everything has been complicated by the behind-the-scenes scheming of Greg Halpern, as well as the financial, legal, and reporting condition Halpern left the company in before he was terminated, the process has been elongated due to these issues. Especially due to Halpern's recent legal threats on his websites. This elongation process apparently includes the Expert Market issue, which Halpern admitted placing MAXD there on purpose, and complex OTC pathway issues, the SEC non-filing for three quarters issues, shareholder complaints filed with the SEC issues, potential DOJ issues, charter, patent, trademark, and delinquent tax issues. All combine to complicate the slow-moving process.

As stated in the Final Order court ruling, “The allegations in the complaint and supporting evidence submitted with the motion for default judgment establish that Plaintiff is entitled to an order removing Halpern as a director of Max Sound, as well as attendant permanent injunctive relief to stop Halpern from using his majority voting power to re-elect himself or a proxy into the directorship of Max Sound.” The court ruling also stated, for a reason, that “defendant Halpern, and anyone acting in concert with him, are permanently enjoined and restrained from, directly or indirectly……. Serving as a director of Max Sound for a period of five (5) years.”

That statement has been interpreted to mean that Halpern cannot use his voting control to appoint anyone “acting in concert with him,” which would include the “stooge” individual you referenced. As to the additional questions, I’m sure Harvey Vechery will issue a PR as soon as the legal team notifies him to do so. I think all shareholders would love to hear who is taking the helm, but we will all have to wait for the PR. As to overdue filings, MAXD is already three quarters behind due to Greg Halpern and that is one of several issues the SEC attorney is apparently dealing with.

[PleaseTheZzs]

The stock is at 0. Your shares are worthless. The company is dead. Why is this board even active?

[grantastic]

Thanks. However this excerpt does not name Vechery, Bill Nichols, or any other person(s) as eligible to select a replacement director.

This leads to the questions:

1. What would stop Greg Halpern from using the majority control afforded by his Preferred Shares to appoint a stooge in his stead?
2. Who is director now?
3. Why was this person selected as director, and how?
4. Why is this person ostensibly 2 months overdue in issuing an 8-k publicizing their appointment?

Case No. 37-2022-00018595-CU-BT-CTL
[Assigned to The Honorable Timothy B.
Taylor, Department C-72]
FINAL JUDGMENT AND
PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Hearing
Date: April 28, 2023
Time: 11:00 a.m.
Dept.: C-72
Original Complaint Filed:
May 13, 2022


IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT:
Thus, based on the foregoing factual findings and for good cause, pursuant to Corporations Code § 304 and the equitable authority of this Court, defendant Halpern, and anyone acting in concert with him, are permanently enjoined and restrained from, directly or indirectly, by use of any means or instrumentalities:

A. Serving as a director of Max Sound for a period of five (5) years. Moreover, Halpern is hereby ordered removed as a director of Max Sound as of the issuance of this Judgment.
B. Seeking reelection as a director of Max Sound for a period of five (5) years.
C. Making false statements about his relationship with Max Sound, including by holding himself out as a director, officer, or agent of Max Sound.


As anyone can see, Halpern was removed from MAXD by the court and is no longer the CEO, or in any other position with MAXD. Greg Halpern knows this as does Harvey Vechery. There is more information available in the full document, but I hope this answers the question.

[J Galt]

Although it is not considered ethical, many people hesitate to change their Facebook and Linkedin pages when they leave a company. Greg Halpern himself made “light” of the fact John Blaisure didn’t change his Linkedin page right away but I’m not surprised Halpern didn’t follow his own rules as its mainly ego based anyway.

I thought I had posted this FINAL ORDER information on both the IHUB and Yahoo boards but that may not be the case so here it is again. The case number is included for anyone who wants to go on Pacer and download a copy for themselves. The important part is the closing statements specify after the court information. The final order was not uploaded onto the court website until the end of the day on May 18, 2023. The judge had stated on April 28th that he agreed with the Relief Request with “minor adjustments.” Therefore, it was important to see what those adjustments would be. However, there were no adjustments made to the original order, so the Vechery attorneys started their examination of the company on the 19th, even though the court backdated the Final Order to April 28th.

Case No. 37-2022-00018595-CU-BT-CTL
[Assigned to The Honorable Timothy B.
Taylor, Department C-72]
FINAL JUDGMENT AND
PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Hearing
Date: April 28, 2023
Time: 11:00 a.m.
Dept.: C-72
Original Complaint Filed:
May 13, 2022


IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT:
Thus, based on the foregoing factual findings and for good cause, pursuant to Corporations Code § 304 and the equitable authority of this Court, defendant Halpern, and anyone acting in concert with him, are permanently enjoined and restrained from, directly or indirectly, by use of any means or instrumentalities:

A. Serving as a director of Max Sound for a period of five (5) years. Moreover, Halpern is hereby ordered removed as a director of Max Sound as of the issuance of this Judgment.
B. Seeking reelection as a director of Max Sound for a period of five (5) years.
C. Making false statements about his relationship with Max Sound, including by holding himself out as a director, officer, or agent of Max Sound.


As anyone can see, Halpern was removed from MAXD by the court and is no longer the CEO, or in any other position with MAXD. Greg Halpern knows this as does Harvey Vechery. There is more information available in the full document, but I hope this answers the question.

[grantastic]

Greg Halpern says he's chairman & CEO of MAXD

Can anyone prove he's not?? So far, lots of empty talk but no proof!

https://www.linkedin.com/in/greg-halpern-70814613/

[J Galt]

I don’t think shareholders who have lost millions are amused by anything connected to MAXD. Especially words I post on the boards. It is not my intention and I am not looking to amuse people, simply to post facts and truths. I also don’t think anyone is amused when the board poster ends so many sentences with “lol.” Nothing about this company is a laughing matter. Unless you want to include Hapern’s delusional opinion of himself and his lifestyle. That is laughable.

A great number of “smart investors” lost money in this company because they believed in the technology and the management. They are not amused by anything being posted on the boards. Many lost their investment because they believed in me, and my word. I will carry that burden until the day I die as the money is unrecoverable, as is, in some cases, the trust. What am I doing about it? I’m speaking out. I’m countering the lies I fell for years ago with the truth. Maybe shareholders and potential investors will not follow down the same path I chose. I have a moral compass and I’m ashamed of getting people involved in MAXD. Halpern has no such moral compass and instead feeds his individual ego with fantasies, false promises, and images of an undeserving lifestyle. His “Hatfield’s vs the McCoy’s” style websites are despicable and employ a strategy that is beneath contempt and borderline criminal.

I think everyone here can read the digital tea leaves. The board poster leaves no doubt where he stands with MAXD and with Greg Halpern. Words such as “team” and “camp” are a way of describing an allegiance to a concept, idea, or agenda. Comments made by each one of the members who post on this board generally indicate what their opinions are and whether they side with one agenda or another. Including the board poster himself.