InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 273
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/14/2012

Re: None

Wednesday, 07/19/2023 12:33:32 PM

Wednesday, July 19, 2023 12:33:32 PM

Post# of 39829
POST TWO OF NINE:
This audio/video post is nothing more than the beginning of the Halpern end game. Just not the ending he expects to achieve. Halpern imagines he will be getting a pay day from Vechery but all indications are that’s not going to happen. It’s obvious that Greg Halpern wants MAXD to shut down so he can sue Harvey Vechery for failing to resurrect a financial corpse with rigor mortis already setting in. Even though Halpern is the one who committed the crime against the shareholders and harmed the MAXD “body.” The company is on life support and Halpern is distracting and insulting the EMS team while they are in the process of trying to keep it alive. By making threats in voice mails, on websites, and through online chat boards, by registering company and personal names on attack websites, and by openly defying a court order by stating he is claiming the Biometric technology, without authority or approval to do so, Halpern is causing the Vechery legal team to spend time and money countering these moves. These are hardly maneuvers made by someone intending to save the company. They are Machiavellian level and for the benefit of one.

“You’re going to be sued by me first.” As I’ve stated many times in my posts, this was Halpern’s game plan all along. This is what Halpern does. He attempted to take Google’s money, due to the Connie Nash patent infringement, and lost at each and every legal turn. An infringement MAXD had no part of I might add. It wasn’t a MAXD patent infringed upon, it was a Constance Nash patent. Halpern turned MAXD from a technology company to a patent troll vulture over money. He can’t make money on his own, so he finds someone with money and sues them. Now it’s Harvey Vechery’s turn to be the target. However, there’s a flip side to this action. If Greg Halpern files suit on Harvey Vechery, then Halpern must come out from under his rock to be served by the long arm of the law. Halpern must come out of hiding for depositions and interrogatories. What are the chances of that happening?

“You’re going to be sued by me first.” As I’ve stated many times in my posts, this was Halpern’s game plan all along. This is what Halpern does. He attempted to take Google’s money, due to the Connie Nash patent infringement, and lost at each and every legal turn. An infringement MAXD had no part of I might add. It wasn’t a MAXD patent infringed upon, it was a Constance Nash patent. Halpern turned MAXD from a technology company to a patent troll vulture over money. He can’t make money on his own, so he finds someone with money and sues them. Now it’s Harvey Vechery’s turn to be the target. However, there’s a flip side to this action. If Greg Halpern files suit on Harvey Vechery, then Halpern must come out from under his rock to be served by the long arm of the law. Halpern must come out of hiding for depositions and interrogatories. What are the chances of that happening?

“The damage to the company is from the damage you did to the company and its reputation and my reputation.” Halpern damaged his own reputation through his individual actions, first at Z-Trim which resulted in an $8m judgment for fraud, then at MAXD through his Constance Nash, Elli Attia, Google fiascos, then through his amateurish and pathetic “I’m For The Dream” Vimeo productions, then through his financed chat board leak and promotional campaign, then through the deceptions surrounding his personal bankruptcy, and finally though his open online warfare against Harvey Vechery and anyone associated with him, where slander, libel, and defamation of character is on the menu every day. If anyone is to be blamed for the status of the company or damage to the reputation, it is Greg Halpern.

The “liability is ticking.” It’s rather humorous that Halpern would start the time clock after 14 years of Zen Nothingness. Where was the “liability is ticking” mentality when he was in charge?